Det Energipolitiske Udvalg 2010-11 (1. samling)
L 141 Bilag 6
Offentligt
973039_0001.png
973039_0002.png
973039_0003.png
973039_0004.png
973039_0005.png
973039_0006.png
973039_0007.png
973039_0008.png
973039_0009.png
973039_0010.png
973039_0011.png
1. Tab af EFFEKTIVITET pga. CCS2. Merbehov pga. CCS - ENERGI3. Merbehov pga. CCS - VANDKILDER:IPCC, Special Report Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage,Summary for Policy Makers, 2005,
RECCS PlusFinal Report, Wuppertal Inst., 2010P. Viebahn et al., Comparison of Renewable Energy Technologies with Carbon Dioxide Capture andStorage (CCS)House, Harvey, Aziz and Schrag,The energy penalty of post-combustion CO2 capture & storageand its implications for retrofitting the U.S. installed base,Jan 2009, Energy & EnvironmentalScience, Energy Environ. Sci., 2009 DOI: 10.1039/b811608c PerspectiveLast Gasp of the Coal IndustryBy Gabriela von Goerne and Fredrik Lundberg.Published in October 2008 by the Air Pollution & Climate Secretariatwww.airclim.org.Thirsty Energy: Water and Energy in the 21st CenturyWorld Economic Forum in partnership with Cambridge Energy Research AssociatesUPDATE 2009Water Requirements for Existing and Emerging Thermoelectric Plant TechnologiesDOE/NETL-402/080108Department of Energy, USAugust 2008 (April2009 Revision)Strategic Analysis of the Global Status of Carbon Capture and StorageReport 2: Economic assessment of carbon capture and storage technologies.Final Report � 2009 Global CCS Institute.
1. Tab af effektivitet
KILDE:Last Gasp of the Coal IndustryBy Gabriela von Goerne and Fredrik Lundberg.Published in October 2008 by the Air Pollution & Climate Secretariatwww.airclim.org.Side 12
[CDR= Carbon Dioxide Recovery = CO2-fangst.]Subcritical PC36,824,911,932%SupercriticalPC39,127,211,930%IGCC (Slurryfed)38,232,55,715%IGCC (dryfed)41,1329,122%NGCC50,843,77,114%
No CDRCDRDiff.%*
* NOAHs beregning
KILDE: Water Requirements for Existing and Emerging Thermoelectric Plant TechnologiesDOE/NETL-402/080108Department of Energy, USAugust 2008 (April2009 Revision)
KILDE: RECCS Final Report, Wuppertal Inst., 2010Side 194
2. Merbehov - ENERGI10 – 40 %(Kulkraftværker: 24 – 40 %, se fodnote)
Side 4IPCC, Special Report Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage, Summary for Policy Makers,2005,
18 – 35 %
Side 208
LIGNITE (brunkul):
24 – 66 %
Side 197KILDE: RECCS Final Report, Wuppertal Inst., 2010
18 – 32 %(kul: 21 %)
Side 242KILDE: RECCS Final Report, Wuppertal Inst., 2010
30 %
KILDE: Thirsty Energy: Water andEnergy in the 21st CenturyWorld Economic Forum in partnershipwith Cambridge Energy ResearchAssociatesUPDATE 2009
25 - 33 %
Side 20KOMPRESSIONSDELEN:
KILDE: Strategic Analysis of the Global Status of Carbon Capture and StorageReport 2: Economic assessment of carbon capture and storage technologies.Final Report � 2009 Global CCS Institute.
21 – 27 % (op til 40 %)
KILDE: Last Gasp of the Coal IndustrySide 12
50 – 80 %
KILDE:House, Harvey, Aziz and Schrag,The energy penalty of post-combustion CO2 capture& storage and its implications for retrofitting the U.S. installed base,Jan 2009, Energy &Environmental Science, Energy Environ. Sci., 2009 DOI: 10.1039/b811608c PerspectiveSide 21
Se i øvrigt NOAHs CCS-hjemmeside:http://ccs-info.dk/klima.htmlog
http://ccs-info.dk/energypenalty.html
3. Merbehov vand
KILDE: Water Requirements for Existing and Emerging Thermoelectric Plant TechnologiesSide 7
Last Gasp of the Coal IndustrySide 13
KILDE: Thirsty Energy: Water and Energy in the 21st CenturyWorld Economic Forumin partnership with Cambridge Energy Research Associates, UPDATE 2009Side 22 ff.
Appendix
OPSUMMERING fra Wuppertal Institute:
Side 17, 20 og 21-22KILDE: RECCS Final Report, Wuppertal Inst., 2010