Markedsudvalget 1985
KOM (1985) 0516
Offentligt
1440716_0001.png
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT.
·FUND
Tenth annual report (1984)
COM(8§) 516
4 October 1985
Blank pages:
32, 74, 82, 104
COMMISSION
OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0002.png
This publication is also available in the following languages:
DA
DE
GR
FR
IT
NL
ISBN
ISBN
ISBN
ISBN
ISBN
ISBN
92-825-5872-X
92-825-5873-8
92-825-5874-6
92-825-5876-2
92-825-5877-0
92-825-5878-9
Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication
Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities,
1986
ISBN: 92-825-5875-4
Catalogue number: CB-45-85-195-EN-C
Articles and texts appearing in this document may be reproduced freely in
whole or in part providing their source is mentioned.
Printed in Belgium
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0003.png
Commission of the European Communities
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND
Tenth Annual Report (1984)
Document
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0004.png
This document has been prepared for use within the Commission.
necessarily represent the Commission's official position.
It does not
Manuscript finished in May 1985
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0005.png
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 Chapter I : Introduction
• • • • • • • . •
1.1
An
eventful year for European regional policy
1.1.1 Analysing the situation in the regions
..
1.1.2 Coordinating Member States' regional policies
. 1.1.3 Providing financial assistance in the regions
2.0 Chapter II : After the first decade
of
ERDF operations.
a
new
era begzns
• . • • . • . . • • • . • . . . • • • • . . .
2.1 Review of the first ten years (1975-1984)
..... .
2.1.1 Increased resources
. . . . . .
. ..•..
2.1.2 Analysis of grants by country
...•..
2.1.3 Marked geographical concentration in the less-favoured
regions
....•......................
2.1.4 Nearly 9 500 million ECU went to infrastructure projects
2.1.5 An estimated 640 000 jobs directly created or maintained in
the productive sector since 1975
2.1.6 Infrastructure projects also create jobs
2.1.7 One hundred studies financed
.....
2.1.8 A more active year for specific Community measures
2.1.9 Financial management of the ERDF: maximum use of resources
2. 2 Reform of Community regional policy
2;2.1 A new ERDF from 1985
2.2.2 Content of the Regulation
1
1
1
2
2
5
5
5
6
7
9
9
10
11
11
12
12
12
13
3.0 Chapter III : Community action in support
of
regional policy
17
measures by the Member States
• • • .
• • . . .
17
3 . 1 Submission of applications
. . . . .
17
3.1.1 Grant applications for just under 6 000 projects
18
3.1.2 Project selection
....
19
3.2 Consultation of the ERDF Committee
20
3.3 Nearly 4 400 projects approved
21
3.4 Concentration of aid in five Member States
21
3.5 85% of aid goes to infrastructure projects
24
3.5.1 A lower average rate of contribution
3.5.2 Proportion of aid going to small projects continues to grow 24
24
3.5.3 Transport regains the lead
..... .
26
3.6 Productive investment up and more jobs created or maintained
28
3. 6.1 Capital goods 'predominate
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
31
3.7 The share of aid allocated to studies has increased fourfold
33
3.8 99.8% of commitment appropriations used in 1984
34
3.9 97% of payment appropriations used
38
3. 10 Controls · . . . . . . . . . . .
39
3.11 Information on ERDF activities
.
39
3.11.1 The European citizen's right to know
. 40
3.11.2 Press information in 1984: more detailed coverage
. '40
3.11.3 Signboards: tangible evidence of the ERDF
3.11.4 Publication in the Official Journal: still too little
41
information
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
42
3.11.5 Letters to investors
...... .
i
4.0
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.
5
Chapter IV : Specific community regional development measures
New type of measures
. . . . . . . .
A second series of measures launched in 1984
Commitments: distinct increase
in
1984
Payments: almost half of commitments
Inspections
. . . . . . . . . . . .. .
43
43
44
45
47
47
iii
Table of Contents
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0006.png
4.6 Information
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.6.1 Publication in the Official Journal
4.6.2 Information activity by the Member States and the
' Commission
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.7 Proposal to supplement the second series of measures
47
47
48
48
51
51
53
53
56
57
58
60
62
63
67
67
68
5
.0 Chapter V : Location
of
ERDF assistance
• . . • •
5.1 The eight most assisted regions received half of the grants
5.2 Location ·of assistance in the Member States
5.2.1 Belgium
. . . . . . . . .
5.2.2 Denmark
. . . . . . . . .
5.2.3 Federal Republic of Germany
5.2.4 Greece
5.2.5 France
5.2.6
Ireland
5.2.7 Italy
5.2.8 Luxembourg
5.2.9 Netherlands
5.2.10 United Kingdom
6.0
Chapter VI : Regional development programmes
{RDP)
.
73.
75
·
75
76
76
76
78
79
7.0
Chapter VII : Integrated operations under the Community's
structural Funds
• . . . . • • . • • • • • . • . . . • . • • • .
7.1 Integrated regional development operations
. . . . .
7.1.1 TWo pilot schemes in progress in Belfast and Naples
7
.1.1. 1 Belfast
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
7.1.1.2 The integrated operation in Naples
. . . . .
7.1.2 Preparatory studies for integrated operations
7.2 Integrated development programmes (IDP)
. . . . . . .
7.2.1 The Western Isles Integrated Development Programme
7.2.2
The Lozere Integrated Development Programme
7.2.3 The South East of Belgium Integrated Development
Progr~mme
7.3 Preparation of the Integrated Mediterranean Programme (IMPs)
A.O
B.O
B.1
19
80
80
80
Annex A: Statistical data 1984 and 1975-1984
Annex B: Bibliography ( 1984 Publications)
European Regional Development Fund
.
ERDF: Specific Community regional development measures
Regional Policy
. . . . . . . . .
Integrated mediterranean programmes
Regional aid
. . . . . . . . . .
Annex C: Symbols and abbreviations used
83
99
99
99
B.2
B.3
B.4
B.S
C.
0
List
List
List
101
101
102
103
of
tables
of
maps
of
graphs
105
106
106
iv
ERDF
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0007.png
FOR.i!.JVORD
by Mr. Grigoris VARFIS,
Member of the Commission of the European Communities, in charge
of regional policy and relations with the European Parliament
TOWARDS A MORE COORDINATED AND MORE INCISIVE REGIONAL
POLICY
The adoption of the new ERDF Regulation
1
on 19 June 1984 marks a
significant step towards a more coordinated and more incisive regional
policy. The new Regulation is the culmination of nearly three years of
discussions within the Council, with the Commission having considerably
amended its proposal in November 1983 in response to the instructions
given to it by the Stuttgart European Council in June 1983 to increase the
effectiveness of the Community's structural Funds.
Although the Commission's proposals were not adopted in full, the improved
provisions of the new Regulation go a long way towards meeting its main
concerns. The new ERDF is designed to contribute to the correction of the
principal regional imbalances within the Community by participating in
the development and structural adjustment of regions whose development. is
lagging behind and in the conversion of declining regions. Details of the
new provisions are set out later on in this report. The most noteworthy
features are greater coordination of Member States' regional policies,
the replacement of national quotas by a system of ranges, an increase in
aid rates, possibilities of assisting small and medium-sized businesses
in the context of measures to exploit the potential for internally
generated development of regions, growing use of programme financing and
recognition of the integrated development approach. The latter two
measures enhance the effectiveness of Community assistance by promoting
coherent, multiannual operations and by using the ERDF in co-ordination
with the other Community financing instruments along with national and
local resources.
It
is
important to emphasize that all the new avenues which have been
opened up will not be effectively used unless all those concerned (the
Commission, Member States and regional and local authorities) respond
fully to the need for a serious political dialogue.
The new ERDF Regulation will allow the regional and local authorities to
participate more actively in drawing up programmes, that is as from the
preparation stage and not simply when plans are finalized. For this
purpose, the Commission will provide logistical and technical support to
national and local authorities requesting it.
In 1985, the Commission pursued four priority regional policy objectives:
1
J.D.
1
169 du 28.6.1984
v
Foreword
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0008.png
• emphasizing the regional dimension of the Community's other policies by
taking account of the effects which they may have at regional level;
• continuing its efforts to improve the link-up between the measures
coming under its own responsibility and those introduced by the Member
States;
• making use of the full range of financial support instruments available
to promote development measures
in
the Community's disadvantaged
regions;
• increasing the effectiveness of the structural financial instruments,
which means greater coordination both of the instruments themselves and
of assessment methods.
The findings of the second periodic report on the situation in the
regions are disturbing. Regional disparities within the Community have
not narrowed in recent years and will widen significantly in the enlarged
Community. It is up to the Community institutions, particularly the
Commission, in collaboration with the Member States and regional and local
authorities, to take effective advantage of the new possibilities
provided by the revised ERDF Regulation so as to help in correcting the
main regional imbalances within the Community.
vi
ERDF
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0009.png
NOTICE TO THE READER
A· KEY TO SOME ERDF TERMS AND CONCEPTS
Anyone not dealing with the ERDF on a regular basis may be somewhat
perplexed by some of the terms and concepts used, such as support
measures, specific measures,. geographical concentration, integrated
operation, structural funds and regional development programmes (RDP).
It was therefore felt that this notice could usefully provide some
· definitions of the principles underlying the ERDF' s day-to-day
activities.
• The ERDF, one of the Community's structural Funds
2 ,
was set up in 1975
to help correct the principal regional imbalances within the Community.
ERDF aid
is
accordingly granted in areas and regions suffering from
imbalances
resulting in particular from the predominance of
agriculture, industrial change and structural under-employment. Such
regions are generally the areas covered by national regional aid
schemes, these areas being approved by the Commission in accordance with
Articles 92 and 94 of the Treaty establishing the European Economic
Community. The ERDF provides assistance by making grants which support
and supplement national regional development efforts. It was not until
1979 that the Cmmunity began to initiate specific Community regional
development measures not directly linked to national regional policy
measures.
• What does the ERDF finance? Infrastructure investments: industrial
estates, roads, dams, power stations, etc ... , and directly productive
investment in industrial, craft industry and service activities to
create or maintain jobs and assistance in providing firms with access to
advice on management and innovation.
• The ERDF makes grants. In the report, the reader will frequently come
across references to grant decisions, amounts granted or appropriations
committed; these terms are all different aspects of the same thing.
Commitment appropriations and payment appropriations are, however,
different, which means that the ERDF can make an expenditure commitment
one year and make the payments in several instalments in the following
years as the project is carried out.
• In 1984, the ERDF was divided into two sections:
a.
b.
The first section accounts for 95% of the Fund's resources. It
covers Community measures in support of regional policy measures
adopted by Member States.
It
used to be known as the "quota"
section, because resources were distributed among Member States on
the basis of national quotas. However, the relevant Article has not
been in force since 1982, and the term "support measures" is used
throughout this report instead of "quota" measures.
The other section is for specific Community repional development
measures and can draw on up to
5%
of the Funds resources. This
section used to be known as the nnon-quotan section, because
There are two other Community structural Funds: the European Social
Fund and the EAGGF Guidance Section
vii
2
Notice to the reader
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0010.png
resources were not distributed between Member States on the basis of
any predetermined allocation system. The term "specific Community
measures
11
is used throughout this report instead of "non-quota
measures
11 •
For the specific Community measures, each Member State
presents a special implementing programme specifying the nature of
the operations to which the Fund may contribute.
• These definitions should assist the general reader in understanding
some of the key concepts used in this tenth report on the Fund's
activities.
• The Council Regulation establishing a European Regional Development
Fund
3
provides as follows:
a.
Before 1 October each year the Commission shall present a report to
the Council, the European Parliament and the Economic and Social
Committee on the implementation of this Regulation during the
p,receding year" .
'This report shall also cover the financial management of the Fund
and the conclusions drawn by the Commission from the checks made on
the Fund's operations".
11
b.
The obligation to present
an
annual report is further reinforced, where
specific Community measures are concerned, by Article 6 paragraphs
2
and
3
of the Council Regulations instituting such measures.
In
keeping with these regulations, the lOth report of the activities of
the ERDF relates to the year 1984. For this reason, it does not cover
the adoption of the regulation relating to Integrated Mediterranean
Programmes, which dates from
27
June 1985, nor to the strengthening of
Community structural activities in favour of steel restructuring areas,
of which the principle was established by the Commission on 16th July
1985. These aspects will be developed in the 11th report of the
activities of the ERDF relating to the year 1985. While waiting for its
publication, readers will find
i t
useful to refer ·to the Commissions
periodic publications (monthly bulletins and general reports of
activities) to follow the latest changes in these matters. ·
3
Article 21, paragraphs
1
and
2 ..
ERDF
viii
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0011.png
1 .0
CHAPTER I : INTRODUCTION
1,1
AN EVENTFUL YEAR
FOR
EUROPEAN REGIONAL POLICY
1.
A turning point in European regional policy was reached in 1984. Iri
June, following a conciliation meeting with Parliament, the Council
adopted the new ERDF Regulation which represents an important reform of
regional policy as a whole, the ERDF being the only Community instrument
set up with the sole and specific purpose of helping to reduce regional
imbalances in the Community.
The Fund was set up in 1975, just when the economic
cr~s~s
was taking hold
within the Community. Its resources are too small for it to remedy, on its
own, the structural underdevelopment problems of the most disadvantaged
regions and the more recent problems of industrial decline in regions
which used to be prosperous. The ERDF's annual budget allocation - 2 140
million ECU in 1984, i.e. 7.3% of the Community budget- is equivalent to
only 0.08% of the Community's GOP: Even so, ERDF assistance can represent
up to 20% and sometimes more of total public and private sector investment
in some regions and can therefore be ·an important element in regional
development.
1 .1 .1
Analysing the situation in the regions
2.
In March 1984, the Commission approved the second periodic report on
the situation in the regions of the Community in the early 1980s and on
their social and economic development since the first oil crisis. The
report shows that, during the last ten years, regional disparities in
output and productivity have not lessened but remain very substantial.
Regional labour market disequilibria are characterized by a relative
increase in disparities in unemployment rates. The essential conclusion
is that the serious situation of the regions with a development lag has
been exacerbated in the present crisis situation, while at the same time
new problems are emerging affecting the more
ind~strialised
core regions.
The most serious problems are often those being experienced in regions on
the periphery of the Community (Italian Mezzogiorno, most of the Greek
regions, Corsica, Ireland, Northern Ireland and the French Overseas
Departments). To these must be added regions in the North and West of the
United Kingdom, in central Italy and in Belgium. These regions together
have over 50 million inhabitants, nearly one fifth of the Community's
total population.
The enlargement of the Community to include Spain and Portugal will
virtually double the population of the regions with a per capita GDP of
less than 60% of the Community's average GDP. Whereas in 1980 less than
10% of the Community's population (24 million) lived in such less
developed regions, the proportion in a Community of Twelve will be 20% (50
million).
3.
Regional impact assessment of Community policies is used as the basis
for either modifying policy in response .to regional needs or devising
back-up measures to counteract any harmful effects these policies may have
on the regions. On the question of the impact of enlargement, the
Commission's second periodic report on the social and economic situation
Chapter· I
Introduction
1
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0012.png
and development of the regions of the Community included a regional
assessment which showed the need for the Community's Mediterranean
regions to adapt to the new situation that will be created by enlargement,
especially as far as agriculture is concerned.
·
The report also provides an analysis of the regional effects of the common
agricultural policy and a brief analysis of the regional impact of new
information technologies. In the light of the latter analysis, the
Commission has announced that, within the framework of the reorganized
ERDF, a Community programme will be drawn up to develop advanced
telecommunications in the disadvantaged regions.
The Commission is also working on a strategy to exploit the potential of
new energy resources of the disadvantaged regions which have a high level
of energy dependence.
Other studies in progress or completed relate to the regional impact of
industrial decline in the Community and of the Community's external trade
policy.
1.1.2
Coordinatinq Member States' regional policies
4.
Reducing disparities between the regions requires, amongst other
things, the coordination of Member States' regional policies, notably
through their regional development programmes. These
se~ve
as the
reference framework for ERDF assistance and as basic instruments for
coordination. On 19 June the Commission delivered an opinion on the
second generation regional development programmes (covering the period
1981-85), and stated its intention of conducting with each Member State an
annual examination of projects and programmes that could be cofinanced by
the Community in line with the priorities drawn up in the framework of the
regional development programmes·. The importance of such regional policy
coordination has been further underscored by the inclusion of a section on
coordination in the new ERDF Regulation.
5. The Regional Policy Committee, which is the key forum for regional
policy coordination, held four meetings in 1984. The Committee advised the
Commission during the preparation of the second periodic report on the
social and economic situation and development of the regions and itself
adopted a statement on the report; it examined the regional development
programmes for France and Italy (Friuli-Venezia Giulia), and discussed
the links between the Community's competition policy and national
regional aid policies. It also delivered 131 opinions on major
infrastructure projects prior to their examination by the ERDF Committee.
It elected a new chairman, Mr. S. Miedema, and a new vice-chairman, Mrs.
Andreasen.
1.1.3
Providing financial assistance in the regions
6. The Community's most tangible contribution to regional policy is of
course the financial assistance it provides, in the form of loans or
grants.
Apart from the ERDF, a very large proportion of assistance from the
European Social Fund goes to projects located in regions eligible for
Regional Fund Assistance.
Most (57%) of European Investment Bank loans go to investment projects
situated in less-developed areas or areas with serious problems of
industrial decline. Such regions also receive the bulk of ECSC social aid
and industrial conversion loans. In 1984 the Commission made available 13
2
ERDF
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0013.png
million ECU in interest subsidies on ECSC loans previously granted and
decided to grant new loans totalling 293 million ECU, with provision for
50
million ECU in interest subsidies. These operations involve a total of
19 000 jobs. Continuing its activities to promote industrial conversion,
the Commission provided assistance in 1984 to facilitate the setting up
and extension of business and innovation centres that will provide a full
range of services for new and innovatory firms. Drawing on the pilot
projects launched in 1983, notably in Liege, the Commission helped to set
up eight new centres in industrial conversion regions in 1984 and was
instrumental in the establishment of a European association of some 40
centres.
Regional assistance is also provided through the Guidance Section of the
EAGGF, loans granted under the New Community Instrument (NCI) and the
exceptional Community measure to promote urban renewal in Northern
Ireland.
7.
So as to achieve greater cohesion between Community and national
financial assistance, the Commission has for some time been trying out an
integrated development approach. The aim is, through constant dialogue
between the local, regional, national and Community authorities, to
concentrate and coordinate available financial resources within a given
area so as to increase their effectiveness .. For this purpose, two
integrated operations are currently being tried out in Belfast and Naples.
A number of others are being prepared, pointing to wider use of this
approach in the years ahead.
8.
In 1983 the Commission proposed the introduction of integrated
Mediterranean programmes to deal with the problems which enlargement of
the Conlmunity to include Spain and Portugal would create for certain
regions in Italy, southern France and Greece. On 6 September 1984, in the
light of the opinions delivered by Parliament and the Economic and Social
Committee, the Commission amended its proposal for a Regulation
instituting the integrated Mediterranean programmes.
,,,
On 27 March 1984, the European Council meeting in Brussels reached the
following conclusions, confirmed by the Fountainebleau European Council,
on this question:
"An
attempt will be made to coordinate the activities of
the various Funds, for example in the form of integrated programmes. With
this in mind, integrated Mediterranean programmes will be launched in
favour of the southern regions of the present Community so as to be
operational in 1985. Designed to be of limited duration such programmes
will have as their aim improvement of the economic structures of those
regions to enable them to adjust under the best conditions possible to the
new situation created by enlargement. They will also cover problems raised
in the Greek Memorandum. The financial resources allocated to aid from the
Funds, having regard to the IMPs, will be significantly increased in real
terms within the limits of financing possibilities".
In view of this agreement, the Council resumed its examination of the
Regulation in September, on the basis of the Commission's amended
proposal. Its findings were discussed by the European Council in Dublin
in December 1984.
Pending adoption of the Integrated Mediterranean programmes, the
Commission adopted a number of decisions in December 1984 continuing the
pilot projects in preparation for the programmes.
9. As regards specific Community regional development measures under the
ERDF, 1984 was an important year with the Council adopting in January six
Regulations to back up existing measures and introduce one new measure. In
December the Commission adopted four new proposals for Regulations to
supplement this second series of measures.
10.
The new ERDF Regulation, adopted by the Council on 19 June, enters
into force on 1 January 1985. Accordingly, as last year, the Commission
had no legal basis for the national quotas, since Article 2 paragraph 3 of
Chapter I : Introduction
3
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0014.png
the revised 1975 Regulation, which laid down the quotas, was no longer in
force. Acting in its capacity as manager of the Fund, the Commission
therefore committed the appropriations available according to the
applications submitted by the Member States, accepted after thorough
examination. It was guided by the scheme of allocation provisionally
authorized by the Council for 1981, and also took account of the future
impact of implementation of Article
45
of the new ERDF Regulation. ERDF
assistance was concentrated mainly on those regions whose per capita
GDP
is below the Community average.
4
ERDF
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0015.png
2.0
CHAPTER II : AFTER THE FIRST DECADE OF ERDF
OPERATIONS·, A NEW ERA BEGINS
2.1
REVIEW OF THE FIRST TEN YEARS (1975-1984)
With the entry into force of the new ERDF Regulation on 1 January 1985,
the year 1984 marks the end of the first decade of ERDF operations. Those
operations are briefly reviewed below.
2.1.1
Increased resources
11.
Since 1975, the ERDF has helped to finance almost 26 000 investment
projects, of which 19 000 have been infrastructure projects and 6 500
industrial projects. The total number of projects financed in 1984 was
4 400, an increase of 700 on the previous year. The average ERDF grant
per project was 450 000 ECU.
Total grant made stands at more than 11 700 million ECU for the period
1975-84 (current prices), equivalent to 14% of the cost of the investment
projects assisted (more than 80 000 million ECU).
12.
In 1984, the Fund's budget allocation of commitment appropriations
was 2 140 million ECU or 7.3% of the Community budget. Part of the 115
million ECU allocated to specific Community measures was transferred at
the end of the year to be used for support measures.
In nominal terms, the Fund's allocation in 1984 was 6. 5% up on the
previous year. With inflation at 5.6%
4
there was a very slight growth in
real terms in the Fund's resources (0.9%).
Table 1 shows just how much the resources available to the ERDF have
grown, its budget allocation having increased more than eightfold ever ten
years.
The total allocation of payment appropriations was fixed at 1 413 million
ECU for 1984, of which 100 million ECU was for specific Community
measures. The total allocation was 12% up on 1983.
4
GDP deflator. Commission departments. Economic forecasts 1984-1985
(January-February 1985)
Chapter II : After the first decade of ERDF operations, a new era
begins
5
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0016.png
TABLE ·1
ERDF ALLOCATIONS 1975-1984
TOTAL FUNDS
(Mio ECU)
Commitment appropriations
Year
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
Support
measures
Specific
measures
TOTAL
257 .6*
394.3*
378.5*
581.0
945.0
165.0
540.0
759.5
010.0
140.0
Annual
increase (%)
Share in
Community
budget (%)
4.8
5.6
4.9
4.6
6.1
6.7
7.3
7.6
7.6
7.3
-
-
-
-
900.0
1
1
1
1
2
106.8
463.0
669.0
909.5
025.0
-
-
-
45.0
58.2
77.0
90.5
100.5
115.0
1
1
1
-
2
2
66.6
0.0
53.5
62.7
23.3
32.2
14.3
14.2
6.5
-
*
1975: 300 million u.a., 1976: 500 million u.a.
1977: 500 million u.a., converted into ECU at the January 1978 rate.
2 .1.2
Analysis
of
grants by country
The analysis of total ERDF grants in the Community over the last ten
years shows a very high concentration in five Member States (Italy, the
United Kingdom, France, Greece and Ireland), which between them received
more than nine tenths of Fund assistance in those ten years. Italy
received the largest share (37.7%), with more than 4 400 million ECU. Next
came the United Kingdom, with more than 2 800 million ECU (24.1%). These
percentages are calculated from the complete figures given in Table 2 and
illustrated
in
Map 1.
This ranking, based on absolute amounts of assistance, does not take
account of population differences between the ten Member States. A
different method of calculation is to relate total Fund grants to the
population in the areas eligible for Fund aid
in
each Member State.
Ireland then heads the list with 207 ECU per inhabitant, followed closely
by Italy (190 ECU), Greece
5
(171 ECU), Denmark (165 ECU) and the United
Kingdom (133 ECU). The second group, made up of France (73 ECU), the
Netherlands (66 ECU), Luxembourg (33 ECU), Belgium (33 ECU) and the
Federal Republic of Germany (24 ECU) received well below the Community
average of 109 ECU per inhabitant. This method of calculation brings out
more clearly the level of intensity of Community assistance in certain
countries.
13.
14.
15.
As regards the use of ERDF grants by Member States, progress has been
achieved in getting Fund resources shown separately in national budgets.
Such budgetary transparency makes it easier to apply the principle of
additionality. The particularly complex character of additionality must
be borne in mind.
s
Greece did not become a member of the Community until 1981.
Calculating the period 1981-1984, Greece heads the list with 171 ECU
per inhabitant ahead of Ireland (142 ECU).
ERDF
6
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0017.png
Determining whether,
in
the various Member States, ERDF resources are in
fact combined with national financial resources, supplementing the total
budget allocations for regional development, would require an assessment
to be made of what the situation would have been without the ERDF
resources. The qualitative as well as the quantitative aspects of
additionality must also be taken into account, i.e. the knock-on effects
of ERDF assistance and the lead which it gives. That being said, however,
it may cautiously be affirmed that general additionality applied in·all
the Member States. Even with strictly limited budgetary resources, the
level of support for productive and infrastructure investment seems to be
holding steady, and indeed actually rising, which can only imply that ERDF
resources are complementing national resources.
2.1 .3
Marked geographical concentration in the less-favoured regions
In order for the Fund to have a significant impact on the economic
development of the regions, the overall effect of interventions, that is
geographical concentration, is one of its ·explicit aims. Since 1975, the
ten most -aided regions, which account for 13% of the Community's
population, have received more than half of ERDF assistance. More
broadly, two thirds-of ERDF assistance goes to 20% of the regions.
17.
The regions with priority status for Community regional policy
purposes, i.e. the Mezzogiorno, Greenland, Ireland, Northern Ireland, the
French Overseas Departments and Greece (except for Athens), have received
more that 57% of ERDF assistance since 1975 (see Taple 3). In per capita
terms, Greenland is by far the largest beneficiary with· ·1 960 ECU per
person, followed by French Guiana with 581 ECU per person. These large
amounts are mainly due to the low population figures in these regions,
both of which have fewer than 100 000 inhabitants. Most of the priority
regions have as a rule received between 150 and 500 ECU per resident in an
ERDF-assisted area.
16.
TABLE 2
TOTAL EROF GRANTS IN 1984 AND FROM 1975 TO 1964
TOTAL FUNDS
( Mio ECU)
Member
State
Support
measures
33., 8
24.6D
109.34
261.47
267.66
159. 12
605.38
'-1.73
35.59
619.84
2 320.9'-1
1984
Specific
measures
ERDF
total
33. 18
24.60
110. 24
268.20
277.63
163.27
823.06
'-1.73
35.82
6'-10.98
2 381.93
Support
measures
, 1'-1.'-11
131.86
5'-1'-1.79
091.70
683.51
713.4'-1
368.73
11.97
156. 18
782.01
1975-198'-1
Specific
measures
1981-198'-1
0.98
6.73
38.38
11.72
38.85
0.23
'-12,36
1'-10. 15
ERDF
total
115. 39
131.86
5'-15.69
096.'-13
721.89
725.16
'-107.58
11.97
156.'-11
82'-1.37
B
OK
D
GR
F
IRL
I
UK
l
Nl
6.73
10.15
'-1. 15
17.68
0.23
21. 1'-1
60.99
-
0.90
-
-
1
1
4
2
-
0.90
-
1
1
'-1
2
EUR 10
11 598.63
11 738.78
Chapter II
begins
After the first decade of ERDF operations, a new era
7
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0018.png
MAP 1
REGIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF ERDF GRANTS FROM 1975 TO 1984,
LEVEL III REGIONS (MIO ECU)
0.0
1.5
<
X
=<
<
X
=<
<
X
=<
1.5
5.8
5.8
21.0
21.0
<
X
=<
659.2.
§
§
.
II'
.
,
.
••
"
.4
,
ill
~Ea
ERDF
8
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0019.png
2 .1.4
Nearly
9
500 million ECU went to infrastructure projects
18.
Since the Fund was set up, four fifths of assistance has been
allocated to infrastructure projects. The Federal Republic of Germany is
the only one of the ten Member States to have used more than half of its
allocation to assist projects in industry, while Ireland, Belgium and the
United Kingdom are not far from the 30% of grant aid to be allocated to
industrial investment projects pursuant to Article 4.1. b of the revised
1975 Regulation. The other Member States, particularly Greece and Italy,
have given priority to infrastructure projects. The year 1984 has seen a
slight upturn in industrial investment projects assisted by the ERDF,
since they accounted for 14% of grants, compared with 10.9% the previous
year.
19.
Once again transport infrastructure - in particular roads and highway
structures - received most from the ERDF: more than 3 300 million ECU,
equivalent to more than a third of grants to infrastructure projects.
Water engineering projects took second place with a quarter of grants,
followed by energy projects (17%). The marked shift towards this latter
category of infrastructure project, which began in 1983, did not continue
in 1984.
TABLE 3
GRANTS TO PRIORITY REGIONS IN 1984 AND FROM .1975 TO 1984
ERDF, SUPPORT NEASURES
Priority
regions
Amount
(Hio ECU)
~lezzogiorno
1984
Assistance
per capita
(ECU)
35
41
46
22
36
270
37
22
1975 to 1984
Amount
(Mio ECU)
4013.49
1091.70
713.44
296.66
327.29
99.98
Assistance
per capita
(ECU)
197
171
207
190
263
1960
198
109
*
*
.Ell as
Ireland
Northern Ireland
D.O.H.
Gr¢nland
Total
EUR 10
723.81
261.47
159.12
34.66
44.64
13.77
1237.47
2320.94
-
6542.56
11598.63
*
Assistance per capita, calculated on the basis of the population
of the ERDF-assisted areas
2 .1.5 An estimated 640 000 jobs directly created or maintained in the
productive sector since 1975
20.
Grants for projects in industry, craft .industry and services
accounted for 14% of ERDF appropriations, whilst the regulation provided
for a 30% minimum. These investments helped to create or maintain almost
69 000 jobs in 1984, according to the estimates provided by Member States.
This brings to almost 640 000 the estimated number of jobs created or
maintained since 1975 with the joint help of the ERDF and the national
authorities. Jobs created account for 85% of this total. The figures on
jobs created or maintained in each Member State are set out in Table 4.
Chapter II
begins
After the first decade of ERDF operations, a new era
9
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0020.png
TABLE 4
FORECASTS OF JOBS CREATED OR MAINTAINED
IN 1984 AND FROM 1975 TO 1984
ERDF, SUPPORT MEASURES
Member
State
B
DK
D
GR
F
IRL
I
1
1984
created
410
.1 010
10 880
930
14 640
9 470
6 700
main-
tained
Total
created
6
5
80
6
172
67
80
550
670
080
410
990
700
010
1975-1984
main-
tained
100
140
15 870
70
16 340
770
1 620
Total
6
5
95
6
189
68
81
650
810
950
480
330
470
630
-
-
-
3 750
730
320
NL
UK
250
11
240
-
8 620
13 420
-
-
-
410
1 010
14 630
930
15 370
9 790
6 700
250
19 860
68 950
-
1 080
121 030
-
680
61 210
-
1 760
182 240
-
EUR
.____
10
____
55
530
541 520
96 800
638 320
It should be added, however, that investment projects in the productive
sector, by the very activity they generate, indirectly create jobs around
them. It is estimated that for every job directly created a further job is
indirectly created.
During the period 1975-1984, average CommUnity assistance per job
amounted to 3 200 ECU, with approximately 100 jobs planned per project.
With nearly 365 000 jobs assisted, the metalworking and precision
engineering industries come easily top of the list of economic sectors
financed by the ERDF. The electrical and electronic industries expanded
its share further in 1984, receiving 71 million ECU (double the previous
year's figure) for more than 14 000 jobs planned.
All of these figures should not blind us to the fact that it is frequently
very difficult to make job creation forecasts. For cyclical reasons, there
is some delay before certain investment projects really create jobs. A
particularly telling example "is that of a German firm in the Saarland,
which received ERDF assistance after initially forecasting that 490 jobs
would be· created. When the Court of Auditors carried out a check in 1983,
the firm had created only approximately half the jobs planned. Between
then and the beginning of 1985, however, the firm increased the number of
jobs created to 613 thereby filling the jobs cofinanced by the ERDF. All
in all, the firm in question created 123 jobs more than originally
forecast. This example shows how dangerous it is draw hasty conclusions
concerning jobs created.
Furthermore, the number of jobs announced by Member States in connection
with industrial investment projects does not take into account those
created indirectly by the investment: construction of a new factory,
installation of new production lines, etc.
2 .1.6
Infrastructure projects also create jobs
21.
Many jobs are also created directly and indirectly as infrastructure
projects are carried out. First of all, these projects entail a large
ERDF
10
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0021.png
volume of work, particularly in the building and public works sector.
According to some estimates, the activity generated by the infrastructure
investment projects assisted by the ERDF since it was set up was
sufficient to employ a million persons for a year in the building and
public works sector.
Secondly, as in the case of industrial investment projects, jobs have to
be created to operate the infrastructure facilities. Such is the case with
ports, airports, power stations, research centres, etc. , which need a
permanent and technically skilled staff.
Furthermore, as the second periodic report on the social and economic
situation in the regions clearly shows, infrastructure is a necessary
pre-condition for the growth and development of industrial, craft and
service activities.
It should also be emphasized that, as in the case of productive
activities, certain infrastructure projects generate indirectly a
substantial volume of employment.
2 .1.7
One htmdred studies financed
22.
Under Article 12 of the revised 1975 Fund Regulation, Hember States
may undertake studies related to ERDF operations and obtain a financial
contribution of up to half their cost. Following an initial experimental
phase which began in 1980, the year 1984 saw a further increase in this
type of measure. Decisions were taken in respect of 43 studies, bringing
to 100 the total number of studies financed by the ERDF since it was set
up.
By providing grants for these studies, the Commission should be able to
participate in the financing of a number of investment projects from the
planning stage and play a more active role in their implementation.
These aims are also consistent with the views expressed by the European
Parliament and the Economic and Social Committee regarding the use of the
ERDF for promoting and searching out new initiatives.
2 .1.8
A more active year for specific Commtmity measures
23.
Since 1979, 95% of the Fund's resources have, in accordance with the
revised 1975 Regulation, been earmarked for Community action in support of
regional policy measures taken by the Member States. The remaining 5% is
allocated to specific Community regional development measures. In fact,
the appropriations committed for such measures up to 1984 represented only
1.2% of the Fund's appropriations, so that the analysis given above covers
virtually the whole (98.8%) of the Fund's resources.
24.
As far as the first series of specific Community measures is
concerned, out of a total of 216 million ECU available for a five-year
period, 54% of the appropriations had been committed by the end of 1984.
The pace of implementation of the measures therefore accelerated in 1984,
since 38 million ECU were committed, compared with 6 million ECU in 1983.
A total of 23 million ECU was committed in 1984 in respect of the second
series of specific Community measures adopted in January 1984.
Notwithstanding the year 1984 saw a slight increase in these measures
since a total of 61 million ECU was committed, in addition to the
79 million ECU committed over the three previous years, the overall result
is still not adequate.
Chapter II
begins
After the first decade of ERDF operations, a new era
11
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0022.png
2 .1.9
Financial management
of
the ERDF: maximwn use
of
resources
25.
The unused appropriations from the specific Community measures
section were transferred to the support measures·. The rate of utilization
of appropriations available was very high in
1984,
with
99%
of resources
having been committed. Furthermore, the remaining balance of 5 million ECU
is the cumulative balance since the ERDF's inception and represents less
than
0.04%
commitments made during those ten years.
Taking the first decade of ERDF activity as a whole, the total amount of
payments exceeded
6 400
million ECU, equivalent to
55.2%
of the
commitments during that period. Excluding the commitments entered into in
December
1984,
in respect of which payments could not yet have been made,
this rate is in reality
64%.
2.2
REFORM OF COMMUNITY REGIONAL POLICY
2.2 .1
A new ERDF from 1985
26.
The Council, having reached an overall compromise agreement in May
1984,
adopted the Regulation reforming the European Regional Development
Fund on
19
June
1984,
following a conciliation meeting between the Council
and Parliament attended by the Commission. The Regulation adopted was
based on the Commission's proposals of
21
October
1981
and
18
November
1983.
The Regulation, which contains the principles of the
into force on
1
January
1985.
By drawing three years
close in this way, the Council discharged one of
assigned to it by the Stuttgart European Council with
the efficiency of the Community's structural Funds.
1983
proposal, came
of negotiation to a
the important tasks
the aim of improving
27.
At the close of a thorough discussion, the three institutions noted
that the conciliation procedure had been satisfactorily concluded and
agreed on the following joint declaration:
"The Council, the Commission and the European Parliament, noting the
emphasis on the Community nature of the new Regional Fund, consider that
appraisal and implementation of the principles contained in the new
Regulation must be the subject of an exchange of views at least once a
year.
The Council, the Commission and the European Parliament consider that the
operations of the Fund will give priority to the elimination of regional
imbalances. They will take maximum account of the regional implications of
the other Community policies in their deliberations on these policies.
Data on employment, and especially the employment of women and young
people, are fundamental factors in assistance from the Fund, as from other
Community instruments.
The three institutions agree on the advantages, with due regard for the
internal competence of the Member States and the provisions of Community
law, of more efficient relations between the Commission of the Communities
and regional or, where applicable, local authorities·. 'fP,is will enable
regional interests to be better taken into account when regional
development programmes and assistance programmes are drawn up.
ERDF aid will, in general, be an additional overall source of finance for
the development of beneficiary regions or areas.
12
ERDF
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0023.png
The European Parliament, the Council and the Commission agree that in any
event those points which were the subject of amendments by the European
Parliament and which were not adopted by the Council will be discussed in
detail in the future and in any event when the Fund Regulation is
subsequently reviewed."
28.
The new ERDF Regulation contains substantial improvements on the
revised 1975 Regu1Rtion
6 •
It provides the Commission with the means to
develop a propex rtrategy of assistance and ties ERDF grants more closely
to Community objectives.
2.2 .2
·
Content of the Regulation
IMPROVED COORDINATION
·
29.
In order to contribute to the achievement of a higher degree of
convergence of the economies of Member States and to ensure a more
balanced distribution of economic activities within the territory of the
Community, the Regulation provides, in its first two Articles, that
Community policies are to be coordinated with each other and that
Community regional policy guidelines and priorities are to be coordinated
with.national regional policies.
in' order to accomplish these tasks, the Commission - which is also
responsible for coordinating the generai systems of regional aids - will
use the following instruments:
• the periodic report on the situation and socio-economic changes in the
regions of the Community, which the Commission will prepare at
two-and-a-half-year intervals;
0
regional development programmes, communicated .to the Commission by the
Member States, and the reports on their implementation;
• the analysis by the Commission of the regional impact of Community
economic and sectoral policies;
0
operations of
instruments.
the
ERDF
and
of
the
Community's
other
financial
THE MECHANISM FOR DISTRIBUTING THE ERDF'S.RESOURCES
30.
5).
The ERDF's resources will be used by reference to ranges which set
the lower and upper limits of the assistance for which each Member State
is eligible, these limits applying for periods of three years (see Table
Allocation of resources will -depend on the implementation of the
priorities and criteria laid down in the Regulat'ion. Provided that the
Member· State submits an adequate volume of applications for aid which
satisfy the conditions stipulated, it is guaranteed to receive the amount
corresponding to the lower limit of the range during the three-year
period. The system of ranges ensures greater flexibility in the management
of the Fund.
6
O.J. L
73, 21.3.1975;
O.J. L
349, 23.12.1980.
Chapter II : After the first decade of ERDF operations, a new era
begins
13
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0024.png
TABLE 5
RANGES FOR ERDF ASSISTANCE
ERDF, SUPPORT MEASURES
(in
%)
Member State
B
Lower limit
0.90
0.51
3. 76
12.35
11.05
5.64
31.94
0.06
1. 00
21.42
Upper limit
1.20
0.67
4.81
15.74
14.74
6.83
42.59
0.08
1.34
28.56
DK
D
GR
F
IRL
I
L
NL
UK
THE CRITERIA FOR ALLOCATING ERDF RESOURCES
31.
The Commission will decide whether measures are eligible for ERDF
assistance on the basis of, among others, the following criteria:
• the relative severity of the economic imbalance affecting the areas or
regions where the measures are carried out;
• the measures' contribution
objectives and priorities;
to
the
attainment
of
the Community's
• the measures' contribution to the development of the areas or regions
concerned, their direct and indirect effect on employment and the
mobilization of the indigenous potential of the regions concerned;
• consistency with the regional development programmes;
• the integrated use of the ERDF and other financial instruments for
structural purposes.
Furthermore, when administering the ERDF, . the Commission will. give
priority to assistance to industry and the crafts and services sectors,
primarily to small and medium-sized enterprises, to measures in national
priority areas and to measures which fall within Community programmes or
integrated programmes or operations. However, the application of these
criteria will depend, to a certain extent, on the applications submitted
by Member States.
PROGRAMME FINANCING
32.
An increasing part of the ERDF' s allocation will be used to cofinance
programmes, in the form of:
• Community programmes, undertaken on the initiative of the Commission
and drawn up by the Member State concerned in consultation with the
Commission, on the basis of a framework which the Council will adopt by
a qualified majority (hitherto Regulations introducing specific
Community measures have been adopted by the Council acting
unanimously);
• national programmes of Community interest, undertaken on the initiative
of Member States and jointly agreed by the Member State and the
Commission.
ERDF
14
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0025.png
Unlike the national programmes, the Community programmes may, where
appropriate, relate to areas other than the assisted areas designated by
Member States for the purposes of their regional aid systems. A programme
which has become the subject of an agreement between the Commission and
the Member State or States concerned and has been adopted by the
Commission after consultation of the ERDF Committee constitutes a
programme agreement. The Commission will make potential beneficiaries of
these programmes aware of the opportunities open to them.
MEASURES TO EXPLOIT
THE
POTENTIAL FOR INTERNALLY GENERATED DEVELOPMENT
OF REGIONS
33.
In order to promote the development of small and medium-sized
undertakings in industry, craft industries and tourism, the ERDF will
contribute to ·the financing of consistent sets of measures (of the sort
already provided for by some of the Regulations introducing specific
Community measures) whose aim is to provide these undertakings with
facilities enabling them to expand their activities and to obtain access
to new technology, and to facilitate their access to the capital market.
FINANCING OF INDIVIDUAL PROJECTS
34.
The ERDF will continue to contribute to the financing of two types of
individual investment projects:
• in industry, the crafts or services sectors,
• in infrastructure,
costing more than 50 000 ECU, the projects to be located in assisted areas
as designated by Member States for the purposes of their regional aid
systems.
Bearing in mind the differences which exist between regions whose
development is lagging and those faced with problems relating to
industrial conversion, the requirement to apply a minimum of
30%
of ERDF
" resources to projects in industry, craft industry and servicf,s could not
be attained and became instead, an objective to be considered. This fact
however may be compensated by appropriate use of new possibilities offered
by the co-financing of aid schemes, interventions relating to indigenous
potential and the integrated approach.
Unlike the old Regulation, the new one lists the categories of
infrastructure which are not eligible for ERDF assistance (the negative
list).
RATE OF ASSISTANCE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES
35.
The ERDF's contribution will as a rule be
50%
of public expenditure,
but may rise to 55% in the case of projects of particular importance. to
the development of the regions in which they are located and in the case
of Community programmes and measures to exploit the potential for
internally generated development of regions. This.new rate is well above
the rates laid down by the Regulation now in force.
In order to accelerate payments, the new Regulation provides the
possibility
of
making advance payments within the limits of budget
availabilities and according to the progress made with the operations.
THE FINANCING OF STUDIES AND ACTIVITIES PREPARATORY TO ERDF ASSISTANCE
36.
While still helping to finance studies closely related to its
operations, the ERDF may contribute to public expenditure on the planning,
technical preparation and implementation of operations which are the
subject of grant applications by the Member States; this was not possible
under the old Regulation.
Chapter II : After the first decade of ERDF operations, a new era
begins
15
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0026.png
INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT OPERATIONS
37.
The new Regulation makes provision for an integrated development
approach; this marks a first step towards the establishment of a legal
framework for integrated operations. Such integrated operations can be an
effective instrument both in improving the coordination of the
Community's Funds and in introducing closer cooperation between the
Commission and the national and local authorities of the Member States.
16
ERDF
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0027.png
3 .0
CHAPTER Ill : COMMUNITY ACTION IN SUPPORT OF REGIONAL
POLICY MEASURES BY THE MEMBER STATES
38.
Before receiving a gran'. from the support measures section of the
ERDF, a project must pass through several stages. The application is
submitted by the Member State in question; it is then examined by the
Commission departments and referred to all the Member States for their
opinion and, in some cases, to the ERDF Committee before being approved
and finally published. The appropriations are then committed, and later
paid; in some cases, projects are inspected. This Chapter provides an
account of all the stages. It also describes in detail.the wide range of
assistance provided by the support measures section of the ERDF.
3.1
SUBMISSION OF APPLICATIONS
3 .1.1
Grant applications for just under
6
000 projects
39.
In 1984, the Member States submitted to the Commission grant
applications
concerning 5 906
investment projects and studies.
Altogether, these projects (broken down by Member State in Tables 23 and
24 in the Annex) were the subject of applications for assistance totalling
2 937 million ECU, an appreciable increase over 1983.
The breakdown by project category is as follows:
• infrastructure:
2 539.4 million ECU of aid requested for 4 737
projects;
• industry, craft industry and services:
381.9 million ECU of aid
requested for 1 128 projects;
• studies (Article 12): 15.5 million ECU of aid requested for 41 projects.
40.
Again in 1984, most grant applications were submitted towards the
middle of the year. This concentration on a brief period preceding the
last meeting of the ERDF Committee resulted in over 70% of grants being
decided and committed at the end of the year.
There are therefore two main stages in the work of the Commission
departments:
a first stage stretching from the last quarter of the previous year to the
first quarter of the current year is devoted primarily to contacts with
the Member States to prepare applications and obtain an overall view of
the projects that might receive grants over the year;
a second stage taking in the second and third quarters of the current year
is, in practice, given over to examining most of the applications. This
examination focuses on the various aspects of each application and,
consequently, the Directorate-General for Regional Policy consults the
other Commission departments concerned (competition, economic and
financial affairs, transport, environment, energy and sectoral policies:
agriculture, fisheries and industry).
41.
In the interest of making a better selection of projects, the
Commission has for several years asked Member States to submit
Chapter III : Community action in support of regional policy
measures by the Member States
17
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0028.png
applications for grants totalling more than the budget funds available for
the year.
42.
In selecting projects, the
Commissio~ dA~artments
based themselves
on-the work carried out and broad lines of policy drawn up since the
establishment of the ERDF concerning grant criteria, and the relevant case
law. For exampie, guidelines exist on the scope for assisting
socio-cultural or tourist investments, on the eligibility of certain
industrial
projects
depending on their purpose
(restructuring,
conversion, replacement, etc.), on the advisability of providing finance
for advance factories and on the rates of grant to be applied to them.
There are also rules for differentiating the level of aid according to the
type of region, the. category and nature of the project and its importance
for the region concerned.
In 1984, the Commission departments drew up guidelines for granting aid to
general educational projects involving technical and vocational training
(e.g. intermediate vocational schools
LEPs - in France) and for
examining industrial projects, the aim being to make vetting procedures
for sensitive
indu~tries
more consistent and more transparent. Lastly, on
adoption of the new ERDF Regulation, the Commission, in preparation for
its implementation in 1985, began studying more sophisticated methods for
vetting applications, focusing on their merits as projects serving the
Community s interest.
3 .I .2 Project selection
43.
Of the 5 906 investment projects and studies submitted by the Member
States in 1984, 3 697, or just over 60%, were finally accepted on
completion of the examination procedure.
A
total of. 397 projects were not received in time for them to be examined
before the end of the year. They can therefore be held over to 1985
provided the national authorities decide to resubmit them under the new
ERDF Regulation, in force since 1 January 1985.
44.
Of the 5 509 projects examined, 1 812 (one third) were not accepted
by the Commission for the following reasons:
• 57 projects were withdrawn by Member States during the processing
procedure.
• 171 projects either failed to fulfil the formal conditions laid down by
the Fund Regulation (location in an assisted area, minimum of ten jobs
to be created, investment to cost more than 50 000 ECU, project not to
be completed by the date on which . the Commission receives the grant
application) or did not respect certain Community procedures, e.g. with
regard to public tendering;
• 187 projects were rejected either because they made no clear
contribution to the development of the region in question and were not
part of a regional development programme, or because the national aid
schemes from which they benefited were incompatible with the
Community's competition rules or because the nature of the investment
did not conform to the Commission's guidelines;
• 29 projects were rejected because they related to sensitive industries
(e.g. where there are risks of structural overcapacity);
• 1 211 projects were not fully
docum~nted
and the Commission requested
further 'information; when the dossiers are complete, some of these
projects may receive ERDF assistance in 1985;
• 157 projects were not accepted because the processing procedure had not
been completed by the end of the year.
In all, 3 697 projects were finally accepted in 1984. To this total must
be added 939 projects submitted in previous
year~
(including 816 in 1983)
18
ERDF
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0029.png
which were not examined until 1984. This gives a grant total of 4 636
projects accepted.
45.
Table 6 prpvides a breakdown by Member State of the number of
investment projects and studies examined, accepted or deferred.
Most of the projects not accepted were situated
in
Italy
(1
095) and
France (399), and almost all of them were small-scale infrastructure
projects.
TABLE
6
· OUTCOME OF EXAMINATION OF PROJECTS IN 1984
ERDF, SUPPORT MEASURES
(number of projects)
Member
State
Submitted
(1)
1984
Examined
(2)
121
143
291
206
1 053
152
2 117
17
28
1 381
5 509
Accepted
(3)
109
142
224
198
654
140
1 022
17
27
1 164
3 697
Accepted in
84, held over
from previous
years
(4)
42
25
63
127
109
Total
accepted
(3+4)
151
167
287
325
763
140
1 542
17
27
l.c217
B
DK
D
GR
F
IRL
I
L
NL
UK
185
143
348
209
1 129
155
2 292
17
520
28
1 400
5 906
53
939
-
-
-
EUR 10
4
636
3.2
CONSULTATION OF THE ERDF COMMITTEE
46.
For
all
large projects costing 10 million ECU or more, draft
decisions are referred to the Fund Committee,, for its
op~n~on,
in
accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 16 of the revised 1975
ERDF Regulation
7 .
.
In.the case of small-scale projects costing less than 10 million ECU which
are the subject of a global grant application, the Commission provides
prior information for the Member States in the form of simplified lists.
The only small-scale projects referred to the Fund Committee are those on
which the Commission or a Member State wishes the Committee to be
consulted
8 •
Draft negative decisions are automatically referred to the Committee.
Draft decisions.concerning the joint financing of studies (Article 12) are
not submitted to the Committee for an opinion.
7
8
For infrastructure investments in this category, the Commission,
before seeking the opinion of the Fund Committee, consults the
Regional Policy Committee (see Article
5,
paragraph 2a of the revised
1975 ERDF Regulation).
·
Article 5, paragraph 2b of the revised 1975 ERDF.Regulation.
Chapter III : Community action in support of regional policy
measures by the Member States
19
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0030.png
47.
At its three meetings in April, June and November, the Committee was
consulted for an opinion on 829 investment projects out of .the 4 593
accepted on completion of the stages of the examination . procedure
described above.
The prior information procedure introduced in 1979 greatly simplified the
work of the Committee again in 1984; of the 4 393 projects costing less
than 10 million ECU, only 630 (14%) needed to be discussed at the meetings
for an opinion. The Committee also examined the 199 projects costing 10
million ECU or more. None of the projects referred to the Committee was
rejected or failed to be the subject of an opinion. However, it should be
pointed out that, on 23 investment projects, a number of delegations cast
a negative vote or abstained from voting, although this did not lead to
the Committee delivering a negative opinion. Examination of one project
was discontinued when it was withdrawn by the Hember State concerned. In
the end,
4
592 investment projects and 43 studies have thus been accepted
on completion of the annual examination procedure.
3
~3
NEARLY 4 400 PROJECTS
APPROVED
48.
To these
4 592
projects must be added
8
which had already been
endorsed by the Fund Committee in 1983 but which, for administrative
reasons, had had to wait until 1984 for a formal grant decision to be
taken. On the other hand, 250 of the projects accepted .under the annual
examination procedure could not be approved in 1984 because of inadequate
budget resources. In all, the Commission adopted in 1984 decisions
granting aid totalling 2 320.9 million ECU for
4
393 investment projects
and studies. The grant decisions were divided into three allocations
during the course of the year, except for those relating to studies, which
were adopted on a case-by-case basis.
49.
The
number
of
projects assisted was up by 19% compared with 1983. As
Table
7
shows, Italy, the United Kingdom, France and Greece accounted for
four fifths of the total. All the Member States except France registered
an increase, especially Belgium, the Netherlands, Denmark and Greece. The·
increase was due to the growth in the number of small-scale infrastructure
projects, combined with an advance in industrial projects.
TABLE 7
NUMBER OF PROJECTS BENEFITING FROM AID IN 1984
ERDF, SUPPORT MEASURES
Member
State
B
Industry, services
and crafts
13
36
228
18
302
75
189
Infrastructure
133
129
58
311
234
64
1 327
17
17
1
049
3 339
Studies
5
2
Total
151
167
287
330
538
139
1 521
17
27
1
216
4
393
DK
D
GR
F
IRL
I
L
1
1
NL
UK
10
140
1
011
-
-
-
-
27
5
2
EUR
10
43
20
ERDF
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0031.png
3A
CONCENTRATION OF AID IN
FIVE MEMBER
STATES
50. In 1984, aid totalled over 2 300 million ECU, i.e. 9.7% more than in
1983. This percentage increase, which exceeded the expansion· in the Fund's
budget allocation in 1984, was made possible by the growth in the volume
of resources available for commitment as a result of decommitments and
changes in the value of the EGU (see Table 11).
·The geographical concentration of aid continued to favour five countries,
Italy (34.7%), the United Kingdom (26.7%), France (11.5%), Greece (11.3%)
and Ireland (6, 9%). Together, these countries accounted for 91.1% of aid
(see Graph 1 a)). Greece and, to a lesser extent, France and Italy, which
had received a relatively large amount of aid in 1983 (16.8%, 13.5% and
38.7% respectively), saw their shares fall. By contrast, the proportion of
aid going to the United Kingdom and especially Ireland, which had received
21.7% ·and 4. 8% respectively in 1983, rose. The other beneficiaries of the
increase in aid over 1983 were Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands.
Table_s 8 and 28 provide analyses of aid granted.
·
Taking aid per inhabitant solely in the areas assisted by the ERDF in
1984, Ireland heads the list with 46 ECU per head, followed by Greece with
41 ECU and then Italy and Denmark with 35 ECU and 31 ECU respectively. The
full details are given in Table 21.
51.
Article 7 paragraph 5 of the revised 1975 Regulation gives priority
to large investment projects costing 10 million ECU or more. The tendency
noted in 1983 for Member States to submit small projects at the expense of
large-scale projects continued in 1984. There were 194 large projects
accounting for 48.3% of total aid, a fall of some 6 percentage points
compared with 1983. This fall was due solely to a sharp decline (8
percentage points) 'in aid to large infrastructure projects. For the first
time since 1979, over half of ERDF assistance went to small projects.
3.5
85% OF AID GOES TO INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS
52.
Infrastructure projects representing a total investment volume of
7 600 million ECU received just under 2 000 million ECU in 1984, i.e.
almost 85% of ERDF assistance, a fall of 4 percentage points compared with
1983 even though the volume of assistance rose.
The number of projects assisted (3 339) was sharply up (17%) on 1983.
Map 2 shows the regional distribution of assistance to infrastructure
projects in 1984.
Chapter III : Community action in support of regional policy
measures by the Member States
21
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0032.png
N
N
TABLE 6
AID GRANTED IN 1964
EROF, SUPPORT MEASURES
(Mio)
Member
State
Industry, services
and crafts
Nat. cur.
B
OK
0
1:1:1
Infrastructure
Nat. cur.
1 211.04
169.32
112.14
23.30*
1 562.46
78.76
1 016.50*
212.30
77.93
303.97
ECU
26.96
21.06
50.20
255.90
228.29
109.58
736.46
4. 73
30.92
505.55
1 969.65
Studies
Nat. cur.
70.00
0.08
0.00*
41.17
ECU
1. 56
0.68
0.04
0.03
6.02
Total
Nat. cur.
1 490.41
197.77
244.25
23.81*
1 832.07
114.36
1 111.63*
212.30
89.71
372.69
ECU
33. 18
24.60
109.34
261.47
267.68
159. 12
805.38
4.73
35.59
619.84
2 320.94
~ll>
t>jt:l
ECU
4.66
2.85
59.11
5.55
33.38
49.54
56.62
4.67
110. 70
327.08
~
GR
F
IRL
I
L
NL
UK
EUR 10
209.38
22.95
132.03
0.51*
228.44
35.61
76.15*
11.76
66.56
5.50
rl
~'='~
1-1
00
"tl
"tl
en§
1-3
c::
en
o;t
>
-
-
-
16.98*
-
-
2.16
-
12.30
3.56
24.21
-
-
> ....
Cll\D
Cll
~z
~~
-
- -
-
-
-
-
-
--
*Thousand millions
ECU rates at 1st December 1984: 1 ECU
=
44,91 BFR/LFR
=
8,041 OKR
=
2.234 OM
=
91,07 ORA= 6,844 FF
=
0,7188 IRL
~
1380 LIT= 2,520 HFL
=
0,6013 UKL.
--~~
------
-
--
~
----------
---
--~
----
~
1:1:1
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0033.png
GRAPH 1 (SUPPORT MEASURES)
AID GRANTED BY COUNTRY IN
1984:
OVERALL DISTRIBUTION IN
%
AND AMOUNTS GRANTED TO INFRASTRUCTURE
AND
INDUSTRY
a) Overall distribution in
%
0.:2%: LIJ><H1BOIJRG
1.
1%
Df:.i\!t~RK
1. 4X
BELGIE-BELGIQUE
1.
5X NElJERLAND
4. 7%
DEUTSCHLAND---.....,
b. B%
IRELAND
34. 7% ITALIA
2b. 7% UNITED KINGDOM
b) Aid to infrastructure
and
industry
a
tiVV-,·111o-···················································································································
w
e
INFRASTRUCT!JRE
!!!I
INDUSTRY
I
F
Gr
Irl
D
Nl
B
D~
ME~IBER
L
STATE
Chapter III : Community action in support of regional policy
measures by the Member States
23
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0034.png
3
.
5
.1
.53.
A lower average rate
of
contribution
The average ERDF contribution per infrastructure project amounted to
590 000 ECU; this was one third of public expenditure and one quarter of
the total investment costs.
This average contribution in relation to public expenditure (32.8%) was 2
percentage points down on the previous year. While the normal rates are
between 10% and 30% of public expenditure for large projects costing 10
million ECU, and 30% for small projects costing less than 10 million ECU,
the maximum may, pursuant to Article 4 paragraph 2 of the revised 1975
Fund Regulation, be as high as 40% for projects of particular importance
to the region. In 1984, this was the case with 681 projects located for
the most part in Italy, Greece and, to a lesser extent, France and
Denmark. Furthermore, 127 projects located almost exclusively in the
United Kingdom received aid at a rate of less than 30%, mainly because
they involved advance factories or workshops, for which the rate of ERDF
contribution is limited to 20%.
Once again, no assistance was given in the form of interest rebates on EIB
loans, a possibility open under Article 4 paragraph 2b of the revised 1975
ERDF Regulation.
3.5
.2 Proportion of aid going to small projects continues to grow
54.
At 980 million ECU and 990 million ECU respectively, the volume of
assistance to infrastructure investment in 1984 was divided almost evenly
between large projects (numbering 126 compared with 115 in 1983) and small
projects (numbering 3 213 compared with 2 741 in 1983). The share going to
large projects thus continued its downward trend (63% in 1982, 56% in 1983
and 50% in 1984), with small projects benefiting accordingly.
The average grant to large projects, after rising to 9.2 million ECU in
1983, declined to 7.8 million ECU this year, a figure lower than that
recorded in 1982. The average grant to small projects was 308 000 ECU,
much the same as in 1983.
Projects classified as located in mountain and hill-farming areas
(Article 4, paragraph lc of the revised 1975 Fund Regulation) accounted
for 1.4% of aid for infrastructure projects. Although very low, this share
was higher than in in 1983 {0.8%).
3
.
5 .
3 Transport regains the lead
55. Three sectors continued to absorb four fifths of the aid granted to
infrastructure projects - transport (47.9%), water engineering (17.7%)
and energy (15.8%). The basic pattern was thus identical to that in 1983,
although there was a distinctly smaller share for water engineering and a
much larger share for transport.
Compared with 1983, the share taken by energy, which dropped back to third
position, halved (34.3% in 1983) while transport more than doubled its
share to move into the lead (21. 9% in 1983). Water engineering, which
remained in second position saw its share fall by around 6 percentage
points compared with 1983.
24
ERDF
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0035.png
MAP 2
REGIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF ERDF ASSISTANCE
TO INFRASTRUCTURES PROJECTS IN 1984, LEVEL III REGIONS (MID ECU)
0.0
<
X
X
X
X
=<
=<
=<
1.0
2.7
§
'
1.0
<
2.7
<
8.0
8.0
<
=<
211.2
§
Chapter
III :
Community action in support of regional policy
measures by the Member States
25
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0036.png
Table 32
in
the Annex shows, for 1984, a detailed breakdown of.the number
of infrastructure projects, and of aid, between the various types of
infrastructure project, while Graph 2
a),
shows the assistance given to the
ten types of infrastructure receiving the most aid.
In the transport sector, roads and highway structures received
fifths of aid, easily outdistancing port improvements and
projects. In relation to infrastructure projects as a whole,
highway structures absorbed in 1984 close on half the aid
projects and nearly one third on the aid for small projects.
over four
railways
roads and
for large
The proportions of aid going to the water engineering and energy sectors
are broadly the same. In water engineering, the bulk of assistance (86%)
went to large and small water collection and distribution schemes and
especially to small drainage/treatment schemes. In the energy sector,
nine tenths of aid went primarily to gas-distribution projects and to
large electricity- distribution projects.
As for the other sectors, the proportion of aid allocated to
telecommunications was the same (8%) as in 1983. Virtually all the aid
went to small and large telephone and telex networks split equally between
the two. By contrast, in comparison with 1983, the proportion of aid
allocated to infrastructure projects connected with productive activities
(5.9%) fell by almost a half to much the same level as had been recorded in
1982. The main beneficiaries in this sector continued to be projects
providing services and utilities for industrial es.tates (71%), followed
by research centres (16%).
Small-scale improvement projects received half of the aid allocated to the
environment sector, which almost trebled its share (1.6%) compared with
1983
(0.
6%).
Infrastructure projects in the socio-cultural and leisure fields shared
the remainder of ERDF and more than doubled their share compared with 1983
(from 1.3% to 3.1%). Grants went primarily to projects in education and
tourism (culture, sports and leisure).
3.6 PRODUCTIVE INVESTMENT UP AND MORE JOBS CREATED
OR
MAINTAINED
56.
In 1984, grants to industry and services (327 million ECU) accounted
for 14. 1% of aid for support measures, an increase of more than 3
percentage points over 1983. This figure was higher than in 1982 (12.8%)
and 1981 (11.9%).
As Graph 1 b) clearly shows, the share of such grants varied considerably
from one country to another, ranging from 0% in Luxembourg to 54% in
Germany; it was 31% in Ireland, 18% in the United Kingdom, between 12% and
14% in Denmark, France, the Netherlands and Belgium, 7% in Italy and 2% in
Greece.
Compared with 1983, it rose in all countries except Belgium,
Germany and Greece, where it fell. Germany remains the Member State
channelling most ERDF aid to productive investments, whereas Italy and
especially Greece again devoted the bulk ·Of their efforts to
infrastructure projects in 1984.
The number of projects (1 011) and the volume of assistance increased in
1984 by 27% (799 projects in 1983) and 42% (231 millions ECU in 1983)
respectively.
26
ERDF
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0037.png
GRAPH 2 (SUPPORT MEASURES) .
AID GRANTED IN 1984 TO THE LEADING TEN TYPES OF INFRASTRUCTURE
AND TO THE LEADING TEN INDUSTRIAL SECTORS
a) Types of infrastructure
200
400
b00
1"11o ECU
eoo
ROADS,
COLLECT. DiiTRIB.
TELEPHONE,
SEWERS,
PORT INS
b) Industrial sectors
40
t11o ECU
S0
FOOD,
NON-t1ETAL. 11INER{t. PROD.
Chapter III : Community action in support of regional policy
measures by the Member States
27
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0038.png
Map. 3 gives the regional distribution of ERDF assistance to industry,
craft industry and services in 1984.
57.
Whereas in 1983 small projects received significantly more aid than
large projects, there was a marked tendency in 1984 for aid to be divided
equally between the- two categories, although small projects comfortably
retained their lead (57%). According to the figures put forward, these
grants should create or maintain 68 950 jobs, an 11% rise on 1983, just
over two thirds of which result-from small projects.
Average ERDF aid per project was 324 000 ECU, equivalent to 44.3% (42.9%
in 1983) of public expenditure
9
and 9,2% of investment cost.
A total of 68 large projects received aid amounting to 141.2 million ECU
and, according to the forecasts made, will create or maintain 19 600 jobs,
the same as in 1983, even though the number of projects rose by 51% and the
volume of aid by 78%.
In 1984, 943 small projects received 186 million ECU in grants to promote
the creation or maintenance of 49 400 jobs, 16% more than in 1983.
ERDF aid per job expected to be created or maintained differed quite
markedly in 1984 as between large and small projects: 7 200 ECU for the
former and
3
800 ECU for the latter. Average aid per job was 4 700 ECU,
significantly higher than in 1983 (3 700 ECU).
Table 9 gives the size breakdown of productive investment projects.
3.6
.1
.
Capital goods predominate
58.
As in 1983, 97% of ERDF assistance to the productive sector was
concentrated in three areas of industrial activity: capital goods
(54. 7%), ·consumer goods (29%) and intermediate goods (14%). All ar.eas of
industrial activity saw slight falls, with two exceptions: capital goods,
which increased their share compared with 1983 (by 6 percentage points),
and services, which, despite an increase, were still of no more than
marginal importance (2% of aid and 1 300 jobs announced).
g
Under article 4, paragraph 2a of the revised 1975 Regulation, ERDF aid
to industrial investment projects can amount to 20% of the investment
cost
an~ .~ay
not exceed 50% of the national aid. It is limited to that
part of the investment which does not exceed 100 000 ECU per job
created or 50 000 per job maintained. In the services sector and in
the craft industry, the Fund's contribution may exceed 20% of the
investment cost but may not exceed 10 000 ECU per job created or
maintained or 50% of the national aid.
28
ERDF
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0039.png
MAP 3
REGIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF ERDF ASSISTANCE TO INDUSTRY,
CRAFT INDUSTRY AND SERVICES IN 1984, LEVEL III REGIONS (MID ECU)
0.0
0.2
0.5
1. 3
< X=<
<X=<
<X=<
< X =<
0.2.
0.5
1.3
f===l
§
~~~
42.5 •
Chapter III
:
Community action in support of regional policy
measures by the Member States
29
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0040.png
TABLE 9
SIZE BREAKDOWN OF INDUSTRIAL, CRAFT INDUSTRY
AND
SERVICE
PROJECTS AIDS IN
1984
.
ERDF, SUPPORT MEASURES
ERDF aid
per
project
Mio ECU
Small projects:
Investment
<10
Mio ECU
Large projects:
Investment
>10
Mio ECU
Average
per
job
ECU
National aid
per
project
Mio ECU
per
job
ECU
Investment
per
project
Mio ECU
per
job
ECU
0.20
3 800
0.44
8300
1.
92
36 600
2.08
0.32
7 200
4 700
4.82
0.73
16 800
10 700
25.46
3.50
88 500
51 400
Capital goods accounted for over half the aid given to productive
activities. First place was again taken by electrical engineering and
electronics, whose share rose by almost
7
percentage points in
1984.
More
than
14 000
jobs are expected to be created or maintained in this sector,
which absorbed over one fifth of aid to productive activities. Two other
sectors came next, each wlth roughly the same share
(9.5%):
office and
data -processing machines, and the motor vehicle industry (some
6 500
jobs
expected to be created or maintained in each sector). Compared with
1983,
there was a shift in favour of these sectors in
1984,
to the detriment of
the metal products and mechanical engineering sectors. Investments
receiving aid in the capital goods sector were fairly evenly distributed
between large and small projects and should help to create or maintain
39 200
jobs, i.e.
57%
of the jobs announced under the support measures
alone.
The proportion of aid going to the consumer goods industries, after·
doubling in
1983,
declined a little in
1984 (2.5
percentage points).
There was a sharp fall in grants to the food, drink and tobacco industries
( 4. 6
percentage points) and, to a lesser extent, the textile industry,
with the paper/publishing and rubber/plastics processing industries
benefiting. In all, the assistance given to the consumer goods industries
s~ould
create or maintain some
22 000
jobs. Two thirds of the aid given
was allocated to small projects.
The proportion of aid given to the intermediate goods sector, the bulk
going to· small investment projects, fell by
3.2
percentage points compared
with
1983.
All the industries concerned were affected, with the exception
of the chemical industry, which registered a marked increase in aid.
Services apart, the textile industry rece:j.ved the least assistance per job
(1 700
ECU) and the mining of solid fuels and briquetting the most
(12 500
ECU). Average aid for all sectors was
4 700
ECU per job.
Table
35
in the Annex gives details of productive investments receiving
ERDF aid in
1984,
showing the number of projects, the amount of aid and
the number of jobs created or maintained. Graph
2
b) gives the aid granted
to the ten.sectors receiving most assistance.
.ERDF
30
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0041.png
3.1 THE SHARE OF AID ALLOCATED TO STUDIES HAS INCREASED
FOURFOLD
In addition to infrastructure and productive investment projects,
the ERDF also finances studies serving as preparation for investment
projects which can be financed by the Fund (Article 12 of the revised 1975
Regulation) .
While these studies still absorbed only a very small proportion of the
Fund's resources (around 1%), the figure more than quadrupled in 1984,
when Member States submitted 41 applications for the financing of studies
for a total of 15.5 million ECU.
A total of 43 studies were approved in 1984, at a cost of 24.2 million ECU.
These included 12 studies (5 in Italy and 7 in the United Kingdom)
relating to applications submitted in 1983 (see point 64 of the Ninth ERDF
Report).
FINANCE TOTALLING 24.2 MILLION ECU PROVIDED FOR 43 STUDIES
59.
60.
In 1984, most Member States applied to the ERDF for aid in financing
studies. Most of the aid granted went to Italy, France, the United
K~ngdom
and Belgium.
The 43 studies part-financed in 1984 by the Commission (which contributed
approximately half of the costs involved) were the following:
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
2 in Denmark concerning the use of hydroelectric energy in Greenland
(0.7 million ECU);
1 in Germany concerning flow control of a river in Saarland (O. 04
million ECU);
2 in France concerning a river·improvement scheme and a geothermal
power production plant on the island of Reunion (6 million ECU);
1 in Greece concerning incentives for regional manufacturing (0.03
million ECU);
5 in Italy (12.3 million ECU):
• three concerning water-engineering projects and the construction of
aqueducs (regions: Abruzzi, Marche and Molise);
0
one concerning the construction of a funicular railway on Mount
Vesuvius (region Campania);
• one concerning the working of bauxite deposits (region Sardinia);
f.
5 in Belgium (1.6 million ECU):
o
three concerning the establishment of a service centre for small and
medium-sized firms, a craft industry estate and a redeployment
analysis (region Wallonia);
0
one concerning a prototype bioclimatized greenhouse (region:
Wallonia);
• one concerning the development of a battery powered by
electro-biochemical combustion (region Wallonia);
27 studies in the United Kingdom (3.6 million ECU):
0
g.
eleven relating to the development and use of tourism, industry, the
local economy and the distributive trades (regions: East Midlands,
Yorkshire/Humberside, North, Scotland, South West, Wales);
• five concerning water-engineering, drainage and water-purification
projects (regions: North West and Scotland);
Chapter III : Community action in support of regional policy
measures by the Member States
31
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0042.png
• two concerning the use of telecommunications and the laying of
underwater power lines (regions: North, South West);
• three concerning road improvement projects (regions: Scotland,
South Wales, South West);
• four concerning port infrastructures (regions: East Midlands,
Scotland, South West, Wales);
• two concerning the storage of gas and the generation of electricity
and heating (regions: Northern Ireland, East Midlands).
TABLE 10
STUDIES (ARTICLE 12) FINANCED IN 1984 AND FROM 1980 TO 1984
ERDF, SUPPORT MEASURES
(Mio ECU)
Member
State
B
DK
D
GR
F
1984
Number
5
1980-1984
(1)
Number
6
6
2
5
Amounts
granted
1.56
0.68
0.04
0.03
6.02
Amounts
granted
1.93
5.74
0.05
0.26
6.02
0.61
20.12
0.07
6.49
41.27
Actual
payments
0.37
3.56
0.01
0.06
0.02
2.55
0.05
1.65
8.27
2
1
1
2
5
IRL
I
L
NL
UK
-
-
-
27
43
-
12.30
-
3.58
24.21
2
2
20
54
98
-
-
1
-
-
-
EUR
10
(1)
Before 1980, only two studies had been financed in Ireland
and Northern Ireland
With regard to the state of progress of studies
rece~v~ng
a contribution
from the ERDF, one fifth of the appropriations committed was paid by the
end of 1984. Of the 98 studies approved, nine were completed. To speed .up
work on the other studies, the Commission departments have contacted the
Member States concerned, in particular +taly and the United Kingdom.
The nine studies completed are the following:
• three feasibility studies concerning the use of hydroelectricity to
supply small communities in Greenland (Denmark);
• one feasibility study concerning the transport plans for a link between
Newry in Northern Ireland (United Kingdom) and Dundalk (Ireland);
• one study concerning the supply and distribution of methane gas for
industrial use in Campania (Italy);
• two studies concerning a high-speed road link between San Simone and San
Teodoro and between San Teodoro and Olbia in Sardinia (Italy);
• one feasibility study concerning the development of a coordinated
industrial heritage to promote tourism at Biggar and New Lanark in
Scotland (United Kingdom);
• one feasibility study concerning a programme
activities in the Liege region (Belgium).
for
setting up new
32
ERDF
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0043.png
3.8
99.8% OF COMMITMENT APPROPRIATIONS USED IN 1984
61.
In all, the funds available for commitment in 1984 to finance ERDF
support measures amounted to 2 327.12 million ECU, compared with
2 164.28 million ECU
in
1983, an increase of 7.5%. This amount breaks down
as follows:
TABLE 11
FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR COMI-HTMENT IN 1984
ERDF, SUPPORT MEASURES
(Mio ECU)
Appropriations entered in 1984 budget
Appropriations outstanding from 1983
Appropriations available from:
- decommitments
- changes in value of ECU
Unused appropriations from the specific Community measures
section transferred to the support measures section
Total
2 025.00
42.68
103.34
67.45
. 88.65
2 327.12
The appropriation entered in the 1984 budget (2 025 million.ECU) showed an
increase of 6%, while the increase in each of the previous two years, had
been over 14%.
62.
The grant decisions taken in 1984 resulted in commitments totalling
2 322.20 million ECU, broken down as follows:
TABLE 12
AMOUNTS COMMITTED BY TYPE OF INVESTMENT IN 1984
ERDF, SUPPORT MEASURES
(Mio ECU)
Industry, craft industry and services
Infrastructure
Studies (Article 12)
Total
326.57
1
971.38
24.25
2
322.20
During the first ten years of ERDF operations, virtually all the
appropriations available were committed (99.8%). The difference between
total appropriations available (2 327.12 ·million.· ECU) and the total
commitments (2 322.20 million ECU) leaves a balance of 4.92 million ECU
only, which is the total cumulative balance since the Fund's inception.
Table 13 provides a synopsis of the balance of commitment appropriations
outstanding at each year-end since the Fund was set up; it shows that the
available appropriations have been almost entirely used up since 1975. The
balances outstanding at each year-end have generally been used up at the
very beginning of the following year since they were much lower than the
amounts that could have been committed on the basis of the applications
examined during the year.
Chapter III : Community action in support of regional policy
measures by the Member States
33
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0044.png
TABLE 13
BALANCES OF COMMITMENT APPROPRIATIONS OUTSTANDING
EACH YEAR-END FROM 1975 TO 1984
ERDF, SUPPORT MEASURES
(Mio ECU)
Year
Budget
appropriations
1
030.40(3)
Appropriations
available for
commitment
(1)
1 047.23(3)
599.84
973.65
1 169.64
1 615.17
1 817.69
2 164.28
2 327.12
Appropria-
tions used
up (2)
1 032.20(3)
556.36
970.43
1 137.79
1
596.19
1 812.13
2 121.61
2 322.20
Balance outstan-
ding at year-end
15.03(3)
43.48
3.22
31.85
18.98
5.56
42.68
4.92
75/11
1978
1979
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1
1
1
1
2
581.00
900.00
106.75
463.00
669.00
909.50
025.00
(1) Including appropriations carried over from the previous year,
appropriations made available through decommitment and
through adjustments to take account of fluctuations in the ECU
rate in respect of commitments remaining payable from previous
years.
(2) Commitments for the respective years adjusted to take account of
fluctuations in the ECU rate.
(3) Budget appropriations
1
300 Mia u.a., appropriations
available for commitment 1 312.33 Mia u.a., appropriations used
up 1 301.64 Mia u.a. This leaves a balance of 10.69 Mia u.a.
converted into ECU at the rate ruling in January 1978.
63.
Since for 1984, as for 1983, no quotas were iaid down in the ERDF
Regulation, the Commission committed the appropriations available in
response to the applications made by the Member States, by applying the
criteria for selecting projects laid down in the Regulation. It also had
regard to the distribution of resources provisionally decided on by the
Council for 1981 but, in addition, took account of the impact in the years
ahead of the application of Article 45 of the new ERDF Regulation, which
concerns the specific Community measures instituted by the Council before
1 January 1985.
Each Member State's situation as
appropriations is shown in Table 14.
regards
the
use
of
commitment
3.9
97%
OF PAYMENT APPROPRIATIONS USED
64.
The payment appropriation initially entered in the 1984 budget
amounted to 1 312.50 million ECU, an increase of 11.2% compared with 1983.
Including 31.36 million ECU which had been carried over and 18 million ECU
transferred from Chapter 51 (Specific Community measures), total payment
appropriations available amounted to 1 361.86 million ECU (see Table 38 in
the Annex).
·
ERDF
34
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0045.png
13C1
!DP"
Ill Ill
lll"t:l
11
(D
c::
rt
(D
11
1-i
Ill
'41-i
C"'H
TABLE 14
USE Of COMMITMENT APPROPRIATIONS IN 1984
ERDF, SUPPORT MEASURES
(Mio)
Member
State
Nat. cur.
B
OK
D
rt ••
lfn
g:i
(D
Commitments
11rt
5-§
t-'•
Credits * Ba I ance
Credits unused
outstanding under specific
entered
at the end Community
in 1984
budget
of 1983
measures
section
ECU
33. 18
24.48
109.21
263.21
267.72
158.55
805.85
4.73
35.59
619.68
ECU
ECU
ECU
'<
Ul
Credits made
available by(a)
decommitments
and (b)exchange
rate fluctua-
tions
(a) ECU (b) ECU
1. 86
0.76
4.58
0.03
24.50
17.13
19.41
0.77
3.67
30.63
- 0.45
- 0.17
- 1.12
28.01
- 2.17
- 0.71
13. 14
- 0.07
- 0.30
31.28
67.45
Total credits
avai !able
for
commitment
1984
ECU
I
~
c
~
rtlll
Ill("')
(D
rtrt
t-'•
Ill 0
::1
::1
t-'·
~
0
1:/l
GR
f
IRL
I
NL
UK
EUR 10
L
11
rt
0
H'l
(D
1 490.41
197.77
244.25
23.81**
1 832.07
114. 38
1 1 11.63**
212.30
89.71
372.69
tzj~
egl-i
~
"'::~
C1
~
I
I
I
I
~~~
'tl!>t:C
O'tl~
~;g
~;g.j:-
!>H
Ul!>
o .....
-
2 322.20
2 025.00
42.68
88.65
103.34
2 327.12
11
OQ
t-'•
g
*
Ill
.._.
In 1984, no quotas being laid down by the ERDF Regulation, the Commission committed the
available credits according to the appl /cations presented by the Member States being guided
by the allocations provisionally authorized by the Council for 1981 and applying the criteria
for selection of projects set out in the Regulation.
UlZ
Ul
tzlO
~j
.....
z
.....
\D
00
"C
0
~
.._.
.....
**Thousand mi I lions .
.j:-
"'
w
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0046.png
65.
Table 15 shows that payments actually made amounted to 1 325.98
million ECU. The increase over payments made the previous year was 6.4%.
For budgetary reasons, this increase was much smaller than the previous
year (35.9%). Almost 97% of the appropriations available were used up,
compared with 98% the previous year. The balance of appropriations was
rapidly used in January of the following year.
In actual fact, the applications for payment submitted by the Member
States, at 1 450.2 million ECU, exceeded payments made by 125 million ECU,
whereas initial appropriations amounted to only 1 312.50 million ECU.
This difference was due mainly to the late submission of payment
applications for whose processing additional information was required
from the Member States (some 76 million ECU), other reasons for the
difference being the changes made during the processing of payment
applications submitted and the recovery of amounts released through
decommitment. The payments situation by Member State and for the Community
as a whole is set out in Table 15.
TABLE 15
PAYMENTS MADE IN 1984 AND
COMMITMENTS STILL TO BE PAID AT THE END OF 1984
ERDF, SUPPORT MEASURES
(Mio ECU)
Member
State
-
66.
Commit-
Commit-
ments
ments
1975-1983
1984
still to be
paid at end
1983 (1)
Payments
Payments
as %
of commit-
ments
Commit-
ments
to be paid
at end
1984
1983
B
DK
D
1984
5.63
28.10
43.92
212.63
190.23
101.51
435.12
2.49
14.74
291.61
75/83 75/84
68.0
70.2
73.1
59.4
53.9
75.6
43.1
49.0
52.8
63.1
55.0
52.1
77.6
69.2
64.2
55.1
72.6
44.6
49.2
50.1
60.7
55.2
48.49
25.02
156.23
320.45
616.12
139.67
2 129.80
4.88
77.75
1 023.26
4 541.67
GR
F
IRL
I
L
NL
UK
20.94
28.64
90.94
269.87
538.63
82.63
1 759.07
2.64
56.90
695.19
3 545.45
33.18
24.48
109.21
263.21
267.72
158.55
805.85
4. 73
35.59
619.68
7.03
16.70
45.05
214.59
214.56
91.57
344.50
0.02
18.12
294.46
EUR 10
(1)
2 322.20 1 246.60 1 325.98
Amounts adjusted to take account of decommitments and
adjustments for fluctuations in the ECU rate.
67.
Overall, the ratio of total payments to commitments increased
slightly at the end of 1984 to 55. 2%, compared with 55% at the end of the
previous year and 53.3% at the end of 1978. It remains fairly stable,
having shown a maximum variation of some three percentage points between
the highest ratio recorded at the end of 1980 (56. 4%) and the lowest
recorded in 1979 (53.2%). Excl'lding commitments made in December 1984,
which logically could not yet result in any payments, the ratio is
actually 64%. That overall payments represent only about one half of
commitments stems inevitably from the Fund Regulation. When a decision to
grant aid is taken, the total amount of the grant is committed
immediately, whereas disbursement is staggered over·several years in step
with the progress of the investment projects financed and with the outlay
by Member States. Moreover, ERDF payments are made only in response to
specific claims by the Member States concerned. All other things being
36
ERDF
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0047.png
equal, the ratio will be even lower as commitments in recent year have
been greater.
68.
Table 39 in the Annex provides a breakdown, for each Member State, of
payments made in 1984 against the corresponding commitments made
in
previous years. The payments relating to the period 1975-1980 account for
some 5% of total payments in 1984. This proportion is somewhat higher for
those Member States which, like Italy (6.7%) and France (15.6%), had been
slow in submitting payment claims during that period. In 1984, these two
countries thus continued their efforts to close old files.
69. The second last column in Table 15 shows, for each Member State, the
payments made from 1975 to 1984 as a percentage of total commitments made
over the same period. The Member States still below the Community average
are Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and Belgium.
Table 40 in the Annex provides a breakdown by Member State of payments
from the Fund each year since 1975.
70.
Table 16 summarizes the settlement of payment appropriations since
the ERDF was set up. Annual allocations of payment appropriations total
6 408 million ECU. At 31 December 1984, 6 372 million ECU had been
accounted for by payments made since 1975, representing as in 1983, a rate
of utilization of 99 .4%.
TABLE 16
PAYMENT APPROPRIATIONS SINCE 1975 ·
ERDF, SUPPORT MEASURES
(Mio ECU)
Year
Budget
appropriations
(1)
1975(1)
1976(1)
1977 (1)
1978
1979
1980
122.31
229.05
294.53
525.00
483.00
392.38
16.00
799.20
3.34
015.00
17.78
180.00
312.50
18.00
Balance
carried
over
(2)
48.25
64.25
83.08
353.19
323.04
(2)
4. 72
(2)
15.85
(2)
97.96
31.36
(2)
6 372.21
35.88
1 246.60
1 325.98
31.36
35.88
950.67
97.96
791.41
15.85
Payments
made
(3)
74.06
213.05
275.70
254.89
513.15
726.70
Balance
(1+2-3)
48.25
64.25
83.08 (1)
353.19
323.04
4. 72
-
+
1981
1982
1983
1984
·Total
+
1
+
1
1
+
6 408.09
(1) Million of units of account (u.a.) converted into million ECU
at the average rate for the year.
(2) Transfer from the specific Community measures section
(chap. 51) to the support measures section (chap.SO).
Chapter III : Community action in support of regional policy
measures by the Member States
37
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0048.png
3.10
CONTROLS
71.
Committed contributions are paid out upon presentation by the Member
State concerned of statements certifying the public expenditure incurred
(the basis for Fund
~ssistance)
and the existence of detailed supporting
documents. The latter do not have to accomp.any payment claims. The
conformity of the statements presented to the Commission with the
supporting documents is verified on the occasion of on-the-spot checks
carried out pursuant to Article 9, paragraph 3 of the revised 1975 ERDF
Regulation on a sample of projects aided by the ERDF.
On-the-spot inspections also have the object of verifying the conformity
of completed projects with the proposals as originally presented for ERDF
aid and that of national administrative practices with Community rules,
particularly as regards public tendering. Establishing that the projects
carried out conform with the operations for which ERDF assistance was
provided also involves verifying the extent to which the socio-economic
objectives of the projects financed have been met. While, in the case of
infrastructure projects, such verification focuses on the level of use and
the economic framework, it is more particularly concerned, in the case of
industrial projects visted, with the number of jobs created or maintained
compared with the forecasts given in grant applications.
During on-the-spot checks which involve a visit to the firms concerned,
the Commission inspectors, in order to ascertain the number of jobs
created or maintained, examine appropriate documents, such as the firm's
manpower records.
On-the-spot checks carried out by Commission staff in 1984 did not reveal
any irregularity. Admittedly, discrepancies were discovered between the
targets indicated in grant applications and the actual number of jobs
created or maintained, but such discrepancies do not constitute an
infringement of the ERDF Regulation. Clearly, any forecast of jobs to be
created or maintained, whether at company level or more generally, is
hazardous since it is subject to considerable uncertainty. Forecasts
given in ERDF grant applications can, therefore, be no more than
indicative. Since such forecasts are fraught with risk, there is no
justification for imposing penalties on account of discrepancies between
the forecasts made and the actual number of jobs created or maintained
provided the investment project that has received an ERDF grant has been
implemented as planned and provided all the conditions imposed by the
revised 1975 ERDF Regulation, and in particular the limits prescribed in
Article 4, paragraphs 1a and 2a, have been complied with.
72.
In 1984, the Court of Auditors of the European Communities was
associated with two on-the-spot inspections by the Commission.
73.
In 1984, the Commission made on-the-spot inspections of 204 projects,
compared with 200 in 1983 and 204 in 1982. This brought the number of
projects inspected on site since the Fund was established to 1 672. The
projects inspected in 1984 accounted for ERDF assistance totalling some
193 million ECU, as against 149 million ECU in 1983 and 338 million ECU in
1982. These figures should be seen against commitments of some 9 200
million ECU for the period 1975-83 and payments. of 5 000 million ECU in
the same period. The total number of projects inspected in 1984 involved
investment amounting to approximately 1 600 million ECU.
During the year, the Commission continued to use on-the-spot checks
to examine, in association with the administering authorities, projects
where payments had fallen behind schedule. The purpose was to discover the
causes of such delays and to speed up the processing or closure of the
files, either by final payment if the projects had been completed or by
decommitting the appropriations allocated if the;y- had not been carried
out. In 1984, alongside checks proper, 1 032 'dormant" projects were
inspected (as against 823 in 1983 and 359 in 1982). Following these
inspections, 51 projects lost their grants (the appropriations being
74.
38
ERDF
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0049.png
decommitted), 66 were the subject of further payment claims and 68 the
subject of a final claim to close the file.
On-the-spot checks
in
1984 did not reveal . any operation of a
fraudulent nature, i.e. no case of financial benefit being obtained by way
of an illegal procedure. With a view to efficient use of ERDF resources,
the Member States concerned were asked to take steps to expedite work on
projects or, if these could not be completed within a reasonable period,
to consider applying for decommitment.
·
Generally speaking, on-the-spot inspections carried out during the
year revealed occasional flaws in the information supplied by the Member
States in grant applications and payment claims. They also brought to
light some tardiness in informing the Commission of the completion of·
projects, delaying the closure of files.
75.
76.
77.
In response to this situation the Commission systematically
continued and expanded in 1984 its general effort to speed up the closure
of files on grant decisions taken in the years 1975-77 and in subsequent
years.
The first phase of its action concerned files dating back to the first
three-year period of the ERDF's existence that had not yet been closed.
In 1984, the action was extended to files still pending from 1978 and to
files from 1979 and 1980 that had not resulted in applications ·for
payment.
It
will be gradually extended to files still pending from
subsequent years.
Following this action, unsettled commitments dating back to the period
1975-1980 amounted to only 325 million ECU at 31 December 1984, as against
455 million ECU at the end of 1983, and represented only 7.2% of unsettled
commitments at the end of 1984.
3.11
INFORMATION ON ERDF ACTIVITIES
3 .11.1
The European citizen's right to know
78.
Article 10 of the ERDF Regulation requires that Fund operations be
publicized as follows:
• the investors concerned are to be informed that part of the aid granted
to them has been provided by the Community;
• for infrastructure projects, the Member States are to take all necessary
steps to ensure that assistance from the Fund is given suitable
publicity;
• the list of projects which have received contributions from the Fund is
to be published every six months in the Official Journal of the European
Community.
·
The Commission and the Member States use a wide variety of means to
implement these provisions, some of them suggested by the ERDF Committee.
The Commission attaches very great importance to the publicizing of Fund
operations. It considers that the European public is entitled to know how
the Community administers the resources for which taxpayers in the Member
States foot the bill. Fund operations, being in support of visible
practical projects, are a particularly apt advertisement for the direct
benefit people derive from Community action to promote the development of
the regions in which they live.
Chapter III : Community action in support of regional policy
measures by the Member States
39
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0050.png
Alongside the public;i.ty measures explicitly provided for in the ERDF
Regulation, the Commission continues to publicize its activities through
the normal channels, e.g. press releases, press conferences and
brochures.
3 .11.2
Press information in 1984:
more
detailed coverage
79.
After each of the three series of grant decisions the Commission
issued a press package consisting of a general section concerning the
whole allocation and a national section setting·out the aid granted to
each country and listing all the projects concerned by the latest
allocation. The general section is intended for the newspaper accredited
in Brussels, which are for the most part supraregional papers, while the
national section is of interest primarily to the regional and local press
in the Member States.
In 1964, the Commission continued to improve the lists of projects. For
the third allocation in 1984, as much detail as possible was published for
the projects in nine Member States (exact location, name of investor,
amount of grant and project description). German industrial projects·are
the only ones for which the location and the name of the investor have not
yet been given. This is because the German Government remains opposed to
disclosure of the names of investors who have received a grant, basing
itself on national legislation. Although it does not think this is
correct, the Commission has continued to respect the German Government's
wish and hopes to be able to resolve the matter soon.
3.11.3
Signboards: tangible evidence
of
the ERDF
80.
The signboards which the Member States erect at the sites of some
infrastructure projects are a very effective means of publicizing the
ERDF's financial contribution since the notice draws attention directly
to a visible practical structure (see illustrations at the end of the
report).
Since the Regional Fund was set up, signboards have been erected for some
2 800 projects. The erection of such signboards was agreed by the members
of the ERDF Committee in 1975/76. It was decided that they should be put
up only for projects exceeding a given cost. Unfortunately, agreement was
not reached on what that level of cost should be, with the result that the
thresholds vary from one Member State to another.
·
However, as Table 17 shows, the Member States do not even erect signboards
according to the threshold they have adopted. ·
40
ERDF
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0051.png
TABLE 17
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT SIGNBOARDS ERECTED
FROM 1975 TO 1984
Member
State
B
DK/Gr¢nland
D
GR
F
IRL
I
1
Threshold Number of projects Number of
(Mio ECU) above
signboards
(1)
the threshold
erected
1
0.5/2
0.5 (2)
152
114/26
868 (3)
028 (4)
795
295
099
11
84
009
7.6
10
77
737
70
113
1 064
7
26
740
2 920
been agreed to
of
which
in 1984
0
3
137
6
69
2
119
-
2
1
1
3
3
NL
UK
2
0.5
1
1
0.5
EUR 10
10 481
(1) Investment threshold above which it has
provide publicity
(2) In Germany, the threshold is 10 Mio ECU
already started when the grant decision
(3) Projects exceeding the threshold of 0.5
(4) Total number of projects
for investment projects
is taken
Mio.ECU
In 1984, the Commission asked the Member States to display on these
signboards a European emblem, the letter
E
for "Europe" in gold on a blue
square.
An
emblem gets the message over to the public even more
effectively than a notice and conveys to all Europeans the same image of
the Community's presence.
·
.
The Member States responded favourably and the fir3t. signboards bearing
the European emblem have already been erected, as the illustrations in
this report show.
In addition to the temporary signboards erected during implementation of a
project, some Member States, notably the United Kingdom, affix permanent
plaques to certain projects assisted by the ERDF. These include a bronze
sculpture of the letter
E:
at Manchester Airport and a permanent
inscription indicating that part of the airport project had received an
ERDF grant. The Commission is highly appreciative of such initiatives and
would like to see other Member States following the example set by the
United Kingdom.
3 .11.4
Publication in the Official Journal: still too little information
81.
Details of the first and second grant allocations for 1984 were
published in the Official Journal in September
10 , ·
and December 1984
11 •
respectively, while details of the third allocation are to be published in
1985.
.
10
11
O.J. No C 245 of 13 September 1984
O.J. No C 349 of 31 December 1984
Chapter III : Community action in support of regional policy
measures by the Member States
41
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0052.png
The Commission plans to improve the details given in the published lists
of projects that have received ERDF grants, among other things in order to
permit project identification. For this, it is considering publishing in
the Official Journal in the near future the same information as it makes
available regularly to the press.
3.11.5 Letters to investors
82.
In order to inform investors that their project had received an ERDF
grant, the Commission continued to send out .letters notifying them that
part of the public funds they had received had come from the Community. In
the case of some countries, however, these 'letters were very late in being
sent out. The Commission is proposing to speed up the procedure with the
help of data- processing equipment.
42
ERDF
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0053.png
4.0
CHAPTER IV : SPECIFIC COMMUNITY REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT
MEASURES
4.1
NEW TYPE OF MEASURES
83.
As provided for in Article 13 of the 1975 revised ERDF Regulation,
specific Community regional development measures are to include measures
"linked to Community policies and measures adopted by the Community in
order to take better account of their regional dimension or to reduce
their regional consequences".
On 7 October 1980 the Council adopted five proposals for specific
Community regional development measures under this section of the ERDF.
This first series of measures is designed to enable the Community to
contribute, for a limited period of time, to resolving problems for which
it bears special responsibility in specific regions proposed by the
Commission on the basis of Community criteria. These are regions liable to
·be affected by the consequences of decisions and measures taken under
other Community policies, especially outlying regions facing special
problems to do with their remoteness.
These measures seek to promote:
• the development of certain Mediterranean regions (Mezzogiorno and South
West France) in the context of the enlargement of the Community to
include Spain and Portugal -Regulation (EEC nr. 2615/80);
• the creation of new activities in certain areas seriously affected by
the restructuring of the steel industry in Belgium, Italy and the United
Kingdom- Regulation (EEC nr. 2616/80);
• the creation of new activities in similarly hard-hit shipbuilding areas
in the United Kingdom- Regulation (EEC nr. 2617/80);
• an improvement in the security of energy supply in inland areas of the
Mezzogiorno- Regulation (EEC nr. 2618/80);
• an improvement in the economic and social situation of the border areas
of Ireland and Northern Ireland- Regulation (EEC nr. 2619/80).
These measures differ from Community support measures as regards both the
nature of operations assisted and the financing procedures. They are
implemented in the form of special multiannual programmes presented by
Member States for approval by the Commission, after consultation with the
ERDF Committee.
The programmes are to receive financial assistance'totalling 220 million
ECU in the period 1981-1985. They must form part of the r'egional
development programmes of the countries concerned. In addition, they must
contain information analysing the situation and needs related to the
objectives pursued, specify the operations proposed and the timetable for
carrying them out and, more generally, supply all factors necessary to
enable their consistency with regional development objectives to be
assessed.
Chapter IV
Specific community regional development measures
43
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0054.png
In the context of. these programmes, the ERDF may finance jointly with the
Member States concerned a series of operations to which it does not
contribute under its support measures, notably market studies, the
promotion of industrial innovation, management advisory services,
improved access for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to risk
capital, etc. These operations may benefit from Community assistance of up
to 70%, which means a substantial increase in the Funds available for
operations carried out in Member States.Fund assistance may go to public
authorities including local authorities, various organizations, firms or
individuals.
Under the framework of the first five Regulations, eight special
programmes were approved by the Commission, after consulting the ERDF
Committee, between June 1981 and July 1982, totalling 216 million ECU. The
ninth and last programme, which concerns the measures in the steel making
areas in Italy, was sent to the Commission in March 1984 and has not yet .
been approved.
4.2
A
SECOND SERIES OF MEASURES LAUNCHED IN 1984
84.
On 18 January 1984 the Council adopted the second series of specific
regional development measures, presented by the Commission
in
November
1982. In the meantime, the Commission had amended its original proposals
to take account of a number of amendments passed by Parliament, which had
otherwise approved the measures selected.
Financial assistance under this second series will amount to 724 million
ECU over five years, which is more than three times the amount allocated
to the first series.·The measures apply additional resources and introduce
new forms of action to strengthen some measures already launched against
regional problems stemming from the third enlargement of the Community,
restructuring in the steel industry, shipbuilding and energy supply
difficulties. Their territorial scope has been extended, since Greece is
now covered. Lastly, a new measure has been introduced to deal with the
regional effects of restructuring in the textile industry.
The areas covered by this second series of specific Community measures are
in the following Member States:
enlargement measure: France, Italy, Greece;
energy supply measure: Italy, Greece;
shipbuilding area measure: Germany, United Kingdom;
steel area measure: Belgium, France, Italy, Luxembourg, Germany, United
Kingdom;
• Textile area measure: Belgium, France, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands,
United Kingdom.
85.
To be eligible for financing, measures must have the aim of creating
productive jobs in SME' s and craft enterprises; not only by means of
investment aid but also and especially by action to improve the economic
environment of business (market research, management advice, launching of
common services, information on and application of innovation etc.).
Some major improvements to the first series have been introduced with
these measures. Investment aids may now include an additional grant paid
entirely by the Community. Aid for business advisory services has been
introduced, the aim being to institute more active management of aids from
the public purse by exploring the potential for local economic
initiatives. The steel area measure will be linked more closely to the
Community's policy for the steel industry. A first phase of the measure
will concern areas which have suffered heavy job losses in the sector. A
second phase will also be applied in areas where the Member States' steel
industry restructuring programmes, notified by the Member States as a
result of the Commission's decision of August 1981, will nave major
44
ERDF
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0055.png
consequences. In 1984 the Commission took decisions regarding the steel
areas in Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands, which will receive
assistance under the second phase of this measure (see annexed
bibliography).
86.
On the 20 December 1984, under the framework of this second series of
measures, the Commission, after consulting the ERDF Committee, approved
seven special programmes totalling 235 million ECU. The programmes are as
follows:
IN THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY:
• promotion of new economic activities in Saarland, including certain
areas adjacent to Rhineland-Palatinate, affected by restructuring in
the steel industry (13 million ECU);
IN GREECE:
• development of certain regions (islands in the Aegean Sea and the Ionian
Sea, Crete) which will be particularly affected by the accession of
Spain and Portugal to the Community (40 million ECU);
• development of alternative sources of energy in the Greek islands (20
million ECU) ;
IN THE NETHERLANDS:
0
development of new economic activities in the Twente COROP region and
the Helmond region affected by restructuring in the textile and clothing
industry (7 million ECU);
IN THE UNITED KINGDOM:
promotion of new job-creating activities in areas affected by
restructuring in the steel industry (33 million ECU);
• promotion of new job-creating activities in areas affected by
restructuring in the textile and clothing industry (105 million ECU);
0
promotion of new job-creating activities in areas affected by
restructuring in the shipbuilding industry (17 million ECU).
0
The Member States concerned have still to present eighteen special
programmes to the Commission so as to make use of the remainder (489
million ECU) of the funds allocated to this second series.
4.3
COMMITMENTS: DISTINCT INCREASE IN 1984
87.
Table 18 shows the situation regarding funds available and
appropriations used at 31 December 1984 in respect of all the special
programmes approved by the Commission under the first series of
Regulations of 7 October 1980 and the seven special programmes approved
under the second series of Regulations of 18 January 1984.
88.
Commitments made in 1984 amounted to 61 million ECU (of which 23.4
million ECU under the second series), bringing the total amount of
commitments for these measures since 1981 to some 140.2 million ECU. This
is equivalent to 31% of the sum of the two allocations approved so far,
which is 451 million ECU. In all, 54% of the 216 million ECU allocation
.for the first series and 10% of the 235 million ECU allocation for the
second series have been committed.
Chapter IV
Specific community regional development measures
45
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0056.png
~
0\
TABLE 18
COMMITMENTS AND PAYMENTS 1984 AND 1981-1984
ERDF, SPECIFIC COMMUNITY MEASURES
(MID)
Payments
n
Tota I a I lo-
Special programmes
cat ion over
5 years
ECU
FIRST SERIES
Belgium
-Steel areas
France
-En I a rgement
Ireland
-Border areas
Italy
-Energy
-En I a rgement
United Kingdom
-Border areas
-Steel areas
-Shipbuilding areas
SECOND SERIES
Germany
-stee I a rea s
Greece
-En I a rgement
-Energy
Netherlands
-Textile areas
216
6
55
16
16
65
8
33
17
235
13
40
20
7
33
17
105
451
2.01
499.05
113.83
0.58
1984
Nat. cur.
Commitments
1981-1984
ECU
37.63
Nat. cur.
ECU
1984
1981-1984
ECU
20.55
Nat. cur.
ECU
%(2)
%(
1) Nat. cur.
~
~~
w'"rj
1;/l
1-i
116.78 54.1
43.47
248.73
8.36
0.98 16.3
38.38 69.8
11.72 73.3
5.03 31.4
33.82 52.0
3.65 45.6
12.76 38.7
10.45 61.5
23.37
2.01
499.05
113.83
0.58
1.98
1.02
6.31
0.90
9.9
6.9
16. 17
59.53 51.0
29.38
164.68
6.02
1 984.47
6 486.28
1.45
7.05
2.85
0.66 67.3
24.65 64.2
8.46 72.2
1. 51 30.0
4.84 14.3
2.46 67.4
12.01 94.1
4.93 47.2
4.04 17.3
~
1;/l
-
2.98
-
0. 36
C")t::;l
1-i
"':JD>
l:>lZ
69.47 10. 15
4.15
78.78 11. 51
1. 90
2.64
"i'"d
nt:ic:J
0~~
n~>
t-itl>o-3
6 610.53
-
24 402.82 17.68 45 614.33
1. 70
-
3.94
-
·2.37
23.37
0.90
5.48
1. 25
0.23
1. 02
2.14
7.37
6. 13
-
-
0.93
2.70
-
-
-
1. 55
4.49
§2 .... ())
1-i
\J:)
~!;fl
....
~~
-
-
-
4.04
1;/ll-'
I
\J:)
~~
~~
1;/l
-
3.29
0.75
-
299.61
68.30
-
-
-
-
....
())
~
5.48 13.7
1. 25 6.3
0.23
3.3
299.61
68.30
3.29 60.0
0.75 60.0
El
'":1
1:>1
United Kingdom
-stee
1
a rea s
-Shipbuilding areas
-Textile areas
Total
1.98 3. 30
1.02 1. 70
6.31 10.50
60.99
3.30 10.0
1.70 10.0
10.50 10.0
140. 15 31 . 1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
24.59
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
I
63.57 45.41
(1) Percentage of total allocation
(2) Percentage of commitment
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0057.png
4.4 PAYMENTS: ALMOST HALF OF COMMITMENTS
In 1984 payments amounted to 24.6 million ECU (of which 4 million ECU
were under the second series of measures), bringing the total amount of
payments made so far to some 63.6 million ECU, equivalent to almost half
of commitments
(l1S
.4%).
Table 19 compares the appropriations available for commitment and the
appropriations actually committed in 1984. As
provi~ed
for in Article 2,
paragraph 3b of the revised 1975 ERDF Regulation, the amount by which the
Funds available exceeded requirements (88.65 million ECU) was transferred
at the end of 1984 from the section covering specific Community measures
to that covering support measures.
TABLE 19
AVAILABLE FUNDS AND COMMITMENTS 1984
ERDF, SPECIFIC COMMUNITY MEASURES
(Mio ECU)
Appropriations entered in 1984 budget
Appropriations outstanding from 1983
Total appropriations available in 1984
Appropriations committed
Appropriations transferred to support measures
Balance outstanding at end of year
115.00
100.50
215.50
60.99
88.65
65.86
89.
4.5
INSPECTIONS
90.
In 1984, on-the-spot checks were carried out in respect of four of
the eight special p,rogrammes of the first series of specific Community
measures (Italy - 'Energy", United Kingdom - "Border areas", Ireland -
"Border areas" and Belgium - "Steel areas").
The checks had two main objectives. From an economic viewpoint they were
concerned with conformity and, above all, effectiveness, i.e. the extent
to which the objectives of the special programmes had been achieved and
the contribution which the various measures were making to those
obj actives.
At a technical and financial level, their purpose was to
verify on an overall basis, by type of operation and for a sample of
individual projects, the figures certified by the Member State in
question.
4.6
INFORMATION
4.6 .1
Publication in the Official Journal
The Regulations introducing the first series of specific Community
measures, adopted in 1980, provided that the programmes had to be
published in full in the Official Journal. By contrast, the Regulations
introducing the second series provide only for publication by the
Commission. The seven programmes approved under the second series of
Regulations will be published in 1985.
91.
Chapter IV
Specific community regional development measures
47
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0058.png
4.6 .2
Information activity by the Member States and the Commission
92.
The Commission is restricted in the information it can supply to the
public regarding aid provided for specific Community measures. Only the
Member States know all the details of the special programmes and are
therefore able to inform the public of the individual beneficiaries of
such measures. The United Kingdom does so regularly.
However, the Commission informs the press of the proposals which it has
made and the decisions which it has taken. When the second series of
specific Community measures was adopted by the Council in January, the
Commission issued a statement by the Member of the Commission responsible
for regional policy. It also issued press releases each time it adopted a
special programme submitted by a Member State. There were seven of these
in 1984. The Commission also announced proposals for new regulations and
three decisions concerning the extension of the territorial scope of the
"steel areas" measure.
4. 7
PROPOSAL TO SUPPLEMENT THE SECOND SERIES OF MEASURES
93.
Acting on the undertaking it gave on 18 January 1984 when the Council
adopted the second series of specific regional development measures, the
Commission adopted on 14 December 1984, for transmission to the Council,
four
pro~osals
for Regulations supplementing the second series of
measures
1 .
The proposals provide for ERDF assistance amounting to 133
million ECUover the next five years.
The first proposal aims to complete the territorial coverage of the
"shipbuilding" measure in force since October 1980 and reinforced under
the second series of measures. Information made available during 1983 and
1984 shows that the situation in this sector has deteriorated. The
Commission is therefore proposing that the measure be extended to certain
areas in the Federal Republic of Germany, France and Italy determined on
the basis of sectoral and socio-economic criteria.
Similarly, on the basis of the most recent statistics and the sectoral and
socio-economic criteria laid down, the Commission is proposing that the
"textiles" measure instituted under the second series be extended to
include new areas in the Federal Republic of Germany.
The third proposal is designed to back up the measure instituted in
October 1980 to assist the border areas in Ireland and Northern Ireland.
The territorial coverage of the measure is to be extended to include new
areas adjacent to the areas already covered and suffering from
particularly difficult employment problems, and the existing measures are
to be supplemented by assistance for small and medium-sized enterprises
(investment, innovation, access to risk capital) and for business
advisory services. In addition, the areas in Ireland are to be eligible
for measures to promote the supply and use of natural gas which, while
helping to strengthen the economic base of the areas, will also contribute
to achieving the Community's energy policy objectives, in particular
reducing dependence on oil.
Lastly, a new measure linked to the implementation of the Community's
fisheries policy is proposed to assist certain areas in Denmark, France
and the United Kingdom. Recent developments concerning the Atlantic,
North Sea and Baltic fishing zones, such as the extention of exclusive
fishing zones to 200 miles and the Community's establishment of a system
for the management of fishing resources (total allowable catches, quotas,
12
Document COM(84) 715 final.
ERDF
48
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0059.png
technical conservation measures) have had and will have repercussions on
the fishing activities of the coastal Member States and the areas where
fishing activities are concentrated. Consequently, measures must be
introduced in these areas to enable new economic activities to develop
(notably small and medium-sized enterprises and tourism).
Chapter IV
Specific community regional development measures
49
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0060.png
5.0
CHAPTER
V
:
LOCkTION OF ERDF ASSISTANCE
5.1 THE EIGHT MOST ASSISTED REGIONS RECEIVED HALF OF THE
GRANTS
94.
The extent to which the principle of geographical concentration of
ERDF assistance is put into practice can be seen from an analysis of the
proportion of grants given to the Community regions which received most of
the assistance.
As in 1982, 15 regions received two thirds of Fund assistance:
proportion had been three quarters in 1983.
this
95. Half of the grants went to eight regions. Campania again headed the
list with 290 million ECU, although its share has been declining slightly
over the years: 16% in 1982, 13.5% in 1983 and 12.5%.in 1984.
TABLE 20
THE
TEN REGIONS RECEIVING
THE
BULK OF ERDF ASSISTANCE
ERDF, SUPPORT
~tEASURES
(Mio ECU)
1984
Region
Campania
Sicilia
Ireland
Scotland
Wales
North West
Kentr.Dyt.Makedon.
Yorkshire/Humbers.
Calabria
North
Total
EUR 10
Ass is-
tance
290.39
197.96
159.12
155.07
96.23
95.86
89.65
86.19
72.29
65.15
1 307.91
2 320.94
%
1975-1984
Region
Campania
Sicilia
Scotland
Ireland
North
Calabria
Wales
Kentr.Dyt.Makedon.
Puglia
North West
Ass is-
tance
1 358.68
765.58
743.96
713.44
475.73
440.90
432.38
411.73
353.77
339.57
6 035.74
11
%
11.7
6.6
6.4
6.2
4.1
3.8
3.7
3.5
3.1
2.9
52.0
12.5
8.5
6.9
6.7
4.1
4.1
3.9
3.7
3.1
2.8
56.4 Total
100.0 EUR 10
598.63 100.0
Except in the case of Ireland, the grants made for multi-regional
projects have not been taken into account for the above regions.
They accounted for 0.2% of support measures in 1984 and for 4.5%
over the period 1975-84.
The list of the ten most assisted regions (see Table 20) is not identical
from one year to the next. Two English regions - Yorkshire/Humberside and
the North
joined the list in 1984, while two Italian regions -
Basilicata and Apulia - dropped out. Of those regions which remained in
the list in 1984, some (such as central and western Macedonia and
Calabria) moved down, while others (such as Sicily, Ireland and Wales)
improved their positions.
·
Chapter V
Location of ERDF assistance
51
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0061.png
96. The regions with priority status - the Mezzogiorno, Greece (except
for Athens), Ireland, Northern Ireland, Greenland and the French Overseas
Departments - received more than half the grants
(53.3%)
in
1984,
compared
with
64.1%
in
1983
(see Table
3
in Chapter II for the periods
1984
and
1975-84).
.
97.
The ERDF assists only those Community regions which receive regional
aid from their Governments. These aids are approved by the Commission in
accordance with Articles
92
and
94
of the Treaty establishing the European
Economic Community.
ERDF operations affect areas with a combined population of
107
million
being
39%
of the Community's total population. As.Table
21
shows, however,
the relative importance of these aided regions varies widely from one
Member State to another. They account for some
16%
of the population in
Denmark and the Netherlands, from
35%
to
42%
in the Federal Republic of
Germany, the United Kingdom, Italy, France and Belgium, and as much as
66%
in Greece. Ireland and Luxembourg are regarded as ERDF assisted areas in
their entirety.
TABLE
21
ERDF-ASSISTED AREAS: POPULATION
AND
AID PER CAPITA
ERDF, SUPPORT MEASURES
Member
State
B
Population
*
(in millions)
total
9.9
5.2
61.7
9.7
55.4
3.4
57.2
0.4
14.2
56.3
273.4
Aid per capita
in ERDF areas
in
1984
(ECU)
9
eligible
3.5
0.8
22.8
6.4
23.0
3.4
23.0
0.4
2.4
21. 0(3)
106.6
as
%
35.4
15.5
37.0
65.5
41.6
100.0
40.2
100.0
16.6
37.2
39.0
DK
(1)
D
GR
F
(2)
IRL
I
1
31
5
41
12
46
35
13
NL
UK
15
30
22
EUR
10
(1)
Including Greenland
(2)
Including Overseas Departments
(3)
Including the Inner Urban Areas
(*)
From the available sources, the population figures relate to
the years
1980-1984
inclusive.
Aid calculated in per capita terms provides a better measure of the
level of ERDF assistance in the regions. This year for the first time
this indicator has been calculated by relating ERDF grants solely to the
population of the assisted areas and not to the total population of the
region in question. This indicator thus provides a more accurate picture,
since it provides a better comparison of the measures taken to help the
populations of the eligible areas only.
In
1984,
the two leading regions were Greenland with
270
ECU per head of
population and French Guiana with
146
ECU. Their leading position already
noted for the whole of the period
1975-84
was therefore maintained. In the
table of the ten most aided regions in
1984
according to this indicator,
however, there are five Greek regions. Italy, the United Kingdom, Ireland,
Denmark and France each have only one region in the list. Of the ten
regions receiving the most ERDF grants in absolute terms, only Campania,
52
98.
ERDF
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0062.png
Ireland and central and western Macedonia again appear in the group of the
ten regions with the most aid per capita.
99. For a clearer overview of the ERDF's effort in each assisted region
its activities have been illustrated by two maps portraying the regional
distribution of assistance in terms of total amounts and amounts per
capita (Maps 4 and 5).
Tables 41 and 42 in the Annex provide all the data on the regional
distribution of assistance by type of investment from 1975 to 1984 and per
capita in 1984 and from 1975 to 1984.
5.2
LOCATION
OF
ASSISTANCE IN THE MEMBER STATES
100.
This section of Chapter V reviews ERDF assistance in each of the
Community countries. Table 22 shows the grants made to assisted regions in
1984. After a brief analysis of each country, details of ERDF assistance
are .given for a selection of regions within that country which received
assistance in 1984.
5.2.1
Belgium
101.
In Belgium, 33 million ECU were granted to 151 projects; 81% went to
investments in infrastructure, 14% to industrial investments and 5% to
studies.
In the period 1975-1984, Belgium received 114 million ECU of which 70% for
infrastructure investments, 28% for industrial and service sector
projects and 2% for studies.
In 1984, grants totalling 5 million ECU went to 13 industrial and service
sector projects in various branches, helping to provide 413 jobs.
In the case of infrastructure investments, 37% of the grant aid went to
projects in the food and water supply sectors and 30% to road and sewerage
works. The other projects concerned the improvement or extension of
industrial estates, waste treatment and tourist facilities.
FLANDERS
In 1984, ERDF grants to Flanders totalled 4 million ECU, 12% of the total
for Belgium: 61% of this grant aid went to industrial projects and 39% to
infrastructure projects.
In the period 1975-1984, Flanders received 46 million ECU, 40% of the
total for Belgium: 59% went to infrastructure investments and 41% to
industrial and service sector projects.
Per capita assistance in the ERDF-assisted areas was 3 ECU in 1984 and 33
ECU for the period 1975-1984.
Of the 14 infrastructure projects assisted, 11 concerned the creation of
craft activity areas and the extension of industrial estates in the
Limburg-Campine area, receiving grants totalling 0.9 million ECU. In the
tourist industry, a grant of 0.4 million ECU was made for a second
extension of the "De Spaanjerd" recreation centre at Kinrooi.
The districts of Aalst and Oudenaarde benefited
Community measures to assist textile-producing areas.
from
the specific
Chapter V
Location of ERDF assistance
53
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0063.png
MAP 4
REGIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF ERDF ASSISTANCE IN 1984
LEVEL III
REGIONS (MIO ECU) ·
0.0
0.5
1.8
<
X
=<
<
X
=<
<
<
X
X
0.5
1.8
6.0'
=<
6.0
=<
213.9
§
§
-
f
'
54
..
ERDF
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0064.png
MAP 5
REGIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF ERDF ASSISTANCE PER· CAPITA IN 1984
(ECU)
2
<
<
<
<
X
X
X
X
=<
=<
=<
=<
5
5
14
36
14
36
270
§
§
-
·~
~
, ··',. ,
·I
rl6
:tP¥'
Ea
...
·'
Chapter V
Location of ERDF assistance
55
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0065.png
WALLONIA
In
1984,
ERDF grants to Wallonia totalled
29
million ECU,
88%
of the total
for Belgium:
87%
went to infrastructure investments,
8%
to industrial
projects and
5%
to studies.
In the period
1975-1984,
Wallonia received
69
million ECU,
60%
of the
total for Belgium:
77%
went to infrastructure projects,
20%
to industrial
and service sector projects and
3%
to studies.
Per capita assistance in the ERDF-assisted areas was
14
ECU in
1984
and
34
ECU for the period
1975-84.
More than half the
119
infrastructure projects rece1v1ng grants
(67
in
all) concerned roadworks and sewerage systems,
20
concerned works in the
· food and drinking water supply sectors and
18
related to the purification
of waste water.
··
In the tourist sector, ERDF grants were made for three projects; these
included the construction of a multi-purpose sports hall . and
swimming-pool in the "Worriken" recreation centre at Biitgenbach, which
received almost 2 million ECU.
Grants totalling
1.
6 ·
million ECU were made for five studies, three of
which formed part of a programme to stimulate job creation in the
Charleroi area.
The provinces of Luxembourg, Liege and Hainaut (with the exception of the
districts of Ath and Tournai) benefited from the .specific Community
measures to help steel-making areas. The district of Mouscron benefited
from the measures to assist textile-producing areas.
The. less-favoured agricultural areas of the south-east of Belgium will
benefit from the integrated development programme for that region, which
the Commission approved in December
1984.
Two thirds of the infrastructure
investments which received ERDF grants in Wallonia in
1984
were located in
those areas.
·
5.2 .2
Denmark
102.
In
1984, 167
projects received grants totalling
24.6
million ECU,
85%
of which went to infrastructure projects,
12%
to industrial projects
and
3%
to studies.
In the period
1975-1984, 131.9
million ECU were granted to
831
projects:
86%
for infrastructure projects,
10%
for industrial projects and
4%
for
studies.
GREENLAND
Greenland, which was granted ERDF aid for the last time in
1984,
received
13.8
million ECU:
12.8
million ECU for
106
infrastructure
projects,
0.7
million ECU for feasibility studies concerning the use of
hydroelectric energy to supply local communities, and
0.3
million ECU for
a service sector project. This brings the total aid granted to Greenland
since
1975
to
100
millions ECU. Of that total,
93.9
million ECU went to
infrastructure projects,
5.8
million ECU to six studies and
0.3
million
ECU to a service sector project.
In
1984,
Greenland received
56%
of the total aid granted to Denmark,
compared with
76%
in the period
1975-1984,
already indicating a slowdown
in aid.
103.
56
ERDF
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0066.png
Fund assistance per head of population in Greenland was 270 ECU in 1984,
which brings the total for the period 1975-84 to 1 960 ECU.
Some 40% of the aid granted for infrastructure projects went to the
transport sector, the largest grant being that for the Jakobshavn airport.
Energy supply projects received 20% of total ERDF assistance.
5.2 .3
Federal Republic
of
Germany
104.
From 1975 to 1984, Fund grants to the Federal Republic of Germany
totalled 544.8 million ECU, the bulk of which (55.5%) went to industrial,
craft and service activities.
In total, funds were provided for 680 infrastructure projects, 2 studies
and 1 633 industrial projects. The industrial projects helped to create
some 80 000 jobs and to maintain a further 16 000 (i.e. a total of
96 000). This is more than 15% of the jobs created or preserved by the
ERDF throughout the Community.
In the period 1975-1984, Fund assistance per head of population in the
ERDF-assisted regions amounted to some 24 ECU.
105.
In 1984, grants to the Federal Republic of Germany totalled over 109
million ECU, accounting for some 4.7% of total aid to Member States. The
bulk of this assistance went to 228 industrial projects, with the
remainder going to 58 infrastructure projects and one study. ERDF grants
helped to create 10 900 new jobs and to safeguard some 3 750 more.
A fifth of the grants made to industrial projects went to the automobile
industry, thereby helping to create or safeguard 2 800 jobs. A further
12.3% was allocated to the mechanical engineering industry (2 200 jobs),
with the remainder being divided between a number of sectors.
In 1984, the main beneficiaries of ERDF assistance were Baviara and
Berlin, with 23.1% and 21.8% respectively of the grants made to the
Federal Republic of Germany. They were followed by the Saarland (10.3%)
and North-Rhine-Westphalia (10.2%).
BERLIN
106.
In 1984, 23.9 million ECU were granted to two projects: firstly an
infrastructure project aimed at reviving the Brunnenstrasse industrial
estate to provide facilities for specialist high-tech industries, and
secondly an industrial project which received a ERDF grant of 5.6 million
ECU and which is expected to create or safeguard
1
200 jobs.
In the period 1975-84, 108.2 million ECU were granted to Berlin, which is
equivalent to 8.1% of total assistance to Germany during that period.
This helped to finance major infrastructure projects such as the
construction of a refuse incineration plan at Neukolln and the building of
a. fair and.exhibition complex in the television tower area.
Over the period 1975-84, ERDF assistance per head of population in this
region was 24 ECU.
SAARLAND
107.
As in 1983, all the projects financed in the Saarland in 1984 were
industrial. The ERDF grants helped to finance 23 projects costing a total
of 11.3 million ECU and a feasibility study concerning flow control of the
river Rosse!. The main sectors to benefit were vehicle manufacture, the
steel industry, mechanical engineering and light metal manufacture.
Chapter V
Location of ERDF assistance
57
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0067.png
Since 1975, the Saarland has received 72 million ECU from the ERDF for 267
projects; 82% of that aid went to industrial projects.
In the period 1975-1984, ERDF assistance in the Saarland amounted to 67
ECU per head of population, which is well above the average for Germany.
The Commission also approved a special programme for the Saarland under
Regulation (EEC) n° 216/84 of 18 January 1984. This special programme, to
which the ERDF is contributing 13 million ECU, is designed to eliminate
obstacles to the development of new industries in the context of the
restructuring of the steel industry in the Saarland.
Finally, the ·commission decided in 1984 to contribute to the financing of
a preparatory study for an integrated development operation in the
Saarland.
5 •
2.4
Greece
108.
As Greece did not become a member of the Community until 1981, ERDF
grants to that country have been limited to the period 1981-1984.
During these four years, however, ERDF aid has been substantial, totalling
more than 1
000
million ECU. The ERDF has contributed to
920
infrastructure projects accounting for 96% of the total assistance to
Greece, 49 of which cost more than 10 million ECU each. Foremost among
these are: the project of the National Electricity Corporation (DEI) to
generate electricity from lignite at Agios Dimitrios in the prefecture 0f
Kozani in western Macedonia which received a grant of 43.5 million ECU and
was one of the biggest infrastructure projects co-financed by the ERDF in
1984; the projects to improve the telephone network of the Hellenic
Telecommunications Organization (OTE); major investments in transport
infrastructure; improvements to the rail network; the construction of the
Patras-Olyepia road and the Thessaloniki-Seres road; the modernization of
regional airports; industrial infrastructure (the industrial estates of
the Hellenic Industrial Development Bank (ETVA) and the vocational
training centres of the National Employment Agency (OAED). The remainder
of the aid (some 40 million ECU) was used to finance 103 projects in the
industrial, craft and service sectors, together with five studies. The
projects in question are intended to create or safeguard some 6 500 jobs
and are mainly concentrated in Thrace (22 projects) and in the eastern
Aegean islands (18 projects).
The funds provided for the major projects carried out by the DEI in the
prefecture of Kozani make central and western Macedonia the main
beneficiary of ERDF aid, wich some
40%
of the total. However, these
projects are designed to meet national needs and will therefore have an
impact on the development of other regions.
The remaining
60%
has been shared between all the other regions in Greece,
with the exception of Attica. It should also be noted that 10
multi-regional projects in outlying areas have received a total of some ·30
million ECU.
109.
In 1984, the pattern of ERDF aid to Greece reflected the priority
given to infrastructure projects over industrial investments: 98% of the
261 million ECU granted went to infrastructure prgjects.
The bulk of the grants made to 311 infrastructure projects were for
roadworks, the construction of power stations, the modernization of
telecommunications, port and airport improvements and the modernization
of sewerage and irrigation systems.
58
ERDF
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0068.png
Smaller grants were made for the equipping of research centres
specializing in advanced technologies and for the construction of
cultural centres.
The majority of the grants made to the 18 industrial, craft and service
sector projects went on the construction of 11 hotels; the remainder were
for metal and wood-working projects and a study.
110.
Under Regulation (EEC) N° 215/84 instituting a specific Community
measure contributing to the development of certain regions of Greece in
the context of Community enlargement, a programme was approved to help the
Greek islands, to which the ERDF is contributing 40 million ECU. The
programme in question consists of measures to help small and medium-sized
enterprises, tourism, transport and the environment.
A second programme for assistance to the Greek islands was approved under
Regulation (EEC) n° 218/84, to which the ERDF is contributing 20 million
ECU and which concerns the use of new technologies in the energy sector.
The two specific Community measures in question are the first programmes
to be approved for Greece.
ASSISTANCE BY REGION
111.
In 1984, central and western Macedonia received the largest
proportion of aid (some 34.3%) while 15.4% were allocated to projects in
eastern mainland Greece and in the islands.
In terms of assistance per head of population in 1984, the islands of the
eastern Aegean occupied firsl place with 97 ECU, followed by eastern
mainland Greece and the islands with 64 ECU.
THE PELOPONNESE AND WESTERN MAINLAND GREECE
In 1984, ERDF grants totalling 15.7 million ECU went to 30 projects:
29 infrastructure projects and one industrial project. The infrastructure
projects included work on modernizing the airports at Kalamata and Tripoli
and those on the islands of Zante and Cephalonia (construction of a new
airport).
Grants were also made for work on irrigation and sewerage systems and for
the improvement of the road network in the prefecture of Aetolia-Acarnania
and in all the prefectures of the Peloponnese and the islands of Zante and
Cephalonia.
·
Grants made to this region since 1981 total 130.5 million ECU or 101 ECU
per head of population.
CRETE
113.
In 1984, the ERDF granted 31.7 million ECU to Crete (some 12% total
aid for Greece) to help finance 35 investments. Most of this grant aid
went to 33 infrastructure projects and to the construction of two hotels.
112.
The infrastructure projects assisted included in particular those carried
out by the OTE to improve the telecommunications network on the island,
the construction of sewerage systems at Khania and Rethimnon, the
modernization of the airport and improvements to the industrial estate at
Iraklion and the improvement of the provincial road network in all the
prefectures of Crete.
A contribution was also made towards providing technical equipment for the
Crete research centre (Iraklion) (four investments) to enable the island
to carry out applied research and introduce modern technology.
ERDF grants to Crete in the period 1981-84 totaled .78. 7 million ECU, which
represents assistance of 157 ECU per head of population.
Chapter V : Location of ERDF assistance
59
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0069.png
5.2.5 France
1984 - YEAR OF CHANGE FOR THE ERDF
114.
The year 1984 was of particular significance for ERDF operations in
France. For the first time since 1976, grant applications submitted to the
Commission by the French authorities in respect of infrastructure
investments no longer related exclusively to operations wholly financed
by central government nor to that part of expenditure borne by central
government where the project is financed by a number of public or
quasi-public authorities.
Following a decision taken by the French Government, the ERDF has also
been asked to help finance that part of investmen't expenditure borne by
the regions, departments and municipalities and by other public bodies. In
1984, grant applications were submitted to the ERDF in respect of
expenditure incurred by such bodies as the Agence Fran<;aise pour la
Maitrise de l'Energie, the Syndicats Intercommunaux
a
Vocation Multiple
(SIVOM), the Pares Naturels Regionaux, the
Chambe~s
of craft industry, the
autonomous ports, etc.
As a result of that decision, the ERDF is contributing finance to a
limited but nevertheless significant number of projects in which public
authorities other than central government are involved. The projects for
which grants were approved in 1984 are located in the following regions:
Aquitaine, Auvergne, Champagne-Ardenne, ,Corsica, Languedoc-Roussillon,
Lorraine, Midi-Pyrenees, Nord-Pas-de-Calais, Provence-Alpes-Cote d'Azur,
Rhone-Alpes and the four overseas departments. The regions in .
metropolitan France are those affected by the Community's enlargement an.d
those which include one or more conversion areas. This measure is making
Community action much more transparent and effective and is in keeping
with the spirit of the Regulation setting up the ERDF. According to that
Regulation, ERDF assistance should not lead Member States to reduce their
own regional development efforts but should complement those efforts.
A further major innovation in 198( was the considerably wider range of
investments for which the French authorities submitted applications for
Community financial assistance. New types of projects have been added to
those traditionally submitted by France (roads, ports, telephones,
electricity generation and distribution, etc.). These new projects
include industrial/port areas, craft industry estates equipped with
advance workshops and service buildings, waste water collection systems
in rural communities and urban centres, drinking water supply systems,
municipal campsites, etc. The submission of these new types of investment
project is a consequence of decentralization and of the fact that regional
and local financing is taken into account in the grant applications.
The year 1984 was also a key year for studies. For the first time since
1975, the French authorities submitted grant applications for two studies
which were closely related to ERDF operations. The first was a feasibility
study concerning use of the geothermal resources of Reunion to produce
energy and the second concerned measures to be taken to protect an
industrial/port area against flooding .
. ANALYSIS OF ASSISTANCE IN 1984
115.
Grants totalling 262 million ECU were made in 1984 for productive or
infrastructure investments in France. In addition, there was the
6
million
ECU Community contribution to the two feasibility studies.
Grants for investments in industrial, craft and service activities
totalled
33
million ECU or
13%
of the total. This represents a slight but
nevertheless significant increase over the corresponding figures for
1983. The bulk of the assistance went to firms in the metalworking,
instrument engineering and other manufacturing sectors. The productive
60
ERDF
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0070.png
investment projects rece1v1ng ERDF assistance will permit the creation of
14 615 new jobs and preserve 750 threatened jobs. ·
As in the past, Community grant aid was concentrated on infrastructure
investments, for which a total of 228 mi Ilion ECU was committed. The
sectoral breakdown shows that 62% of that amount went to transport
infrastructures; the proportions allocated to telecommunications and
energy generation and distribution
~ere
down markedly on previous years,
at 6% and 23% respectively.
An
analysis of the regional breakdown shows that Brittany was again the
main recipient of Community assistance with 41 million ECU or 15. 2% of the
total. The other regions which received substantial proportions were-
Midi-Pyrenees (14.6%), Auvergne (8.7%), Aquitaine (7.6%), Limousin (7.4%)
and Languedoc-Roussillon (7.2%).
118.
Concerning the specific Community measures, the year 1984 saw an
upturn in activity under the "enlargement" programme covering the three
regions of the South West (Aquitaine, Languedoc-Roussillon and
Midi-Pyrenees). A total of 10.2 million ECU was committed in respect of
four main types of actions: the development of small and medium-sized
enterprises, the promotion of industrial innovation, the promotion of
craft industries and the exploitation of tourist potential.
In supplementing the measures taken by central government, the regions and
the local authorities, ERDF assistance helps to speed up broad-based
development of the South West. The results, while not spectacular, are
significant. Thus, through the practical implementation of many projects
and initiatives, the ERDF "enlargement" programme has now become a
tangible reality.
The second series of specific Community measures adopted in January 1984
by the Council provides for the funds allocated to the "enlargement"
programme for those same regions to be doubled.
In addition, the "steel areas" measure is to apply henceforth to a number
of areas in the regions of Nord-Pas-de-Calais and Lorraine. The_ ERDF's
contribution to the five-year programme covering the French areas is
planned to be 42 million ECU.
Finally, the new "textile areas" measure is to· apply to a number of areas
in the regions of Nord-Pas-de-Calais, Picardy, Lorraine, Alsace,
Rhone-Alpes, Languedoc-Roussillon and Midi-Pyrenees. The Community
contribution to the five-year programme covering the French areas is to be
80 million ECU.
OVERSEAS DEPARTMENTS
117.
In view of the nature and gravity of the problems facing these
regions at the Community's periphery, a proportionately very high level of
assistance was given to them in 1984. The impact of this assistance on the
regional, departmental and local authorities' resources in the overseas
departments is put at almost 13 million ECU.
The Fund Regulation provisions governing the eligibility of industrial,
craft and service sector investments, and in particular the requirement
that at least 10 jobs must be created or maintained, make it difficult to
consider productive investment projects carried out in the four
departments.
It
is therefore not surprising that in 1984 only eight
projects received grants totalling 0.5 million ECU. Despite difficult
conditions, however, the ERDF helped to create 166 jobs.
The bulk of Fund assistance therefore went to the infrastructure
investments necessary for the development of the region. These included
the following:
Chapter V
Location of ERDF assistance
61
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0071.png
FRENCH GUIANA: the creation of a fully serviced craft industry area of
seven hectares · at Cayenne which will provide .craftsmen not only with
.advance workshops but also with a joint services centre and a wood drier.
This project will create the necessary conditions for promoting and
developing craft activities.
A further interesting project is the construction of a wood-shredding
plant for feeding the future gas-fired power station at Degrad des Cannes.
The power station will utilise trees felled in clearing operations and
sawmill waste and will reduce the energy dependence of French Guiana,
which has to meet almost all of its energy requirements from hydrocarbon
imports.
REUNION: the main study to be financed in this region is also concerned
with reducing dependence on energy imports. Reunion has great potential as
a producer of geothermal energy and it was decided to examine whether it
would be possible and economic to generate electricity from geothermal
steam.
MARTINIQUE: the construction of a new section of the Fort de France
by-pass represents an additional step towards the completion of this
important communications project.
GUADELOUPE:· the extension of the industrial and port area at the Jarry is
an important element of the autonomous port's aim of making Pointe-a-Pitre
a dispersal port in the Caribbean.
CORSICA
118.
No applications for grants for investments in industrial, craft and
service sector activities in Corsica were submitted during the 1984
financial year. This situation is worrying, particularly because only
four projects in the productive sector have received ERDF grants since
1975, totalling no more than 0.6 million ECU.
The decisions taken in 1984 relate to 19 infrastructure investments for
which grants totalling 2 million ECU were approved. While this amount is
appreciably lower than previous years, it covers only investments for
which the· share of the lower-tier public authorities (region, department,
municipalities, SIVOM, regional park) is included in the basis for Fund
assistance.
The new approach adopted by the French Government to the ERDF is
influencing the choice of projects. While the investments co-financed in
1984 include a number of sections of major roads, these are linked to
forestry roads, to improvements to a port and to the construction of a
municipal campsite. However, the Corsican regional authorities have given
priority to work on extending and improving drinking water supplies for
villages. Nine infrastructure investment projects of this type are being
co-financed and have received Community grants of almost 0.7 million ECU.
The inland areas of Corsica are also receiving Community financial aid in
connection with the pilot projects being carried out in preparation for
the future integrated Mediterranean programmes.
·
5
.2
.6
Ireland
119.
In 1984, Ireland received grants totalling 159.1 million ECU, 69% of
which went to infrastructure
projects~
This brings to 713.4 million ECU the grants made to Ireland since 1975,
the relative shares of infrastructure and industrial projects being 72%
and 28% respectively. During the same
period~
some 0.65 million ECU were
allocated to studies.
62
ERDF
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0072.png
Fund aid per head of population in Ireland in 1984 was 46 ECU, which
brings the total for the period 1975-1984 to 207 ECU.
The largest proportion of the grants for infrastructure projects went to
transport (39%), followed by telecommunications (38%). The remaining aid
was divided between water supply and sewerage sc4emes (16%) and various
smaller investments in technical training-and cultural facilities.
In the transport sector, the ERDF continued to support the modernization
and improvement of the road system; grants totalling 42.3 million ECU were
made for
44
projects.
Further grants totalling 41.6 million ECU were made to help complete the
Irish Accelerated Telecommunications Programme, one of the most important
infrastructure projects co-financed by the ERDF in 1984. In addition, 16
water supply and sewerage schemes spread throughout the country received
grants totalling
18
million ECU.
In the technical training field, a grant of 3.9 million ECU was made
towards the construction of a major regional technical college at Tralee,
County Kerry.
The bulk of the grants made for industrial, craft and service sector
activities went to firms specializing in new technologies. Grants
totalling 49.5 million ECU were made to 75 industrial investment projects
throughout the country, which were expected to create 7 900 jobs.
In addition to the grants referred to above, Ireland also received aid in
connection with the specific Community measures to improve the economic
and social situation of the border areas of Ireland and Northern Ireland.
Accelerated implementation of the Irish programme for these specific
measures led to grants totalling
4.15
million ECU.
5.2.7
Italy
120.
In
1984,
1 521 projects in Italy received ERDF grants totalling
805
million ECU, 91% of which went to 1 327 infrastructure projects. Between
1975 and
1984,
Italy received
4
369 million ECU for 9 530 projects,
equivalent to 37.7% of all ERDF grants over that period.
121.
The
following:
main
authorities
which
applied for ERDF grants were the
• The Cassa per il Mezzogiorno, which is the central authority responsible
for the development of the Mezzogiorno, received ERDF grants for water
engineering projects, roadworks, research centres and industrial
projects;
• the municipalities in the Mezzogiorno responsible for the natural gas
distribution network;
• the regions, which submitted applications in respect of projects
directly carried out by the regional authorities or by local bodies such
as the municipalities, provinces, mountain communities and other
similar institutions. As a result of the great encouragement given by
the ERDF departments to local authorities and bodies, these now play an
ever increasing role in ERDF operations. Some regions, such as Campania,
Lazio and Sicily, have specifically made one of the members of their
regional governments responsible for ERDF matters. Furthermore, all the
regions have an office responsible for Community affairs, including
ERDF operations. In
1984,
the Fund grants made for projects submitted by
the regions came to 380 million ECU, almost half the total for the
country.
Chapter V
Location of ERDF assistance
63
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0073.png
122.
The main reasons why total ERDF grants to industrial investments
were low in 1984 were:
• at national level, the continuing low level of industrial investments in
the Mezzogiorno and the limited national resources allocated to
measures to stimulate industry;
• at Community level, the strict selection of eligible projects according
to sector. Investments in sensitive sectors or in manufacturing
industries in which there is already overcapacity are normally
excluded. Furthermore, the requirement that at least ten new jobs must
be created rules out most small investment projects.
The 189 industrial projects which received grants are designed to create
some 6 700 new jobs, the bulk of them in Campania (2 700) and Lazio
(1
400).
·-
123.
In 1984, five studies benefited from ERDF grants .. Of those studies,
three related to the setting up of a comprehensive coordinated planning
system for collecting and supplying water in the regions of Molise,
Abruzzi and in the southern part of Marches.
124.
The ERDF continued to assist infrastructure projects in sectors
playing a prime role in the development of the Mezzogiorno. These
included:
• the supply and distribution of water, particularly in inland areas with
tourist potential;
• the natural gas distributing network, which will supply some 200
municipalities in the Mezzogiorno;
• the supply of electricity to rural areas.
The ERDF also began to promote scientific research by helping to finance
eight research centres
in
a number of regions.
In 1984, ERDF aid went not only to the Mezzogiorno but also to the region
of Friuli-Venezia Giulia for completing investment programmes in the area
affected by the 1976 earthquake.
125.
In 1984, no new commitments were made in favour of Italy under the
specific Community measures, either under the existing programmes for
energy or Community enlargement or under the new programmes provided for
in the Regulations approved in January 1984. However, discussions
continued between the Commission's staff and the Italian authorities with
a view to establishing operational guidelines.
126.
In addition, two pilot projects were carried out in 1984 in
preparation for the integrated Mediterranean programmes - one in Abruzzi
and the other in Sardinia. These projects were concerned with the
production of energy from cedar-wood, the construction of exhibition and
trade centres for local agriculture and craft products and the setting up
of a vocational training centre.
ASSISTANCE BY REGION
Two regions, Campania and Sicily, accounted for 6l'Yo of the grants made to
Italy in 1984.
CAMPANIA
127.
In 1984, grants to Campania accounted for some 36.1% of Fund grants
to Italy. A total of 290.4 million ECU was made available for 119
projects, with 7% going to industrial projects and 93% to infrastructure
projects. Most of the grants were made to projects submitted directly by
64
ERDF
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0074.png
the City of Naples in connection with the integrated development operation
(see Chapter VII for further details).
The industrial projects which received Fund aid included the construction
of a car components factory at Pratola Serra in the province of Avellino -
the result of a joint venture between Alfa Romeo Auto Spa and the Japanese
Nissan Motor Co. Ltd.
The infrastructure projects which received grants in 1984 included a
number of projects under the general programme for cleaning up the Bay of
Naples, improvements to the road network in and around Naples, reservoirs
and water pipelines at Scudillo and Capodimonte (Naples), the
construction of an IRI vocational and training centre, service
infrastructure for industrial estates at Morra, Conza and Parrara
(localities in the province of Avellino) and the research centre for the
electronics and domestic electrical appliance industries at Caserta. The
list further included construction of the Salerno fish market, which will
enable full use to be made of the vast resources of all species of
Mediterranean fish,
in
particular tuna.
Finally, a study on the planning ·of a funicular railway on Mount Vesuvius
was financed in-1984.
SICILY
128.
In 1984, grants to Sicily accounted for 24.6% of Fund grants to
Italy. A total of 198 million ECU was made available for 323 projects,
with 2% going to industrial projects and 98% to infrastructure projects.
Completion of the Messina-Palermo motorway is of special importance for
the region since this will help to link the western side of the island to
the mainland and will improve access to historical and archaeological
sites and picturesque areas. This was the project which received the
largest Fund grant in 1984 (73 million ECU). The construction of a new
terminal at Palermo airport comprising facilities for dealing with 1 200
passengers in the arrivals area, eight departure rooms each with a
capacity of 200 passengers and all essential services will make it
possible to cope with heavy air traffic not only during the tourist season
but throughout the year. Two research centres at Palermo and Catania
(investigating solar energy and electronics respectively) also received
grants in 1984. Fund-aided infrastructure further included the extension
of the natural gas distribution network, which received a grant of 64
million ECU, and a large number of projects which involved various
localiti~s
in Sicily involving road networks and supplies of water and
electricity.
CALABRIA
129.
In 1984, grants to Calabria accounted for 9% of Fund grants to
Italy. A total of 72.2 million ECU was made available for 381 projects,
with 6% going to industrial projects and 94% to infrastructure projects.
The extension of the natural gas distribution network accounted for a
quarter of the aid, while the largest single project was the construction
of a major road crossing the inland mountainous area between Reggio di
Calabria and the plain of Rosarno. The data-processing research centre at
Cosenza also received Fund assistance.
SARDINIA
130.
In 1984, grants to Sardinia accounted for 7.6% of Fund grants to
Italy. A total of 61 million ECU was made available for 236 projects, with
5% going to industrial projects. 93% to infrastructure projects and 2% to
a study.
The Campidano and Is Barrocus water supply projects, which will provide
water for 61 municipalities accounted for more than half the assistance
Chapter V : Location of ERDF assistance
65
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0075.png
granted to Sardinia. Other major projects included the construction of
fire-fighting bases, as fires, by laying waste wide areas, have for a long
time posed serious problems for agriculture, forests and tourism.
Finally, grants went to the agrometeoroligical research centre at Alghero
and the study of the feasibility of extracting bauxite at Olmedo.
LAZIO
131.
In 1984, grants to Lazio accounted for 5. 5% of Fund grants to Italy.
A total of
44
million ECU was made available for 168 projects, with 30%
going to industrial projects and 70% to infrastructure projects. Lazio is
the region for which the greatest number of industrial projects was
submitted for grant aid. The largest infrastructure project was the
underwater aqueduct for supplying water to the island of Panza, absorbing
a third of the assistance granted to Lazio.
APULIA
132.
In 1984, grants to Apulia accounted for
5.
4% of Fund grants to
Italy. A total of 43.8 million ECU was made available for 83 projects,
with
13%
going to industrial projects and
87%
to infrastructure projects
(60% of the latter being allocated to the extension of the natural gas
distribution network). Three research centres at Bari received grants: a
centre for research into ways of applying modern technology to the
processing and preservation of agricultural products, a centre for the
study of advanced technologies and their applications and a laser centre.
ABRUZZI
133.
In 1984, grants to Abruzzi accounted for 3.5% of Fund grants to
Italy.
A
total of some
28
million ECU was made available for 74 projects,
with 19% going to industrial projects, 56% to infrastructure projects and
25%
to a study.
In addition to the pilot proj
e~t
in preparation for the integrated
Mediterranean programmes, the most important projects included the
modernization of a hotel at
a
winter resort in the Apennines, the
- provision of basic infrastructure for industrial estates in the province
of Pescara and the extension of the natural gas distribution programme.
The study related to the collection and distribution of water.
BASILICATA
134.
In
1984,
grants to Basilicata accounted for some
2.8%
of Fund grants
to Italy. Some 40 infrastructure projects received
a
total of
23
million
ECU, more than half of which was
allo~ated
to natural gas distribution
networks. A grant was also made for the development of an industrial
estate at Valle di Viterba,
an
area affected by the 1980 earthquake.
FRIULI-VENEZIA GIULIA
135.
In 1984, grants to the region of Friuli-Venezia Giulia accounted for
some
3.8%
of Fund grants to Italy. A total of
30.2
million ECU was made
available for 35 infrastructure projects, the most important of which were
the restructuring of the port of Trieste and a rail link with the port of
Monfalcone, which together accounted for
43%
of the grant aid to the
region. The other grants went to small-scale infrastructure projects,
s.uch as roadworks, water supplies, sewerage systems and basic facilities
for an industrial estate, all situated in areas affected by the 1976
earthquake.
66
ERDF
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0076.png
5.2
.8
Luxembourg
In Luxembourg, all the Fund grant aid (totalling almost 5 million
ECU) went to 17 infrastructure investments.
In the period 1975-1984, 12 million ECU were granted to 26 projects, all
infrastructure investments. Assistance per nead of population amounted to
13 ECU in 1984, compared with 33 ECU for the period 1975-84.
The projects receiving grants in 1984 were as follows: five projects for
servicing industrial estates (grant aid of 0.6 million ECU),
six
projects
relating to the food industry and water distribution (0.4 million ECU) and
six roadworks projects (almost 4 million ECU). The roadwork projects
assisted were on the Belval-Schifflange section of the expressway in the
mining area. The plan is for this section to take the heavy commuter
traffic which is bringing increasing congestion to the Esch-sur-Alzette
conurbation.
The Grand Duchy of Luxembourg also benefitted from 1984 from the aid given
to steel areas under the ERDF's specific Community measures.
136.
5.2.9
Netherlands
137.
In the Netherlands, grants totalling 36 million ECU were made to 27 ·
projects, with 87% going to infrastructure investment and 13% to
industrial investment.
In the period 1975-1984, ERDF grants to the Netherlands totalled 156
million ECU, with 85% going to infrastructure projects.
Transport infrastructure accounted for almost all (98%) of the grants to
infrastructure projects, the remaining 2% being allocated to tourist
facilities.
Gran~s
for industrial and service sector activities went mainly to the
chemical industry (43%). The remainder was divided between various
industrial and service sectors. The projects which received Fund grants
created 254 jobs.
The region of Twente in the province of Overijssel and the area of Helmond
in the province of Noord-Brabant benefited from the assistance given to
the textile-producting areas under the specific Community measures. In
December 1984, the Commission approved the specific programme, for which a
Fund grant of 7 million ECU was made.
NORTH OF THE
COL~Y
138.
This region, which covers the provinces of Friesland, Groningen and
Drenthe and the labour-market areas of Hardenberg and Steenwijk in the
province. of Overijssel, received 31 million ECU in 1984 (including a
multi-regional project), equivalent to 88% of the total for the country.
92% was allocated to 16 infrastructure projects and 8% to five industrial
projects.
In the period 1975-1984, the north of the country received 114 million ECU
or 73% of the total for the country, with nine tenths going to
infrastructure projects. Assistance per head of population was 18 ECU in
1984 and 70 ECU for the period 1975-84.
The largest grant (7 million ECU) was for the first.phase of the work on a
major road (the N 42), which is to be made into a motorway. This road,
connecting the Netherlands with _the Federal Republic of Germany, will
complete the link from the Eems-Dollard region to the Ruhr.
Chapter V : Location of ERDF assistance
67
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0077.png
Of
the
other
projects
assisted,
the
construction ·of
th~
Veendam-Stadskanaal-Ter Apel-German frontier road received a grant of
5
million ECU, while a grant of 3 million ECU was made towards work on
improving the Almelo-Coevorden canal.
LIM~URG
139.
In this province, the South Limburg redevelopment area received more
than
4
million ECU in
1984
or
12%
of the total for the country. Half of
the Fund aid went to five industrial and service sector projects and the
other half to an infrastructure project.
In the period·
1975-1984,
South Limburg received
42
million ECU or
27%
of
the total for the Netherlands. Fund assistance per head of population was
6
ECU in
1984
and
60
ECU for the period
1975-84.
The infrastructure investment project concerned the construction of the
"Westelijke randweg
11
at Sittard, for which a grant of more than
2
million
ECU was made .
5.2 .10
United Kingdom
140.
In
1984,
grants totalling
620
million ECU were made to the United
Kingdom, an increase of
35%
over the total for
1983.
Some
82%
of the
grants went to infrastructure projects,
18%
to industry and a small amount
to studies. This brings to
2 700
million ECU the total amount of Fund aid
granted to the United Kingdom since
1975.
As in
1983,
the highest proportion of grants for infrastructure projects
was for transport infrastructures, with more than half of all such grants
going to road, railway, harbour, canal, airport and urban transport
investments.
A
sixth of the total went to water infrastructures (water
supply,
sewerage systems,
etc.),
with the remainder going to
telecommunications and energy projects.
About
a
third of the aid to industry went to electrical engineering,
contributing to the creation or preservation of some
5
500
jobs. 'The
remainder was spread over a wide range of other industries, contributing
to the creation or preservation of
14 500
jobs.
A quarter of the total ERDF aid to the United Kingdom in
1984
went to
Scotland, compared with
28%
over the period
1975·83.
The English regions
received some
53%
of the grant aid in
1984,
a considerable increase as
compared with the period
1975-83 (42%),
while Wales received almost
16%,
equivalent to its average share for the period
1975-1983.
In
1984,
Northern Ireland received
34.7
million ECU or
5.6%
of the total
United Kingdom allocation. This represents an appreciable fall compared
with the period
1975-83 (12%)
and gives rise to some concern on the part
of the Commission in view of the need to pursue the regional development
of Northern Ireland. It is hoped that the authorities in Northern Ireland
will rectify this situation in
1985
by submitting a greater number of
grant applications.
A brief analysis is given below of the grants made to two regions in the
United Kingdom - an analysis which exemplifies ERDF assistance to the
United Kingdom in general.
SCOTLAND
141.
In
1984,
support measure grants to Scotland totalled
155.1
million
ECU, with
36%
going to investments in industry and
64%
to investments in
infrastructure. This brings the total grant aid to Scotland for the period
1975-84
to some
750
million ECU.
68
ERDF
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0078.png
The largest single contribution to an industrial project in Scotland in
1984 was the grant of 17 million ECU to Semiconductor (UK) Ltd., at
Greenock, Strathclyde, in respect of an investment introducing the latest
production technology to improve the quality of the semi-conductors
manufactured by the company. The number of jobs arising from the project
are projected to be 850 by 1989.
In the case of infrastructure projects, the ERDF granted 8.5 million ECU
for the upgrading of the Uig-Lochmaddy-Tarbet ferry. service (Western
Isles). The project comprises a roll on/roll off ferry and the associated
ferry terminals. The ERDF's contribution to the mobile infrastructure of
this investment project was made possible by treating the function and
purpose of that infrastructure in the same way as those of conventional
infrastructure - in this case, a bridge - which could not be built for
technical, financial or geographical reasons. The Fund grant was made on
condition that the ferryboat serve the assisted areas throughout its
normal useful life.
The other infrastructure projects included grants totalling
4.6
million
ECU to various investments undertaken by the British Railways Board
contributing to a more efficient and viable rail network for both
commercial and passenger traffic.
In Scotland, the Strathclyde region is covered by the two specific
Community measures for steel and shipbuilding areas, and the assisted
areas of the Tayside region are covered by the new textile areas measure
launched in 1984.
NORTH WEST
142.
In 1984, support measure grants to the North West totalled 95. 9
million ECU, with 19% going to investments in industry, almost 81% to
infrastructure investments and 0.2% to studies.
A grant of 4 million ECU was made towards the conversion of the disused
Manchester Central Station into an exhibition centre and indoor arena.
This centre wi 11 be of great importance for the city centre, the
Manchester conurbation and the North West region as a whole. Manchester
International Airport received 6. 7 million ECU towards improvements to
the terminal and the
developm~nt
of infrastructure services in the western
area of the airport, which should enable the airport authority to prepare
for the levels of use expected in the 1990s.
In the industrial sector, a grant of 9.5 million ECU was made to
Consolidated Bathurst Inc., Cheshire, towards the conversion and
re-equipping of a paper mill to produce newsprint.
In the North West, the County of Merseyside is covered by the specific
Community measures for shipbuilding areas, and in the Counties of
Lancashire and Greater Manchester a number of travel-to-work areas are
covered by the measures introduced in 1984 to assist the textile industry.
Chapter V
Location of ERDF assistance
69
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0079.png
0
.......
TABLE 22
REGIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF GRANTS MADE IN 1984
ERDF, SUPPORT MEASURES
Member State
. Reg ion
BELGIQUE/BELGir
Vlaanderen
Wallonia
Industry, services
and crafts
Mio BFR
209.38
107.99
101. 38
Mio OKR
DANMARK
Gr¢n I and
Other regions
22.95
2.47
20.48
Mio OM
DEUTSCHLAND
Schleswig-Holstein
Nordrhein-Westfalen
Hessen
Rheinland-Pfalz
Baden-WUrttemberg
Bayern
Saarland
Berlin
Niedersachsen
Mu It i- reg i ona I
132.03
12.48
22.77
14.89
13. 16
2.76
9.55
25.17
12.50
18.60
o.
15
Mio DR
'ELLAS
Ana.Ster.Kai Nisoi
Kentr.Oyt.Makedonia
Pelop.Oyt.Ste.EI las
Thessa
1
i a
Anatol iki Makedonia
Kriti
. I pi ros
Thraki
Nisoi Anat.Agaiou
Mu It
i-
reg i ona I
-~
Infrastructure
Mio BfR
, 211.03
68.02
1 143.01
Mio DKR
169.32
102.74
66.58
Mio OM
112. 14
10.41
2.30
1. 22
5.85
1.02
46.97
40.80
3.57
Mio ECU
26.96
1. 51
25.45
Mio ECU
21.06
12.78
8.28
Mio ECU
50.20
4.66
1. 03
0.55
2.62
0.45
21.03
18.26
1.60
Studies
Mio BFR
70.00
MiO ECU
1.56
1.56
Mio ECU
0.68
0.68
Total
Mio BFR
, 490.41
176.02
1 314.39
Mio DKR
197.77
110.71
87.06
Mio OM
244.25
22.88
25.07
16. 11
19.01
3.78
56.52
25.25
53.30
22.17
0.15
Mio DR
23 811.68
3
8
1
1
668.24
164.58
428.09
444.64
242.90
2 884.86
1 964.62
885.41
2,991.43
136.93
Mio ECU
33. 18
3.92
29.27
Mio ECU
24.60
13.77
10.83
Mia ECU
109.34
10.24
11.22
7.21
8.51
1.69
25.30
11.30
23.86
9.93
0.07
Mio ECU
261.47
40.28
89.65
15.68
15.86
2.67
31.68
21.57
9.72_
32.85
1.50
- - -
Mio ECU
4.66
2.40
2.26
Mio ECU
2.85
0. 31
2.55
Mio ECU
59. 11
5.59
10.19
6.67
5.89
1.24
4.28
11.27
5.60
8.33
0.07
Mio ECU
5.55
1. 60
1.04
0.24
0.54
0.28
0.47
1.
37
C'l
H
~
0
-
70.00
Mio DKR
5.50
5.50
-
~
0
t::l'
!:>:len
H
eg;d
enS1
..
'>:IH
C:HI-i
-
-
O,:,OlJ>
o,:,z~
Mio OM
0.08
Mio ECU
0.04
1-i'"'::l
~0~
N
~~N
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.08
-
-
-
Mio DR
2.50
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.04
-
-
-
Mio ECU
0.03
~~
~en
en~
1:>:1
H
z
.....
\0
00
Mio DR
23 303.57
3
8
1
1
522.24
069.81
405.79
395.10
242.90
2 859.37
1 964.62
843.01
2 866.30
134.43.
BFR
Mio ECU
255.90
"38.68
88.61
15.44
15.32
2.67
31.40
21.57
9.26
31.47
1. 48
""'
505.61
146.00
94.77
22.30
49.53
§
tTl
'>:I
125.13
-
-
42.39
-
25.49
-
-
-
2.50
DKR
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.03
--
-----------·
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Value of the ECU at first December 1984: 1 ECU
-
-~-
=
44,91
--
=
8,041
=
2,234
OM= 91,07 ORA.
------ - - - -
----
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0080.png
.g
(0
::T
n
rt
TABLE 22
REGIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF GRANTS MADE IN 1984
ERDF, SUPPORT MEASURES
(CONTINUED)
Member State
Region
FRANCE
Haute-Normandie
Basse-Normandie
Picardie
Champagne-Ardenne
centre
Nord-Pas-de-Calais
Bretagne
Pays-de-la-Loire
Poitou Charentes
Lorraine
Alsace
Limousin
Aquitaine
Mid 1-Pyrenees
Auvergne
Rhone-Aipes
Languedoc-Roussi)lon
Provence-cote-d'Azur
Corse
Martinique
Guadeloupe
Guyane
Reunion
Industry, services
and crafts
Mio FF
228.44
6.64
8.04
9.87
9.72
19. 18
14.34
24.83
7.61
9.69
3.08
6.01
18. 11
36.78
31.71
4.99
12.23
1.88
0.43
0.52
1. 28
Mio IRL
IRELAND
Donegal
North East
North west
West
Mid lands
East
Mid West
South East
South West
Multi-regional
35.61
0.05
0.75
0.36
1.84
2.08
9.27
12.61
1.14
6.65
0.88
Mio ECU
33.38
0.97
1.17
1. 44
1.
42
2.80
2.09
3.63
1.
11
1.142
0.45
0.88
2.65
5.37
4.63
0.73
1. 79
0.27
0.22
0.06
0.08
0.·19
Mio ECU
49.54
0.07
1.04
0.50
2.56
2.89
12.89
17.54
1. 59
9.25
1.23
1nf ra structure
Mio FF
1 562.46
14.75
20.89
5.85
73.23
263.91
20.146
14.35
85.87
4.72
128.70
121.06
229.84
127.02
38.49
120.24
18.03
14.43
71. 12
38.43
72.46
78.59
Mio IRL
78.76
1. 27
1. 23
1.06
3.35
1.62
12.42
2.45
2.74
10.58
42.05
Mio ECU
228.29
2.16
3.05
0.86
10.70
38.56
2.99
2.10
12.55
0.69
18.80
17.69
33.58
18.56
5.62
17.57
2.63
2. 11
10.39
5.62
10.59
11.48
Mio ECU
109.58
1. 77
1.
71
1.47
4.66
2.25
17.28
3.41
3.82
14.72
58.50
Studies
Mio FF
41. 17
Mio ECU
6.02
Tota I
Mio FF
1 832.07
6.64
2?.79
9.87
30.61
5.85
92.41
278.25
45.29
21.96
95.56
7.80
134.71
139. 16
266.63
158.73
43.48
132.47
19.91
14.43
72.63
38.86
72.98
121.04
Mio IRL
114.38
1. 32
1-.97
1.
41
5.19
3.69
21.69
15.06
3.88
17.23
42.93
Mio ECU
267.68
0.97
3.33
1. 44
4.47
0.86
13.50
40.65
6.62
3.21
13.96
1.
14
19.68
20.33
38.96
23.19
6.35
19.35
2.91
2.11
10.61
5.68
10.66
17.69
Mio ECU
159. 12
1. 84
2.74
1. 97 .
7,21
I
s.
14
I
30.17 '
20.95
I
5.40
23.96
59.72
c;"l
r;
<:
t"'
0
~
~
(')
Pl
~
~
t::l
rt
g
0
1-1>
t-'·
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
~
Q>
1:>1
-
-
-
-
til
til
00
-
-
t-'·
Q>
rt
:;:l
(')
CD
-
1. 51
-
41.17
Mio IRL
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
egtll
~
MH
"1~
c;
stllQ
oC::H~
z~o>
~~zc;
'""o
t-<
z:>JjOf>j
---E~
til~
1:>1
H
~:::::C"l~
c::~ITJ
~til
z
,_.
\0
00
6.02
Mio ECU
.p.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
IRL .
-
-
-
-
-
-
J
I
Value of the ECU at first December 1984: 1 ECU
=
6,844
FF
=
0,7188
...,
,_.
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0081.png
"-.1
N
TABLE 22
REGIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF GRANTS MADE IN 1984
ERDF, SUPPORT MEASURES
(CONTINUED)
Member State
Region
I TAL IA
Friuli~Ven.Giul
Industry, services
and crafts
Mrd LIT
78.15
ia
2.23
18.25
7. 1 1
Mia ECU
56.62
1. 61
13.22
5.15
Infra structure
Mrd LIT
1 016.50
41.75
6.59
42.66
21.98
5. 11
373.18
52.52
31.76
94.19
268.24
78.52
Mio LFR
212.30
Mia HFL
77.93
65.10
5.33
7.50
Mia UKL
303.97
38.17
47.22
3.06
27.51
18.06
46.60
50.32
59.27
13.74
Mio ECU
736.46
30.24
4.78
30.91
15.92
3.70
270.37
38.05
23.01
68.24
194.34
56.89
Mio ECU
4.73
Mio ECU
30.92
25.83
2. 11
2.98
Mio ECU
505.55
63.49
78.54
5. 10
45.76
30.04
77.51
83.68
98.58
22.85
Studies
Mrd LIT
16.98
1.
Tota I
Mio ECU
12.30
0.81
6.98
3.45
0.09
Mrd Ll T
1 111.63
41.75
9.95
60.90
38.72
9.87
400.82
60.44
31.76
99.78
273.23
84.42
Mio LFR
212.30
Mia HFL
89.71
71.33
10.88
7.50
Mia UKL
372.69
39.17
51.82
4. 37
28.64
18.06
57.64
57.86
93.24
20.84
1. 05
Mia ECU
805.38
30.24
7.21
44.12
28.05
7. 15
290.39
43.79
23.01
72.29
197.96
61. 16
Mia ECU
4.73
Mia ECU
35.59
28.30
4.32
2.98
Mia ECU
619.84
65.15
86.19
7.27
47.64
30.04
95.86
96.23
155.07
34.66
1. 75
Mia ECU
Gl
Ma rche
Lazio
Abruzzi
Mol i se
Campania
Pug I ia
Basi Iicata
Calabria
Sici I ia
Sardegna
LUXEMBOURG
-
-
-
12
-
-
-
~
H
-
27.51
7.92
-
5.59
4.99
4.56
Mio LFR
-
19.93
5.74
-
4.05
3.61
3.30
Mio ECU
9.63
4.76
o.
13
-
-
1.
34
-
-
-
-
-
-
I:'"'
H
ll>
~
t:t
t'<ltll
'"<jH
0.97
Mia ECU
~Hd
t::d
Mia LFR
-
Mia HFL
11.78
6.23
5.55
-
Mio ECU
4.67
2.47
2.20
-
Mia HFL
-
Mia ECU
ntll~
oC::I-i~
1-io
w
z'"CIO>
~'"CIZt::d
NEDERLAND
Noord-Nederland
Limburg
Mu It i- region a I
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Mio ECU
3.58
0.72
0.13
0.22
o.
14
0.32
0.02
1.
75
Mio ECU
24.21
HFL
~~~~
~til
tz1
t"'
-
'""'&;~
til~
t:tg;jG'lN
Mio UKL
UNITED KINGDOM
North
Yorkshire/Humberside
East Mid lands·
South West
west Midlands
North west
Wales
Scot I and
Northern Ireland
Multi-reg iona 1
66.56
0.91
4.52
0.87
1.
05
10.90
7.46
33.77
7.09
Mio ECU
110.70
1. 51
7.53
1.45
1.
74
18. 12
12.40
56.16
11.79
Mio UKL
2.16
0.09
0.07
0.43
0.08
0.14
0.09
0.20
0.01
1.05
o.
15
o.
12
z
1-'
H
-
-
-
-
.p-
\0
00
-
l:':l
~
-
-
-
Mio ECU
EUR 10
Mio ECU
-
327.08
-
=
1380
1 969.65
-
=
2,520
-
UKL.
2 320.94
Value of the ECU at first December 1984: 1 ECU
LIT= 44,91 LFR
=
0,6013
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0082.png
6.0
CHAPTER VI : REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES
(RDP)
143.
On
19
June
1984
the Commission delivered its op1n1on on the second
generation regional development programmes (covering the period
1981-85)
13 •
The
se~ond-generation
programmes generally represent a
substantial improvement on those for the preceding period. The conditions
under which investment projects presented by Member States for ERDF
assistance can be assessed will be improved. The Commission considers,
however, that a more precise definition of priorities would facilitate
coordination of the objectives and priorities of Community and national
regional policy and selection of measures to be financed jointly with the
ERDF.
The Commission intends to carry out with each Member State an annual
examination of projects and programmes that might be cofinanced by the
Community within the framework of priorities defined on the basis of the
regional development programmes.
144.
France presented its second-generation regional development
programmes for the period
1984-88,
the same period as that for the French
IXth Plan, the period
1981-83
having been covered by intermediate
programmes. The main new feature in the programmes is the use of Plan
contracts by which each region and the central government commit
themselves to a programme of action and to its financing. The contracts
cover some 20% of public infrastructure expenditure. The Regional Policy
Committee delivered its opinion on the French regional development
programmes on
16
November
1984.
145.
Italy
presented
the
regional development programme for
Friuli-Venezia Giulia for the period
1984-86.
The Italian government
recently introduced special development measures to assist the region.
The Regional Policy Committee delivered its opinion on the programme on
16
November
1984.
146.
Updatings of the regional development programmes for -Denmark and
Ireland were presented to the Commission and the Regional Policy
Committee.
13
O.J.N°L 211, 8.8.1984
73
Chapter VI : Regional development programmes (RDP)
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0083.png
7.0
CHAPTER VII : INTEGRATED OPERATIONS UNDER THE
COMMUNITY'S STRUCTURAL FUNDS
7.1
INTEGRATED REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT OPERATIONS
147.
The guidelines adopted by the Commission in 1979 for encouraging
integrated regional development operations were reinforced in 1983 by the
adoption of the report on ways of increasing the effectiveness of the
Community's structural Funds
14 •
In 1984 the inclusion of provisions regarding an integrated development
approach in the new ERDF Regulation marks a first step towards the
establishment of a legal framework for integrated development operations.
148.
An
integrated operation consists of a coherent programme of measures
and
investments,
public
and
private,
having
the
following
characteristics:
• they relate to a limited geographical area facing particularly serious
problems, notably a development lag or industrial or urban decline
liable to affect the development of the region;
• they are carried out by the Community, through combined use of various
structural
financial instruments, and the national and local
authorities in the Member States, working together in close
coordination.
·
An
integrated operation therefore requires effective coordination in time
and space between many partners, both public and private, with vertical
integration of the various levels providing assistance (Community,
national, regional and local) and horizontal integration of the various
financial instruments. It also requires socio-economic integration of the
projects carried out, which must be mutually complementary. While this is
difficult to achieve, the potential benefits are great, for such a
we 11-ordered combined operation should have a synergic effect, i.e. it
should produce greater results than would be obtained by carrying out the
different measures separately, one after the other. In addition, these
areas may be given priority access to the Community's various structural
Funds and financial instruments and qualify for the maximum rates of
assistance.
The ambitious aims of the integrated development oper'ations are
commensurate with the difficulties facing the areas in which such
operations have been or will be launched.
14
Increasing the effectiveness of the Community's structural Funds,
Bulletin of the European Communities, Supplement 3/83.
Chapter VII : Integrated operations under the Community's structural
Funds
75
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0084.png
7 .1 .1
Two pilot schemes in progress in Belfast and Naples
7.1.1.1
BELFAST
THE INTEGRATED OPERATION IN BELFAST
149.
The projects mentioned
in
the 1981 document concerning the
integrated operation in Belfast have reached a level of completion of over
60%.
In 1984 the United Kingdom authorities and the Commission launched a major
new initiative concerning the integrated operation in Belfast.
A new programme relating to the operation will be presented to the
Commission early in 1985. The programme covers a wide range of measures to
be carried out in Belfast in the period up to 1990 at an estimated total
cost of more than 1 100 million ECU, although not all of this has yet been .
entered in the budget. The programme specifies the various Community
Funds, including the ERDF, which will be called upon to help finance it.
The new programme, which is intended to be more operational than· its
predecessor, is computerized so as to allow. greater. efficiency and
flexibility in its management.
It
will be updated regularly and the
Commission will be continuously involved in its implementation.
URBAN RENEWAL IN BELFAST
150.
On 16 November 1984 the Commission decided to grant 33 million ECU
to a number of infrastructure projects which will contribute to urban
renewal in Belfast. This was the second tranche of aid granted under
Council Regulation (EEC) n° 1739/83 of 21 June 1983 introducing an
exceptional Community measure to promote urban renewal in Northern
Ireland (Belfast).
Aid granted under this measure is over and above that granted under the
ERDF. Before aid is granted, the Commission unde.rtakes to ensure that its
aid is complementary to national expenditure.
7.1.1.2
THE INTEGRATED OPERATION IN NAPLES
Since 1980 the national, regional and local authorities have been
developing a method of coordinated and concentrated action and assistance
in the Naples metropolitan area. The ERDF has from the outset promoted
this operation and provided technical and financial assistance. During
the first stage of the integrated operation (1980-84) priority was given
to major basic infrastructure, including transport, pollution control and
water supplies. The total cost of the projects and measures forming the
first basic operational package was 3 500 million ECU. During the first
five years of the integrated operation, from 1980 to 1984, the finance
provided by the Community, both grants and loans, amounted to over 1 500
million ECU, of which 763 million ECU came from the ERDF, 465 million ECU
from the EIB and 235 million ECU from the ECSC. Smaller amounts were made
available by the European Social Fund, 30 million ECU and ·for the
exploitation of new energy sources (1.1 million ECU). The urban and
industrial characteristics of the area did not allow any significant
assistance to be provided by the EAGGF Guidance Section (only 10 million
ECU from 1981 to 1984).
151.
76
ERDF
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0085.png
The political instability which has recently· affected the municipal
administration of Naples, the regional government of Campania and the
Cassa per il Mezzogiorno has sometimes slowed the pace at which the
integrated operation has been carried out. Despite these difficulties,
the technical working group continued to perform its task, meeting twice
in 1984 to monitor the progress of the work and projects. The technical
.working group points out the decisions which should be taken, the
bottlenecks or delays that have been noted and the priorities which should
be observed. It has a local technical secretariat consisting of two
officials provided by the Cassa per il Mezzogiorno and by the City of
Naples. The technical working group has submitted to those responsible
politically the programme of priority assistance for the period 1984-86,
which provides.for investment projects amounting to 2 100 million ECU. The
projects in the programme were selected on the basis of their order of
priority, their technical maturity and the availability of minimum
financing.
At present, the integrated operation continues to ensure the completion of
the large-scale projects already initiated. Measures must also be taken
to improve and strengthen the employment situation, the quality of the
productive system (industry, craft industry and tourism), and technical,
vocational and scientific training structures in addition to research.
Total ERDF assistance in 1984 amounted to 214 million ECU, of which 181
million ECU was for projects implemented directly by the City of Naples.
Three transport infrastructure projects from the integrated operation are
among the list of the ten projects receiving the largest amounts of Fund
assistance in 1984. The most significant projects in 1984 were as follows:
• roads linking the bypass motorway (Tangenziale) with the port, the
Vomero district and the outer ring road;
• work on road links, basic urban infrastructure and a railway passing
under the new "Centro direzionalen area;
• water supply system for the Scudillo and Capodimonte reservoirs;
• natual gas distribution systems for a large number of municipalities;
• implementation of 13 industrial projects (footwear, chemical products,
electrical equipment etc.).
The Commission, and in particular the ERDF, have clearly played a. crucial
role in implementing this integrated operation since it began. ERDF grants
have been particularly concentrated in the Naples area, since the
integrated operation has absorbed two thirds of the total assistance
granted to Campania, which is the European region most aided by the ERDF.
The initial work has been concentrated on the completion of
infrastructures which are easily visible and identificable and where
results are almost immediate, such as measures to reduce pollution and
improve communications. Such projects constitute an essential basis for
ensuring the areas economic development, which will be the main focus of
the second stage of the integrated operation.
Chapter VII
Funds
Integrated operations under the Community's structural
77
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0086.png
7 .1.2
Preparatory studies for integrated operations
152.
Budget Item 5410, Preparatory studies for integrated operations,
enables the Commission, and in particular the Directorates-General for
Regional Policy, Agriculture and Employment and Social Affairs, to help
finance the studies necessary for launching an integrated operation or a
new stage of an operation already under way.
The preparatory studies must be initiated by, or at least receive the
support of, the competent authorities in the Member State concerned. The
Community's financial contribution may amount to up to 75% of the total
cost of the study, excluding the national authorities' own administrative
expenditure.
The studies analyse the economic and social situation in a given area,
draw up an appropriate development strategy and propose a programme of
measures. The programme indicates the measures which are of priority,
identifies the links between the various projects and the synergic effects
anticipated and includes an indicative financing plan drawing on various
sources, both national and Community. The carrying out of such studies has
allowed a constant dialogue to be established between the local, regional
and national authorities and the various Commission departments.
153.
Of the sixteen studies initiated in 1983 at a total cost of 2
million ECU, seven were fully completed by the end of 1984. These were the
studies on Liege in Belgium, Groningen in the Netherlands, the Lens region
in France and Strathclyde (Glasgow), Belfast, Humberside and the Scilly
isles in the United Kingdom. The other studies will be completed in 1985.
Once the studies have been completed and have subsequently been approved
by the Commission, the Member States concerned draw up their Community
grant applications. This means moving from a preparatory stage to the
programme definition stage, with a complete aid programme being worked out
that takes account of budgetary realities. For this purpose, each partner
in the integrated operation, whether at Community, national, regional of
local level, must give a financial commitment.
154.
In 1984 the Commission committed almost
following eight studies:
1 million ECU for the
• Belgium, in the Westhoek area
• Germany:
in the Bavarian forest and in the central part of Oberpfalz
in Saarland
• Greece, in the Grevena area in Macedonia
• France:
in the central, arid part of the mountains in Provence
on the island of Reunion
• Italy:
in the inland hill and mountain areas in the Emilia-Romagna region
in Basilicata.
The purpose of all these studies is to work out a strategy to exploit the
potential of the areas concerned, improve the socio- economic situation of
their inhabitants and make optimum use of Community, national, regional
and local resources.
Payments for studies under this budget item amounted to 1.3 million ECU in
1984.
78
ERDF
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0087.png
Following the experiences of the last three years, it is now increasingly
-clear that the resources for these preparatory studies should also be used
for experimental pilot projects.
7.2
INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES (IDP)
155.
The IDPs place emphasis on development planning for an area or small
region whose natural handicaps and existing agricultural structures
account for the low level of productivity and in which there is very
little scope for alternative activities.
To overcome these difficulties, the idea is to establish programmes for
promoting simultaneously the development of both agriculture and the
non-agricultural sector, starting from the situation and specific
resources of the area.
With this aim, the basic IDP Regulations provide that the EAGGF Guidance
Section, over and above its commitments under existing Directives and
Regulations, is to make an additional financial contribution to fund "new"
measures or to facilitate and speed up implementation of the measures
already provided for. These operations must be supported by measures
financed under the Community's other structural Funds: aid for training
under the European Social Fund and ERDF measures to develop
infrastructures and promote productive activities, including aids for
small and medium-sized enterprises, craft industries and rural tourism.
Three IDPs were adopted in 1981, for:
• the Western Isles in the United Kinidom
15
• the department of Lozere in France
1
• the South-West of Belgium
17
7.2 .1
The W.2stern Isles Integrated Development Progrcmune
156.
Implementation to the Western Isles Integrated Development
Programme has continued at a rapid pace. Communications and transport
infrastructures are crucial to the development of the islands.
In 1984, the Western Isles received a total of 12.3 million ECU in aid
from the ERDF, including 8.
5
million ECU for a ferry service and
associated terminals. Like other development projects in the Western
Isles, the project in question benefited from a rate of assistance of 40%
because of its inclusion in an IDP.
As part of the training component of the IDP, the European Social Fund
financed a number of measures to promote the employment of 83 young people
of less than 25 years of age and 8 people of more than 25 years of age
(51 000 ECU) .
Progress with agricultural and fishery measures under the IDP has been
encouraging. In particular rapid progress has been made with land
improvement measures. Equally the fish farming sector has developed well.
In 1984 EAGGF reimbursed 1.5 million ECU to the United Kingdom Government
15
16
17
Council Regulation (EEC) n° 1939/81 (Western Isles of Scotland), OJ n°
1197, 20.7.1981.
Council Regulation (EEC) n° 1940/81 (Lozere), OJ n° 1 197, 20.07.1981.
Council Regulation (EEC) n° 1941/81 (Belgium), OJ n° 1 197,
20.07. 1981.
Integrated operations under the Community's structural
79
Chapter VII
Funds
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0088.png
against 3.79 million ECU of public expenditure on agriculture and
fisheries
in
1983. Information on the United Kingdom claim from EAGGF for
1984 reimbursement is not yet available.,
1.2 .2
The Lozere Integrated Development Programme
151.
On the basis of information provided by the association of the
Lozere integrated development programme, several operations were financed
under the specific Community measure "Enlargement, South-West France
11 •
A
total of
0. 6
million ECU has been allocated over the last three years for
measures enabling the development ofthe timber sector, the agricultural
food sector and tourism.
Regarding agriculture, the EAGGF Guidance Section financed land and
pastoral improvements, hydraulic works in addition to animal breeding
buildings for a total of 3.88 million ECU, over the first three years of
the IDP. The European Social Fund has financed measures related to
work-related training for a total of 0.5 million ECU since 1982.
1 .2 .3
158.
The South East
of
Belgiwn Integrated Development Programme
The programme presented by the Belgian authorities was formally
by the Commission on 14 December 1984, to be applicable from the
1 January 1985. However, several infrastructure 'investments forming part
of the IDP were financed by the ERDF within the framework of the 1984
financial year.
A
total of
11
million ECU was granted to
80
public
infrastructure projects that will assist in retaining the resident
population in the area (farm access roads, drinking water supplies,
reservoirs, sewerage systems and water purification plants).
~pproved
7.3 PREPARATION OF THE INTEGRATED MEDITERRANEAN
PROGRAMME (IMPS)
159.
On
6
September 1984 the Commission amended
18
its proposal for a
Regulation instituting integrated Mediterranean programmes
19
taking
account of the opinions expressed by Parliament and the Economic and
Social Committee and of certain provisions of the new ERDF Regulation.
On the basis of the amended proposal and in view of the agreements on the
subject reached by the European Council
in
Brussels and Fontainebleau, the
Council resumed its examination of the Regulation in September. Its
findings were discussed by the European Council in Dublin. The programmes
are designed to speed up the development of the Community's Mediterranean
regions, in particular Greece, and to help them adapt to the new
conditions that will be created by enlargement. The measures cover
agriculture, fisheries, craft industry, industry, business advisory
services, tourism and the improvement of infrastructures. They are based
on a comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach to the development of
rural areas in certain Mediterranean regions
in
France, Italy and Greece.
Amended proposal for a Council Regulation (EEC) instituting
integrated Mediterranean programmes, OJ n° C 280, 19.10.1984.
Proposal for a Council Regulation (EEC) instituting integrated
Mediterranean programmes, OJ n° C 251, 19.9.1983.
Commission proposals for the integrated Mediterranean programmes,
Parts I and II- COM(83)24, 17.3.1983.
ERDF
19
80
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0089.png
They will cover a period of seven years and will be partly financed by the
Community: under the proposal for a Regulation of 6 May 1985, a sum of
6 600 million ECU is to be made available (4 100 million ECU in grants and
2 500 million ECU in loans).
·
160.
The Commission, with the cooperation of the three Member States
concerned, also pressed ahead with the pilot projects and studies in
preparation for the integrated Mediterranean programmes which it had
decided on 21 December 1983
20 .
Of the 22 specific measures. initiated, 10
are integrated micro-projects, 3 are pilot projects concerning fisheries
and fish farming, and the others are action-research projects and studies
on research and the environment.
With regard to the preparatory pilot projects, the Commission decided
in
December 1984
21
to amend some of the financing estimates for the
experimental programmes adopted on 21 December 1983, in view of the
momentum they had developed. Community assistance for the continuation of
the projects is of the order of 10 million ECU, financed under budget
Article 550 specifically introduced for this purpose, 'this amount being
additional to aid from the existing structural Funds.
20
21
OJ
L
44, 15.2.1984.
OJ
L 37,
8.2.1985.
Chapter VII
Funds
Integrated operations under the Community's structural
81
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0090.png
§'
(1)
~
TABLE
23
ASSISTANCE APPLIED FOR IN
1984
ERDF, SUPPORT MEASURES
(Mio)
Member
State
Industry, services
and crafts
Nat. cur.
OK
GR
f
>
rt
Ill
rt
til
Infrastructure
Nat. cur.
1 774.52
170.36
144.68
24.14*
2 267.22
80.32
1 332.93*
212.30
77.93
423.55
Studies
Nat. cur.
70.00
5.50
0.08
0.00*
41.17
-
-
-
-
4.32
Total
ECU
1.56
0.68
0.04
0.03
6,02
-
-
-
-
7.19
15.51
rt
Ill
0
I-'•
til
ECU
8.04
1.36
73.92
4.43
36.20
56.64
70.11
-
ECU
39.51
21,19
64.77
265.12
331.26
111.74
965.72
4.73
30.92
704.43
2 539.38
Nat. cur.
2 205.73
186.78
309.89
24.55*
2 556.17
121.03
1 429.70*
212.30
90.68
503.74
ECU
49.11
23.23
138.72
269.58
373.48
168.38
1 035.83
4.73
35.98
837.80
2 936.84
1-'·
B
......
p..
D
Ill
~
IRL
I
L
361.22
10.92
165.12
0.40*
247.77
40.71
96.77*
-
>
Q
I
I
......
~
00
+"'
NL
UK
EUR
10
12.75
75.87
5.06
126.18
381.94
[
1-'
~
..
~
>
~
>
.....,
\J1
I
ECU rates at December
1984:
1
ECU
44,91
BFR/LFR =
8,041
DKR =
2,234
OM=
~0_7
ORA=
6,844
Ff
=
0, 7188
IRL =
1380
LIT
=
2,520
HFL
=
0,~013
UKL.
_
*
Thousand mil 1 ions
{1.1
=
_
>
"'3
"'3
~
....
TABLE
24
NUMBER Of PROJECTS FOR WHICH GRANT APPLICATIONS
WERE SUBMITTED IN
1984
ERDF, SUPPORT MEASURES
Member
State
B
OK
D
GR
f
IRL
I
L
NL
UK
'
EUR
10
------ 0
...
{1.1
.,:-.
00
I:'"'
~
"'3
Industry,
services
and Crafts
8
244
12
337
88
238
179
Infrastructure
172
130
103
196
790
67
2 054
17
17
1 191
4 737
I
--
--------
Studies .
Total
185
143
348
209
1 129
155
2 292
17
28
1 400
5 906
11
-
11
--
-
-
-
-
30
41
---
5
2
1
1
2
!
!
~
....
>
0
>
....
I
~
1 128
__
!
....
~
I
CD
00
t-o)
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0091.png
~
TABLE 25
ASSISTANCE GRANTED TO MEMBER STATES 1975-1984 BY INVESTMENT CATEGORY
ERDF, SUPPORT MEASURES
(Mio)
Member
State
Industry, services
and crafts
Nat. Cur.
B
OK
D
GR
F
IRL
I
L
NL
UK
EUR 10
1 345.46
96.57
739.41
2.81*
.2 028.13
141.20
526.58*
423.81
ECU
32.48
12.66
302.60
39.18
336.58
205.06
437.93
690.00
2 079.47
1
nfra structure
Studies
Nat. cur.
87.00
45.96
0.11
0.02*
41.17
0.43
26.26*
0.17
3.85
ECU
1. 93
5.74
0.05
0.26
6.02
0.64
20.12
0.07
6.52
41.33
Total
Nat. Cur.
4 836.97
1 020.38
1 334.74
82. 13*
10 495.14
493.89
5 493.26*
508.35
416.73
1 670.59
ECU
114.41
131.88
544.79
1 091.70
. 1 683.51
713.44
4368.73
11.97
156.18
2 782.01
11 598.63
Nat. Cur.
3 404.51
877.86
595.22
79.30*
8 425.84
352.26
4 940.40*
508.35
354.92
1 242.94
ECU
80.00
113.48
242.15
052.26
340.91
507.74
910.69
11.97
133. 14
085.49
1
1
3
2
-
61.64
-
-
22.98
-
-
-
-
9 477.83
-
UKL.
*Thousand mill ions
ECU rates at December 1984: 1 ECU
=
44,91 BFR/LFR
=
8,041 DKR
=
2,234 DM
=
91,07 DRA
=
6,844 FF = 0,7188 IRL
=
1380 LIT= 2,520 HFL
=
0,6013
~
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0092.png
i
~
>
.....
Ill
......
p,.
ll>
ll>
TABLE
26
NUMBER OF PROJECTS ASSISTED IN
1984
(DETAIL)
ERDF, SUPPORT MEASURES
Member
State
Industry, services and crafts
Investments
10
Mio ECU
>
1
-
28
-
8
8
Infrastructure
Investments
10
Mio ECU
13
36
228
18
302
75
189
10
140
1 011
>
Studies
Total
Total
rt
ll>
rt
tf.l
Investments
10
Mio ECU
12
36
200
18
294
67
188
8
120
943
<
Total
Investments
10
Mio ECU-
133
129
56
302
209
51
1 294
17
13
1 009
3 213
<
rt
....
0
~
DK
D
GR
F
IRL
L
NL
UK
EUR
10
I
B
I-'
\0
00
.J:'
-
2
20
68
1
-
-
2
9
25
13
33
4
40
-
-
-
p,.
I-'
~
133
129
58
311
234
64
1 327
17
17
1 049
3 339
-
-
-
27
5
43
5
2
1
1
2
151
167
287
330
538
139
1 521
17
27
1 216
4 393
126
\D
.....
lJ1
I
I-'
.J:'
\0
00
TABLE
27
NUMBER OF PROJECTS ASSISTED
1975-1984
ERDF, SUPPORT MEASURES
Member
State
Industry, services and crafts
Investments
10
Mio ECU
>
Infrastructure
Investments
10
Mio ECU
>
Studies
Tota I
Total
Investments
10
Mio ECU
72
174
1 519
102
1 749
292
1 483
735
6 145
- - -
- - - ----
<
Tota I
Investments
10
Mio ECU
409
640
668
871
2 219
530
7 805
26
52
5 304
18 524
-----
<
B
DK
D
GR
F
IRL
I
L
NL
UK
EUR
10
------
-- -
10
1
114
1
76
38
24
119
388
-
5
- -
-
19
82
175
1 633
103
1 825
330
1 507
854
6 533
-
24
1
10
12
49
139
75
198
16
217
717
-
410
650
680
920
2 358
605
8 003
26
68
5 521 .
19 241
6
6
2
5
2
3
20
55
100
2
1
4
9
6
-
1
498
831
315
028
185
938
530
26
93
430
25 874
00
VI
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0093.png
0\
CIO
TABLE
28
ASSISTANCE GRANTED IN
1984
(DETAIL)
ERDF, SUPPORT MEASURES
(Mio ECU)
Member
State
Industry, services and crafts
Investments
10
Mio ECU
>
Infrastructure
Investments
10
Mio ECU
4.66
2.85
59.11
5.55
33.38
49.54
56.62
>
Studies
Tota I
Total
I
I
I
I
Investments
10
Mio ECU
3.73
2.85
27.04
5.55
26.21
27.01
48.36
3.27
41.86
185.89
<
Total
Investments
10
Mio ECU
26.96
21.06
16.22
163.81
76.77
24.78
326.58
4.73
11.91
316.90
989.72
<
B
DK
D
GR
F
IRL
I
L
NL
UK
EUR
10
-
32.06
7.16
22.54
8.26
1. 41
68.83
141.19
0.93
-
-
-
4.67
110.70
327.08
-
92.08
151.52
84.80
409.88
19.01
188.65
979.93
-
-
33.98
-
26.96
21.06
50.20
255.90
228.29
109.58
736.46
4.73
30.92
505.55
1 969.65
1.56 .
0.68
0.04
0.03
6.02
12.30
-
-
-
3.58
33.18
24.60
109.34
261.47
267.68
159.12
805.38
4.73
35.59
619.84
2 320.94
24.21
TABLE
29
ASSISTANCE GRANTED
1975-1984
ERDF, SUPPORT MEASURES
(Mio ECU)
Member
State
Industry, services and crafts
Invest-
ments
10
Mio ECU
>
Infrastructure
Invest-
ments
10
Mio ECU
32.48
12.66
302.60
39.18
336.58
205.06
437.93
22.98
690.00
1.84
29.57
70.76
577.06
. 945.45
382.30
2 448.29
77.75
710.98
5 243.99
>
Studies
Tota I
Total
Invest-
ments
10
Mio ECU
19.37
11.96
175.39
33.42
191.97
113.85
313.47
184.24
1 052.84
<
Total
Invest-
ments
10
Mio ECU
78.17
83.92
171.39
475.20
395.47
125.44
1 462.40
11.97
55.39
1 374.51
4 233.84
<
!
B
DK
GR
F
IRL
I
L
NL
UK
L _ _ _ __ _ _
D
1:>1
13.,
0.70
127.20
5.76
144.61
91.20
124.45
·1
1
3
2
~
-
13.81
-
9.16
-
-
505.76
1 026.63
80.00
113.48
242.15
052.26
340.91
507.74
910.69
11.97
133.14
085.49
1.93
5.74
0.05
0.26
6.02
0.64
20.12
6.52
41.33
1
1
4
2
-
0.07
114.41
131.88
544.79
091.70
683.51
713.44
368.73
11.97
156.18
782.01
- -
EUR
10
2 079.47
9 477.83
------
.11 598.63
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0094.png
·>
(I)
s
><
TABLE
30
INVESTMENTS FOR WHICH ASSISTANCE WAS GRANTED IN
1984
ERDF, SUPPORT MEASURES
(Mio ECU)
Member
State
Industry, services and crafts
Investments
10
Mio ECU
>
>
ll>
Cll
Infrastructure
Investments
10
Mio ECU
>
Studies
Total
95.44
64.53
155.27
739.11
877.61
1 123.80
2 107.46
16.76
112.85
2 325.17
7 617.99
3.12
10.07
0.07
0.05
12.03
Tota I
I
rt
rt
til
.....
rt
.....
(l
Investments
<
10
Mio ECU
40.50
32.99
594.75
35.94
345.72
175.94
286.29
33.70
263.67
1 809.50
-
Total
52.65
32.99
1 323.89
35.94
478.05
354.12
328.75
58.10
876.56
3 541.06
--
-
~
Investments
<
10
Mio £CU
95.44
64.53
57.22
488. 19
293.73
81.20
993.02
16.76
40.04
1 116.05
3 246.18
I
I
II>
f-'
B
OK
GR
F
IRL
I
L
NL
UK
EUR
10
-
12. 15
729.15
Ill
Ill
~
D
-
rt
-
132.33
178.17
42.47
1-'
\0
.p.
00
~
~
1-'
\0
24.39
612.90
1 731.56
-
-
-
250.92
583.87
1 042.60
1 114.44
72.81
1 209.12
4 371.81
-
-
-
-
98.05
-
1
1
1
2
3
-~
-
27.86
-
-
7.38
151.21
107.60
479.23
775.11
367.69
477.91
464.08
16.76
170.94
209.11
--
·-
60.59
---
11 219.64
- · -
---
---
-
--
"-J
VI
I
1-'
\0
00
.p.
TABLE
31
INVESTMENTS FOR WHICH ASSISTANCE WAS GRANTED
1975-1984
.
ERDF, SUPPORT MEASURES
(Mio ECU)
Member
State
Industry, services and crafts
Investments
10
Mio ECU
>
Infrastructure
Investments
10
Mio ECU
448.,15
166.27
449.66
263.90
751.08
564.83
715.34
15.02
128.60
410.81
933.89
013.94
805.06
692.77
>
Studies
Total
302.76
403.09
037.28
764.15
501.72
237.62
224.32
57.23
605.63
334.45
3.86
21.31
o.
10
0.51
12.03
1. 61
44.10
0.14
14.01
97.68
Total
Investments
10
Mio ECU
241.76
155.35
3 968.20
200.89
2 768.04
741.43
1 741.72
85.55
1 302.12
-
Tota I
Investments
10
Mio ECU
287.75
274.49
626.47
830.26
487.78
432.56
531.55
57.23
207.00
277.46
<
<
OK
D
GR
F
B
IRL
I
L
NL
UK
EUR
10
L..-.--
206.39
10.92
3 481.47
63.00
2 983.04
1 823.40
973.62
6 162.16
·--
7
5
2
2
-
156.45
-
7 464.28
27 065.51
-
242.00
1
5
7
14
1
1
4
.5
398.63
8 056.99
38 455.70
-
1
3
6
8
19
13
-
8
4
12
10
21
20
754.77
590.66
487.04.
028.56
264.83
804.06
983.76
57.23
847.76.
812.74
15 860.45
11 205.06
15 012.55
53 468.25
80 631.44
....
00
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0095.png
00
co
TABLE
·32
BREAKDOWN OF ASSISTANCE BY TYPE OF INFRASTRUCTURE IN
1984
(DETAIL)
Type or inYrastructure
>
10
Mia ECU
Investments
<
10
Mia ECU
Investments
Tota 1
Assistance
116.0
83. 1
9.3
18.4
3.6
1.6
943.0
774.0
43.3
69.8
13.3
,31. 2
10.0
1 .4
158.4
153.6
1.4
3.5
311 . 1
32.4
84.1
1.3
192.1
1. 1
o.
1
347.9
20.3
178.8
26.0
121.0
1 .8
32.1
6.4
16.0
3.5
5.8
0.4
61.0
20.4
5.2
18. 1
13.2
. 4.1
1 969.7
7 618.0
6 043.2
Projects
1.
11
12
13
14
10
2.
21
22
23
24
25
26
20
3.
31
32
33
4.
41
42
43
44
45
40
5.
51
52
53
54
50
6.
61
62
63
64
65
1:'<1
I Assistance Projects
37.8
34.0
3.8
Assistance Projects
78.3
49.1
9.3
14.6
3.6
1. 6
380.1
299.4
11.0
46.5
1.0
14.8
5.9
1.4
81.6
76.7
1.4
3.5
175.7
8.5
21.4
1.3
143.4
1. 1
0.1
194.9
6.2
85.5
11.8
89.7
1.8
32.1
6.11-
16.0
3.5
5.8
0.4
47.0
16.5
5.2
10.6
10.6
4.1
989.7
329
222
82
15
7
3
1 454
1 188
35
150
5
44
17
LINKED TO PRODUCTIVE ACTIVITIES
Sites for productive actiVities
Factory construction
Centres for applied research - studies - support
Commercial centres
Miscellaneous
TRANSPORT
Roads, re 1a ted works
Ra i Iways
Sea port installations
Waterways
Airports
Urban transport systems
Mi see II aneous
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
Telephone, telex
Radio, television
lnrormation networks
ENERGY
Electricity supply
Electricity distribution
Therma I insta I lations
Gas distribution networks
Petrol distribution networks
Miscellaneous
WATER ENGINEERING
Dams
Water col lection/distrlbution
Irrigation systems
Sewers, sewage treatment plants
Miscellaneous
ENVIRONMENT
Costal protection
Clearance works, hydrogeological protection
Protection and clearance of sites
lncinerators/recycl ing plants ror garbage
Anti-pol iution systems
-
1
-
-
70
57
3
4
2
3
1
6
6
3
2
-
-
-
326
220
82
14
7
3
1 384
1 131
32
146
3
41
16
15
216
205
7
4
344
21
155
11
148
1
2
769
3
385
32
347
2
82
16
36
16
13
1
92
27
6
32
24
3
3 213
-
562.9
474.5
32.3
23.3
12.3
16.4
4.1
-
15
222
211
7
-
-
15
3
2
10
76.8
76.8
-
-
-
4
359
24
157
11
158
7
2
797
4
401
35
355
2
82
16
36
16
13
1
96
28
6
34
25
3
-
-
-
135.4
24.0
62.7
48.8
-
-
28
1
16
3
8
-
153.0
14. 1
93.3
14.2
31.3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
14. 1
3.9
7.5
2.6
"':!
~
7.
EDUCATION, SOCIO-CULTURAL, SPORT/LEISURE
71
Education
72/73
Social, medical/para-medical infrastructure
74
Cultural inrrastructure
75
Sport and leisure centres
10
Miscellaneous
-
-
2
1
126
-
4
1
-
-
Total
Total investment
Nat i ana I aid
------
979.9
4 371.8
2 955.4
-------
3 339
3 246.2
3 087.8
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0096.png
§
:<
CD
TABLE
33 _
BREAKDOWN BY COUNTRY OF'ASSISTANCE TO INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS IN
1984
ERDF, SUPPORT MEASURES
(Mio ECU)
Member
State
B
OK
GR
IRL
I
NL
UK
EUR
10
f
0
>
til
Ill
Ul
rt
rt
rt
Linked to
productive
activities
2.67
1. 50
41.87
Transport
Telecommu-
nications
Energy
Water
engineering
11.82
1.03
2.56
52.62
9.73
21.41
172.06
0.42
Environment
Education,
socio-
cultural
3.03
2. 34
4.35
10.03
7.31
4.21
2.55
0.63
. 26.60
61.04
Tota I
26.96
21.06
50.20
255.90
228.29
109.58
736.46
4.73
30.92
505.55
1 969.65
f-'•
f-'·
Ill
1-'
n
j:l.
Ill
Ill
rt
-
-
34.90
2.46
1.0
~
.....
co
-
32.43
116.03
0.20
6.63
8.42
1.
08
108.78
144.08
42.35
323.93
4.03
30.29
273.37
942.96
-
-
40.98
-
-
3.49
12.55
41.60
0.14
59.67
158.44
4.28
0.33
43.48
50.62
188.08
0.08
-
2.82
-
-
24.26
1, 54
14.81
12.98
32.15
-
-
-
-
-
76.26
-
-
-
311,12
347.91
&
1.0
......
.......
l.n
I
1.0
.....
co
TABLE
34
BREAKDOWN Of ASSISTANCE BY TYPE OF INFRASTRUCTURE
1975-1984
ERDF, SUPPORT MEASURES
(Mio ECU)
Type of infrastructure
>
10
Mio ECU
~
Investments
<
10
Mio ECU
Investments
Total
assistance
952.9
3 360.9
872.2
1 572.3
2 359.1
156.7
201.6
9 477.8
projects
1 ..
.2.
3.
4,
5.
6.
7.
assistance projects
478.6 .
1 798.3
441.4
1 022.8
1 366.6
85.2
51.0
5 244.0
2
7
1
1
4
753
458
906
495
215
214
483
assistance projects
474.3
1 562.6
430.8
549.5
992.5
73.4
150.8
4 233.8
2
7
1
1
4
834
761
949
559
415
228
495
Linked to productive activities
Transport
Telecommunications
Energy
Water engineering
Environment
Education, soc i o-cu I tu ra I
81
303
43
64
200
14
12
717
Tota I
Total investment
Nat iona I aid
---
18 524
19 241
38 455.7
17 511,2
15 012.5
13 741.6
53 468.3
31 252.8
Some of the figures in this table are estimates, but only where projects covered by global applications
are concerned. These figures are therefore only approximate.
---
-
----
----
---
-----------------
co
1.0
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0097.png
\t)
0
TABLE 35
BREAKDOWN OF ASSISTANCE BY INDUSTRY, CRAFT INDUSTRY AND SERVICE SECTOR IN 19B4 (DETAIL)
ERDF, SUPPORT MEASURES
(Mio ECU)
Sector
NACE Code
Investments
>
10 Mio ECU
<
10 Mio ECU
Investments
Tota I
Jobs
38
22
16
5375
746
155
2149
2250
75
25
5
4
3
9
2
185
035
078
162
279
529
339
763
Projects Assist.
4
3
1
159
15
6
67
67
4
412
114
72
30
113
51
14
18
396
88
25
8
39
84
62
78
12
4
36
3
2
18
1
1
6
3
2
1 011
0.6
0.5
0. 1
45.7
2.6
0.6
16.6
24.8
1.1
178.8
17.8
18.9
31.7
71. 1
30.0
4.9
4.6
94.7
19.7
2. 1
1.0
4.4
16.5
22.3
25.7
3.0
0.8
6.5
0.5
0. 1
3.6
0. 1
0.8
0.7
0.3
0.4
327.1
3 541.1
738.~
Projects
1 . ENERGY
11 Extraction briquett.sol id.fuels
14 MI ne ra I o i I refining
2.
22
23
24
25
26
3.
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
EXTRACT.PROCESS. MINERALS,CHEMIST
Product./prel im.processing metals
Extract. non metal I ifer. minerals
Manuf.non-metal l.mineral products
Chemical industry
Man-made fibres industry
METAL MANUFACTURE, INSTR.ENGINEER,
Manufacture of metal articles
Mechanical engineering
Manuf.office/data process.machin.
Electrical engineering
Manuf.motor vehicul.,parts/acces.
Manuf. other means of transport
Instrument engineering
1
Assist.
Jobs
18
18
Projects Assist,
Jobs
56
40
16
6 261
746
155
2 235
3 050
75
39
5
5
6
14
6
177
073 ;
035
749
084
480
599
1 157
-
1
8
41
1
5
4
19
9
1
2
15
6
9
-
-
1
-
0.2
9.0
-
9.2
-
-
-
0.4
0,4
-
3
2
1
150
15
6
66
59
4
371
113
67
26
94
42
13
16
381
82
25
8
39
81
60
74
12
4
34
3
2
17
1
3
2
943
0.2
0. 1
0. 1
36.5
2.6
0.6
16.4
15.8
1. 1
79.1
17.2
13.7
11. 3
26.0
7.6
1.5
1.9
63.7
12.5
2. 1
1. 0
4.4
13.3
10.5
16.9
3.0
0.8
5.6
0.5
0. 1
3.5
0. 1
886
86
-
-
BOO
13 992
38
957
3 587
4 805
3 951
260
394
4 547
1 120
-
99.7
0.6
5.2
20.5
45.1
22.4
3.3
2.6
31.0
7.2
4. OTHER MANUFACTURING INDUSTRIES
41/42 Food, drink, tobacco industry
43 Textile industry
44 Leather/leather goods industry
45 Footwear/clothing industry
46 Timber/wooden furniture industry
47 Manuf.paper/prod.,print.,publ ish.
48 Processing of rubber and plastics
49 Other manufacturing industries
5. BUILDING AND CIVIL ENGINEERING
6. TO 9. SERVICES
61 Wholesale distributin
64/65 Retail distribution
66 Hotels and catering
75 Air transport
82 Insurance
83 Auxiliary to banking/insurance
94 Research and development
98 Persona I services
-
-
2
-
-
3
2
4
-
-
-
3.2
11.8
8.8
-
-
-
-
-
-
727
2 527
-
-
-
173
-
-
-
-
17 441
3 508
1 209
345
2 215
3 210
2 286
3 981
687
156
1 192
154
58
516
179
200
85
49 387
21 988
4 628
1 209
345
2 215
3 383
3 013
6 508
687
156
1 312
154
58
596
40
179
200
85
68 950
0.9
120
80
40
-
1
-
-
-
68
1
o.
1
0.8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6
0.3
0.4
185.9
1 809.5
410.7
-
0.7
-
-
-
~
1."1
Tota I
Investment
Nat i ona I a i d
141.2
1 731.6
327.8
19 563
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0098.png
§
~
ll>
00
TABLE
36
BREAKDOWN BY COUNTRY OF ASSISTANCE TO INDUSTRY, CRAFT INDUSTRY AND SERVICE SECTOR IN
1984
ERDF, SUPPORT MEASURES
(Mia ECU)
Member
State
Energy
Mineral
products and
by-products,
chemicals
Meta I processing
instrument engi-
nee ring
2.20
2.09
33.59
1.59
14.62
36.38
26.35
0.66
61.35
178.82
Ill
1:/l
('l
rt
rt
Other manufac-
turing indus-
tries
1. 37
0.46
16.55
1.60
14.31
8.16
11.96
0.94
39.37
94.72
Building and
civi 1
engineering
Services
Total
~-
rt
1-'
Ill
p.
ll>
ll>
rt
......
1./)
B
OK
D
GR
F
IRL
I
L
NL
UK
EUR
10
0.42
-
-
-
0. 13
0.56
-
-
-
-
-
0.53
3.55
5.00
17.83
1. 87
9.30
45.70
-
6.64
0.98
-
-
-
0.29
0.47
-
-
-
CX>
-
-
-
-
-
0.31
1.
91
1.82
0.61
o.
12
-
-
-
1.20
4.66
2.85
59.11
5.55
33.38
49.54
56.62
4.67
110.70
327.08
-
0.55
6.52
'
I
.f:'
p.
0.17
§
......
\.0
til
I
.....
TABLE
37
BREAKDOWN OF ASSISTANCE BY INDUSTRY, CRAFT INDUSTRY AND SERVICE SECTOR
1975-1984
ERDF, SUPPORT MEASURES
(Mia ECU)
Sector
NACE code
1.
Energy
2.
Mineral products and by-
products, chemicals
3.
Metal processing, lnstru-
ment engineering
4.
Other manufacturing
industries
5.
Building and civil engineering
6.
to
9.
Services
>
10
Mia ECU
......
\.0
.f:'
CX>
Investments
<
Investments
10
Mia ECU
Jobs
1 584
51 692
219 871
145 190
718
11 429
430 484
6. 1
204.8
459.4
351.6
2.4
28.6
1 052.8
11 205. 1
2 302.8
Total
Projects Assist.
25
1 087
2 704
2 473
18
226
6 533
78.8
363.2
1 091.5
509.5
2.4
34.2
2 079.5
27 065.5
4 911.5
Projects
6
95
193
87
Assist.
72.7
158.3
632. 1
157.8
Jobs
8 111
27 315
144 666
25 439
2 309
207 840
Projects Assist.
19
992
2 511
2 386
18
219
6 145
Jobs
9 695
79 007
364 537
170 629
718
13 738
638 324
-
7
-
5.6
-
Tota I
Tota I investment
Nation a I a
i
d
388
1 026.6
15 860.5
2 608.8
Some of the figures in this table are estimates, but only where projects covered by global appl !cations are
concerned. These figures are therefore only approximate.
.....
\.0
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0099.png
\0
....,
TABLE 38
BUDGETARY SITUATION 1984
ERDF, SUPPORT MEASURES
1. USE OF COMMITMENT APPROPRIATIONS
(Mio ECU)
Commitment appropriations available for 1984
Appropriations
entered
in 1984
budget
2 025.00
Appropriations
outstanding
from
1983
(1)
131.33
Appropriations made available by:
release of
previous
commitments
103.34
exch. rate flue-
tuations affect-
ing amounts pre-
viously released
67.45
Total
Use in
1984
Commitments
made
2 322.20
ava flab le
at 31.12.84
4.92
Appropriations
2 327.12
I
2. USE OF PAYMENT APPROPRIATIONS
(Mio ECU)
Payment appropriations available in 1984
Carry-over 1983
(2)
49.36
Appropriations
for 1984
1 312.50
Tota I
1 361.86
Payments made in 1984
Out of carry-
over from 1983
49.36
Out of appropr. Total
for 1984
1 276.62
3. COMMITMENTS. MADE.
(Mio ECU)
Commitments
1975-1983
unpaid
at
1. 1. 1984
3 716.24
Amounts
Commitments made in 1984
Total
Unpaid
commitments
1975-1983
+
1984
commitments
2 322.20
5 867.65
1 325.98
4 541.67
commitments
paid in
1984
Commitments
sti II to be
paid at
31. 12.84
1 325.98
Payment appropriations not used
at 3 1 • 12 . 1984
Out of carry-over
from 1983
Out of appro-
priations for 1984
35.88
-
Out of appropr. Out of appropr.
released
and adjust-
outstanding
from 1983
ments from 1983 from 1983
170.79
131.33
of 88.65
measures
of 18.00
measures
mill
sect
mill
sect
2 190.87
~
~
M
( 1 ) Including the transfer
section to the support
(2) Including the transfer
section to the support
on ECU of commitment appropriations from the specific Community measures
on
on ECU of payment appropriations from the specific Community measures
on
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0100.png
§
..
Ill
til
("l
~
TABLE 39
PAYMENTS IN 1984 MADE FROM 1975-1984 COMMITMENTS
ERDF, SUPPORT MEASURES
(MIO)
Member
State
B
OK
D
GR
F
IRL
I
L
NL
UK
EUR 10
1975-78
ECU
0. 13
Payments made in 1984 against commitments
1979
ECU
0.17
0. 37
1980
ECU
0.76
- 0.11
2.42
17.46
- 0.08
24.47
1. 14
7.12
53.18
1981
ECU
0. 13
2.68
4.07
7.58
9.34
0.01
104.81
0.58
4.73
13.76
147.69
1982
ECU
0.21
2.56
6.99
6.71
87.37
7. 13
88.14
2.07
4.78
48.13
254.09
1983
ECU
3.53
15.34
16.03
123.88
56.24
29.16
197.89
1.82
164.68
608.57
--
tJ>
Cll
rt
Total payments 1984
National
currency
247.09
207.01
92.73
18.86*
1 303.91
72.07
600.85*
111,76
36.96
175.43
ECU
5.63
28.10
43.92
212.63
190.23
101.51
435.12
2.49
14.74
291.61
1 325.98
·-·----
rt
1-'·
rt
1-'·
1984
ECU
0.70
7.63
13.63
74.46
7.59
68.81
15.29
57.02
245.13
Ill
1-'
A-
ll>
rt
Ill
\D
......
+'
CX>
6.30
0.35 - 3.87
2.02
2.50
- 0.06 - 0. 10
1.52
0.75
2.65
- 1.75
8.55
8. 77
-
5.93
-
0.41
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
&
......
......
\,0
I
\,0
.....,
-
*in thousand mil I ions
V1
+'
CX>
TABLE 40
BREAKDOWN BY MEMBER STATE OF PAYMENTS IN EACH YEAR
ERDF, SUPPORT MEASURES
Member
State
B
OK
D
GR
F
IRL
I
L
NL
UK
EUR 10
1975
0.0
1. 7
0.0
17.8
7.7
48.9
0.2
3. 1
20.6
100.0
1976
1. 7
1. 5
3.6
12. 1
6.8
42.7
0.2
2.3
29.1
100.0
%
or
payments made
1977
0.8
1. 6
6.7
12.3
5.9
40.1
o.
1
0.8
31.7
100.0
1978
2.3
0.5
16.6
16.0
8.0
30.8
o.
1
2.5
23.2
100.0
1979
0.6
1.8
9.0
20.2
6.4
28.0
o.
1
1.7
32.2
1980
0.9
1. 3
6.9
13.7
9.6
34.3
0. 1
1.1
32. 1
100.0
1981
1.2
1. 3
4.6
15.4
7.9
10.0
26.6
0. 1
0.7
32.2
100.0
1982
1. 1
1.5
6.5
16.0
13.3
9.6
29.1
o.
1
0.3
22.5
100.0
1983
0.6
1.3
3.6
17.2
17.2
7.3
27.6
0.0
1. 5
23.6
100.0
1984
0.4
2. 1
3.3
16.0
14.4
7.7
32.8
0.2
1.1
22.0
100.0
-
-
-
-
-
-
- -
100.0
\,0
tJJ
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0101.png
\0
p.
TABLE 41
REGIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF ASSISTANCE 1975-1984
ERDF, SUPPORT MEASURES
Member State
Region
BELGIQUE/BELGI~
Industry, service
and craft
Mio BFR
1 345.46
773.77
571.70
Mia DKR
Mio ECU
32.48
18.46
14.01
Mia ECU
12.66
0.31
12.36
Mio ECU
302.60
40.24
0.96
33.00
22.46
29.82
11.31
43.01
59.05
5.60
57.08
0.07
Mio ECU
39.18
1.80
3.08
3.14
2.99
1.95
1. 18
5.93
8 86
4.48
5.76
Infrastructure
Mlo BFR
3 404.51
1 129.73
2 274.78
Mia DKR
877.86
723.61
154.25
Mio OM
595.22
72.68
1.62
30.81
31.93
12.30
18.33
184. 15
32.60
95.65
115.16
Mia ECU
80.00
27.11
52.89
Mio ECU
113.48
93.94
19.55
Mio ECU
242.15
29.02
0.65
12.55
12.71
5.14
7.40
75.54
12.99
40.13
46.01
Studies
Mia BFR
87.00
87.00
Mia OKR
45.96
45.96
Mia ECU
1.93
1. 93
Mia ECU
5.74
5.74
Total
Mia BFR
4 836.97
1 903.50
2 933.47
M!o DKR
1 020.38
772.04
248.35
Mio OM
1 334.74
171.59
4.06
110.38
86.08
85.51
46.34
290.36
176.91
108. 15
255.21
0.15
Mio DR
82 131.38
8
33
9
5
2
5
4
3
6
1
254.48
020.79
374.62
813.13
930.27
984.73
967.35
668.89
200.44
916.83
Mia ECU
114.41
45.58
68.83
Mio ECU
131.88
99.98
31.90
Mio ECU
544.79
69.26
1.60
45.55
35.18
34.96
18.71
118.55
72.08
45.72
103.11
0.07
Mio ECU
1 091.70 :
112.26
411.73
130.54
81.36
42.83
78.85
66.54
53.88
83.46
30.25
Vlaanderen
wa llonle
-
-
DAN MARK
Gr!ilnland
Other regions
96.57
2.47
94.10
Mia OM
-
-
Mio OM
0. 11
Mio ECU
0.05
DEUTSCHLAND
Schleswig-Holstein
Bremen
Nord rhe i n-Westfa
1_
en
Hessen
Rheinland-Pfalz
Baden-Wurttemberg
Bayern ·
Saarland
Berlin
Ni ede rsachsen
Mu It i- reg i ona I
739.41
98.91
2.44
79.57.
54.16
73.20
28.01
106.21
144.23
12.50
140.02
o.
15
Mio DR
2 809.61
159.28
237.56
243.64
240.41
153. 13
88.81
409.79
570.
co·
345.54
361.46
-------
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.08
-
0.03
-
Mio DR
17.60
3.00
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.04
0.01
Mio ECU
0.26
0.05
-
-
Mio DR
79 304.19
8
32
9
5
2
5
4
3
5
1
~
Mia ECU
1 052.26
110.41
408.64
127.40
78.37
40.88
77.67
60.61
45.02
78.93
24.32
~
--
ELLAS
Ana.Ster.Kai Nisoi
Kentr.Dyt.Makedonia
Pelop.Dyt.Ste.EI las
Thessa I ia
Anatol iki Makedonia
Kriti
I pi ros
Thraki
Nisoi Anat.Agaiou
Multi-regional
l:>j
~
092.20
783.23
130.98
572.71
777.14
895.92
557.56
098.90
850.90
544,77
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4.00
10.60
~
··-·--
-
-
-
-
-
0.05
0.16
-
-
Value of the ECU at first December 1984: 1 ECU·
44,91 BFR
8,041 DKR
=
2,234 OM
91,07 ORA.
---
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0102.png
§
(1)
TABLE
41
REGIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF ASSISTANCE
1975-1984
ERDF, SUPPORT MEASURES
..
(CONTINUED)
Member State
Region
FRANCE
Haute-Normandie
Basse-Normand ie
Picardie
Champagne-Ardenne
Bourgogne
Centre
Nord-Pas-de-Calais
Bretagne
Pays-de-la-Loire
Poitou-Charentes
Lorraine
AI sace
Franche-comte
Limous in
Aquitaine
Midi -Pyrenees
Auve rgne
Rhona-Alpes
Languedoc-Roussll lon
Provence-Cote-d'Azur
Corse
Martinique
Guadeloupe
Guyana
Reunion
Mu I t i- reg i ona I
IRELAND
Donegal
North East
North West
West
Midlands
East
Mid West
South East
South West
Mu I t i -reg i ona I
Industry, service
and craft
Mio FF
2 028.13
10.46
45.35
16.59
45.34
4. 13
10.09
438. 19
132.50
232.07
94.42
296.60
-36.90
0.48
33.31
145.70
120.57
74.96
120.66
69.55
11.39
4.18
20.43
23.40
23.16
17.66
:>c
Infrastructure
Mio ff
8 425.84
119.94
2.40
25.15
149.45
1 576.14
352.06
260.93
210.40
5.02
474.85
1 072.07
616.94
99.60
499.98
18.78
301.54
501.93
506.31
246.84
697.04
216.24
Studies
Mio FF
41.17
Total
Mio ECU
6.02
>
Ul
Mio ECU
336.58
1. 57
7.45
2.55
7.55
0.71
1. 66
75. 11
21.62
37.36
15.46
50.26
6.21
0.06
5.44
23.81
19.33
11.94
20. 11
11.41
1. 89
0.63
3.46
4.02
3.95
2.99
Mio ECU
1 340.91
19.07
0.35
3.67
22.74
255.84
58.24
42.67
32.89
0.74
73.78
76.05
166.65
100.46
14.78
79.46
2.74
49.16
79.81
80.45
38.49
108.11
32.73
Mio
ff
Mio ECU
1 663.51
1.57
26.52
2.90
11.22
0.71
3.69
97.65
277.46
95.61
56.13 '
83.17 I
6.95
I
0.08
79.22
99.86
185.99
112.40
34.89
90.87
4.63
49.79
83.27
84.47
42.44
117.12
32.73
M"
Ill
M"
l)l
10 495.14
10.46
165.30
16.99
70.49
4.13
23.80
567.64
1 708.65
584.13
355.36
507.00
41.92
0.48
491.81
620.55
1 192.64
691.90
220.27
569.54
30.17
305.71
522.36
529.72
269.99
755.89
216.24
M"
(1
-
-
......
p.
Ill
Ill
~
-
13.71
-
2.03
-
......
\0
o:>
.p..
p.
\0
....,
lJ1
I
g:
-
458.50
......
......
.j::-
o:>
\0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
41.17
-
Mio IRL
0.43
0.02
0.01
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
6.02
-
Mio ECU
0.64
0.03
0.02
14io IRL
141.20
3.31
7.48
2.87
11.18
8.38
40.12
27.48
12.31
27.06
1. 01
Mio ECU
205.06
4.89
11.22
4.18
16.50
12.30
57.71
39.48
18. 12
39.23
1.42
Mio IRL
352.26
8.58
5. 13
4.18
18.17
9.55
47.34
21.99
15.01
41.23
161.08
Mio ECU
507.74
12.59
7.54
6.04
26.40
13.84
67.43
32.00
21.77
59.92
260.22
Mio IRL
493.69
'
Mio ECU
713.44
17.51
18.78
10.22
42.90
26.14
125. 14
71.47
39.88
99.15
262.24
-
-
-
-
-
0.40
-
-
0.60
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
11.91
12.62
7.05
29.35
17.93
87.45
49.48
27.32
68.29
182.49
Value of the ECU at first December
1984: 1
ECU
=
6,844
Ff
=
0,7188
IRL.
\0
1.11
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0103.png
"'
TABLE 41
REGIONAL DISTRIBUTION OF ASSISTANCE 1975-1984
ERDF, SUPPORT MEASURES
.
(CONTINUED)
Member State
Region
IT ALIA
friul i-Ven.Giul ia
Toscana
Marche
Lazfo
Abruzzi
Mol ise
Campania
Pug I Ia
Basi I icata
Ca
1
abria
Sic i I ia
Sardegna
Mu I t i- reg ion a I
LUXEMBOURG
Industry, service
and craft
Mrd Ll T
526.58
1 . 11
24.05
95.35
96.49
5.40
115.83
96.67
15.05
20.20
38. 14
18.29
Mio ECU
.437.93
0.99
19.41
79.25
79.51
4.65
94.27
84.50
12.48
15.76
32.12
14.98
Infra structure
Mrd LIT
4 940.39
93.36
18.68
52.83
153.25
146.90
69.83
1 617.72
339.98
213.20
539.49
923.94
334.42
436.80
Mfo LFR
508.35
Mio HFL
354.92
251.29
7.50
88.63
7.50
Mio UKL
1 242.94
207.37
122.04
13.80
62.38
22.26
158.79
203.04
335.23
118.04
Mio ECU
3 910.69
75.81
14.01
43.24
121.72
116.96
55.19
1 258.70
269.27
161.88
425.14
733.27
271.11
364.41
Mio ECU
11.97
Mio ECU
133.14
94.35
2.77
33.04
2.98
Mio ECU
2 085.49
346.59
203.80
23.99
104.74
37.29
267.24
340.67
565.20
195.97
Studies
Mrd Ll T
26.28
Mio ECU
20.12
Total
Mrd LIT
Mio ECU
4 368.73
\C
5
493.26
-
-
-
-
1.12
-
-
-
-
-
-
0.24
3.66
-
Mio LFR
9.63
4.76
6.87
-
0.81
6.98
3.45
5.72
-
-
-
0.19
2.97
-
-
-
-
75.81
93.36
19.79.
15.00
78.00
63.47
248.60
200.97
203.44
253.01
63.29
79.99
1 740.42 1 358.68
436.65
353.77
228.25
174.36
559.68
440.90
962.33
765.58
289.06
356.37
436.80
364.41
Mio LFR
508.35
Mio HFL
416.73
287.61
7.50
114.12
7.50
Mio UKL
1 670.59
285.75
133.19
17.73
66.83
22.26
203.65
257.71
442.49
179.92
61.06
Mio ECU
11.97
Mio ECU
156.18
107.96
2.77
42.48
2.98
Mio ECU '
2 782.01
475.73
221.91
30.39
111.86
37.29
339.57
432.38
743.96
296.66
92.26
Mio ECU
11 598.63
Mio LFR
Mio ECU
Mio ECU
-
Mio HFL
61.64
-
Mio HFL
0.17
0.17
-
Mio ECU
0.07
0.07
Mio ECU
22.98
13.54
NEDERLAND
Noo rd-Nede rIa nd
Oost-Nederland
Limburg
Mu I t i- reg I on a I
UNITED KINGDOM
North
Yorkshire/Humberside
East Midlands
south west
West Midlands
North west
Wales
Scotland
Northern I reI and
Mu It i- reg ion a I
EUR 10
-
25.50
36.15
-
-
9.43
-
-
-
Mio UKL
3.85
0.36
0.27
0.55
0.13
0.14
0.65
0.49
0.19
1.06
-
-
-
-
Mio UKL
423.81
78.02
10.88
3.38
4.32
44.73
54.01
106.77
61.70
60.00
Mio ECU
690.00
128.52
17.66
5.48
6.89
72.10
90.58
177.91
100.37
90.50
Mio ECU
2 079.47
Mio ECU
6.52
0.62
0.46
0.93
0.23
0.22
1.14
0.84
0.32
1. 76
Mio ECU
41.33
-
-
-
-
t>l
~
-
-
Mio ECU
-
-
9 477.83
-
-
Value of the ECU at first December 1984: 1 ECU = 1380 LIT= 44,91 LFR = 2,520 HFL = 0,6013 UKL.
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0104.png
TABLE
42
REGIONAL BREAKDOWN OF POPULATION AND
PER CAPITA ASSISTANCE IN ERDF-ASSISTED AREAS
EROF, SUPPORT MEASURES
Member
State
BELGIQUE/BELGir
Vlaanderen
Wa llonie
DANMARK
Grf)n
I
and
Other reg ions
DEUTSCHLAND
Schleswig-Holstein
Bremen
Nordrhein-Westfalen
Hess en
Rheinland-Pfalz
Baden-wurttemberg
Baye rn
Saar Ia?d
Berlin,
Niedersachsen
ELLAS
Ana. Ster. Kai Nisoi
Kentr.Dyt. Makedonia
Pelop.Dyt. Ste. El las
Thessa II a
Anatollki Makedonia
Krit i
I pi ros
Thraki
Nisol Anat. Agaiou
FRANCE
Haute-Normandie
Basse-Normand i e
Picardie
Champagne-Ardenne
Bourgogne
Centre
Nord-Pas-de-Calais
Bretagne
Pays de Ia Lo
I
re
Poitou-Charentes
Lorra•i ne
Alsace
Franche-Comte
Limousin
Aquitaine
Midi-Pyrenees
Auvergne
Rhones-Aipes
Languedoc-Roussillon
Provence-Cote-d'Azur
Corse
Martinique
Guadeloupe
Guyane
Reunion
IRELAND
1
Population * x
1000
tota
I
5 638
3 224
Aid per capita (ECU)***
1984
1975/84
eligible**
1 412
2 082
14
3
32
33
51
3 332
51
749
270
14
1
960
43
2
605
695
17 044
5 589
3 639
9 233
10 899
1
068
1 899
7 246
2 226
"695
5 555
1 447
1
813
196
3 327
1
068
, 899
4 603
5
2
5
5
9
8
11
13
2
24
19
95
36
67
24
22
31
2
8
3 996
1
696
1
294
696
426
502
446
345
340
, 294
696
426
502
446
345
340
1
696
632
64
12
23
6
63
48
28
53
243
101
176
.97
117
101
157
149
156
245
1
1
1
,
2
3
2
2
2
,
,
1
656
351
740
346
596
264
933
708
930
568
320
566
084
737
391
969
541
354
43
209
2 233
2
3
3
13
6
4
27
5
32
18
44
112
43
37
58
50
1
4
17
2 473
2 198
1
568
1 429
264
138
737
16
10
8
3
2
.
I
2
657
2 325
1
333
5 016
, 927
3 965
240
329
326
73
516
2
016
, 764
1 022
890
1 666
618
240
27
10
22
23
12
5
32
146
34
17
9
7
107
50
104
110
39
55
207
253
·258
581
227
7
328
73
516 '
329
3 443
3 443
46
207
*
**
***
Depending on the sources available, the population figures
relate to years
1980-84
inclusive.
Population in the ERDF-assisted areas.
Per capita aid calculated on the basis of eligible population.
Annex
A:
Statistical data 1984 and 1975-1984
97
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0105.png
TABLE 42
REGIONAL BREAKDOWN OF POPULATION AND
PER CAPITA ASSISTANCE IN ERDF-ASSISTED AREAS
ERDF, SUPPORT MEASURES
(CONTINUED)
Member
State
ITALIA
Friul i-Venezia Giu I ia
Toscana
Ma rche
lazio
Abruzzi
Mol ise
Campania
Pug I ia
Basi I icata
calabria
Sici i Ia
Sardegna
LUXEMBOURG
NEDERLAND
Noord Nederland
Oost Nederland
Limburg
UNITED KINGDOM
North
Yorkshire/Humberside
East Mid Iands
South-West
West Midlands
North-West
Wales
Scotland
Northern Ireland
3
4
3
4
5
6
2
5
1
117
917
852
381
187
459
814
150
564
2 693
2 598
111
1 077
2 261
4 332
2 736
3 589
1 564
24
33
65
44
13
22
35
43
22
177
85
274
104
16
78
158
207
190
1 571
2 828
1
075
1 571
85
711
18
1
3
1
5
1
5
3
2
5
1
228
581
421
056
236
332
563
947
615
098
007
617
366
1 228
30
174
1 127
1 236
332
5 563
3 947
615
2 098
5
007
1 617
366
25
41
39
23
22
52
11
37
34
40
38
13
Population *
tota I
X
1000
Aid per capita (ECU)***
1984
1975/84
62
500
365
178
165
191
244
90
284
210
153
179
33
el lg ible**
-
-
6
70
33
60
*
**
***
Depending on the sources avai labie, the population figures
relate to years 1980-84 inclusive.
Population in the ERDF-assisted areas.
Per capita aid calculated on the basis of eligible population.
ERDF
98
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0106.png
B.O
ANNEX B: BIBLIOGRAPHY (1984 PUBLICATIONS)
B .1
.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND
• Council Regulation (CEE) N° 1787/84 of 19 June 1984 on the European
Regional Development Fund
(O.J. N° L 169, 28.6.1984)
• Opinion of the Economic and Social Committee on the proposal for a
Council Regulation amending Regulation (EEC) N° 724/75 establishing a
European Regional Development Fund
(O.J. N° C 140, 28.5.1984, p. 17)
• ERDF in figures: 1983, 1975-1983 (XVI/107/84)
• Ninth Annual ERDF Report (1983)
Published by the Office for Official Publications of the European
Communities, 1984
• Opinion of the Economic and Social Committee on the European Regional
Development Fund (Eighth Report from the Commission to the Council)
(O.J. N° C 206, 6.8.1984, p. 13)
• Resolution of the European Parliament on the seventh annual report
(1981) of the Commission of the European Communities on the European
Regional Development Fund
(O.J. N° C 10, 16.1.1984, p. 110)
• Commission communication
Development Fund:
a.
b.
c.
d.
1983
1983
1984
1984
on
grants
from
the
European
Regional
(third allocation), O.J. N° C 30, 6.2.1984
(fourth allocation), O.J. N° C 136, 23.5.1984
(first allocation), O.J. N° C 245, 13.9.1984
(second allocation), O.J. N° C 349, 31.12.1984
B
.2.
ERDF: SPECIFIC COMMUNITY REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT
MEASURES
• Second series of specific Community regional development measures under
Article 13 of the ERDF Regulation
(O.J. N°
L
27, 31.1.1984)
a.
Council Regulation (EEC) N° 214/84 of 18 January 1984 amending
Regulation (EEC) N° 2615/80 instituting a specific Community
measure contributing to the development of certain French and
Italian regions in the context of Community enlargement.
Council Regulation (EEC) N° 215/84 of 18 January 1984 instituting a
specific Community measure contributing to the development of
certain regions of Greece in the context of Community enlargement.
b.
Annex B: Bibliography (1984 Publications)
99
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0107.png
c.
d.
e.
f.
Council Regulation (EEC) N° 216/84 of 18 January 1984 amending
Regulation (EEC) N° 2616/80 instituting a specific Community
regional development measure contributing to overcoming constraints
on the development of new economic activities in certain zones
adversely affected by restructuring of the steel industry.
Council Regulation (CEE) N° 217/84 of
:a
January 1984 amending
Regulation (EEC) N° 2617/80
instit1•+::n~
A
spP.cific Community
regional development measure -:or>t-!'i.Lutiug to overcoming constraints
on the development of new economic activities in certain zones
adversely affected by restructuring of the shipbuilding industry.
Council Regulation (EEC) N° 218/84 of 18 January 1984 amending
Regulation (EEC) N° 2618/80 instituting a specific Community
regional development measure contributing to improving security of
energy supply in certain Community regions by way of improved use of
new techniques for hydro-electrical power and alternative energy
sources.
Council Regulation (EEC) N° 219/84 of 18 January 1984 instituting a
specific Community regional development measure contributing to
overcoming constraints on the development of new economic
activities in certain zones adversely affected by restructuring of
the textile and clothing industry.
• Commission Decisions
a.
Commission Decision of 30 May 1984 concerning the zones referred to
in Article 2 paragraph 3 of Regulation (EEC) N° 2616/80 instituting
a ·specific Community regional development measure contributing to
overcoming constraints on the development of new economic
activities in certain zones adversely affected by restructuring of
the steel industry.
·
(O.J. N° 1 249. 18.9.1984)
This decision concerns the areas in the Federal Republic of .Germany.
Commission Decision of 10 September 1984 concerning the zones
referred to in Article 2 paragraph 3 of Regulation (EEC) N°. 2616/80
instituting a specific Community regional development measure
contributing to overcoming constraints on the development of new
economic activities in certain zones adversely affected by
restructuring of the steel industry.
(O.J. N° 1249. 18.9.1984)
This Decision concerns the areas in the Netherlands.
Commission Decision of 8 October 1984 concerning the zones referred
to in Article 2 paragraph 3 of Regulation (EEC) N° 2616/80
instituting a specific Community regional development measure
contributing to overcoming constraints on the development of new
economic activities in certain zones adversely affected by
restructuring of the steel industry.
(O.J. N° 1275. 18.10.1984)
This Decision concerns the areas in Belgium.
b.
c.
• Third series of specific Community regional development measures.
Proposals for Council Regulations (doc. COM(84) 715 final. 14.12.1984):
a.
amending Regulation (EEC) N° 2619/80 instituting a specific
Community regional development measure contributing to the
improvement of the economic and social situation of the border areas
of Ireland and Northern Ireland
amending Regulation (EEC) N° 2617/80 instituting a specific
Community regional development measure contributing to overcoming
constraints on the development of new economic activities in
certain zones adversely affected by restructuring of the
shipbuilding industry
amending Regulation (EEC) N° 219/84 instituting a specific
Community regional development measure contributing to overcoming
constraints on the development of new economic activities in
certain zones adversely affected by restructuring of the textile.
and clothing industry
b.
c.
100
ERDF
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0108.png
d.
instituting a specific Community regional development measure
contributing to the development of new . economic activities in
certain zones affected by the implementation of the Community
fisheries policy.
B .3 REGIONAL POLICY
• The regions of Europe. Second periodic. report on the social'and economic
situation of the regions of the Community, together with a statement of
the Regional Policy Committee
Published by the Office for Official Publications of the European
Communities, 1984
• Modification to the rules of procedure of the Regional Policy Committee
(O.J. N° C 195, 24.7.1984, p. 2)
• Commission opinion of 19 June 1984 on the sec0nd-generation regional
development programmes (1981-1985)
(O.J. N° L 211, 8.8.1984, p. 18)
• Regional development programmes (second generation) for the Federal
Republic of Germany, including Berlin (West) 1981-1985
Published by the Office for Official Publications of the European
Communities, 1984
B.4 INTEGRATED MEDITERRANEAN PROGRAMMES
• Commission Decisions of 21 December 1983, published in Official Journal
N° L 44 of 15 February 1984, instituting pilot actions in preparation
for the integrated Mediterranean programmes:
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
i.
j.
k.
1.
m.
in the areas of Ogliastro, Nuoro, the region of Sardinia; Italy
in the inland areas of the region of Corsica, France
in the department of Herault, France
in the island of Lesbos, prefecture of Lesbos, Greece
in the inland areas of the Viterbo province, region of Lazio, Italy
in the prefecture of Ioannina, Greece
in the prefecture of Evritania, Greece
in the Prespa area of the prefecture of Florina, Greece
on the island of Limnos, prefecture of Lesbos.,. Greece
in certain rural areas of the Abruzzi region, Italy
for the fisheries and aquaculture sector in the regions of
Languedoc-Roussillon, Provence-Cote d'Azur, Corsica and Aquitaine,
France
in the fisheries and aquaculture sector in Italy
in the fisheries and aquaculture sector in Greece.
• Opinion cf the Economic and Social Committee .on the Commission's
proposals concerning integrated Mediterranean programmes
(O,J. N° C 23, 30.1.1984)
• Resolution closing the procedure for consultation of the European
Parliament on the proposal for a Regulation instituting the integrated
Mediterranean programmes
(O.J. N° C 117, 30.4.1984)
• Amended proposal for
a
Council
Mediterranean programmes
(O.J. N° C 280, 19.10.1984).
Regulation
instituting
integrated
Annex B: Bibliography (1984 Publications)
101
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0109.png
B
.5
REGIONAL AID
• Commission Decision of 16 May 1984 on the extension until 30 June 1983
of the regional aid supplement provided for in Article 2 point b) of the
Belgian Economic Expansion Act of 30 December 1970
(O.J.
N° L
268, 9.10.1984, p. 27)
• Commission Decision of 21 December 1983 amending Decision 82/691/EEC on
the designation of areas eligible for regional aid in Denmark from 1
January 1982
(O.J.
N° L
62, 3.3.1984, p. 23).
102
ERDF
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0110.png
C.O
ANNEX
C:
SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS USED
DOM
EAGGF
ECSC
EIB
EMS
ERDF
ESF
GDP
IDP
IMP
NACE
NCI
PAT
RPC
RDP
SMEs
B
French overseas departments
European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund
European Coal and Steel Community
European Investment Bank
European Monetary System
European Regional Development Fund
European Social Fund
Gross domestic product (at market prices)
Integrated development programme
Integrated Mediterranean programme
General industrial classification of economic activities within
the European Communities
New Community Instrument
Prime d'amenagement du territoire (Regional development grant)
Regional Policy Committee
Regional development programme
Small and medium-sized enterprises
Belgium
Denmark
Germany
Greece
France
Ireland
Italy
Luxembourg
Netherlands
United Kingdom
All member countries of the European Communities
Belgian franc
Danish krone
German mark
Greek drachma
French franc
Irish pound
Italian lira
Luxembourg franc
Dutch guilder
Pound sterling
European Currency Unit
less than
more than
percentage
million
' 000 mill ion
DK
D
GR
F
IRL
I
L
NL
UK
EUR 10
BFR
DKR
DM
DR
FF
IRL
LIT
LFR
HFL
UKL
ECU
<
>
%
Mio
Mrd
Annex C: Symbols and abbreviations used
103
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0111.png
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
Table 4
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
5
6
7
8
9
Table 10
Table 11
Table 12
Table 13
Table 14
Table 15
Table 16
·Table 17
Table 18
Table 19
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
20
21
22
23
24
Table 25
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
Table
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
Table 33
Table 34
Table 35
Table 36
Table 37
Table 38
Table 39
ERDF allocations 1975-1984, Total Funds
Total ERDF grants in 1984 and from 1975 to 1984, Total
Funds
Grants to priority regions in 1984 and from 1975 to 1984
Forecasts of jobs created or maintained in 1984 and from
1975 to 1984
.
Ranges for ERDF assistance
Outcome of examination of projects in 1984
Number of projects benefiting from aid in 1984
Aid granted in 1984
Size breakdown of industrial, craft industry and service
projects aids in 1984
.
Studies (article 12) financed in 1984 and from 1980 to
1984
. .
.
Funds available for commitment in 1984
Amounts committed by type of investment in 1984
Balances of commitment appropriations. outstanding each
year-end from 1975 to 1984
Use of commitment appropriations in 1984
Payments made in 1984 and commitments still to be paid at
the end of 1984
.
Payment appropriations since 1975
Infrastructure project signboards erected from 1975 to
1984
.
Commitments and payments 1984 and 1981-1984, ERDF,
specific Community measures
Available funds and commitments 1984, ERDF, specific
Community measures
The ten regions receiving the bulk of ERDF assistance
ERDF-assisted areas: population and aid per capita
Regional distribution of grants made in 1984
Assistance applied for in 1984
Number of projects for which grant applications were
submitted in 1984
.
Assistance granted to Member States 1975-1984 by
investment category
.
Number of projects assisted in 1984 (detail)
Number of projects assisted 1975-1984
Assistance granted in 1984 (detail)
Assistance granted 1975-1984
Investments for which assistance was granted in 1984
Investments for which assistance ·was granted 1975-1984
Breakdown of assistance by type of infrastructure in 1984
(detail)
Breakdown by country of assistance to infrastructure
projects in 1984
Breakdown of assistance by type of infrastructure
1975-1984
Breakdown of assistance by industry, craft industry and
service sector in 1984 (detail)
.
Breakdown by country of assistance to industry, craft
industry and service sector in 1984
Breakdown of assistance by industry, craft industry and
service sector 1975-1984
.
Budgetary situation 1984 .
Payments in 1984 made from 1975-1984 commitments
6
7
9
10
14
19
20
22
30
32
33
33
34
35
36
37
41
46
47
51
52
70
83
83
84
85
85
86
86
87
87
88
89
89
90
91
91
92
93
105
List of tables
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0112.png
Table 40 Breakdown by Member State of payments in each year
Table
41
Regional distribution of assistance
1975-1984
Table.
42
Regional breakdown of population and per capita assistance
in ERDF-assisted areas . . • . • • . • . . . . . . . . .
93
94
97
LIST OF MAPS
Map
1
Map
2
Map
3
Map
4
Map
5
Regional distribution of ERDF grants from
1975
to
1984,
Level
III
regions
. .
. .
. .
Regional distribution of ERDF assistance to infrastructures
projects in
1984,
level
III
regions
.
• . •
Regional distribution of ERDF assistance to industry, craft
industry and services
in
1984,
level
I l l
regions
• .
Regional distribution of ERDF assistance in
1984,
Level
III
regions
. . . .
• • . • • • •
.
Regional distribution of ERDF assistance per capita in
1984
8
25
29
54
55
LIST OF GRAPHS
Graph
1
Graph
2
a and b Aid granted by country in
1984:
distribution in
%
and amounts granted to infrastructure and industry
a and b Aid granted
in
1984
to the leading ten types of
infrastructure and to the leading ten industrial sectors
23
27
106
ERDF
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0113.png
ILLUSTRATION 1: PRESS CUTTINGS
EFRU
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0114.png
ILLUSTRATION 2: SIGNBOARDS
Road scheme in Brittany (F)
Improvement of the Pekeler Hoofddiep canal near Groningen (NL)
HERINRICHTING PEKELER
HOOFDDIEP · ·
EEN
WERKPROJECT
VAN -HET
INTEGRAAL
STRUCTUURPLAN
NOOROEN DES
LANDS
I
s
p
HERlNRtCHTINQ OOST- GRONlNGEN EN
D1:
!
GRONINGS • DRrin-SE VEENKci.oNlEN
*
*
Die
pfDja<:t
!.
gefinanciard do.or:
E.F. A.D.- Europees
Fcrn:b
YOOf
I.S.P.-
Regiomde
OntWI'kkellng
tntegriUII'
Structuurpla:n
N:oorden
des
LAnds
*
*
*
"' Hurinridrting
Oo10t
-Groningen-
Gnmings-Drentsa
veenlcoloniin
Y.R.O.M.-min. Volb:ltuin. Ruimtolljke Ord.en Mili•ubebcar
»:
L.on V.
-min.
Lllndbi)UW
tn
Vlsserij
wa1ersch~
Reidefzi.Pwst
*
pmeenten Stadska.naal on Nleuwe
Opdroc:htgewar:
provfnda
!Moningen
Pekela
gamoant& Nieuwe
Pekeb
Grontmlj
n•
HANm
Provlndo:Jo W.rterttaat Gronlng#ll
Oirectin
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0115.png
ILLUSTRATION 3: SIGNBOARDS
Development of an industrial estate at Llineburg (D)
Line 1 of the Naples underground system (I)
EFRU
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0116.png
ILLUSTRATI0N 4: SIGNBOARDS
Road construction in Fermanagh, Northern Ireland (UK)
Port improvement work at Laesoe in North Jutland (DK)
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0117.png
SUMMARY
The year 1984 was an eventful year for European regional policy. The new
ERDF Regulation was adopted by the Council on 19 June. Previously, on 18
January 1984, the Council had adopted the second series of specific
Community
measure~
designed to strengthen the first series of measures
already launched and to introduce one new measure.
With the new ERDF Regulation entering into force on 1 January 1985, this
report reviews the first ten years of Fund operations.
In 1984, the Fund's budget allocation _of commitment appropriations was
2 140 million ECU or 7.3% of the Community budget .. Payment appropriation
were set at 1 410 million ECU and, like the commitment appropriations,
were .. almost fully used up.
Over 4 350 investment projects and 43 studies were financed in 1984
being selected from 5'900 grant applications.
aft~r
The bulk of the grants (91.1%) went to five Member·States: Italy (34.7%),
the United Kingdom (26. 7%), France (11.5%), Greece (11.3%) and Ireland
(6.9%). However, in terms of per capita assistance in ,the Fund assisted
·areas only, Ireland heads the list, followed by Greece, Denmark and Italy.
The assistance was concentrated in the Community's least-favoured
regions, with eight regions receiving half of the ERDF grants.
Some 85% of the grants went to infrastructure investments (roads, bridges,
energy distribution networks, etc.), and 14% to productive investments in
the industrial and . service sectors, allowing the projected direct
creation of nearly 69 000 jobs. To this total can be added the number of
jobs created indirectly by these investments, as well as those created
directly and indirectly by infrastructure investments assisted by ERDF
grants.
Commitments for specific Community measures totalled 61 million ECU
in
1984, bringing to 140 million ECU the total amount of commitments since
the measures were introduced in 1981.
Summary
PDF to HTML - Convert PDF files to HTML files
1440716_0118.png
European Communities- Commission
European Regional Development Fund -Tenth annual report (1964)
Document
Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities
1986- 119 pp.- 21.0
x
29.7 em
DA, DE, GR, EN, FR, IT, NL
ISBN: 92-825-5875-4
Catalogue number: CB-45-85-195-EN-C
Price (excluding VAT) in Luxembourg:
ECU 10.05
BFR 450
IRL 7.20
UKL 6
USD 9
Salg og abonnement · Verkauf und Abonnement · nwA"oEIS KDI auv6po1JES · Sales and subscriptions
Vanta
v
abonos · Vente et abonnements · Vendita e abbonamenti
Verkoop en abonnementen · Venda e assinaturas
BELGIOUE/BELGI~
FRANCE
Service do vente en France des publications
des Communautbs
europ6ennes.
Journal officioJ
2-6.
rue
Desai•
75732
Par~s
Ccc:lex 15
Tel. l\145 78 6\39
IRELAND
Government Publications Sales Office
Sun
Alliance House
Molosworlh Slteet
Dublin 2
Tel.710309
PORTUGAL
Moniteur belge/Bolgisch Staatsblad
Rue de louvain 40-42/leuvansestraat40-42
1000 Bruxelles/1000 Brussel
lmprensa Nncional
Av. Francisco Manuel de Melo. 5
Tel 512 00 26
CCP/.PostrekenJng 000-2005502-27
Sous-depOts/ Agef1tschappen:
Librairio europbenne/
E01opesa Boekhandel
P • 1000
lis
boa
Tel. 65 39 96
Grupo
Bert1
and, SARL
Dfstribui:dor-o
de
livros Berttand lda.
Rua das Terras
dos Vales.
4-A
Apart.
37
P·2701 Amadora CODEX
Rue de Ia loi 244/WelStraat 244
1040 Bruxelles/1 040 Brussel
CAE DOC
Rue de Ia Montagne 34/Bergstraar 34
B1e 11/Bus 11
Tel.
493
90
50 - 494 87 88
TeleX
15798
BERDIS
1000 Bruxelles/1000
Bn1ssel
UNITED KINGDOM
or by post
Stationery
Office
DANMARK
Schultz- EF-publikationer
St
Martin's
House
Waterloo Road
. Dublin 4
Tet
68
90
66
HM
~tationerv
Offcc8 ·
HMSO Publ•c.::ations Centre
51
Nine Elms
lane
london SW8 SD"A
Tel.
IOH' 211 56 56
Sub-agent:
Alan Armstrong
& Associates
ltd
72
Park
Road
london
NWt
4SH
Tel. {01) 723 39 02
.
Telex 297635 AAAL
TO G
M0ntergade 19
1116 Kebenhavn K
Tlf: 101) 14 11 95
Girokonto 200 11 95
ITALIA
BR DEUTSCHLAND
Verlag Bundesanzeigor
Breite
Stra!le
Postla-ch 01 80 06
5000
KOin 1
Tel.
102
21
J
20
29·0
Fernsc.::hreiber·
ANZE~GER
BONN
B
882
595
Telecop1crer:
2029278
licosa
Spa
Via
lamarmora.
45
Casella
postale 552
50 12
1 Fircnze
Tel.
57 97
51
Telex
5
70466 LtCOSA I
CCP 343 509
Subagerni:
libferia scientifica Lucio do Biasi-o - AEIOU
VHl
Mcravigli,
16
SCHWEIZ/SUISSE/SVI2ZERA
librairie Payot
6.
rue
Gn:nus
1211
Geneve
20
12J
Milano
Tel. 80 76
79
libreria Tassi
Via A.
Famese,
28
00
192
Roma
Tel.
31
05
90
HI. 31 89
50
CCP 12-2:S6
UNITED STATES
OF
AMERICA
European Community Information
Se~ice
GREECE
G.C.
Elefthoroudakis
SA
International
Bookstore
4 Nikis Street
1
05 63 Athens
Tel.
322 22 55
Tele•
219410 ELEF
Sub-agent
for
Northern Greec.::e:
Ubreria giuridica
Via 12
Oltobro,
172/R
16 121 Genova
Tel. 59 56 93
GRAND·DUCH£ DE LUXEMBOURG
Office des publications
officio
lies
d-es
CommunoutOs europ6ennes
2,
rue Mercier
2100 M Street NW
Suite
707
Wasl'1inglon. DC
2003 7
Tel. {2021 862 9 500
Molho's
Bookstore
The Bus1ness Bookshop
10 Tsimiski
Street
Thessatoniki
Tel. 275 271
CANADA
Renouf.Publishing Co., ltd
61
Sparks
Street
Ottawa
Ontario
KIP
SRI
Tel.
Toll Free 1 (80012674164
Ottawa
Region
(61 3)
238
8985-6
Tele11
053-4936
L-2985
lu~~:embourg
Tel.
499281
Telex PUBOF LU 1324 b
CCP 19190·8\
CC
hancaire
81l 8-1 09/6003/200
Tele11
412885
LIMO
ESPANA
Bolotin Oficial del Estado
Trafalgar
27
E-28010 Madrid
Messageries Paul Kraus
11. rue Christophe
Ptantin
l-2339
lu~~:embourg
TC~.482131
JAPAN
K1nokun~ya·
Company
ltd
1 7-7
Sh~njuku
3-Chome
Tei.I9H7-60611
Mundi-Prens.o libros, S.A.
CasteU6 37
E-28001
Madrid
Tel
(911
431 33
99
fl•bros)
431
32 22
{Abonos)
435 36 37
{Direcci6n)
Hlex
49370-MPLI-E
Tele• 2515
CCP 49242 ·63
_NEDERLAND
.
Shiniuk~J-ktJ
StoatsdrukkeJij-
en uttgeverijbedrijf
Chnstoffel
Plantijnsllaat
Postbus
20014
2500 EA
's-Gravenhage
Tel. (0701 78 99 11
Tok11o 160-91
Tel. (03) 354 0131
Journal Oopartment
PO Bo11 55 Chilose
Tokyo
156'
Tel. (031
4390124