Udvalget for Videnskab og Teknologi 2008-09
KOM (2007) 0698
Offentligt
615098_0001.png
COUNCIL OF
THE EUROPEAN UNION
Brussels, 20 November 2008
15758/08
Interinstitutional File:
2007/0247 (COD)
TELECOM 197
MI 447
COMPET 482
CONSOM 176
CODEC 1552
REPORT
from :
COREPER
to :
CONSEIL
Nos. Cion prop. : 15379/07 TELECOM 150 MI 297 COMPET 391 CONSOM 132 CODEC 1294
15424/08 TELECOM 187 MI 429 COMPET 458 CONSOM 171 CODEC 1510
No prev. doc.
15072/08 TELECOM 175 MI 413 COMPET 437 CONSOM 163 CODEC 1466
Subject :
Review of the EU regulatory framework for electronic communications networks
and services:
Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending
Directives 2002/21/EC on a common regulatory framework for electronic
communications networks and services, 2002/19/EC on access to and
interconnection of electronic communications networks and services, and
2002/20/EC on the authorisation of electronic communications networks and
services
- Political agreement
I. INTRODUCTION
1.
The European Commission adopted a proposal for a Better Regulation Directive on 13
November 2007. This proposal forms part of the so-called
review package
of the EU
regulatory framework for electronic communications, comprising two proposals for
amending Directives (the so-called Better Regulation Directive amending the current
Framework, Authorisation and Access Directives and the so-called Citizen's Rights
Directive amending the Universal Service and Privacy Directives) and a proposal for a
Regulation (establishing a European Electronic Communications Market Authority).
15758/08
DG C II B
HVW/ek
EN
1
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0002.png
2.
With its proposal for a Better Regulation Directive, the Commission aims to adjust the
regulatory framework for electronic communications by improving its effectiveness,
reducing the administrative resources needed for implementing economic regulation
(the market analysis procedure) and making access to radio frequencies simpler and
more efficient.
3.
A first examination of the proposal by the Working Party on Telecommunications and
the Information Society took place under the Slovenian Presidency. On 12 June 2008,
the Council held a public exchange of views on the review of the EU regulatory
framework for electronic communications networks and services and took note of the
presidency's progress reports on the work carried out so far in its preparatory bodies.
4.
During the current French Presidency, the proposal was examined in further detail, both
on the basis of a Presidency compromise text put together under the Slovenian
Presidency and in relation to the European Parliament amendments adopted in its First
Reading opinion on 24 September 2008.
5.
The Commission adopted its amended proposal, following the first reading of the
Euroepan Parliament, on 6 November 2008 (doc. 15424/08).
6.
The European Economic and Social Committee (EESC) adopted its Opinion on 29 May
2008 and the Committee of the Regions (CoR) on 19 June 2008.
II. OUTCOME OF THE COREPER PROCEEDINGS
1.
The text of the Presidency compromise proposal concerning the Framework Directive is
annexed. This text, which reflects the results from the last WP and Coreper discussions,
provides a consolidated version of the proposal for an amending Directive on the basis
of the current Directive 2002/21/EC and includes all its provisions (from Article 1 to
Annex I), even those for which no modifications were suggested.
15758/08
DG C II B
HVW/ek
EN
2
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0003.png
2.
The Coreper has reached a broad consensus on the essential features of the Commission
proposal and has taken due account of the European Parliament's First Reading Opinion.
a.
Specific issues for further consideration
National regulatory authorities (NRAs):
The independence of NRAs from undertakings is guaranteed in Article 3. As some
delegations wished to reinforce this provision, while other delegations underlined that the
NRAs should be subject to supervision if required by national constitutional law, the
Presidency proposed in Coreper a compromise text which was welcomed in principle, subject
to scrutiny by delegations.
Consolidating the internal market for electronic communications:
The Commission's proposal gives the possibility to the Commission to issue decision on draft
measures intended to be taken by NRAs. Although few delegations support the intervention of
the Commission on remedies by means of decisions, a majority of delegations opposes this
provision. The Presidency therefore proposes as a compromise that the Commission should
issue opinions and that NRAs should justify their decisions in case they do not follow the
Commission's opinion.
Policy objectives and regulatory principles:
In order for NRAs to promote the interests of the citizens, Article 8 of the Presidency text
calls upon NRAs to promote "efficient investment and innovation in new and enhanced
infrastructures" (paragraph 4a(d)). This reference is, however, not supported by all
delegations as some believe that it should be strengthened to provide for a clearer political
signal in favour of investment sharing.
15758/08
DG C II B
HVW/ek
EN
3
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0004.png
Management of radio frequencies for electronic communications services:
With regard to various references in Article 9 of the Presidency text to the "ITU Radio
Regulations" and to "National Frequency Allocation Plans", few delegations still have
concerns regarding the consistency between EU legislation and international and national
arrangements regarding the use of radio spectrum. Another issue requiring further
consideration concerns possible exceptions to the principle of technology neutrality.
b.
Remaining reservations
Linguistic reservations on the text are maintained by all delegations and the Commission has
reserved its overall position on the Presidency compromise proposal.
Individual reservations have been made on the following specific provisions:
- National Regulatory Authorities (NRAs) (Article 3) (footnote 8)
- Consolidating the internal market for electronic communications (Article 7) (footnote 9)
- Policy objectives and regulatory principles (Article 8) (footnote 10)
- Strategic planning and coordination of radio spectrum policy in the Union (Article 8a)
(footnote 11)
- Management of radio frequencies for electronic communications services (Article 9)
(footnote 12)
- Transfer or lease of individual rights to use radio frequencies (Article 9b) (footnote 13)
- Procedure for identification and definition of markets (Article 15) (footnote 14)
III. THE TASK FOR COUNCIL
The Council is therefore invited to examine the questions still under discussion in order to
adopt a political agreement. The text should be sent to legal-linguists for finalisation in view
of the adoption of Council's common position.
___________________
15758/08
DG C II B
HVW/ek
EN
4
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0005.png
ANNEX
PRESIDENCY COMPROMISE PROPOSAL FOR THE
CONSOLIDATED VERSION OF THE PROPOSAL AMENDING DIRECTIVE 2002/21/EC
(Framework Directive)
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 95
thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,
Having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee,
Acting in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 251 of the Treaty,
Whereas: [common to Framework, Access and Authorisation Directive]
15758/08
ANNEX
HVW/ek
DG C II B
EN
5
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0006.png
(1)
The functioning of the five directives comprising the existing regulatory framework for
electronic communications networks and services (Directive 2002/21/EC of the European
Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on a common regulatory framework for
electronic communications networks and services
1
('Framework Directive'), Directive
2002/19/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on access to,
and interconnection of, electronic communications networks and associated facilities
2
('Access Directive'), Directive 2002/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council
of 7 March 2002 on the authorisation of the electronic communications networks and
services
3
('Authorisation Directive'), Directive 2002/22/EC of the European Parliament and
of the Council of 7 March 2002 on universal service and users' rights relating to electronic
communications networks and services
4
('Universal Service Directive'), and Directive
2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the
processing of personal data and the protection of privacy in the electronic communications
sector
5
('Directive on privacy and electronic communications') is subject to periodic review
by the Commission, with a view in particular to determining the need for modification in the
light of technological and market developments.
In that regard, the Commission presented its initial findings in its Communication to the
Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the
Committee of the Regions of 29 June 2006 on the review of the EU regulatory framework for
electronic communications networks and services. On the basis of these initial findings, a
public consultation was held, which identified the continued lack of an internal market for
electronic communications as the most important aspect needing to be addressed. In
particular, regulatory fragmentation and inconsistencies between the activities of the
national regulatory authorities were found to jeopardise not only the competitiveness of the
sector, but also the substantial consumer benefits from cross-border competition.
The EU regulatory framework for electronic communications networks and services should
therefore be reformed in order to complete the internal market for electronic
communications by strengthening the Community mechanism for regulating operators with
significant market power in the key markets. This is complemented through the
establishment by Regulation […/…/EC] of [date] of the European Parliament and of the
Council
6
of
an Group of European Regulators in Telecoms (hereinafter referred to as "the
GERT")].
The reform also includes the definition of an efficient
and coordinated
spectrum
management strategy in order to achieve a Single European Information Space and the
reinforcement of provisions for users with disabilities in order to obtain an inclusive
information society.
(2)
(3)
1
2
3
4
5
6
OJ L 108, 24.4.2002, p. 33.
OJ L 108, 24.4.2002, p. 7.
OJ L 108, 24.4.2002, p. 21.
OJ L 108, 24.4.2002, p. 51.
OJ L 201, 31.7.2002, p. 37.
OJ C […], […], p. […].
HVW/ek
DG C II B
15758/08
ANNEX
EN
6
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0007.png
(3b)
The aim is to progressively reduce ex ante sector specific rules as competition in the
markets develops and, ultimately, for electronic communications to be governed by
competition law only. […] Considering that the markets for electronic communications
have shown strong competitive dynamics in recent years, it is essential that ex ante
regulatory obligations should only be imposed where there is no effective and sustainable
competition. […]
In order to ensure a proportional and adapted approach to varying competitive conditions,
national regulatory authorities […] may define markets on a subnational basis and/or lift
regulatory obligations in markets and/or geographic areas where there is effective
infrastructure competition. […]
A key issue for the coming years in order to achieve the goals of the Lisbon Agenda is to
[…] provide the conditions for efficient investments in new high speed networks that will
support innovation in content-rich internet services and strengthen international
competitiveness of the European Union. Such networks have enormous potential to
deliver benefits to consumers and business across the European Union. It is therefore
vital to foster sustainable investment in the development of these new networks, while
safeguarding competition and boosting consumer choice through regulatory predictability
and consistency.
(3c)
(3d)
(39a) Both efficient investment and competition should be encouraged in tandem, […] in order
to increase economic growth, innovation and consumer choice […].
(44a) The continuing market integration within the internal market for electronic
communications networks and services requires better coordination in the application of
the ex ante regulation as provided for under the legal framework for electronic
communications.
[for the rest, see the relevant articles]
HAVE ADOPTED THIS DIRECTIVE:
15758/08
ANNEX
HVW/ek
DG C II B
EN
7
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0008.png
CHAPTER I
SCOPE, AIM AND DEFINITIONS
Article 1
Scope and aim
1.
This Directive establishes a harmonised framework for the regulation of electronic
communications services, electronic communications networks, associated facilities and associated
services. It lays down tasks of national regulatory authorities and establishes a set of procedures to
ensure the harmonised application of the regulatory framework throughout the Community.
The
framework also includes provisions on certain aspects of terminal equipment to facilitate
access for disabled users.
(4)
In order to allow national regulatory authorities to meet the objectives set out in the
Framework Directive and the Specific Directives, in particular concerning end-to-end
interoperability, the scope of the Framework Directive should be extended to cover
certain
aspects of
radio equipment and telecommunications terminal equipment as defined in
Directive 1999/5/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 1999 on
radio equipment and telecommunications terminal equipment and the mutual recognition of
their conformity
7
as well as consumer equipment used for digital television,
to facilitate
access for disabled users.
2.
This Directive as well as the Specific Directives are without prejudice to obligations imposed
by national law in accordance with Community law or by Community law in respect of services
provided using electronic communications networks and services.
3.
This Directive as well as the Specific Directives are without prejudice to measures taken at
Community or national level, in compliance with Community law, to pursue general interest
objectives, in particular relating to content regulation and audio-visual policy.
7
OJ L 91, 7.4.1999, p. 10.
HVW/ek
DG C II B
15758/08
ANNEX
EN
8
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0009.png
4.
This Directive and the Specific Directives are without prejudice to the provisions of Directive
1999/5/EC.
5.
This Directive and the Specific Directives shall be without prejudice to any specific measure
adopted for the regulation of international roaming on public mobile telephone networks within the
Community.
Article 2
Definitions
For the purposes of this Directive:
(a) "electronic communications network" means transmission systems and, where applicable,
switching or routing equipment and other resources,
including network elements which are not
active,
which permit the conveyance of signals by wire, by radio, by optical or by other
electromagnetic means, including satellite networks, fixed (circuit- and packet-switched, including
Internet) and mobile terrestrial networks, electricity cable systems, to the extent that they are used
for the purpose of transmitting signals, networks used for radio and television broadcasting, and
cable television networks, irrespective of the type of information conveyed;
(b) "transnational markets" means markets identified in accordance with Article 15(4) covering the
Community or a substantial part thereof
located in more than one Member State;
(c) "electronic communications service" means a service normally provided for remuneration which
consists wholly or mainly in the conveyance of signals on electronic communications networks,
including telecommunications services and transmission services in networks used for broadcasting,
but exclude services providing, or exercising editorial control over, content transmitted using
electronic communications networks and services; it does not include information society services,
as defined in Article 1 of Directive 98/34/EC, which do not consist wholly or mainly in the
conveyance of signals on electronic communications networks;
15758/08
ANNEX
HVW/ek
DG C II B
EN
9
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0010.png
(d) "public communications network" means an electronic communications network used wholly or
mainly for the provision of
[…]
electronic communications services
available to the public which
support the transfer of information between network termination points;
(da) "network termination point" (NTP) means the physical point at which a subscriber is
provided with access to a public communications network; in the case of networks involving
switching or routing, the NTP is identified by means of a specific network address, which may
be linked to a subscriber number or name;
(e) "associated facilities" means those
[…] physical infrastructures and other facilities or
elements
associated with an electronic communications network and/or an electronic
communications service which enable and/or support the provision of services via that network
and/or service
or have the potential to do so, and […] include inter alia […] buildings or
entries to buildings, antennae, towers and other supporting constructions, ducts, conduits,
masts, manholes, and cabinets.
(ea) "associated services" means those services associated with an electronic communications
network and/or an electronic communications service which enable and/or support the
provision of services via that network and/or service or have the potential to do so and include
inter alia number translation or systems offering equivalent functionality, conditional access
systems and electronic programme guides, as well as other services such as identity, location
and presence service;
(f) "conditional access system" means any technical measure and/or arrangement whereby access to
a protected radio or television broadcasting service in intelligible form is made conditional upon
subscription or other form of prior individual authorisation;
(g) "national regulatory authority" means the body or bodies charged by a Member State with any
of the regulatory tasks assigned in this Directive and the Specific Directives;
(h) "user" means a legal entity or natural person using or requesting a publicly available electronic
communications service;
15758/08
ANNEX
HVW/ek
DG C II B
EN
10
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0011.png
(i) "consumer" means any natural person who uses or requests a publicly available electronic
communications service for purposes which are outside his or her trade, business or profession;
(j) "universal service" means the minimum set of services, defined in Directive 2002/22/EC
(Universal Service Directive), of specified quality which is available to all users regardless of their
geographical location and, in the light of specific national conditions, at an affordable price;
(k) "subscriber" means any natural person or legal entity who or which is party to a contract with
the provider of publicly available electronic communications services for the supply of such
services;
(l) "Specific Directives" means Directive 2002/20/EC (Authorisation Directive), Directive
2002/19/EC (Access Directive), Directive 2002/22/EC (Universal Service Directive) and Directive
[…] 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (hereinafter referred to as
"Directive 2002/58/EC(Directive on privacy and electronic communications)");
(m) "provision of an electronic communications network" means the establishment, operation,
control or making available of such a network;
(n) "end-user" means a user not providing public communications networks or publicly available
electronic communications services;
(o) "enhanced digital television equipment" means set-top boxes intended for connection to
television sets or integrated digital television sets, able to receive digital interactive television
services;
(p) "application program interface (API)" means the software interfaces between applications, made
available by broadcasters or service providers, and the resources in the enhanced digital television
equipment for digital television and radio services;
15758/08
ANNEX
HVW/ek
DG C II B
EN
11
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0012.png
(q) "spectrum allocation" means the designation of a given frequency band for use by one or
more types of radiocommunications services, where appropriate, under specified conditions;
(r) "harmful interference" means interference which endangers the functioning of a
radionavigation service or of other safety services or which otherwise seriously degrades,
obstructs or repeatedly interrupts a radiocommunications service operating in accordance
with the applicable international, Community or national regulations;
(s) "call" means a connection established by means of a publicly available electronic
communications service allowing two-way voice communication.
(17)
Radio frequencies should be managed so as to ensure that harmful interference is avoided.
This basic concept of harmful interference should therefore be properly defined to ensure
that regulatory intervention is limited to the extent necessary to prevent such interference.
Certain definitions should be clarified or changed to take account of market and
technological developments and to eliminate ambiguities identified in implementing the
regulatory framework.
CHAPTER II
NATIONAL REGULATORY AUTHORITIES
Article 3
National regulatory authorities
(5)
1.
Member States shall ensure that each of the tasks assigned to national regulatory authorities in
this Directive and the Specific Directives is undertaken by a competent body.
2.
Member States shall guarantee the independence of national regulatory authorities by
ensuring that they are legally distinct from and functionally independent of all organisations
providing electronic communications networks, equipment or services. Member States that retain
ownership or control of undertakings providing electronic communications networks and/or
services shall ensure effective structural separation of the regulatory function from activities
associated with ownership or control.
15758/08
ANNEX
HVW/ek
DG C II B
EN
12
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0013.png
3.
Member States shall ensure that national regulatory authorities exercise their powers
impartially,
[…]
transparently
and in a timely manner. Member States shall ensure that
national regulatory authorities have adequate financial and human resources to carry out the
task assigned to them.
8
3a
Without prejudice to the provisions of paragraphs 4 and 5, national regulatory
authorities responsible for ex ante market regulation or for resolution of disputes between
undertakings in accordance with Article 20 or 21 of this Directive shall act independently and
shall not seek or take instructions from any other body in relation to exercising these tasks
assigned to them under national law implementing Community law. This shall not prevent
supervision in accordance with national constitutional law. Only appeal bodies set up in
accordance with Article 4 shall have the power to suspend or overturn decisions by the
national regulatory authorities.
Member States shall ensure that the head of, or where applicable members of the collegiate
body fulfilling that function within, a national regulatory authority referred to in the first
subparagraph or his/her/their replacement may be dismissed only if he/she/they no longer
fulfils the conditions required for the performance of his/her/their duties which are laid down
in advance in national law. The decision to dismiss the head of, or where applicable members
of the collegiate body fulfilling that function within, the national regulatory authority
concerned shall be made public at the time of dismissal. The dismissed head of, or where
applicable members of the collegiate body fulfilling that function within, the national
regulatory authority shall receive a statement of reasons and shall have the right to request its
publication, where this would not otherwise take place, in which case it shall be published.
Member States shall ensure that national regulatory authorities referred to in the first
subparagraph have separate annual budgets. The budgets shall be made public.
8
UK, HU, PT, IT and SE have a reservation on paragraphs 3 and 3a.
HVW/ek
DG C II B
15758/08
ANNEX
EN
13
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0014.png
3b.
Member States shall ensure that the goals of the GERT in promoting greater regulatory
coordination and coherence are actively supported by the respective national regulatory
authorities.
3c.
Member States shall ensure that national regulatory authorities take utmost account of
opinions and common positions issued by the GERT when adopting their own decisions for
their national markets.
4.
Member States shall publish the tasks to be undertaken by national regulatory authorities in an
easily accessible form, in particular where those tasks are assigned to more than one body. Member
States shall ensure, where appropriate, consultation and cooperation between those authorities, and
between those authorities and national authorities entrusted with the implementation of competition
law and national authorities entrusted with the implementation of consumer law, on matters of
common interest. Where more than one authority has competence to address such matters, Member
States shall ensure that the respective tasks of each authority are published in an easily accessible
form.
5.
National regulatory authorities and national competition authorities shall provide each other
with the information necessary for the application of the provisions of this Directive and the
Specific Directives. In respect of the information exchanged, the receiving authority shall ensure the
same level of confidentiality as the originating authority.
6.
Member States shall notify to the Commission all national regulatory authorities assigned
tasks under this Directive and the Specific Directives, and their respective responsibilities.
15758/08
ANNEX
HVW/ek
DG C II B
EN
14
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0015.png
(6)
The independence of the national regulatory authorities should be strengthened in order to
ensure a more effective application of the regulatory framework and increase their authority
and the predictability of their decisions. To this end, express provision should be made in
national law to ensure that, in the exercise of its tasks, a national regulatory authority
responsible for ex ante market regulation or for resolution of disputes between
undertakings
is protected against external intervention or political pressure liable to
jeopardise its independent assessment of matters coming before it.
[…]
For that purpose
rules should be laid down in advance regarding the grounds for the dismissal of the head of
the national regulatory authority
above mentioned
in order to remove any reasonable doubt
as to the neutrality of that body and its imperviousness to external factors. It is important
that national regulatory authorities
responsible for ex ante market regulation
should have
their own budget allowing them, in particular, to recruit a sufficient number of qualified
staff. In order to ensure transparency, this should be published annually.
Article 4
Right of appeal
1.
Member States shall ensure that effective mechanisms exist at national level under which any
user or undertaking providing electronic communications networks and/or services who is affected
by a decision of a national regulatory authority has the right of appeal against the decision to an
appeal body that is independent of the parties involved. This body, which may be a court, shall have
the appropriate expertise available to it to enable it to carry out its functions
effectively.
Member
States shall ensure that the merits of the case are duly taken into account and that there is an
effective appeal mechanism.
Pending the outcome of
[…] the
appeal, the decision of the national regulatory authority shall
stand, unless
[…] interim measures are granted in accordance with national law.
2.
Where the appeal body referred to in paragraph 1 is not judicial in character, written reasons
for its decision shall always be given. Furthermore, in such a case, its decision shall be subject to
review by a court or tribunal within the meaning of Article 234 of the Treaty.
15758/08
ANNEX
HVW/ek
DG C II B
EN
15
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0016.png
3.
Member States shall collect information on the number of requests for appeal, the
duration of the appeal proceedings and the number of decisions to grant interim measures
taken. Member States shall provide such information to the Commission and the GERT after
a reasoned request from either.
(6a)
(7)
In order to ensure legal certainty for markets players, appeal bodies should carry out their
functions effectively; in particular, appeals proceedings should not be unduly lengthy.
There has been a wide divergence in the manner in which appeal bodies have applied
interim measures to suspend the decisions of the national regulatory authorities. In order to
achieve greater consistency of approach common standard should be applied in line with
Community jurisprudence.
Appeal bodies should also be entitled to request available
information published by the GERT.
Given the importance of appeals for the overall
working of the regulatory framework, a mechanism should be set up for collecting
information on appeals and decisions to suspend decisions taken by the regulatory
authorities in all the Member States and for the reporting of that information to the
Commission.
Article 5
Provision of information
1.
Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing electronic communications networks
and services provide all the information, including financial information, necessary for national
regulatory authorities to ensure conformity with the provisions of, or decisions made in accordance
with, this Directive and the Specific Directives.
In particular those undertakings may also be
required to submit information concerning future network or service developments that could
have an impact on the wholesale services that they make available to competitors.
Undertakings with significant market power on wholesale markets may also be required to
submit accounting data on the retail markets that are associated with those wholesale
markets.
[…] Undertakings
shall provide such information promptly on request and to the timescales and
level of detail required by the national regulatory authority. The information requested by the
national regulatory authority shall be proportionate to the performance of that task. The national
regulatory authority shall give the reasons justifying its request for information
and shall treat the
information in accordance with paragraph 3 of this Article.
15758/08
ANNEX
HVW/ek
DG C II B
EN
16
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0017.png
(8)
In order to carry out their regulatory tasks in an effective manner, the data that national
regulatory authorities are to gather should include accounting data on the retail markets
that are associated with wholesale markets where an operator has significant market power
and as such are regulated by the national regulatory authority, and should also include data
to enable the national regulatory authority to assess the possible impact of planned
upgrades or changes to network topology on the development of competition or on
wholesale products made available to other parties.
Member States shall ensure that national regulatory authorities provide the Commission, after
2.
a reasoned request, with the information necessary for it to carry out its tasks under the Treaty. The
information requested by the Commission shall be proportionate to the performance of those tasks.
Where the information provided refers to information previously provided by undertakings at the
request of the national regulatory authority, such undertakings shall be informed thereof. To the
extent necessary, and unless the authority that provides the information has made an explicit and
reasoned request to the contrary, the Commission shall make the information provided available to
another such authority in another Member State.
Subject to the requirements of paragraph 3, Member States shall ensure that the information
submitted to one national regulatory authority can be made available to another such authority in
the same or different Member State, after a substantiated request, where necessary to allow either
authority to fulfil its responsibilities under Community law.
3.
Where information is considered confidential by a national regulatory authority in accordance
with Community and national rules on business confidentiality, the Commission and the national
regulatory authorities concerned shall ensure such confidentiality.
4.
Member States shall ensure that, acting in accordance with national rules on public access to
information and subject to Community and national rules on business confidentiality, national
regulatory authorities publish such information as would contribute to an open and competitive
market.
5.
National regulatory authorities shall publish the terms of public access to information as
referred to in paragraph 4, including procedures for obtaining such access.
15758/08
ANNEX
HVW/ek
DG C II B
EN
17
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0018.png
Article 6
Consultation and transparency mechanism
Except in cases falling within Articles 7(9), 20 or 21,
and unless otherwise provided in the
implementing measures adopted pursuant to Article 9c,
Member States shall ensure that, where
national regulatory authorities intend to take measures in accordance with this Directive or the
Specific Directives
[…], or where they intend to provide for retrictions in accordance with
Article 9(3) and 9(4), and which have a significant impact on the relevant market,
they give
interested parties the opportunity to comment on the draft measure within a reasonable period.
National regulatory authorities shall publish their national consultation procedures.
Member States shall ensure the establishment of a single information point through which all
current consultations can be accessed.
The results of the consultation procedure shall be made publicly available by the national regulatory
authority, except in the case of confidential information in accordance with Community and
national law on business confidentiality.
(9)
The national consultation provided for under Article 6 of the Framework Directive should
be conducted prior to the Community consultation provided for under Article 7 of that
Directive, in order to allow the views of interested parties to be reflected in the Community
consultation. This would also avoid the need for a second Community consultation in the
event of changes to a planned measure as a result of the national consultation.
15758/08
ANNEX
HVW/ek
DG C II B
EN
18
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0019.png
Article 7
Consolidating the internal market for electronic communications
1.
In carrying out their tasks under this Directive and the Specific Directives, national regulatory
authorities shall take the utmost account of the objectives set out in Article 8, including insofar as
they relate to the functioning of the Internal Market.
2.
National regulatory authorities shall contribute to the development of the Internal Market by
cooperating with each other and with the Commission
and the GERT all
in a transparent manner
so as
to ensure the consistent application, in all Member States, of the provisions of this Directive
and the Specific Directives. To this end, they shall, in particular,
[…] cooperate with the
Commission and the GERT to identify
the types of instruments and remedies best suited to
address particular types of situations in the marketplace.
(10)
The discretion of national regulatory authorities needs to be reconciled with the
development of consistent regulatory practices and the consistent application of the
regulatory framework in order to contribute effectively to the development and completion
of the internal market. National regulatory authorities should therefore support the internal
market activities of the Commission and those of
the GERT […].
[…] Except where otherwise provided in recommendations and/or guidelines adopted
3.
pursuant to Article 7a, upon completion of
the consultation referred to in Article 6, where a
national regulatory authority intends to take a measure which:
(a)
falls within the scope of Articles 15 or 16 of this Directive, Articles 5 or 8 of Directive
2002/19/EC (Access Directive)
[…],
and
(b)
would affect trade between Member States,
15758/08
ANNEX
HVW/ek
DG C II B
EN
19
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0020.png
it shall
[…]
make the draft measure accessible to the Commission,
the GERT,
and the national
regulatory authorities in other Member States, together with the reasoning on which the measure is
based, in accordance with Article 5(3), and inform the Commission,
the GERT
and other national
regulatory authorities thereof. National regulatory authorities,
the GERT
and the Commission may
make comments to the national regulatory authority concerned only within one month
[…].
The
one-month period may not be extended.
4.
(a)
Where an intended measure covered by paragraph 3 aims at:
defining a relevant market which differs from those defined in the Recommendation in
accordance with Article 15(1); or
(b)
deciding whether or not to designate an undertaking as having, either individually or jointly
with others, significant market power, under Article 16(3), (4) or (5); or
(c)
imposing, amending or withdrawing an obligation on an operator in application of Article 16
in conjunction with Articles 5 and 9 to 13 of Directive 2002/19/EC (Access Directive), and Article
17 of Directive 2002/22/EC (Universal Service Directive),
and would affect trade between Member States and the Commission has indicated to the national
regulatory authority that it considers that the draft measure would create a barrier to the single
market or if it has serious doubts as to its compatibility with Community law and in particular the
objectives referred to in Article 8, then the draft measure shall not be adopted for a further two
months. This period may not be extended.
The Commission shall inform other national
regulatory authorities of its reservations in such a case.
15758/08
ANNEX
HVW/ek
DG C II B
EN
20
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0021.png
(11)
The Community mechanism allowing the Commission to require national regulatory
authorities to withdraw planned measures concerning market definition and the designation
of operators having significant market power has contributed significantly to a consistent
approach in identifying the circumstances in which ex-ante regulation may be applied and
the operators are subject to such regulation.
[…]
Monitoring of the market by the
Commission and, in particular, the experience with the procedure under Article 7 of the
Framework Directive, has shown that inconsistencies in the national regulatory authorities'
application of remedies, even under similar market conditions,
could
undermine the internal
market in electronic communications
[…]. […] Therefore the Commission may participate
in ensuring a higher level of consistency in the application of remedies by issuing
opinions on draft measures proposed by national regulatory authorities.
In order to
[…]
benefit from the expertise of national regulatory authorities on the market analysis,
the
Commission should consult
the GERT
prior to its decision.
Within
[…] the two-month
period
referred to in paragraph 4,
the Commission may
take a decision
in relation to the draft measure referred to in paragraph 4(a) and 4(b)
5.
(a)
requiring the national regulatory authority concerned to withdraw the draft measure,
and/or
(b)
(c)
issue an opinion
9
in relation to the draft measure referred to in paragraph 4(c), or
take a decision to lift its reservations in relation to the draft measure referred to in
paragraph 4.
The Commission shall take utmost account of the opinion of the GERT before issuing a
decision and/or issuing a opinion. […] The
decision
and/or opinion
shall be accompanied by a
detailed and objective analysis of why the Commission considers that the draft measure should not
be adopted together with specific proposals for amending the draft measure.
6.
Within six months of the Commission issuing a decision in accordance with paragraph
5(a) requiring the national regulatory authority to withdraw a draft measure, the national
regulatory authority shall amend or withdraw the draft measure. If the draft measure is
amended, the national regulatory authority shall undertake a public consultation in
accordance with the procedures referred to in Article 6, and re-notify the amended draft
measure to the Commission in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 3.
9
MT, UK, SE and DK have a reservation on the term "opinion".
HVW/ek
DG C II B
15758/08
ANNEX
EN
21
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0022.png
(12)
It is important that the regulatory framework is implemented in a timely manner. When the
Commission has taken a decision requiring a national regulatory authority to withdraw a
planned measure, national regulatory authorities should submit a revised measure to the
Commission. A deadline should be laid down for the notification of the revised measure to
the Commission under Article 7 of the Framework Directive in order that market players
may know the duration of the market review and in order to increase legal certainty.
The national regulatory authority concerned shall take the utmost account of comments of
7.
other national regulatory authorities,
the GERT
and the Commission and may, except in cases
covered by paragraph 4(a)
and (b),
adopt the resulting draft measure and, where it does so, shall
communicate it to the Commission.
Where the national regulatory authority decides to amend the draft measure according to the
opinion issued under paragraph 5(b), it shall, within six months of the Commission issuing the
opinion, undertake a public consultation in accordance with the procedures referred to in
Article 6 and communicate the amended measure to the Commission.
Where the national regulatory authority decides not to amend the draft measure on the basis
of the opinion issued under paragraph 5(b), it shall also publish the reasons justifying its
decision and shall communicate them to the Commission within six months.
Recital (13) is deleted.
8.
The national regulatory authority shall communicate to the Commission and the GERT
all final measures which fall under conditions a) and b) in Article 7(3).
9.
In exceptional circumstances, where a national regulatory authority considers that there is an
urgent need to act, by way of derogation from the procedure set out in paragraphs 3 and 4, in order
to safeguard competition and protect the interests of users, it may immediately adopt proportionate
and provisional measures. It shall, without delay, communicate those measures, with full reasons, to
the Commission,
[…]
the other national regulatory authorities,
and the GERT.
A decision by the
national regulatory authority to render such measures permanent or extend the time for which they
are applicable shall be subject to the provisions of paragraphs 3 and 4.
15758/08
ANNEX
HVW/ek
DG C II B
EN
22
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0023.png
Article 7a
Notifications
1.
After public consultation and consultation with national regulatory authorities and
taking utmost account of the opinion of the GERT, the Commission may adopt
recommendations and/or guidelines in relation to Article 7 that define the form, content and
level of details to be given in the notifications required in accordance with Article 7(3), the
circumstances in which notifications would not be required, and the calculation of the time
limits.
2.
The measures referred to in paragraph 1 shall be adopted in accordance with the
advisory procedure referred to in Article 22(2).
(14)
Having regard to the short time limits in the Community consultation mechanism, powers
should be conferred on the Commission to adopt
recommendations and/or guidelines
to
simplify the procedures for exchanging information between the Commission and national
regulatory authorities - for example in cases concerning stable markets, or involving only
minor changes to previously notified measures - or to allow for the introduction of a
notification exemption in order to streamline procedures in certain cases.
CHAPTER III
TASKS OF NATIONAL REGULATORY AUTHORITIES
Article 8
Policy objectives and regulatory principles
1.
Member States shall ensure that in carrying out the regulatory tasks specified in this Directive
and the Specific Directives, the national regulatory authorities take all reasonable measures which
are aimed at achieving the objectives set out in paragraphs 2, 3 and 4. Such measures shall be
proportionate to those objectives.
15758/08
ANNEX
HVW/ek
DG C II B
EN
23
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0024.png
Unless otherwise provided in Article 9 regarding radio frequencies,
Member States
shall take
the utmost account of the desirability of making regulations technologically neutral and
shall
ensure that, in carrying out the regulatory tasks specified in this Directive and the Specific
Directives, in particular those designed to ensure effective competition, national regulatory
authorities
[…] do likewise.
National regulatory authorities may contribute within their competencies to ensuring the
implementation of policies aimed at the promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity, as well as
media pluralism.
2.
The national regulatory authorities shall promote competition in the provision of electronic
communications networks, electronic communications services and associated facilities and
services by inter alia:
(a)
ensuring that users, including disabled users,
elderly users, and users with special social
needs
derive maximum benefit in terms of choice, price, and quality;
(15)
In line with the objectives of the European Charter on fundamental rights and the United
Nations Convention on the Rights of the Persons with Disabilities, the regulatory framework
should ensure that all users, including disabled end-users, the elderly, and users with
special social needs, have easy access to affordable high quality services. Declaration 22
annexed to the final Act of Amsterdam provides that the institutions of the Community shall
take account of the needs of persons with a disability in drawing up measures under Article
95 of the Treaty.
ensuring that there is no distortion or restriction of competition in the electronic
(b)
communications sector
[…];
(c)
(d)
deleted
encouraging efficient use and ensuring the effective management of radio frequencies and
numbering resources.
15758/08
ANNEX
HVW/ek
DG C II B
EN
24
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0025.png
3.
The national regulatory authorities shall contribute to the development of the internal market
by inter alia:
(a)
removing remaining obstacles to the provision of electronic communications networks,
associated facilities and services and electronic communications services at European level;
(b)
encouraging the establishment and development of trans-European networks and the
interoperability of pan-European services, and end-to-end connectivity;
(c)
(d)
deleted
cooperating with each other […],
with the Commission
and the GERT
so as to ensure the
development of consistent regulatory practice and the consistent application of this Directive and
the Specific Directives.
4.
The national regulatory authorities shall promote the interests of the citizens of the European
Union by inter alia:
(a)
ensuring all citizens have access to a universal service specified in Directive 2002/22/EC
(Universal Service Directive);
(b)
ensuring a high level of protection for consumers in their dealings with suppliers, in particular
by ensuring the availability of simple and inexpensive dispute resolution procedures carried out by a
body that is independent of the parties involved;
(c)
(d)
contributing to ensuring a high level of protection of personal data and privacy;
promoting the provision of clear information, in particular requiring transparency of tariffs
and conditions for using publicly available electronic communications services;
(e)
addressing the needs of specific social groups, in particular disabled users,
elderly users and
users with special social needs; […]
15758/08
ANNEX
HVW/ek
DG C II B
EN
25
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0026.png
(f)
(g)
4a.
ensuring that the integrity and security of public communications networks are maintained;
deleted
The national regulatory authorities shall, in pursuit of the policy objectives referred to
in paragraphs 2, 3 and 4, apply objective, transparent, non-discriminatory and proportionate
regulatory principles by inter alia:
(a)
(b)
promoting regulatory predictability;
ensuring that, in similar circumstances, there is no discrimination in the treatment of
undertakings providing electronic communications networks and services;
(c)
safeguarding competition to the benefit of consumers and promoting where appropriate
infrastructure-based competition;
(d)
(e)
promoting efficient investment and innovation in new and enhanced infrastructures;
10
taking due account of the variety of conditions relating to competition and consumers
that exist in the various geographic areas within a Member State;
(e)
taking due account of the variety of conditions relating to competition and consumers
that exist in the various geographic areas within a Member State.
10
CZ, ES and DE have a reservation on (d).
HVW/ek
DG C II B
15758/08
ANNEX
EN
26
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0027.png
Article 8a
Strategic planning and coordination of radio spectrum policy in the Union
11
1.
Member States shall cooperate with each other and with the Commission in the strategic
planning, coordination and harmonisation of the use of radio spectrum in the European
Union. To this end, they shall take into consideration inter alia economic, safety, health,
public interest, freedom of expression, cultural, scientific, social and technical aspects of the
EU policies as well as the various interests of radio spectrum user communities with the aim
of optimising the use of radio spectrum and of avoiding harmful interference.
2.
3.
Deleted.
Member States shall promote the coordination of radio spectrum policy approaches in
the European Union and, where appropriate, harmonised conditions with regard to the
availability and efficient use of radio spectrum necessary for the establishment and
functioning of the internal market in […] electronic communications.
4.
Member States shall promote the effective coordination of the EU interests in
international organisations competent in radio spectrum matters. Whenever necessary for
promoting this effective coordination, the Commission, taking utmost account of the opinion
of the Radio Spectrum Policy Group (RSPG), may propose to the European Parliament and
the Council common policy objectives.
5.
The Commission, taking utmost account of the opinion of the RSPG, may submit
legislative proposals for establishing multiannual radio spectrum policy programs.
11
FI has a reservation on Article 8a.
HVW/ek
DG C II B
15758/08
ANNEX
EN
27
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0028.png
Article 9
12
Management of radio frequencies for electronic communications services
1.
Taking due account of the fact that radio frequencies are a public good that has an
important social, cultural and economic value,
Member States shall ensure the effective
management of radio frequencies for electronic communication services in their territory in
accordance with Article 8. They shall ensure that
[…] spectrum
allocation
used for electronic
communications services
and
[…] issuing general authorisations or individual rights of use
of
such radio frequencies by
competent
national
[…]
authorities are based on objective, transparent,
non-discriminatory and proportionate criteria.
In doing so, they respect relevant` international
agreements and may take public policy considerations into account.
2.
Member States shall promote the harmonisation of use of radio frequencies across the
Community, consistent with the need to ensure effective and efficient use thereof and
in pursuit of
benefits for the consumer such as economies of scale and interoperability of services. In so
doing, they shall act
in accordance with the Decision No 676/2002/EC (Radio Spectrum Decision).
(16)
Radio frequencies should be considered a scarce public resource that has an important
public and market value. It is in the public interest that spectrum is managed as efficiently
and effectively as possible from an economic, social and environmental perspective
and
taking account of the objectives of cultural diversity and of media pluralism,
and that
obstacles to its efficient use are gradually withdrawn.
(16a) Before a specific harmonisation measure under Decision No 676/2002/EC is proposed,
impact assessments should be made by the Commission assessing the costs and benefits of
the proposed measures, such as the realization of economy of scales and interoperability
of services for the consumer benefit, the impact on efficiency of spectrum use, or the
demand for the harmonised use in the different parts of the EU.
(16aa) Although spectrum management remains within the competence of the Member States,
[…] coordination and, where appropriate, harmonisation at Community level can help
ensure that spectrum users derive the full benefits of the internal market and that EU
interests can be effectively defended world-wide.
12
UK and SE have a reservation on this article and its recitals.
HVW/ek
DG C II B
15758/08
ANNEX
EN
28
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0029.png
(16b) The spectrum management provisions of this Directive should be consistent with the work
of international and regional organisations dealing with radio spectrum management,
such as the International Telecommunications Union (ITU) and the European
Conference of Postal and Telecommunications Administrations (CEPT), so as to ensure
the efficient management of and harmonisation of the use of spectrum across the
Community and globally.
(18)
The current spectrum management and distribution system is generally based on
administrative decisions that are insufficiently flexible to cope with technological and
economic evolution, in particular with the rapid development of wireless technology and the
increasing demand for bandwidth. The undue fragmentation amongst national policies
results in increased costs and lost market opportunities for spectrum users, and slows down
innovation, to the detriment of the internal market, consumers and the economy as a whole.
Moreover, the conditions for access to, and use of, radio frequencies may vary according to
the type of operator, while electronic services provided by these operators increasingly
overlap, thereby creating tensions between rights holders, discrepancies in the cost of
access to spectrum, and potential distortions in the functioning of the internal market.
National borders are increasingly irrelevant in determining optimal radio spectrum use.
Fragmentation of the management of access to spectrum rights limits investment and
innovation and does not allow operators and equipment manufacturers to realise economies
of scale, thereby hindering the development of an internal market for electronic
communications networks and services using radio spectrum.
[…] Unless otherwise provided in the second subparagraph, Member States shall ensure
(19)
3.
that all types of technology used for electronic communications services may be used in the
radio frequency bands, available for electronic communications services in accordance with
their National Frequency Allocation Plan and the ITU Radio Regulations.
Member States may, however, provide for proportionate and non-discriminatory restrictions
to the types of technology used for electronic communications services where this is necessary
to:
(a)
(b)
avoid harmful interference,
protect public health against electromagnetic fields,
15758/08
ANNEX
HVW/ek
DG C II B
EN
29
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0030.png
(ba) ensure technical quality of service,
(c)
ensure maximisation of radio frequencies sharing […],
(ca) safeguard efficient use of spectrum, or
(d)
fulfil a general interest objective in accordance with paragraph 4 below.
(20)
Flexibility in spectrum management and access to spectrum should be increased through
technology- and service-neutral authorisations to let spectrum users, choose the best
technologies and services to apply in
[…]
frequency bands
available to electronic
communications services as identified in national frequency allocation tables and in the
ITU Radio Regulations
(hereinafter referred to as the 'principles of technology and service
neutrality'). The administrative determination of technologies and services should
[…] apply
when general interest objectives are at stake
and should be clearly justified and subject to
regular periodic review.
[…] Restrictions
to the principle of technology neutrality should be
[…] appropriate
and
justified by the need to avoid harmful interference, for example by imposing emission masks
and power levels,
[…]
to ensure the protection of public health by limiting public exposure
to electromagnetic fields,
to ensure the proper functioning of services through an adequate
level of technical quality of service, […]
to ensure proper sharing of spectrum, in particular
where its use is only subject to general authorisations,
to safeguard efficient use of
spectrum,
or
[…] to fulfil a general interest objective in conformity with Community law.
[…] Unless otherwise provided in the second subparagraph, Member States shall ensure
(21)
4.
that all types of electronic communications services may be provided in the radio frequency
bands, available for electronic communications services in accordance with their National
Frequency Allocation Plan and the ITU Radio Regulations.
The Member States may, however, provide for proportionate and non-discriminatory
restrictions to the types of electronic communications services to be provided.
15758/08
ANNEX
HVW/ek
DG C II B
EN
30
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0031.png
Measures that require an electronic communications service to be provided in a specific band
available for electronic communications services shall be justified in order to ensure the
fulfilment of a general interest objective as defined by Member States in conformity with
Community law, such as and not limited to:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
safety of life,
the promotion of social, regional or territorial cohesion,
the avoidance of inefficient use of radio frequencies, or
the promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity and media pluralism, for example by
the provision of radio and television broadcasting services.
A measure which prohibits the provision of any other electronic communications service in a
specific band may only be provided for where justified by the need to protect safety of life
services. Member states may also extend such measure in order to fulfil other general interest
objectives.
(22)
Spectrum users should also be able to freely choose the services they wish to offer over the
spectrum subject to transitional measures to cope with previously acquired rights. It should
be possible for exceptions to the principle of service neutrality which require the provision
of a specific service to meet clearly defined general interest objectives such as safety of life,
the need to promote social, regional and territorial cohesion, or the avoidance of inefficient
use of spectrum to be permitted where necessary and proportionate. Those objectives should
include the promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity and media pluralism as defined
[…] by Member States
in conformity with Community law. Except where necessary to
protect safety of life
or to fulfil other general interest objectives,
exceptions should not
result in exclusive use for certain services, but rather grant priority so that other services or
technologies may coexist in the same band insofar as possible.
[…]
It lies within the competence of the Member States to define the scope and nature of any
exception regarding the promotion of cultural and linguistic diversity and media pluralism
[…].
(23)
15758/08
ANNEX
HVW/ek
DG C II B
EN
31
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0032.png
5.
Member States shall regularly review the necessity of the restrictions and measures
referred to in paragraphs 3 and 4, and shall make the results of these reviews public.
(24)
As the allocation of spectrum to specific technologies or services is an exception to the
principles of technology and service neutrality and reduces the freedom to choose the
service provided or technology used, any proposal for such allocation should be transparent
and subject to public consultation.
Paragraphs 3 and 4 shall apply to spectrum allocated to be used for electronic
6.
communications services, general authorisations issued and individual rights of use of radio
frequencies granted after [subject to the date of transposition].
Spectrum allocations, general authorisations and individual rights of use which existed at the
date of [subject to the date of transposition] shall be subject to Article 9a.
7.
Without prejudice to the provisions of the Specific Directives and taking into account
the relevant national circumstances, Member States may lay down rules in order to prevent
spectrum hoarding, in particular by setting out strict deadlines for the effective exploitation of
the rights of use by the holder of the rights and by applying sanctions, including financial
penalties or withdrawal of the rights of use in case of non-compliance with the deadlines.
These rules shall be established and applied in a proportionate, non-discriminatory and
transparent manner.
Article 9a
Review of restrictions to existing rights
1.
For a period of five years starting on [subject to the date of transposition], Member
States may ensure that holders of rights to use radio frequencies which were granted before
that date and which will remain valid for a period of not less that five years after that date,
may submit an application to the competent national authority for a reassessment of the
restrictions to their rights in accordance with Article 9(3) and (4).
15758/08
ANNEX
HVW/ek
DG C II B
EN
32
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0033.png
Before adopting its decision the competent national regulatory authority shall notify the right
holder of its reassessment of the restrictions, indicating the extent of the right after
reassessment, and allow him a reasonable time limit to withdraw his application.
If the right holder withdraws his application, the right shall remain unchanged until its expiry
or till the end of the 5 year period, whichever is the earlier date.
2.
3.
Deleted.
After the five-year period referred to in paragraph 1, Member States shall take all
appropriate measures to ensure that Article 9(3) and (4) apply to all remaining general
authorisations/individual rights of use and spectrum allocations used for electronic
communications services which existed at the date of [subject to the date of transposition].
4.
In applying this Article, Member States shall take appropriate measures to promote fair
competition.
5.
Measure adopted in applying this Article do not constitute the granting of new rights of
use and therefore are not subject to the relevant provisions of Article 5(2) of Directive
2002/20/EC (Authorisation Directive).
(28)
The introduction of technology and service neutrality and trading for existing spectrum
usage rights may require transitional rules, including measures to ensure fair competition,
as the new system may entitle certain spectrum users to start competing with spectrum users
having acquired their spectrum rights under more burdensome terms and conditions.
[…]
Article 9b
Transfer or lease of Individual Rights to Use radio frequencies
1.
[…] Member States may […] make provision for undertakings to transfer or lease
individual rights to use radio frequencies to other undertakings in accordance with national
procedures.
15758/08
ANNEX
HVW/ek
DG C II B
EN
33
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0034.png
Conditions attached to individual rights to use radio frequencies shall continue to apply after
the transfer or lease, unless otherwise specified by the competent national authority.
2.
Member States shall ensure that an undertaking’s intention to transfer rights to use
radio frequencies, as well as the effective transfer thereof is notified in accordance with
national procedures to the competent national authority responsible for granting individual
rights of use and is made public. Where radio frequency use has been harmonised through the
application of the Radio Spectrum Decision or other Community measures, any such transfer
shall comply with such harmonised use.
13
(25)
In the interests of flexibility and efficiency, national regulatory authorities
[…] may
allow
spectrum users to freely transfer or lease their usage rights to third parties, which would
allow spectrum valuation by the market. In view of their power to ensure effective use of
spectrum, national regulatory authorities should take action so as to ensure that trading
does not lead to a distortion of competition where spectrum is left unused.
Article 9c
Radio Frequency Management Harmonisation Measures
Deleted.
Recital (26) is deleted.
Recital (27) is deleted.
Article 10
Numbering, naming and addressing
1.
Member States shall ensure that national regulatory authorities control the
[…] granting of
rights of use
of all national numbering resources and the management of the national numbering
plans. Member States shall ensure that adequate numbers and numbering ranges are provided for all
publicly available electronic communications services. National regulatory authorities shall
establish objective, transparent and non-discriminatory
[…]
procedures
for granting rights of use
for national numbering resources.
13
UK has a reservation on paragraph 2.
HVW/ek
DG C II B
15758/08
ANNEX
EN
34
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0035.png
2.
National regulatory authorities shall ensure that
national
numbering plans and procedures are
applied in a manner that gives equal treatment to all providers of publicly available electronic
communications services. In particular, Member States shall ensure that an undertaking
[…] to
which the right of use for
a range of numbers
has been granted
does not discriminate against
other providers of electronic communications services as regards the number sequences used to give
access to their services.
3.
Member States shall ensure that the national numbering plans, and all subsequent additions or
amendments thereto, are published, subject only to limitations imposed on the grounds of national
security.
4.
Member States shall support the harmonisation of
[…] specific numbers or numbering
ranges
within the Community where that
[…]
promotes
both
the functioning of the internal market
[…] and
the development of pan-European services. The Commission may
[…]
take
[…]
appropriate technical implementing measures on this matter
[…].
The Measures designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive by supplementing it,
shall be adopted in accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in
Article 22(3).
5.
Where this is appropriate in order to ensure full global interoperability of services, Member
States shall coordinate their positions in international organisations and forums in which decisions
are taken on issues relating to the numbering, naming and addressing of electronic communications
networks and services.
(29)
In order to promote the functioning of the internal market, and to support the development
of cross-border services, the Commission should be given the power
to adopt technical
implementing measures in the field of numbering. […]
Article 11
Rights of way
1.
Member States shall ensure that when a competent authority considers:
15758/08
ANNEX
HVW/ek
DG C II B
EN
35
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0036.png
- an application for the granting of rights to install facilities on, over or under public or private
property to an undertaking authorised to provide public communications networks, or
- an application for the granting of rights to install facilities on, over or under public property to an
undertaking authorised to provide electronic communications networks other than to the public,
the competent authority:
- acts on the basis of
efficient,
transparent and publicly available procedures, applied without
discrimination and wihtout delay,
and in any event makes its decision within six months of the
application, except in cases of expropriation,
and
- follows the principles of transparency and non-discrimination in attaching conditions to any such
rights.
The abovementioned procedures can differ depending on whether the applicant is providing public
communications networks or not.
(30)
Permits issued to undertakings providing electronic communications networks and services
allowing them to gain access to public or private property are essential factors for the
establishment of electronic communications networks or new network elements.
Unnecessary complexity and delay in the procedures for granting rights of way may
therefore represent important obstacles to the development of competition. Consequently,
the acquisition of rights of way by authorised undertakings should be simplified. National
regulatory authorities should be able to coordinate the acquisition of rights of way, making
relevant information accessible on their websites.
Member States shall ensure that where public or local authorities retain ownership or control
2.
of undertakings operating
public
electronic communications networks and/or
publicly available
electronic communications
services, there is effective structural separation of the function
responsible for granting the rights referred to in paragraph 1 from activities associated with
ownership or control.
15758/08
ANNEX
HVW/ek
DG C II B
EN
36
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0037.png
3.
Member States shall ensure that effective mechanisms exist to allow undertakings to appeal
against decisions on the granting of rights to install facilities to a body that is independent of the
parties involved.
Article 12
Co-location and […] sharing of network elements and associated facilities for providers of
electronic communications networks
1.
Where an undertaking providing electronic communications networks has the right under
national legislation to install facilities on, over or under public or private property, or may take
advantage of a procedure for the expropriation or use of property, national regulatory authorities
shall
[…] be able to impose
the sharing of such facilities or property,
including inter alia
buildings or entries to buildings, masts, antennae, towers and other supporting constructions,
ducts, conduits, manholes, cabinets, as well as network elements which are not active.
2.
[…] Member States may require holders of the rights referred to in paragraph 1 to
share facilities or property (including physical co-location) or take measures to facilitate the
coordination of public works in order
to protect the environment, public health, public security or
to meet town and country planning objectives
[…]
only after an appropriate period of public
consultation, during which all interested parties
[…] shall
be given an opportunity to express their
views. Such sharing or coordination arrangements may include rules for apportioning the costs of
facility or property sharing.
2a.
Member States may, where appropriate, ensure that undertakings provide the necessary
information, if requested by the competent authorities, in order for these authorities, in
conjunction with national regulatory authorities, to be able to establish a detailed inventory of
the nature, availability and geographical location of the facilities referred to in paragraph 1
and make it available to interested parties.
3.
Measures taken by a national regulatory authority in accordance with paragraph 1 shall
be objective, transparent, non-discriminatory, and proportionate.
15758/08
ANNEX
HVW/ek
DG C II B
EN
37
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0038.png
(31)
It is necessary to strengthen the powers of the Member States vis-à-vis holders of rights of
way to ensure the entry or roll out of new network in
[…] a fair, efficient and
environmentally responsible way and independently of any obligation on an operator with
significant market power to grant access to its electronic communications network.
Improving facility sharing can significantly improve competition and lower the overall
financial and environmental cost of deploying electronic communications infrastructure
for undertakings, notably of new […] access networks. National regulatory authorities
should be empowered to require that the holders of the rights to install facilities on, over
or under public or private property share such facilities or property (including physical
co-location) in order to encourage efficient investment in infrastructure and the
promotion of innovation, after an appropriate period of public consultation, during which
all interested parties shall be given the opportunity to state their views. Such sharing or
coordination arrangements may include rules for apportioning the costs of facility or
property sharing and shall ensure that there is an appropriate rewarding of risk between
the undertakings concerned.
National regulatory authorities should
in particular
be able to
impose
[…]
the sharing of
network elements and associated facilities […], such as
ducts,
conduits,
masts,
manholes, cabinets, […]
antennae,
towers and other supporting
constructions, buildings or […]
entries into buildings, and a better coordination of civil
works.
[…] The competent authorities, notably local authorities, should also establish
appropriate coordination procedures, in cooperation with national regulatory authorities,
with respect to public works and also to other appropriate public facilities or property
which may include procedures that ensure that interested parties have information
concerning appropriate public facilities or property and on-going and planned public
works, that they are notified in a timely manner of such works, and that sharing is
facilitated to the maximum extent possible.
Article 13
Accounting separation and financial reports
1.
Member States shall require undertakings providing public communications networks or
publicly available electronic communications services which have special or exclusive rights for the
provision of services in other sectors in the same or another Member State to:
(a) keep separate accounts for the activities associated with the provision of electronic
communications networks or services, to the extent that would be required if these activities were
carried out by legally independent companies, so as to identify all elements of cost and revenue,
with the basis of their calculation and the detailed attribution methods used, related to their
activities associated with the provision of electronic communications networks or services including
an itemised breakdown of fixed asset and structural costs, or
15758/08
ANNEX
HVW/ek
DG C II B
EN
38
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0039.png
(b)
have structural separation for the activities associated with the provision of electronic
communications networks or services.
Member States may choose not to apply the requirements referred to in the first subparagraph to
undertakings the annual turnover of which in activities associated with electronic communications
networks or services in the Member States is less than EUR 50 million.
2.
Where undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly available
electronic communications services are not subject to the requirements of company law and do not
satisfy the small and medium-sized enterprise criteria of Community law accounting rules, their
financial reports shall be drawn up and submitted to independent audit and published. The audit
shall be carried out in accordance with the relevant Community and national rules.
This requirement shall also apply to the separate accounts required under paragraph 1(a).
15758/08
ANNEX
HVW/ek
DG C II B
EN
39
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0040.png
CHAPTER III A
SECURITY AND INTEGRITY OF NETWORKS AND SERVICES
Article 13a
Security and integrity
1.
Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing public communications
networks or publicly available electronic communications services take appropriate technical
and organisational measures to appropriately manage risk to security of networks and
services. Having regard to the state of the art, these measures shall ensure a level of security
appropriate to the risk presented. In particular, measures shall be taken to prevent and
minimise the impact of security incidents on users and on interconnected networks.
2.
Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing public communications
networks take all appropriate steps to ensure the integrity of their networks, and thus ensure
the continuity of supply of services provided over those networks.
3.
Member States shall ensure that undertakings providing public communications
networks or publicly available electronic communications services notify the competent
national regulatory authority of a breach of security or loss of integrity that had a significant
impact on the operation of networks or services.
The national regulatory authority concerned shall inform the national regulatory authorities
in other Member States and the European Network and Information Security Agency
(ENISA) if other Member States could be or have been affected. The national regulatory
authority concerned may inform the public or require the undertakings to do so, where it
determines that disclosure of the breach is in the public interest.
Once a year, the national regulatory authority concerned shall submit a summary report to
the Commission and ENISA on the notifications received and the action taken in accordance
with this paragraph.
15758/08
ANNEX
HVW/ek
DG C II B
EN
40
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0041.png
4.
The Commission, taking the utmost account of the opinion of ENISA, may adopt
appropriate technical implementing measures with a view to harmonising the measures
referred to in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3, including measures defining the circumstances, format
and procedures applicable to notification requirements. These technical implementing
measures will be based on European and international standards to the greatest extent
possible, and they shall not prevent Member States from adopting additional requirements in
order to pursue the objectives set out in paragraphs 1 and 2.
These implementing measures, designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive by
supplementing it, shall be adopted in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article
22(3). […]
(32)
Reliable and secure communication of information over electronic communications
networks is increasingly central to the whole economy and society in general. System
complexity, technical failure or human mistake, accidents or attacks may all have
consequences for the functioning and availability of the physical infrastructures that deliver
important services to EU citizens, including e-Government services. National regulatory
authorities should therefore ensure the integrity and security of public communications
networks are maintained. The
ENISA […]
should contribute to the enhanced level of
security of electronic communications by, among other things, providing expertise and
advice, and promoting the exchange of best practices. Both the
ENISA […]
and the national
regulatory authorities should have the necessary means to perform their duties, including
powers to obtain sufficient information to be able to assess the level of security of networks
or services as well as comprehensive and reliable data about actual security incidents that
have had a significant impact on the operation of networks or services. Bearing in mind that
the successful application of adequate security is not a one-off exercise but a continuous
process of implementation, review and updating, the providers of electronic communications
networks and services should be required to take measures to safeguard their integrity and
security in accordance with the assessed risks, taking into account the state of the art of
such measures.
Where there is a need to agree on a common set of security requirements, power should be
conferred on the Commission to adopt technical implementing measures to achieve an
adequate level of security of electronic communications networks and services in the
internal market. The
ENISA […]
should contribute to the harmonisation of appropriate
technical and organisational security measures by providing expert advice. National
regulatory authorities should have the power to issue binding instructions relating to the
technical implementing measures adopted pursuant to the Framework Directive. In order to
perform their duties, they should have the power to investigate and to impose penalties in
cases of non-compliance.
(33)
15758/08
ANNEX
HVW/ek
DG C II B
EN
41
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0042.png
Article 13b
Implementation and enforcement
1.
Member States shall ensure that competent national regulatory authorities have the
power to issue binding instructions to undertakings providing public communications
networks or publicly available electronic communications services in order to implement
Article 13a.
2.
Member States shall ensure that competent national regulatory authorities have the
power to require undertakings providing public communications networks or publicly
available electronic communications services to:
(a)
provide information needed to assess the security and integrity of their services and
networks, including documented security policies; and
(b)
submit to a security audit carried out by a qualified independent body or a competent
national authority and make results thereof available to the national regulatory authority.
The cost of the audit shall be paid by the undertaking.
3.
Member States shall ensure that national regulatory authorities have all the powers
necessary to investigate cases of non-compliance.
4.
These provisions shall be without prejudice to Article 3 of this Directive.
15758/08
ANNEX
HVW/ek
DG C II B
EN
42
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0043.png
CHAPTER IV
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Article 14
Undertakings with significant market power
1.
Where the Specific Directives require national regulatory authorities to determine whether
operators have significant market power in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 16,
paragraphs 2 and 3 of this Article shall apply.
2.
An undertaking shall be deemed to have significant market power if, either individually or
jointly with others, it enjoys a position equivalent to dominance, that is to say a position of
economic strength affording it the power to behave to an appreciable extent independently of
competitors, customers and ultimately consumers.
In particular, national regulatory authorities shall, when assessing whether two or more
undertakings are in a joint dominant position in a market, act in accordance with Community law
and take into the utmost account the guidelines on market analysis and the assessment of significant
market power published by the Commission pursuant to Article 15. Criteria to be used in making
such an assessment are set out in Annex II.
3.
Where an undertaking has significant market power on a specific market, it may also be
deemed to have significant market power on a closely related market, where the links between the
two markets are such as to allow the market power held in one market to be leveraged into the other
market, thereby strengthening the market power of the undertaking.
Consequently, remedies
aimed at preventing such leverage may be applied in the linked market pursuant to Articles 9,
10, 11 and 13 of Directive 2002/19/21 (Access directive), and where such remedies prove to be
insufficient, remedies pursuant to Article 17 of Directive 2002/22/EC (Universal Service
Directive) may be imposed.
15758/08
ANNEX
HVW/ek
DG C II B
EN
43
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0044.png
Recital (34) is deleted.
Article 15
Procedure for […] identification and definition […] of markets
1.
After public consultation and consultation
with national regulatory authorities and taking
the utmost account of the opinion of the GERT, […]
the Commission shall
in accordance with
the procedure referred to in Article 22(2)
adopt a Recommendation on Relevant Product and
Service Markets (hereinafter "the Recommendation"). The Recommendation shall identify
[…]
those product and service markets within the electronic communications sector the characteristics of
which may be such as to justify the imposition of regulatory obligations set out in the Specific
Directives, without prejudice to markets that may be defined in specific cases under competition
law. The Commission shall define markets in accordance with the principles of competition law.
The Commission shall regularly review the recommendation.
14
2.
The Commission shall publish, at the latest on the date of entry into force of this Directive,
guidelines for market analysis and the assessment of significant market power (hereinafter "the
guidelines") which shall be in accordance with the principles of competition law.
3.
National regulatory authorities shall, taking the utmost account of the Recommendation and
the Guidelines, define relevant markets appropriate to national circumstances, in particular relevant
geographic markets within their territory, in accordance with the principles of competition law.
National regulatory authorities shall follow the procedures referred to in Articles 6 and 7 before
defining the markets that differ from those
[…] identified
in the Recommendation.
4.
After consultation with national regulatory authorities the Commission may,
taking the
utmost account of the opinion of the GERT, […]
adopt a Decision identifying transnational
markets,
acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 22(2a).
14
NL has a reservation on this Article.
HVW/ek
DG C II B
15758/08
ANNEX
EN
44
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0045.png
Article 16
Market analysis procedure
1.
[…]
National regulatory authorities shall carry out an analysis of the relevant markets
taking
into account the markets identified in the Recommendation, and
taking the utmost account of
the Guidelines. Member States shall ensure that this analysis is carried out, where appropriate, in
collaboration with the national competition authorities.
2.
Where a national regulatory authority is required under
[…] paragraphs 3 or 4, Article
17
[…]
of Directive 2002/22/EC (Universal Service Directive), or Article
[…]
8 of Directive
2002/19/EC (Access Directive) to determine whether to impose, maintain, amend or withdraw
obligations on undertakings, it shall determine on the basis of its market analysis referred to in
paragraph 1 of this Article whether a relevant market is effectively competitive.
3.
Where a national regulatory authority concludes that the market is effectively competitive, it
shall not impose or maintain any of the specific regulatory obligations referred to in paragraph 2 of
this Article. In cases where sector specific regulatory obligations already exist, it shall withdraw
such obligations placed on undertakings in that relevant market. An appropriate period of notice
shall be given to parties affected by such a withdrawal of obligations.
4.
Where a national regulatory authority determines that a relevant market is not effectively
competitive, it shall identify undertakings
which individually or jointly with others have a […]
significant market power on that market in accordance with Article 14 and the national regulatory
authority shall on such undertakings impose appropriate specific regulatory obligations referred to
in paragraph 2 of this Article or maintain or amend such obligations where they already exist.
5.
In the case of transnational markets identified in the Decision referred to in Article 15(4), the
national regulatory authorities concerned shall jointly conduct the market analysis taking the utmost
account of the Guidelines and decide on any imposition, maintenance, amendment or withdrawal of
regulatory obligations referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article in a concerted fashion.
Recital (35) is deleted.
15758/08
ANNEX
HVW/ek
DG C II B
EN
45
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0046.png
6.
Measures taken according to the provisions of paragraphs 3,
and
4
[…]
of this Article shall be
subject to the procedures referred to in Articles 6 and 7.
National regulatory authorities shall
carry out an analysis of the relevant market and notify the corresponding draft measure in
accordance with Article 7:
a)
within three years from the adoption of a previous measure relating to that market.
However, exceptionally, that period may be extended beyond three years, where the NRA has
notified a reasoned proposed extension to the Commission and the Commission has not
objected within one month of the notified extension;
b)
for markets not previously notified to the Commission, within two years from the
adoption of a revised Recommendation on relevant markets, or;
c)
for Member States which have newly joined the Union, within two years from their
accession.
7.
Where a national regulatory authority has not completed its analysis of a relevant
market identified in the Recommendation within the time limit laid down in Article 16(6), the
GERT shall provide assistance to the national regulatory authority concerned on its request
in completing the analysis of the specific market and the specific obligations to be imposed.
With this assistance, the national regulatory authority concerned shall within six months
notify the draft measure to the Commission in accordance with Article 7.
(36)
In order to provide market players with certainty as to regulatory conditions, a time limit for
market reviews is necessary. It is important to conduct a market analysis on a regular basis
and within a reasonable and appropriate timeframe. The timeframe should take account of
whether the particular market has previously been subject to market analysis and duly
notified. Failure of a national regulatory authority to analyse a market within the time limit
may jeopardise the internal market, and normal infringement proceedings may not produce
their desired effect in time.
[…] Alternatively, the NRA concerned should be able to
request the assistance of the GERT to complete the market analysis. For instance, this
assistance could take the form of a specific task force composed of other NRAs
representatives.
15758/08
ANNEX
HVW/ek
DG C II B
EN
46
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0047.png
Article 17
Standardisation
1.
The Commission, acting in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 22(2), shall
draw up and publish in the Official Journal of the European Communities a list of standards and/or
specifications to serve as a basis for encouraging the harmonised provision of electronic
communications networks, electronic communications services and associated facilities and
services. Where necessary, the Commission may, acting in accordance with the procedure referred
to in Article 22(2a) and following consultation of the Committee established by Directive
98/34/EC, request that standards be drawn up by the European standards organisations (European
Committee for Standardisation (CEN), European Committee for Electrotechnical Standardisation
(CENELEC), and European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI)).
2.
Member States shall encourage the use of the standards and/or specifications referred to in
paragraph 1, for the provision of services, technical interfaces and/or network functions, to the
extent strictly necessary to ensure interoperability of services and to improve freedom of choice for
users.
As long as standards and/or specifications have not been published in accordance with paragraph 1,
Member States shall encourage the implementation of standards and/or specifications adopted by
the European standards organisations.
In the absence of such standards and/or specifications, Member States shall encourage the
implementation of international standards or recommendations adopted by the International
Telecommunication Union (ITU),
the Electronic Communications Committee (ECC),
the
International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO) or the International Electrotechnical
Commission (IEC).
Where international standards exist, Member States shall encourage the European standards
organisations to use them, or the relevant parts of them, as a basis for the standards they develop,
except where such international standards or relevant parts would be ineffective.
15758/08
ANNEX
HVW/ek
DG C II B
EN
47
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0048.png
3.
If the standards and/or specifications referred to in paragraph 1 have not been adequately
implemented so that interoperability of services in one or more Member States cannot be ensured,
the implementation of such standards and/or specifications may be made compulsory under the
procedure laid down in paragraph 4, to the extent strictly necessary to ensure such interoperability
and to improve freedom of choice for users.
4.
Where the Commission intends to make the implementation of certain standards and/or
specifications compulsory, it shall publish a notice in the Official Journal of the European
Communities and invite public comment by all parties concerned. The Commission
[…]
shall
take
appropriate implementing measures and
make implementation of the relevant standards
compulsory by making reference to them as compulsory standards in the list of standards and/or
specifications published in the Official Journal of the European Communities.
5.
Where the Commission considers that standards and/or specifications referred to in paragraph
1 no longer contribute to the provision of harmonised electronic communications services, or that
they no longer meet consumers' needs or are hampering technological development, it shall, acting
in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 22(2a), remove them from the list of
standards and/or specifications referred to in paragraph 1.
6.
Where the Commission considers that standards and/or specifications referred to in paragraph
4 no longer contribute to the provision of harmonised electronic communications services, or that
they no longer meet consumers' needs or are hampering technological development, it shall,
[…]
take the appropriate implementing measures and
remove
[…] those standards and/or
specifications
from
[…] the
list of standards and/or specifications referred to in paragraph 1.
6a.
The implementing measures designed to amend non-essential elements of this Directive
by supplementing it referred to in paragraphs 4 and 6 shall be adopted in accordance with the
regulatory procedure with scrutiny referred to in Article 22(3).
7.
This Article does not apply in respect of any of the essential requirements, interface
specifications or harmonised standards to which the provisions of Directive 1999/5/EC apply.
15758/08
ANNEX
HVW/ek
DG C II B
EN
48
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0049.png
Article 18
Interoperability of digital interactive television services
1.
In order to promote the free flow of information, media pluralism and cultural diversity,
Member States shall encourage, in accordance with the provisions of Article 17(2):
(a) providers of digital interactive television services for distribution to the public in the Community
on digital interactive television platforms, regardless of the transmission mode, to use an open API;
(b) providers of all enhanced digital television equipment deployed for the reception of digital
interactive television services on interactive digital television platforms to comply with an open API
in accordance with the minimum requirements of the relevant standards or specifications;
c)
providers of digital TV services and equipment to cooperate in the provision of
interoperable TV services for disabled end-users.
2.
Without prejudice to Article 5(1)(b) of Directive 2002/19/ EC (Access Directive), Member
States shall encourage proprietors of APIs to make available on fair, reasonable and non-
discriminatory terms, and against appropriate remuneration, all such information as is necessary to
enable providers of digital interactive television services to provide all services supported by the
API in a fully functional form.
3.
Deleted.
15758/08
ANNEX
HVW/ek
DG C II B
EN
49
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0050.png
Article 19
Harmonisation procedures
1.
[…] Without prejudice to Article 9 of this Directive and to Articles 6 and 8 of Directive
2002/20/EC (Authorisation Directive), where the Commission finds that divergences in the
implementation by the national regulatory authorities of the regulatory tasks specified in this
Directive and the Specific Directives may create a barrier to the internal market, the
Commission may, taking the utmost account of the opinion of the GERT, if any, issue a
recommendation on the harmonised application of the provisions in this Directive and the
Specific Directives in order to further the achievement of the objectives set out in Article 8.
2.
[…] Where the Commission, issues a recommendation pursuant to paragraph 1, it shall
act in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 22(2).
Member States shall ensure that national regulatory authorities take the utmost account of
those recommendations in carrying out their tasks. Where a national regulatory authority
chooses not to follow a recommendation, it shall inform the Commission, giving the reasoning
for its position.
3.
The GERT may on its own initiative advise the Commission on whether a measure
should be adopted pursuant to paragraph 1.
(37) Due to the a high level of technological innovation and highly dynamic markets in the
electronic communications sector there is a need to be able to adapt regulation rapidly in a
coordinated and harmonised way at European level, as experience shows that divergence among
the national regulatory authorities in the implementation of the regulatory framework may create a
barrier to the development of the internal market.
[…]
15758/08
ANNEX
HVW/ek
DG C II B
EN
50
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0051.png
Article 20
Dispute resolution between undertakings
1.
In the event of a dispute
[…]
arising in connection with
existing
obligations
[…]
under this
Directive or the Specific Directives
[…] between undertakings
providing electronic
communications networks or services, in a Member State,
[…] or between such undertakings and
other undertakings in the Member State benefiting from obligations of access and/or
inerconnection arising under this Directive or the Specific Directive,
the national regulatory
authority concerned shall, at the request of either party, and without prejudice to the provisions of
paragraph 2, issue a binding decision to resolve the dispute in the shortest possible time frame and
in any case within four months except in exceptional circumstances. The Member State concerned
shall require that all parties cooperate fully with the national regulatory authority.
2.
Member States may make provision for national regulatory authorities to decline to resolve a
dispute through a binding decision where other mechanisms, including mediation, exist and would
better contribute to resolution of the dispute in a timely manner in accordance with the provisions of
Article 8. The national regulatory authority shall inform the parties without delay. If after four
months the dispute is not resolved, and if the dispute has not been brought before the courts by the
party seeking redress, the national regulatory authority shall issue, at the request of either party, a
binding decision to resolve the dispute in the shortest possible time frame and in any case within
four months.
3.
In resolving a dispute, the national regulatory authority shall take decisions aimed at
achieving the objectives set out in Article 8. Any obligations imposed on an undertaking by the
national regulatory authority in resolving a dispute shall respect the provisions of this Directive or
the Specific Directives.
4.
The decision of the national regulatory authority shall be made available to the public, having
regard to the requirements of business confidentiality. The parties concerned shall be given a full
statement of the reasons on which it is based.
15758/08
ANNEX
HVW/ek
DG C II B
EN
51
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0052.png
5.
The procedure referred to in paragraph 1, 3 and 4 shall not preclude either party from bringing
an action before the courts.
Article 21
Resolution of cross-border disputes
1.
In the event of a cross-border dispute arising under this Directive or the Specific Directives
between parties in different Member States, where the dispute lies within the competence of
national regulatory authorities from more than one Member State, the
[…] provisions
set out in
paragraphs 2, 3 and 4 shall be applicable.
2.
Any party may refer the dispute to the national regulatory authorities concerned. The
competent
national regulatory authorities shall coordinate their efforts in order to bring about a
resolution of the dispute, in accordance with the objectives set out in Article 8.
Any national regulatory authority which has competence in such a dispute may request the
GERT to issue an opinion as to the action to be taken in accordance with the provisions of the
Framework Directive and/or the specific Directives to resolve the dispute.
Where such a request has been made to the GERT, any national regulatory authority with
competence in any aspect of the dispute shall await the GERT’s opinion before taking action
to resolve the dispute, without prejudice to the possibility for national regulatory authorities
to take urgent measures where necessary.
Any obligations imposed on an undertaking by the national regulatory authority in resolving a
dispute shall respect the provisions of this Directive or the Specific Directives
and take the utmost
account of the opinion issued by the GERT.
(38)
One important task assigned to
the GERT
is to issue opinions in relation to cross-border
disputes where appropriate. National regulatory authorities should therefore take account
of any opinions of
the GERT
in such cases.
15758/08
ANNEX
HVW/ek
DG C II B
EN
52
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0053.png
3.
Member States may make provision for
the competent
national regulatory authorities jointly
to decline to resolve a dispute where other mechanisms, including mediation, exist and would better
contribute to resolution of the dispute in a timely manner in accordance with the provisions of
Article 8.
They shall inform the parties without delay. If after four months the dispute is not resolved, if the
dispute has not been brought before the courts by the party seeking redress and if either party
requests it, the national regulatory authorities shall coordinate their efforts in order to bring about a
resolution of the dispute, in accordance with the provisions set out in Article 8
and taking the
utmost account of any opinion issued by the GERT.
4.
The procedure referred to in paragraph 2 shall not preclude either party from bringing an
action before the courts.
Article 21a
Penalties
Member States shall lay down the rules on penalties applicable to infringements of the
national provisions adopted pursuant to this Directive and the Specific Directives and shall
take all measures necessary to ensure that they are implemented. The penalties provided for
must be effective, proportionate and dissuasive and may be applied to cover the period of any
breach, even if the breach has subsequently been rectified. The Member States shall notify
those provisions to the Commission by the [time-limit
for implementation of the amending act]
at the latest and shall notify it without delay of any subsequent amendment affecting them.
(39)
Experience in the implementation of the regulatory framework indicates that existing
provisions empowering national regulatory authorities to impose fines have failed to
provide an adequate incentive to comply with regulatory requirements. Adequate
enforcement powers can contribute to the timely implementation of the regulatory
framework and therefore foster regulatory certainty, which is an important driver for
investment. The lack of effective powers in the event of non-compliance applies across the
regulatory framework. The introduction of a new provision in the Framework Directive to
deal with breaches of obligations under the Framework and Specific Directives should
therefore ensure the application of consistent and coherent principles to enforcement and
penalties for the whole regulatory framework.
15758/08
ANNEX
HVW/ek
DG C II B
EN
53
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0054.png
Article 22
Committee
1.
2.
The Commission shall be assisted by a Committee ("the Communications Committee").
Where reference is made to this paragraph, Articles 3 and 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall
apply, having regard to the provisions of Article 8 thereof.
2a.
Where reference is made to this paragraph, Articles 5 and 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC
shall apply, having regard to the provisions of Article 8 thereof.
3.
Where reference is made to this paragraph, Article 5a(1)
to (4),
and
Article
7 of Decision
1999/468/EC shall apply, having regard to the provisions of Article 8 thereof.
[…]
4.
Deleted.
(59)
Measures necessary for the implementation of the Framework, Access and Authorisation
Directives should be adopted in accordance with Council Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June
1999 laying down the procedures for the exercise of implementing powers conferred on the
Commission
15
.
In particular, power should be conferred on the Commission to adopt
Recommendations
and/or
implementing measures in relation to the notifications under Article 7 of the
Framework Directive; the harmonisation in the fields of spectrum and numbering as well as
in matters related to security of networks and services;
the identification of the Relevant
Product and Service Markets;
the identification of trans-national markets; the
implementation of the standards; the harmonised application of the provisions of the
regulatory framework. Power should also be conferred to adopt implementing measures to
update Annexes I and II to the Access Directive to market and technological developments
[…].
Since those measures are of general scope and are designed to supplement these
Directives by the addition of new non-essential elements, they must be adopted in
accordance with the regulatory procedure with scrutiny provided for in Article 5a of
Decision 1999/468/EC.
[…]
(60)
15
OJ L 184, 17.7.1999, p. 23. Decision as amended by Decision 2006/512/EC (OJ L 200,
22.7.2006, p. 11).
HVW/ek
DG C II B
15758/08
ANNEX
EN
54
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0055.png
Article 23
Exchange of information
1.
The Commission shall provide all relevant information to the Communications Committee on
the outcome of regular consultations with the representatives of network operators, service
providers, users, consumers, manufacturers and trade unions, as well as third countries and
international organisations.
2.
The Communications Committee shall, taking account of the Community's electronic
communications policy, foster the exchange of information between the Member States and
between the Member States and the Commission on the situation and the development of regulatory
activities regarding electronic communications networks and services.
Article 24
Publication of information
1.
Member States shall ensure that up-to-date information pertaining to the application of this
Directive and the Specific Directives is made publicly available in a manner that guarantees all
interested parties easy access to that information. They shall publish a notice in their national
official gazette describing how and where the information is published. The first such notice shall
be published before the date of application referred to in Article 28(1), second subparagraph, and
thereafter a notice shall be published whenever there is any change in the information contained
therein.
2.
Member States shall send to the Commission a copy of all such notices at the time of
publication. The Commission shall distribute the information to the Communications Committee as
appropriate.
15758/08
ANNEX
HVW/ek
DG C II B
EN
55
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0056.png
Article 25
Review procedures
The Commission shall periodically review the functioning of this Directive and report to the
European Parliament and to the Council, on the first occasion not later than three years after the
date of application referred to in Article 28(1), second subparagraph. For this purpose, the
Commission may request information from the Member States, which shall be supplied without
undue delay.
CHAPTER V
FINAL PROVISIONS
Article 26
Repeal
The following Directives and Decisions are hereby repealed with effect from the date of application
referred to in Article 28(1), second subparagraph:
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Directive 90/387/EEC,
Council Decision 91/396/EEC of 29 July 1991 on the introduction of a single European
emergency call number,
Council Directive 92/44/EEC of 5 June 1992 on the application of open network provision to
leased lines,
Council Decision 92/264/EEC of 11 May 1992 on the introduction of a standard international
telephone access code in the Community,
Directive 95/47/EC,
Directive 97/13/EC,
Directive 97/33/EC,
15758/08
ANNEX
HVW/ek
DG C II B
EN
56
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0057.png
-
Directive 98/10/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 1998 on the
application of open network provision (ONP) to voice telephony and on universal service for
telecommunications in a competitive environment.
Article 27
Transitional measures
Deleted.
(40)
The existing regulatory framework included certain provisions to facilitate the transition
from the old regulatory framework of 1998 to the new 2002 framework. This transition has
been completed in all Member States and these measures should be repealed as they are
now redundant.
[Article
28
Transposition
Article 29
Entry into force
Article 30
Addressees]
15758/08
ANNEX
HVW/ek
DG C II B
EN
57
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0058.png
ANNEX I
Deleted.
(41)
Annex I to the Framework Directive identified the list of markets to be included in the
Recommendation on relevant product and service markets which may warrant ex-ante
regulation. This Annex should be repealed since its purpose of serving as a basis for drawing
up the initial version of the Recommendation
16
has been fulfilled.
ANNEX II
Criteria to be used by national regulatory authorities in making an assessment of joint
dominance in accordance with Article 14(2), second subparagraph.
Two or more undertakings can be found to be in a joint dominant position within the meaning
of Article 14 if, even in the absence of structural or other links between them, they operate in
a market which is characterised by a lack of effective competition and in which no single
undertaking has significant market power. In accordance with the provisions on joint
dominance set in the Regulation (EC) N° 139/2004 of 20 January 2004, this is likely to be the
case where the market is concentrated and exhibits a number of appropriate characteristics of
which the following may be the most relevant in the context of communications:
16
Commission Recommendation of 11 February 2003 on Relevant Product and Service Markets
within the electronic communications sector susceptible to ex ante regulation in accordance
with Directive 2002/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on a common
regulatory framework for electronic communication networks and services - C(2003) 497.
HVW/ek
DG C II B
15758/08
ANNEX
EN
58
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
615098_0059.png
-
-
-
-
-
-
low elasticity of demand
similar market shares
high legal or economic barriers to entry
vertical integration with collective refusal to supply
lack of countervailing buyer power
lack of potential competition
The above is an indicative list and is not exhaustive, nor are the criteria cumulative. Rather,
the list is intended to illustrate only the sorts of evidence that could be used to support
assertions concerning the existence of joint dominance.
Recital (42) is deleted.
_______________
15758/08
ANNEX
HVW/ek
DG C II B
EN
59