Det Udenrigspolitiske Nævn 2018-19 (1. samling)
S 340
Offentligt
1994677_0001.png
Aggregation of periods for
unemployment benefits
Report on U1 Portable Documents
for mobile workers
Reference year 2017
Frederic De Wispelaere & Jozef Pacolet - HIVA–KU Leuven
October 2018
S 340 - 2018-19 (1. samling) - Endeligt svar på S 340: Vil regeringen, i lyset af Parlamentets holdning om at EU-/EØS-borgere skal have ret til danske dagpenge fra dag et, aktivere artikel 48 TEUF i Lissabon-traktaten, som giver et medlemsland mulighed for at anmode om, at et forslag til en EU-retsakt forelægges det Europæiske Råd til drøftelse, hvis medlemslandet erklærer, at denne retsakt lovgivningsmæssig berører vigtige aspekter af den pågældende medlemsstats sociale sikringssystem?
EUROPEAN COMMISSION
Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion
Directorate D
Labour Mobility
Unit D/2
Social security coordination
Contact :
[email protected]
European Commission
B-1049 Brussels
S 340 - 2018-19 (1. samling) - Endeligt svar på S 340: Vil regeringen, i lyset af Parlamentets holdning om at EU-/EØS-borgere skal have ret til danske dagpenge fra dag et, aktivere artikel 48 TEUF i Lissabon-traktaten, som giver et medlemsland mulighed for at anmode om, at et forslag til en EU-retsakt forelægges det Europæiske Råd til drøftelse, hvis medlemslandet erklærer, at denne retsakt lovgivningsmæssig berører vigtige aspekter af den pågældende medlemsstats sociale sikringssystem?
EUROPEAN COMMISSION
Aggregation of periods for
unemployment benefits
Report on U1 Portable Documents
for mobile workers
Reference year 2017
Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion
Network Statistics FMSSFE (Contract VC/2017/0463
‘Network of Experts on intra-EU
mobility
Lot 2: Statistics and compilation of national data’)
2018
S 340 - 2018-19 (1. samling) - Endeligt svar på S 340: Vil regeringen, i lyset af Parlamentets holdning om at EU-/EØS-borgere skal have ret til danske dagpenge fra dag et, aktivere artikel 48 TEUF i Lissabon-traktaten, som giver et medlemsland mulighed for at anmode om, at et forslag til en EU-retsakt forelægges det Europæiske Råd til drøftelse, hvis medlemslandet erklærer, at denne retsakt lovgivningsmæssig berører vigtige aspekter af den pågældende medlemsstats sociale sikringssystem?
1994677_0004.png
Network Statistics FMSSFE
This report has been prepared in the framework of Contract VC/2017/0463 ‘Network of Experts on intra-EU
mobility
social security coordination and free movement of workers / Lot 2: Statistics and compilation of
national data’. This contract
was awarded to Network Statistics FMSSFE, an independent research network
composed of expert teams from HIVA (KU Leuven), Milieu Ltd, IRIS (UGent), ICON-INSTITUT Public Sector
GmbH, Szeged University and Eftheia bvba. Network Statistics FMSSFE is coordinated by HIVA.
Authors:
Frederic De Wispelaere, Research expert, HIVA Research Institute for Work and Society, University of
Leuven (KU Leuven).
Prof dr Jozef Pacolet, Emeritus with formal duties, HIVA Research Institute for Work and Society, University
of Leuven (KU Leuven).
Peer reviewers:
Prof dr József Hajdú, Head of the Department of Labour Law and Social Security, Szeged University.
Dr Gabriella Berki, Assistant Professor at the Department of Labour Law and Social Security, Szeged
University.
Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers
to your questions about the European Union.
Freephone number
(*):
00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11
(*)
The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone
boxes or hotels may charge you).
LEGAL NOTICE
This document has been prepared for the European Commission however it reflects the views only of the
authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information
contained therein.
More information on the European Union is available on the
Internet (http://www.europa.eu).
© European Union, 2018
Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged.
S 340 - 2018-19 (1. samling) - Endeligt svar på S 340: Vil regeringen, i lyset af Parlamentets holdning om at EU-/EØS-borgere skal have ret til danske dagpenge fra dag et, aktivere artikel 48 TEUF i Lissabon-traktaten, som giver et medlemsland mulighed for at anmode om, at et forslag til en EU-retsakt forelægges det Europæiske Råd til drøftelse, hvis medlemslandet erklærer, at denne retsakt lovgivningsmæssig berører vigtige aspekter af den pågældende medlemsstats sociale sikringssystem?
Aggregation of periods for unemployment benefits
Table of Contents
List of Tables .................................................................................................... 6
List of Figures ................................................................................................... 7
Summary of the main findings ............................................................................ 8
Introduction ...................................................................................................... 9
1.
2.
General overview ....................................................................................10
Evolution of the number of PDs U1 received ................................................17
3.
A relatively small share in the total unemployment figure and in intra-EU
mobility ...........................................................................................................19
Annex I Additional tables ...................................................................................22
Annex II PD U1 Questionnaire ............................................................................24
Annex III Portable Document U1 ........................................................................25
5
S 340 - 2018-19 (1. samling) - Endeligt svar på S 340: Vil regeringen, i lyset af Parlamentets holdning om at EU-/EØS-borgere skal have ret til danske dagpenge fra dag et, aktivere artikel 48 TEUF i Lissabon-traktaten, som giver et medlemsland mulighed for at anmode om, at et forslag til en EU-retsakt forelægges det Europæiske Råd til drøftelse, hvis medlemslandet erklærer, at denne retsakt lovgivningsmæssig berører vigtige aspekter af den pågældende medlemsstats sociale sikringssystem?
Aggregation of periods for unemployment benefits
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1
Table 2
The number of aggregations of periods for unemployment, 2017
The number of aggregations of periods for unemployment, by length
of insurance, employment or self-employment in Member State of
last activity,
by competent Member State,
2017
The number of aggregations of periods for unemployment, by group
of Member States, 2017
The number of aggregations of periods for unemployment, by length
of insurance, employment or self-employment in Member State of
last activity,
by former Member State of insurance, employment or
self-employment,
2017
Evolution of the number of PDs U1 received, 2013-2017
Evolution of the percentage of PDs U1 received for a length of
insurance, employment or self-employment of more than three
months, 2013-2017
The number of aggregations of periods for unemployment, as a
percentage of the total number of unemployed persons and the total
annual EU/EFTA migration inflow of working age, 2017
12
13
Table 3
15
Table 4
16
18
Table 5
Table 6
19
Table 7
21
6
S 340 - 2018-19 (1. samling) - Endeligt svar på S 340: Vil regeringen, i lyset af Parlamentets holdning om at EU-/EØS-borgere skal have ret til danske dagpenge fra dag et, aktivere artikel 48 TEUF i Lissabon-traktaten, som giver et medlemsland mulighed for at anmode om, at et forslag til en EU-retsakt forelægges det Europæiske Råd til drøftelse, hvis medlemslandet erklærer, at denne retsakt lovgivningsmæssig berører vigtige aspekter af den pågældende medlemsstats sociale sikringssystem?
Aggregation of periods for unemployment benefits
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1
Aggregation of periods for unemployment by length of insurance,
employment or self-employment in Member State of last activity,
by
competent Member State,
2017
Aggregation of periods for unemployment by length of insurance,
employment or self-employment in Member State of last activity,
by
former Member State of insurance, employment or self-employment,
2017
Citizenship of migrants of working age (15-64), by receiving Member
State, 2016
14
Figure 2
17
Figure 3
20
7
S 340 - 2018-19 (1. samling) - Endeligt svar på S 340: Vil regeringen, i lyset af Parlamentets holdning om at EU-/EØS-borgere skal have ret til danske dagpenge fra dag et, aktivere artikel 48 TEUF i Lissabon-traktaten, som giver et medlemsland mulighed for at anmode om, at et forslag til en EU-retsakt forelægges det Europæiske Råd til drøftelse, hvis medlemslandet erklærer, at denne retsakt lovgivningsmæssig berører vigtige aspekter af den pågældende medlemsstats sociale sikringssystem?
1994677_0008.png
Aggregation of periods for unemployment benefits
SUMMARY OF THE MAIN FINDINGS
As a principle, unemployed mobile workers
1
will claim benefits in the Member State
2
of
last activity.
3
In some cases a mobile
worker’s period of insurance, employment or
self-employment is insufficient to be entitled to an unemployment benefit. In such
cases additional periods completed by the person in a Member State other than the
competent State (Member State of last activity) and proven by a Portable Document
U1 are required.
For reference year 2017, a total of 43,901 cases of aggregation of periods for
unemployment were reported by 28 Member States. In most of these cases the
Member State of last activity was Bulgaria (11,973) or France (7,347). A similar
number of cases of aggregation were reported by EU-15 and EU-13 Member States.
Only 0.3% of the unemployed persons had to rely on the principle of aggregation of
periods. Furthermore, an average 2.7% of the new intra-EU movers of working age
became unemployed and completed an insufficient period of insurance, employment or
self-employment in order to be entitled to an unemployment benefit.
In most cases the period of insurance, employment or self-employment of the Member
State of last activity was aggregated with an additional period completed in the United
Kingdom and Germany. What is remarkable is that the main former Member States of
insurance, employment or self-employment
are ‘immigration’ Member States.
Moreover, almost nine out of ten cases of aggregation in the EU-13 were completed
with an additional period from an EU-15 Member State. This is probably the result of
return migration. Moreover, only one out of ten cases of aggregation in the EU-15
were completed with an additional period from an EU-13 Member State.
In roughly seven out of ten cases of aggregation a period of insurance, employment or
self-employment of more than three months was already completed by the
unemployed mobile worker in the Member State of last activity. This is an indication
that only in a minority of cases new intra-EU movers of working age who became
unemployed worked for a very short period in the last Member State of activity.
1
EU-28/EFTA citizens who move to another Member State to integrate into the labour market on a long-
term or permanent basis, whether employed, self-employed or jobseeking. Within the scope of Article 61 of
Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the
coordination
of social security systems (i.e. the ‘Basic Regulation’).
Unemployed persons who resided in a
Member State other than the Member State of last activity (Article 65 of the Basic Regulation), i.e. frontier
workers and other cross-border workers are not covered by this term.
2
28 EU Member States, as well as Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland. EU-15 Member States:
Belgium (BE), Greece (EL), Luxembourg (LU), Denmark (DK), Spain (ES), the Netherlands (NL), Germany
(DE), France (FR), Portugal (PT), Ireland (IE), Italy (IT), United Kingdom (UK), Austria (AT), Finland (FI)
and Sweden (SE). EU-13 Member States: Croatia (HR), Romania (RO), Bulgaria (BG), Poland (PL), the
Czech Republic (CZ), Latvia (LV), Lithuania (LT), Slovenia (SI), Estonia (EE), Slovakia (SK), Hungary (HU),
Cyprus (CY) and Malta (MT). EFTA countries: Iceland (IS), Liechtenstein (LT), Norway (NO) and Switzerland
(CH).
3
Within the personal scope determined by Article 2 of the Basic Regulation.
8
S 340 - 2018-19 (1. samling) - Endeligt svar på S 340: Vil regeringen, i lyset af Parlamentets holdning om at EU-/EØS-borgere skal have ret til danske dagpenge fra dag et, aktivere artikel 48 TEUF i Lissabon-traktaten, som giver et medlemsland mulighed for at anmode om, at et forslag til en EU-retsakt forelægges det Europæiske Råd til drøftelse, hvis medlemslandet erklærer, at denne retsakt lovgivningsmæssig berører vigtige aspekter af den pågældende medlemsstats sociale sikringssystem?
1994677_0009.png
Aggregation of periods for unemployment benefits
INTRODUCTION
As a principle, unemployed mobile workers will claim benefits in the Member State of
last activity. In some cases a mobile
worker’s period of insurance, employment or self-
employment is insufficient to be entitled to an unemployment benefit. In that case
additional periods completed by the person in a Member State other than the
competent Member State (i.e. the Member State of last activity) are required.
4
For the
aggregation of periods, the competent institution where the person applied for
unemployment benefits must contact the institutions of the Member States to whose
legislation the person has also been subject in order to determine all periods
completed under their legislation. Portable Document (PD) U1
5
or the corresponding
Structured Electronic Document (SED) U002 certifies periods of insurance,
employment or self-employment completed by a worker in another Member State that
are to be taken into account for the award of unemployment benefits. The PD U1 is
issued to the worker, on his or her request, by the institution of the Member State
where the person completed the periods of insurance, employment or self-
employment.
6
The SED U002 is issued at the request of the competent institution.
It should be noted that a mobile worker becomes subject to the legislation of a
Member State as soon as he or she starts to work there
7
(leaving aside the special
case of posting
8
). Hence, the aggregation rules become fully applicable from that
moment on. However, this principle is not uniformly applied by all Member States.
Some Member States (for example, Belgium, Finland and Denmark) have specifically
defined periods for the application of the aggregation principle in their national law.
9
Not only the number of new intra-EU movers,
10
their risk of becoming unemployed
11
and the period of insurance, employment or self-employment completed by these
mobile persons in the Member State of last activity will determine the number of
PDs U1 or SEDs U002 requested by the competent Member States and issued by the
former Member States of insurance, employment or self-employment (i.e. issuing
Member States) but also the qualifying period, which varies significantly across
Member States.
12
It varies from at least 4 months in France to 24 months in Slovakia.
Nevertheless, many Member States apply a qualifying period of some 12 months.
A questionnaire on the aggregation of periods for unemployment was launched in
order to obtain an idea of the size of the phenomenon.
13
The questionnaire applies to
reference year 2017 and covers mobile workers who became unemployed in their
Member State of last activity and needed additional periods completed in a Member
State other than the competent Member State to be entitled to an unemployment
benefit. The questionnaire only covers unemployed recent mobile workers. However, a
Article 61 of the Basic Regulation.
See Annex III.
6
Article 54 of Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September
2009 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 on the coordination of
social security systems
(i.e. the ‘Implementing Regulation’).
7
Article 11 (3) of the Basic Regulation.
8
Article 12 of the Basic Regulation.
9
Fuchs, M. (ed.), Garcia de Cortazar, C., Kahil, B. and Pötl, M., 2015,
Assessment of the impact of
amendments to the EU social security coordination rules on aggregation of periods or salaries for
unemployment benefits,
FreSsco, European Commission.
10
See Fries-Tersch, E., Tugran, T., Rossi, L. and Bradley, H., 2018,
2017 annual report on intra-EU labour
mobility,
Network Statistics FMSSFE, European Commission.
11
In general, some 11% of the new EU-28/EFTA movers (= < 1 year of residence) were unemployed in
2013 (De Wispelaere, F. and Pacolet, J., 2015,
Aggregation of periods for unemployment benefits. Analysis
of the economic impact of the options,
Network Statistics FMSSFE, European Commission.
12
See the MISSOC tables for more detailed information.
13
See Annex II.
5
4
9
S 340 - 2018-19 (1. samling) - Endeligt svar på S 340: Vil regeringen, i lyset af Parlamentets holdning om at EU-/EØS-borgere skal have ret til danske dagpenge fra dag et, aktivere artikel 48 TEUF i Lissabon-traktaten, som giver et medlemsland mulighed for at anmode om, at et forslag til en EU-retsakt forelægges det Europæiske Råd til drøftelse, hvis medlemslandet erklærer, at denne retsakt lovgivningsmæssig berører vigtige aspekter af den pågældende medlemsstats sociale sikringssystem?
1994677_0010.png
Aggregation of periods for unemployment benefits
PD U1 might also be received for outgoing frontier workers
14
and other cross-border
workers
15
who became unemployed
(Article 65 of the Basic Regulation).
In the past,
some Member States provided data on the number of PDs U1 received without
selecting the number of unemployed mobile persons (and thus not excluding
‘frontier
workers’ and
‘other
cross-border workers’). It cannot be ruled out that this is still the
case in the data collection for reference year 2017.
16
For instance, Bulgaria reported
that it is not possible to make a distinction between these categories of unemployed
persons.
A total of 28 Member States
17
provided quantitative data, of which five Member
States
18
were not able to provide a breakdown by former Member State of insurance,
employment or self-employment (i.e. the Member State which issued the PD U1) and
three other Member States
19
were not able to provide a breakdown by length of
insurance, employment or self-employment in the Member State of last activity. Over
the years, more Member States were able to respond to this questionnaire. This
enables us to draw more adequate conclusions. This year, Germany has reported
figures on the number of PDs U1 received for the first time. However, data are only
available for the period May to December 2017. This implies that figures reported for
Germany are underestimated.
1. GENERAL OVERVIEW
A total of 43,901 cases of aggregation of periods for unemployment were reported by
the 28 Member States. In most of these cases the Member State of last activity was
Bulgaria (11,973) or France (7,347). Also Austria, Spain and Italy reported more than
3,000 cases of aggregation. Member States such as Malta (2 cases), Romania (33
cases) received only a minor number of PDs U1.
Table 1
as well as
Annex I
give an overview of the flow of aggregated cases between
competent Member States and the former Member States of insurance, employment
or self-employment. Some 6,800 cases of aggregation were reported by Bulgaria
where additional periods completed in the United Kingdom were required in order to
receive an unemployment benefit from Bulgaria. Spain also granted 1,646
unemployment benefits based on additional periods completed in the United Kingdom.
Furthermore, a high number of unemployed mobile persons residing in Slovenia and
Bulgaria needed to prove additional periods completed in Austria (1,468 cases) and
Germany (1,341 cases) respectively.
A similar number of cases of aggregation were reported by EU-15 and EU-13 Member
States. However, aggregated results for the EU-13 Member States are strongly
affected by the number of cases reported by Bulgaria, whereas figures for France had
an impact on the total number of cases reported for the EU-15 Member States.
Nonetheless, it is clear that EU-13 Member States receive a significant number of PDs
U1 as well.
14
Article 1(f) of the Basic Regulation defines frontier workers as persons who pursue their occupation in the
territory of a Member State which is different than their Member State of residence to which they return as
a rule daily or at least once a week. Frontier workers will receive their unemployment benefit from the
competent institution in their Member State of residence.
15
Other cross-border workers have the right to choose: either they remain in the Member State of last
activity and are entitled to an unemployment benefit from that Member State; or they return to the Member
State of residence and are entitled to an unemployment benefit from that Member State.
16
Member States are invited to report this during the Administrative Commission of June 2018.
17
No data available for IE, EL, IS and LI.
18
CZ, EE and IT. AT and CH provided a breakdown by Member State of birth.
19
LT, IT and UK.
10
S 340 - 2018-19 (1. samling) - Endeligt svar på S 340: Vil regeringen, i lyset af Parlamentets holdning om at EU-/EØS-borgere skal have ret til danske dagpenge fra dag et, aktivere artikel 48 TEUF i Lissabon-traktaten, som giver et medlemsland mulighed for at anmode om, at et forslag til en EU-retsakt forelægges det Europæiske Råd til drøftelse, hvis medlemslandet erklærer, at denne retsakt lovgivningsmæssig berører vigtige aspekter af den pågældende medlemsstats sociale sikringssystem?
1994677_0011.png
Aggregation of periods for unemployment benefits
Data shows that in particular an additional period completed in an EU-15 Member
State was added to the short period already achieved in the Member State of last
activity
(Annex I
Table A1.1).
20
In some eight out of ten cases of aggregation a
period completed in the EU-15 was added. The United Kingdom is the former Member
State of insurance, employment or self-employment for unemployed mobile workers
who had to aggregate periods to be entitled to an unemployment benefit in Bulgaria,
Spain, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta and Romania. New EU Member States such as Poland,
Bulgaria and Romania never appear as one of the main former Member States of
insurance, employment or self-employment of the unemployed mobile workers in the
EU-15 who had to prove additional periods of insurance, employment or self-
employment. Finally, some three out of ten forms were exchanged across
neighbouring Member States.
This is the case for BE, BG, DE, ES, FR, HR, LV, LT, LU, HU, NL, PL, PT, RO, SI, SK, FI, UK and NO. For
unemployed mobile workers living in Sweden and Denmark in many cases an additional period completed in
Norway was added to the period already completed in Sweden/Denmark.
20
11
S 340 - 2018-19 (1. samling) - Endeligt svar på S 340: Vil regeringen, i lyset af Parlamentets holdning om at EU-/EØS-borgere skal have ret til danske dagpenge fra dag et, aktivere artikel 48 TEUF i Lissabon-traktaten, som giver et medlemsland mulighed for at anmode om, at et forslag til en EU-retsakt forelægges det Europæiske Råd til drøftelse, hvis medlemslandet erklærer, at denne retsakt lovgivningsmæssig berører vigtige aspekter af den pågældende medlemsstats sociale sikringssystem?
1994677_0012.png
Aggregation of periods for unemployment benefits
Table 1
The number of aggregations of periods for unemployment, 2017
BE
BG
200
397
17
1341
22
246
174
583
348
0
145
574
10
3
21
2
57
180
162
16
130
15
24
47
47
107
6,776
11
2
85
231
CZ
DK
1
2
27
1
3
17
2
14
13
42
17
118
59
0
7
7
18
80
3
64
205
144
10
54
5
18
2
8
80
0
3
6
174
DE
19
46
30
4
EE
IE
EL
ES
57
25
30
8
357
10
106
6
492
2
72
1
1
4
8
4
19
84
19
23
101
64
7
2
4
24
1,646
27
2
31
171
FR
523
17
15
19
278
3
119
19
271
HR
0
0
0
0
37
0
6
0
0
1
IT
CY
0
1
0
0
3
0
1
4
0
0
0
0
Competent Member State
LV
LT
LU
HU MT
0
1
4
10
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
16
0
0
43
0
2
0
4
143 12 630
0
2
6
0
0
0
3
152
0
43
0
0
9
0
4
0
1
35
3
11
0
0
12
18
27
0
0
0
2
2
0
0
3
3
22
0
0
19
0
6
0
19
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
1
1
4
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
6
1
79
3
117
0
0
1
0
834
0
1
13
1
7
1
0
2
6
0
0
0
0
2
25
0
0
0
1
7
0
0
1
0
145
0
0
3
0
5
0
2
46
0
6
0
6
769
1
562
1
1
18
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
91
0
4
0
0
12
4
41
0
NL
20
0
1
1
25
0
0
0
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
AT
PL
20
1
38
21
324
0
42
1
2
42
1
3
1
0
0
1
1
1
171
23
PT
2
1
1
3
10
0
0
0
19
27
0
0
1
0
0
2
0
1
6
0
0
RO
SI
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
2
28
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
2
3
0
9
0
6
2
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
6 1,468
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
0
SK
0
1
392
2
113
0
41
0
5
9
0
17
3
0
0
2
59
3
34
105
2
0
1
2
FI
1
0
0
5
3
6
0
0
8
2
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
1
3
0
1
0
1
0
0
SE
0
0
1
19
6
0
2
1
7
2
3
1
0
0
1
UK
2
2
0
1
6
0
19
5
5
3
0
2
0
4
4
0
4
1
5
1
13
3
4
0
0
2
1
IS
LI
Total
863
111
928
186
3,416
52
801
250
1,140
1,206
141
690
609
45
38
550
164
116
1,155
2,887
321
357
239
68
228
113
361
10,963
94
7
512
1,912
2599 13,378
224 2,599 43,901
163
24,938
42
3,060
19
2,525
59
8,954
NO
2
2
0
40
15
0
2
0
3
4
1
1
0
1
7
0
1
2
11
1
27
0
1
0
0
13
46
25
15
0
0
4
CH
BE
BG
CZ
DK
DE
EE
IE
EL
ES
FR
HR
IT
CY
LV
LT
LU
HU
MT
NL
AT
PL
PT
RO
SI
SK
FI
SE
UK
IS
LI
NO
CH
Unknown
Total
EU-15
EU-13
EFTA
Neighbour
Member State of previous employment/insurance (i.e. Member State which issued the PD U1)
0
261
4
0
0
2
0
1
8
0
0
1
385
0
0
1
6
0
0
1
17
0
2
2
4
63
0
1
3
29
25
0
3
2
1
38
0
0
1
2
2
72
0
0
1
2
0
1
23
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
21
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
7
0
0
1
16
1
0
0
2
0
0
14
27
16
0
0
1
11
1
3
58
31
458
0
15
2
289 14
233
2
5
2
9
0
0
0
3
2
2
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
105
18
0
1
0
28
2
10
60
60
8
3
1,171 2
0
1
9
22
28
5
1
6
329
187
3,485
3,345
3,433
1,101 11,973 329 231 1,252 187
3,407 7,347 97 3,345 29
25 1,479 62 2,536 2
63 3,433 1,044 114 33 1,526 1,067 160 134 102
978 10,477
116 555
2,984 2,529 74
24
18 1,299 50 2,277 1
59
954 84
21 1,509 564 85
62
55
101 1,167
5
514
192 135 21
4
5
59
8
214
1
3
50
4
4
17 463
9
10
32
22
329
110 183
231 1,198 2
1
2
121
4
45
0
1
40
26
8
0
40
66
62
15
678 189
54 675
593 2,889 21
4
32
34 1,013
45
369 19
0 1,479 558 124 93
19
* DE: Data from January to April 2017 is not available. The extrapolation results in an estimated number of some 1,900 PDs U1 received in 2017.
** BG: Overestimation as unemployed frontier workers and other cross-border workers returning to Bulgaria are reported as well.
*** AT and CH: Breakdown by Member State which has issued the PD U1 is not included as both Member States provided a breakdown by citizenship.
1
13
3
1
52
1
4
10
123
195
3
87
0
0
1
105
1
0
326
3
30
28
48
0
1
3
4
37
1
0
2
19
Source
Questionnaire on aggregation of periods for unemployment benefits
12
S 340 - 2018-19 (1. samling) - Endeligt svar på S 340: Vil regeringen, i lyset af Parlamentets holdning om at EU-/EØS-borgere skal have ret til danske dagpenge fra dag et, aktivere artikel 48 TEUF i Lissabon-traktaten, som giver et medlemsland mulighed for at anmode om, at et forslag til en EU-retsakt forelægges det Europæiske Råd til drøftelse, hvis medlemslandet erklærer, at denne retsakt lovgivningsmæssig berører vigtige aspekter af den pågældende medlemsstats sociale sikringssystem?
1994677_0013.png
Aggregation of periods for unemployment benefits
Member States were asked to provide a more detailed breakdown by the period of
insurance, employment or self-employment completed by the unemployed mobile
persons in the Member State of last activity for the reported cases of aggregation.
Approximately 17% of the reported cases were applicable to a period of insurance,
employment or self-employment of less than 30 days in the Member State of last
activity
(Table 2 and Figure 1).
Also, 14% of the cases were applicable to a period
between one and three months, and 69% of the cases to a period of three months or
longer. So, in seven out of ten cases of aggregation a period of insurance,
employment or self-employment of more than three months was already completed by
the unemployed mobile worker in the Member State of last activity. These figures
prove that only in a minority of cases new mobile workers who became unemployed
worked for a very short period in the last Member State of activity.
Table 2
The number of aggregations of periods for unemployment, by length of insurance,
employment or self-employment in Member State of last activity,
by competent
Member State,
2017
Less than 30 days
BE
BG
CZ
DK
DE
EE
IE
EL
ES
FR
HR
IT
CY
LV
LT
LU
HU
MT
NL
AT
PL
PT
RO
SI
SK
FI
SE
UK
IS
LI
NO
CH
Total
EU-13
EU-15
EFTA
Number
114
291
37
181
105
47
Row %
10.4%
2.4%
11.2%
78.4%
8.4%
25.1%
More than 1
month but less
than 3 months
Number
Row %
179
16.3%
1,056
8.8%
135
41.0%
9
3.9%
203
16.2%
44
23.5%
3 months
and more
Number
808
10,626
157
41
944
96
Row %
73.4%
88.7%
47.7%
17.7%
75.4%
51.3%
Total for
subperiods
Number
1,101
11,973
329
231
1,252
187
Total
Number Column %
1,101
2.5%
11,973
27.3%
329
0.7%
231
0.5%
1,252
2.9%
187
0.4%
1,289
2,809
8
n.a.
2
4
n.a.
0
293
0
10
421
87
16
0
380
185
12
48
n.a.
37.8%
38.2%
8.2%
n.a.
6.9%
16.0%
n.a.
0.0%
11.6%
0.0%
15.9%
12.3%
8.3%
14.0%
0.0%
24.9%
17.3%
7.5%
35.8%
n.a.
739
1,157
7
n.a.
3
4
n.a.
5
512
0
27
259
215
37
10
156
125
38
37
n.a.
21.7%
15.7%
7.2%
n.a.
10.3%
16.0%
n.a.
8.1%
20.2%
0.0%
42.9%
7.5%
20.6%
32.5%
30.3%
10.2%
11.7%
23.8%
27.6%
n.a.
1,379
3,381
82
n.a.
24
17
n.a.
57
1,731
2
26
2,753
742
61
23
990
757
110
49
n.a.
40.5%
46.0%
84.5%
n.a.
82.8%
68.0%
n.a.
91.9%
68.3%
100.0%
41.3%
80.2%
71.1%
53.5%
69.7%
64.9%
70.9%
68.8%
36.6%
n.a.
3,407
7,347
97
n.a.
29
25
n.a.
62
2,536
2
63
3,433
1,044
114
33
1,526
1,067
160
134
n.a.
3,407
7,347
97
3,345
29
25
1,479
62
2,536
2
63
3,433
1,044
114
33
1,526
1,067
160
134
102
7.8%
16.7%
0.2%
7.6%
0.1%
0.1%
3.4%
0.1%
5.8%
0.0%
0.1%
7.8%
2.4%
0.3%
0.1%
3.5%
2.4%
0.4%
0.3%
0.2%
94
353
6,786
1,334
5,005
447
42.2%
13.6%
17.4%
7.1%
28.9%
15.8%
35
302
5,294
2,267
2,690
337
15.7%
11.6%
13.6%
12.0%
15.5%
11.9%
94
1,944
26,894
15,247
9,609
2,038
42.2%
74.8%
69.0%
80.9%
55.5%
72.2%
223
2,599
38,974
18,848
17,304
2,822
224
2,599
43,901
20,327
20,751
2,823
0.5%
5.9%
100.0%
46.3%
47.3%
6.4%
Source
Questionnaire on aggregation of periods for unemployment benefits
13
S 340 - 2018-19 (1. samling) - Endeligt svar på S 340: Vil regeringen, i lyset af Parlamentets holdning om at EU-/EØS-borgere skal have ret til danske dagpenge fra dag et, aktivere artikel 48 TEUF i Lissabon-traktaten, som giver et medlemsland mulighed for at anmode om, at et forslag til en EU-retsakt forelægges det Europæiske Råd til drøftelse, hvis medlemslandet erklærer, at denne retsakt lovgivningsmæssig berører vigtige aspekter af den pågældende medlemsstats sociale sikringssystem?
1994677_0014.png
Aggregation of periods for unemployment benefits
The distribution of the length of insurance, employment or self-employment varies
markedly between the EU-13 and the EU-15. Some 44% of the cases reported by the
EU-15 concerned a period of insurance, employment or self-employment of less than
three months compared to only 19% of the cases reported by the EU-13.
The period already completed by the unemployed mobile workers also differs across
the Member States of last activity. In most cases, the length of the period of
insurance, employment or self-employment completed in the Member State of last
activity is longer than three months. For both Belgium and Finland this will be the
result of the defined waiting periods for the application of the aggregation principle in
their national law. Only in Denmark, Sweden, Spain, the Netherlands, France, the
Czech Republic and Norway most of the PDs U1 were required based on a period of
insurance of less than three months. The fact that France applies a qualifying period of
only four months will have an impact on the distribution of the aggregated cases as
the number of PDs U1 needed on the basis of a period of insurance of three months or
longer in France will be lower as result of this low qualifying period.
Figure 1
Aggregation of periods for unemployment by length of insurance, employment or
self-employment in Member State of last activity,
by competent Member State,
2017
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
CZ
EE
SI
HU
LV
RO
SK
PL
CY
HR
BG
MT
DK
SE
ES
NL
FR
PT
FI
BE
DE
AT
LU
EU-15
Less than 30 days
3 months and more
Total - Less than 3 months
EU-13
EFTA
More than 1 month but less than 3 months
Total - Less than 30 days
Source
Questionnaire on aggregation of periods for unemployment benefits
It is also useful to determine the former Member State of insurance, employment or
self-employment (i.e. issuing Member State) whose legislation the unemployed mobile
worker has been subject to
(Table 3).
However, the missing data for 10 Member
States
21
lead to a distorted view of reality if the number of cases are reported by the
former Member State of insurance, employment or self-employment. Therefore, some
caution is required when drawing conclusions.
In most cases, the period of insurance, employment or self-employment of the
Member State of last activity was aggregated with an additional period completed in
the United Kingdom and Germany
(see Table 1
last column).
Remarkably, these
former Member States of insurance, employment or self-employment
are ‘immigration’
Member States. Moreover, some eight out of ten cases are aggregated with an
21
CZ, EE, IE, EL, IT, AT, UK, IS, LI and CH.
EU-13
EU-15
EFTA
Total
Total
14
NO
CH
S 340 - 2018-19 (1. samling) - Endeligt svar på S 340: Vil regeringen, i lyset af Parlamentets holdning om at EU-/EØS-borgere skal have ret til danske dagpenge fra dag et, aktivere artikel 48 TEUF i Lissabon-traktaten, som giver et medlemsland mulighed for at anmode om, at et forslag til en EU-retsakt forelægges det Europæiske Råd til drøftelse, hvis medlemslandet erklærer, at denne retsakt lovgivningsmæssig berører vigtige aspekter af den pågældende medlemsstats sociale sikringssystem?
1994677_0015.png
Aggregation of periods for unemployment benefits
additional period from the EU-15, whereas only one out of ten cases are aggregated
with a period from the EU-13
(Table 3).
Moreover, the percentage of cases aggregated
with an additional period from the EU-15 is much higher in the EU-13 compared to the
EU-15 (87% compared to 72%). This is probably the result of return migration for the
EU-13 Member States
(see Box I
see section 3).
22
In that case, nationals from the
EU-13 return from an EU-15 Member State. Finally, only one out of ten cases of
aggregation in the EU-15 are completed with an additional period from an EU-13
Member State.
Table 3
The number of aggregations of periods for unemployment, by group of Member
States, 2017
Member State of last activity (competent MS)
EU-15
Former
MS
EU-15
EU-13
EFTA
72.1%
9.7%
18.2%
EU-13
86.9%
10.1%
3.0%
Total
82%
10%
8%
Source
Questionnaire on aggregation of periods for unemployment benefits
For most former Member States of insurance, employment or self-employment a
period of longer than three months was already completed in the Member State of last
activity
(Table 4 and Figure 2).
This is also the case for new EU Member States such
as Croatia, Bulgaria and Romania. Moreover, the number of cases whereby a period of
more than three months was already completed in the Member State of last activity
accounts for 84% of the cases for EU former EU-13 Member States of insurance,
employment or self-employment and for 74% of the cases for former EU-15 Member
States of insurance, employment or self-employment.
22
In that respect, not only the former Member State of insurance, employment or self-employment but also
the nationality of the unemployed mobile worker should be asked. Austria and Switzerland have provided a
breakdown by citizenship. Some 13% of the PDs U1 received by Switzerland refer to persons with the Swiss
nationality. Furthermore some 44% of the PDS U1 received by Austria refer to persons with the Austrian
nationality.
15
S 340 - 2018-19 (1. samling) - Endeligt svar på S 340: Vil regeringen, i lyset af Parlamentets holdning om at EU-/EØS-borgere skal have ret til danske dagpenge fra dag et, aktivere artikel 48 TEUF i Lissabon-traktaten, som giver et medlemsland mulighed for at anmode om, at et forslag til en EU-retsakt forelægges det Europæiske Råd til drøftelse, hvis medlemslandet erklærer, at denne retsakt lovgivningsmæssig berører vigtige aspekter af den pågældende medlemsstats sociale sikringssystem?
1994677_0016.png
Aggregation of periods for unemployment benefits
Table 4
The number of aggregations of periods for unemployment, by length of insurance,
employment or self-employment in Member State of last activity,
by former Member
State of insurance, employment or self-employment,
2017
Less than 30 days
BE
BG
CZ
DK
DE
EE
IE
EL
ES
FR
HR
IT
CY
LV
LT
LU
HU
MT
NL
AT
PL
PT
RO
SI
SK
FI
SE
UK
IS
LI
NO
CH
Total
EU-13
EU-15
EFTA
Number
205
22
66
55
366
3
57
45
113
260
7
81
11
1
7
178
12
18
140
519
19
54
34
8
16
17
65
878
27
1
126
273
3,684
224
3,033
427
Row %
23.8%
20.4%
7.1%
38.7%
11.2%
6.5%
9.0%
19.1%
10.3%
21.8%
5.0%
11.8%
1.9%
4.5%
20.6%
32.4%
7.5%
15.7%
13.1%
18.0%
6.4%
15.3%
14.5%
11.8%
7.0%
15.7%
20.7%
8.6%
36.0%
14.3%
30.5%
14.4%
12.7%
7.5%
12.9%
17.9%
More than 1 month
but less than 3
months
Number
Row %
217
25.2%
12
11.1%
72
7.8%
28
19.7%
446
13.7%
4
8.7%
77
12.2%
18
7.6%
207
18.8%
262
22.0%
14
9.9%
80
11.7%
8
1.4%
0
0.0%
6
17.6%
82
14.9%
22
13.8%
11
9.6%
186
17.4%
382
13.2%
37
12.5%
35
9.9%
34
14.5%
4
5.9%
36
15.9%
14
13.0%
59
18.8%
1,126
11.0%
12
16.0%
1
14.3%
58
14.0%
343
18.1%
3,893
13.5%
260
8.8%
3,219
13.6%
414
17.3%
3 months and more
Total for
subperiods
Number
860
108
927
142
3,267
46
630
236
1,100
1,191
141
685
590
22
34
549
160
115
1,071
2,885
295
352
235
68
227
108
314
10,194
75
7
413
1,894
28,941
2,968
23,584
2,389
Total
Number
438
74
789
59
2,455
39
496
173
780
669
120
524
571
21
21
289
126
86
745
1,984
239
263
167
56
175
77
190
8,190
36
5
229
1,278
21,364
2,484
17,332
1,548
Row %
50.9%
68.5%
85.1%
41.5%
75.1%
84.8%
78.7%
73.3%
70.9%
56.2%
85.1%
76.5%
96.8%
95.5%
61.8%
52.6%
78.8%
74.8%
69.6%
68.8%
81.0%
74.7%
71.1%
82.4%
77.1%
71.3%
60.5%
80.3%
48.0%
71.4%
55.4%
67.5%
73.8%
83.7%
73.5%
64.8%
Number
863
111
928
186
3,416
52
801
250
1,140
1,206
141
690
609
45
38
550
164
116
1,155
2,887
321
357
239
68
228
113
361
10,963
94
7
512
1,912
30,523
3,060
24,938
2,525
Column %
2.8%
0.4%
3.0%
0.6%
11.2%
0.2%
2.6%
0.8%
3.7%
4.0%
0.5%
2.3%
2.0%
0.1%
0.1%
1.8%
0.5%
0.4%
3.8%
9.5%
1.1%
1.2%
0.8%
0.2%
0.7%
0.4%
1.2%
35.9%
0.3%
0.0%
1.7%
6.3%
100.0%
10.0%
81.7%
8.3%
* This is an incomplete picture due to missing data for IE, EL, IS and LI as reporting Member State and
given that some Member States did not provide a (complete) breakdown by former Member State of
insurance, employment or self-employment (CZ, EE, IT, LT, AT, UK and CH).
** Total numbers differ compared to
Table 2
as some Member States did not provide a breakdown by
former Member State of insurance, employment or self-employment.
Source
Questionnaire on aggregation of periods for unemployment benefits
16
S 340 - 2018-19 (1. samling) - Endeligt svar på S 340: Vil regeringen, i lyset af Parlamentets holdning om at EU-/EØS-borgere skal have ret til danske dagpenge fra dag et, aktivere artikel 48 TEUF i Lissabon-traktaten, som giver et medlemsland mulighed for at anmode om, at et forslag til en EU-retsakt forelægges det Europæiske Råd til drøftelse, hvis medlemslandet erklærer, at denne retsakt lovgivningsmæssig berører vigtige aspekter af den pågældende medlemsstats sociale sikringssystem?
1994677_0017.png
Aggregation of periods for unemployment benefits
Figure 2
Aggregation of periods for unemployment by length of insurance, employment or
self-employment in Member State of last activity,
by former Member State of
insurance, employment or self-employment,
2017
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
DK
BE
LU
FR
SE
AT
NL
ES
FI
EL
PT
DE
IT
IE
UK
LT
BG
RO
MT
SK
HU
PL
SI
EE
HR
CZ
LV
CY
IS
NO
CH
LI
EFTA
EU-15
Less than 30 days
3 months and more
Total - Less than 3 months
EU-13
More than 1 month but less than 3 months
Total - Less than 30 days
* This is an incomplete picture due to missing data for several Member States.
Source
Questionnaire on aggregation of periods for unemployment benefits
2. EVOLUTION OF THE NUMBER OF PDS U1 RECEIVED
The figures reported for reference year 2017 could be compared with those provided
for previous years
(Table 5).
The number of cases of aggregation increased by some
6% compared to 2016.
23
However, the number of PDs U1 received by EU-15 Member
States decreased by 8% while the number increased by some 31% in the EU-13
Member States. The growth rates for the EU-28 and the EU-13 are mainly affected by
Bulgaria. The number of unemployed mobile workers residing in Bulgaria who had to
prove an additional period completed in the former Member State of insurance,
employment or self-employment increased by almost 70% or some 4,900 persons
compared to 2016. Disregarding Bulgaria, the number of PDs U1 received even
decreased in 2017 compared to 2016 for both the EU-28 and the EU-13.
Compared to 2016, Belgium, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Spain, Croatia, Italy, Latvia,
Lithuania, Malta, Austria, Poland, Portugal, Sweden, the United Kingdom and
Switzerland received less cases. The strongest decline is observed in Italy (-1,141
PDs U1). This in contrast to Bulgaria, Denmark, France, the Netherlands, Romania,
Slovakia, Finland and Norway which received more forms.
23
Only selecting those countries which reported figures for both years.
EU-13
EU-15
EFTA
Total
Total
17
S 340 - 2018-19 (1. samling) - Endeligt svar på S 340: Vil regeringen, i lyset af Parlamentets holdning om at EU-/EØS-borgere skal have ret til danske dagpenge fra dag et, aktivere artikel 48 TEUF i Lissabon-traktaten, som giver et medlemsland mulighed for at anmode om, at et forslag til en EU-retsakt forelægges det Europæiske Råd til drøftelse, hvis medlemslandet erklærer, at denne retsakt lovgivningsmæssig berører vigtige aspekter af den pågældende medlemsstats sociale sikringssystem?
1994677_0018.png
Aggregation of periods for unemployment benefits
Table 5
Evolution of the number of PDs U1 received, 2013-2017
BE
BG
CZ
DK
DE
EE
IE
EL
ES
FR
HR
IT
CY
LV
LT
LU
HU
MT
NL
AT
PL
PT
RO
SI
SK
FI
SE
UK
IS
LI
NO
CH
Total
EU-15
EU-13
EFTA
2017
1,101
11,973
329
231
1,252
187
Number of forms received
2016
2015
2014
1,433
1,335
7,057
5,861
522
122
85
234
229
2013
2,196
4,118
54
174
% change compared to
2016
2013
-23.2%
-49.9%
69.7%
190.7%
-37.0%
89.3%
327.8%
-20.1%
7.5%
3,407
7,347
97
3,345
29
25
1,479
62
2,536
2
63
3,433
1,044
114
33
1,526
1,067
160
134
102
3,538
7,311
146
4,486
0
39
1,779
39
1,960
9
61
3,670
1,788
126
26
1,040
123
242
182
31
206
2,661
2,871
7,575
69
10
23
1,854
27
4,351
3
32
3,814
2,945
105
11
1,590
1,057
205
303
156
2,471
8,338
16
3
19
370
48
1,149
8
160
1,517
12
-3.7%
0.5%
-33.6%
-25.4%
-35.9%
-16.9%
59.0%
29.4%
-77.8%
3.3%
-6.5%
-41.6%
-9.5%
26.9%
2.6%
30.1%
-44.6%
-44.0%
37.9%
-11.9%
506.3%
866.7%
31.6%
299.7%
29.2%
120.7%
-75.0%
-60.6%
-31.2%
175.0%
-8.0%
18.5%
-70.7%
240.0%
19
1,448
2,660
1,156
394
133
1,160
135
457
30
726
500
1,305
224
2,599
115
1,076
1,163
8.7%
-2.3%
6.3%
-8.1%
31.2%
-1.5%
-55.2%
99.2%
* Total: Only selecting those countries which reported figures for both years.
Source
Questionnaire on aggregation of periods in case of unemployment benefits
In 2017, compared to 2016, Belgium, Spain, Luxembourg, Malta, Romania and Finland
received
(i.e. ‘accepted)
a higher percentage of PDs U1 required for a period of
insurance, employment or self-employment of more than three months
(Table 6).
Results for Belgium are probably affected by the fact that since October 2016 a
waiting period of three months has been introduced before aggregating periods of
unemployment insurance. Finally, only Denmark and Hungary received much more
requests for aggregation on the basis of a period of insurance, employment or self-
employment of more than 3 months.
18
S 340 - 2018-19 (1. samling) - Endeligt svar på S 340: Vil regeringen, i lyset af Parlamentets holdning om at EU-/EØS-borgere skal have ret til danske dagpenge fra dag et, aktivere artikel 48 TEUF i Lissabon-traktaten, som giver et medlemsland mulighed for at anmode om, at et forslag til en EU-retsakt forelægges det Europæiske Råd til drøftelse, hvis medlemslandet erklærer, at denne retsakt lovgivningsmæssig berører vigtige aspekter af den pågældende medlemsstats sociale sikringssystem?
1994677_0019.png
Aggregation of periods for unemployment benefits
Table 6
Evolution of the percentage of PDs U1 received for a length of insurance,
employment or self-employment of more than three months, 2013-2017
2017
2016
2015
2014
2013
BE
BG
CZ
DK
DE
EE
IE
EL
ES
FR
HR
IT
CY
LV
LT
LU
HU
MT
NL
AT
PL
PT
RO
SI
SK
FI
SE
UK
IS
LI
NO
CH
73%
89%
48%
17%
75%
51%
48%
90%
49%
34%
59%
48%
91%
21%
55%
47%
96%
37%
45%
% change in
% change in
p.p. compared p.p. compared
to 2016
to 2013
25 p.p.
26 p.p.
-1 p.p.
-7 p.p.
-2 p.p.
-17 p.p.
-19 p.p.
-8 p.p.
6 p.p.
40%
46%
85%
83%
68%
92%
68%
100%
41%
80%
71%
54%
70%
65%
71%
69%
37%
33%
48%
77%
29%
84%
50%
57%
85%
92%
100%
34%
81%
74%
51%
55%
67%
61%
36%
30%
37%
94%
100%
58%
83%
97%
75%
67%
72%
64%
67%
56%
44%
63%
46%
39%
40%
76%
8 p.p.
-2 p.p.
7 p.p.
10 p.p.
9 p.p.
-9 p.p.
-17 p.p.
10 p.p.
9 p.p.
-29 p.p.
25 p.p.
-26 p.p.
7 p.p.
3 p.p.
8 p.p.
-3 p.p.
41%
87%
85%
22%
44%
81%
70%
62%
58%
69%
21%
40%
77%
58%
27 p.p.
5 p.p.
-16 p.p.
78 p.p.
-3 p.p.
-1 p.p.
1 p.p.
-8 p.p.
12 p.p.
2 p.p.
48 p.p.
-4 p.p.
42%
75%
44%
74%
24%
72%
75%
97%
-2 p.p.
1 p.p.
-22 p.p.
* p.p.: percentage points.
Source
Questionnaire on aggregation of periods in case of unemployment benefits
3. A RELATIVELY SMALL SHARE IN THE TOTAL
UNEMPLOYMENT FIGURE AND IN INTRA-EU MOBILITY
The reported number of cases of aggregation on the basis of a PD U1 could be
compared to the total number of unemployed persons.
24
In general, only 0.3% of the
unemployed persons had to rely on the principle of aggregation of periods
(Table 7).
25
Only in Bulgaria, Lithuania, Austria and Switzerland more than 1% of the unemployed
persons made use of the principle of aggregation of periods. A lower share of
unemployed persons in the EU-15 (0.1% of total unemployed persons in the EU-15)
24
Note that no data is available on the total number of unemployed persons who were or became
unemployed during the year. This implies a (small) overestimation of the share of the cases of aggregated
periods in the total unemployment figure.
25
However, the estimated impact might be an underestimation as the number of unemployed persons and
not the number of persons actually receiving an unemployment benefit has been used as denominator for
the calculation of this indicator. No data on the number of persons receiving an unemployment benefit are,
however, available at EU-level.
19
S 340 - 2018-19 (1. samling) - Endeligt svar på S 340: Vil regeringen, i lyset af Parlamentets holdning om at EU-/EØS-borgere skal have ret til danske dagpenge fra dag et, aktivere artikel 48 TEUF i Lissabon-traktaten, som giver et medlemsland mulighed for at anmode om, at et forslag til en EU-retsakt forelægges det Europæiske Råd til drøftelse, hvis medlemslandet erklærer, at denne retsakt lovgivningsmæssig berører vigtige aspekter af den pågældende medlemsstats sociale sikringssystem?
1994677_0020.png
Aggregation of periods for unemployment benefits
had to rely on this principle compared to unemployed persons in the EU-13 (0.8% of
total unemployed persons in the EU-13) or the EFTA (1% of total unemployed persons
in the EFTA).
Box I - Return migration in the EU
The composition of inflows to EU-28/EFTA Member States for 2016 show that in
several EU-13 Member State (LT, LV, BG, PL, HR, HU and EE), but also in Portugal and
France, nationals made up the largest group of incoming movers (only selecting
nationals and other EU/EFTA citizens
excluding third country nationals). This means
that inflows to many EU-13 Member States are largely return mobility.
Figure 3
Citizenship of migrants of working age (15-64), by receiving Member State, 2016
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
PT FR FI DK NL IT SE ES BE DE LU
EU-15
Nationals
EU-28/EFTA
LT LV BG PL HR HU EE CY SK CZ
EU-13
LI IS CH NO
EFTA
Source
Own elaboration based on data from Eurostat [migr_imm1ctz] (2016 figures)
These cases of aggregated periods could also be compared to the annual inflow of
intra-EU mobile workers of working age.
26
On average 2.7% of the mobile workers of
working age became unemployed and completed an insufficient period of insurance,
employment or self-employment to be entitled to an unemployment benefit
(Table 7).
A much higher percentage of new intra-EU/EFTA mobile workers to the EU-13 (8.8%
of the total flow of intra-EU/EFTA mobile workers of working age to the EU-13 in
2017) made use of the principle of aggregation of periods compared to new intra-
EU/EFTA mobile workers to the EU-15 (1.6% of the total flow of intra-EU/EFTA mobile
workers of working age to the EU-15 in 2017) or the EFTA (2.4% of the total flow of
intra-EU/EFTA mobile workers of working age to the EFTA in 2017). This could be an
indication of return migration for the EU-13 Member States. Especially because figures
show that inflows to many EU-13 countries are nationals who return from an EU-15
Member State
(see Box I).
26
Taking into consideration that most of the Member States apply a qualifying period of 12 months.
20
S 340 - 2018-19 (1. samling) - Endeligt svar på S 340: Vil regeringen, i lyset af Parlamentets holdning om at EU-/EØS-borgere skal have ret til danske dagpenge fra dag et, aktivere artikel 48 TEUF i Lissabon-traktaten, som giver et medlemsland mulighed for at anmode om, at et forslag til en EU-retsakt forelægges det Europæiske Råd til drøftelse, hvis medlemslandet erklærer, at denne retsakt lovgivningsmæssig berører vigtige aspekter af den pågældende medlemsstats sociale sikringssystem?
1994677_0021.png
Aggregation of periods for unemployment benefits
Table 7
The number of aggregations of periods for unemployment, as a percentage of the
total number of unemployed persons and the total annual EU/EFTA migration inflow
of working age, 2017
Cases of
aggregation
Number
BE
BG
CZ
DK
DE
EE
IE
EL
ES
FR
HR
IT
CY
LV
LT
LU
HU
MT
NL
AT
PL
PT
RO
SI
SK
FI
SE
UK
IS
LI
NO
CH
Total
EU-15
EU-13
EFTA
1,101
11,973
329
231
1,252
187
Number of annual average unemployed
persons (2016)
Number (in ,000)
% cases of
aggregation
354
0.3%
207
5.8%
155
0.2%
172
0.1%
1,621
40
0.5%
Total annual inflow of EU-27/EFTA migrants
at working age (2016)
Number (in ,000)
% cases of
aggregation
61,707
1.8%
7,930
151.0%
29,300
1.1%
40,482
0.6%
428,008
0.3%
9,317
2.0%
3,407
7,347
97
3,345
29
25
1,479
62
2,536
2
63
3,433
1,044
114
33
1,526
1,067
160
134
102
3,917
2,788
203
2,907
47
85
103
16
192
8
438
248
844
465
449
67
224
234
358
1,448
6
116
147
17,859
14,966
2,624
269
0.1%
0.3%
0.0%
0.1%
0.0%
1.4%
0.4%
1.3%
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
1.8%
0.3%
0.1%
0.8%
1.0%
135,738
170,043
7,956
79,736
10,120
3,874
13,323
14,395
36,611
89,665
90,696
17,642
2.5%
4.3%
1.2%
4.2%
0.3%
0.6%
11.1%
0.4%
6.9%
0.1%
1.2%
0.6%
3,716
11,598
42,225
28.7%
1.4%
0.3%
224
2,599
43,901
20,751
20,327
2,823
22,860
93,875
1,420,817
1,091,239
212,843
116,735
1.0%
2.8%
2.7%
1.6%
8.8%
2.4%
Source
Questionnaire on aggregation of periods in case of unemployment benefits; Eurostat [une_nb_a]; Eurostat
data on migration [migr_imm1ctz] (2016 figures)
.
21
S 340 - 2018-19 (1. samling) - Endeligt svar på S 340: Vil regeringen, i lyset af Parlamentets holdning om at EU-/EØS-borgere skal have ret til danske dagpenge fra dag et, aktivere artikel 48 TEUF i Lissabon-traktaten, som giver et medlemsland mulighed for at anmode om, at et forslag til en EU-retsakt forelægges det Europæiske Råd til drøftelse, hvis medlemslandet erklærer, at denne retsakt lovgivningsmæssig berører vigtige aspekter af den pågældende medlemsstats sociale sikringssystem?
1994677_0022.png
Aggregation of periods for unemployment benefits
ANNEX I ADDITIONAL TABLES
Table A1.1
The number of aggregations of periods in case of unemployment
as % of column total,
2017
Competent Member State
BE
BE
BG
CZ
DK
DE
EE
IE
EL
ES
FR
HR
IT
CY
LV
LT
LU
HU
MT
NL
AT
PL
PT
RO
SI
SK
FI
SE
UK
IS
LI
NO
CH
Unknown
Total
EU-15
EU-13
EFTA
Neighbour
0%
1%
0%
0%
5%
0%
0%
1%
11%
18%
0%
8%
0%
0%
0%
10%
0%
0%
30%
0%
3%
3%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
2%
0%
100%
89%
9%
2%
62%
BG
CZ
DK
DE
EE
IE
EL
ES
2%
1%
1%
0%
10%
0%
3%
0%
0%
14%
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1%
2%
1%
1%
3%
2%
0%
0%
0%
1%
48%
1%
0%
1%
5%
0%
100%
88%
6%
7%
17%
FR
7%
0%
0%
0%
4%
0%
2%
0%
4%
0%
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
5%
0%
0%
1%
0%
1%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
6%
0%
0%
0%
16%
47%
100%
65%
3%
31%
75%
HR
IT
CY
LV
0%
0%
0%
0%
16%
8%
12%
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
8%
4%
0%
0%
4%
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
8%
24%
4%
0%
4%
0%
0%
100%
72%
20%
8%
16%
LT
0%
0%
0%
3%
10%
0%
10%
1%
2%
1%
0%
0%
1%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
5%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3%
52%
1%
0%
6%
1%
0%
100%
88%
4%
8%
2%
LU
6%
2%
0%
0%
19%
0%
0%
0%
5%
29%
3%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2%
0%
5%
0%
2%
10%
3%
2%
0%
0%
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
6%
0%
100%
81%
13%
6%
55%
HU
0%
0%
1%
0%
25%
0%
2%
0%
0%
1%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
5%
33%
0%
0%
1%
0%
6%
0%
0%
22%
0%
0%
0%
2%
0%
100%
90%
8%
2%
40%
MT
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
50%
50%
0%
0%
NL
AT
PL
PT
RO
0%
0%
0%
0%
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
6%
0%
0%
6%
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
18%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3%
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
24%
0%
100%
64%
12%
24%
0%
SI
0%
0%
0%
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
96%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
99%
1%
0%
97%
SK
0%
0%
37%
0%
11%
0%
4%
0%
0%
1%
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
6%
0%
3%
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
22%
0%
0%
1%
3%
0%
100%
53%
43%
4%
52%
FI
1%
0%
0%
3%
2%
4%
0%
0%
5%
1%
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1%
2%
0%
1%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
36%
1%
1%
0%
38%
3%
0%
100%
53%
6%
41%
78%
SE
0%
0%
1%
14%
4%
0%
1%
1%
5%
1%
2%
1%
0%
0%
1%
0%
1%
1%
2%
1%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
10%
0%
4%
1%
0%
45%
1%
0%
100%
46%
7%
46%
69%
UK
2%
2%
0%
1%
6%
0%
19%
5%
5%
3%
0%
2%
0%
4%
4%
0%
4%
1%
5%
1%
13%
3%
4%
0%
0%
2%
1%
0%
1%
0%
8%
6%
0%
100%
54%
31%
15%
19%
IS
LI
NO
CH
Total
2%
0%
2%
0%
0%
4%
3%
1%
2%
0%
0%
0%
11%
12% 0%
0%
0%
0%
2%
0%
1%
1%
1%
1%
5%
7%
3%
3%
0%
1%
0%
0%
9%
1%
0%
5%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
6%
0%
0%
0%
2%
2%
5%
1%
0% 16%
0%
0% 12%
1%
1%
1%
0%
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
1%
12% 1%
57%
13% 6%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1%
45% 0%
2%
1% 14%
0% 100% 0%
0% 100%
100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
88%
50% 44%
10%
2% 41%
3%
48% 15%
2%
23% 54%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
38% 0%
0%
0%
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
26% 0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
22% 0%
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2%
0%
0% 100%
100% 100%
76%
22%
2%
22%
32%
2%
2%
0%
0%
1%
2%
4%
1%
2%
2%
3%
40%
31% 9%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
5%
0% 17%
3%
4% 24%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2%
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
2%
0%
1%
0%
16% 5%
5%
2%
0%
2%
0%
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2%
1%
1%
3%
28% 12%
0%
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3%
2%
2%
1% 19%
0% 100% 0%
0%
100% 100% 100% 100%
94%
91% 74%
5%
5%
4%
2%
4% 23%
71%
35% 17%
1%
2%
1%
0%
0%
2%
18%
0%
7%
8%
0%
0%
1%
2%
0%
1%
1%
3%
2%
3%
0%
0%
0%
2%
0%
1%
0%
0%
3%
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
1%
0%
5%
3%
0%
7%
12%
1%
0%
1%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
1%
6%
0%
21%
1%
11%
25%
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1%
2%
4%
0% 100% 30%
100% 100% 100%
73%
82%
19%
10%
8%
8%
26%
29%
Former Member State of insurance, employment or self-employment (i.e. Member State which issued the PD U1)
*
Dark blue: main former Member State of insurance, employment or self-employment.
** No data available for IE, EL, CY, SI and LI. CZ, EE, FR, IT, AT and CH did not provide a (complete) breakdown by former Member State of insurance, employment or self-employment.
Source
Questionnaire on aggregation of periods in case of unemployment benefits
22
S 340 - 2018-19 (1. samling) - Endeligt svar på S 340: Vil regeringen, i lyset af Parlamentets holdning om at EU-/EØS-borgere skal have ret til danske dagpenge fra dag et, aktivere artikel 48 TEUF i Lissabon-traktaten, som giver et medlemsland mulighed for at anmode om, at et forslag til en EU-retsakt forelægges det Europæiske Råd til drøftelse, hvis medlemslandet erklærer, at denne retsakt lovgivningsmæssig berører vigtige aspekter af den pågældende medlemsstats sociale sikringssystem?
1994677_0023.png
Aggregation of periods for unemployment benefits
Table A1.2
The number of aggregations of periods in case of unemployment
as % of row total,
2017
BE
BG
23%
0%
43%
9%
39%
42%
31%
70%
51%
29%
0%
21%
94%
22%
8%
4%
1%
49%
16%
6%
5%
36%
6%
35%
21%
42%
30%
62%
12%
29%
17%
12%
0%
27%
CZ
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2%
1%
DK
0%
0%
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
1%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
1%
7%
0%
2%
0%
21%
0%
0%
1%
DE
2%
41%
3%
2%
0%
4%
2%
5%
4%
1%
84%
9%
0%
16%
18%
3%
49%
3%
6%
7%
45%
3%
23%
7%
8%
2%
2%
1%
0%
43%
1%
9%
0%
3%
EE
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1%
0%
IE
EL
ES
7%
23%
3%
4%
10%
19%
13%
2%
0%
41%
1%
10%
0%
2%
11%
1%
2%
16%
7%
1%
7%
28%
27%
10%
1%
4%
7%
15%
29%
29%
6%
9%
0%
8%
FR
61%
15%
2%
10%
8%
6%
15%
8%
24%
0%
0%
38%
0%
4%
21%
70%
4%
15%
5%
1%
12%
20%
10%
1%
2%
14%
4%
4%
10%
0%
4%
61%
26%
17%
HR
0%
0%
0%
0%
1%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
31%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
IT
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
25%
8%
CY
LV
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Competent Member State
LT
LU HU MT NL
0%
0%
0%
23%
4%
12%
19%
4%
3%
1%
0%
0%
3%
42%
0%
0%
0%
0%
7%
0%
4%
1%
0%
0%
0%
3%
13%
7%
19%
0%
18%
1%
0%
3%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2%
1%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1%
0%
2%
1%
18%
0%
5%
2%
1%
2%
1%
3%
1%
0%
0%
1%
0%
5%
10%
29%
2%
0%
10%
10%
64%
4%
2%
5%
0%
0%
1%
2%
0%
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2%
0%
0%
1%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
AT
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
26%
8%
PL
2%
1%
4%
11%
9%
0%
5%
0%
0%
3%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1%
1%
15%
1%
0%
1%
0%
0%
3%
2%
3%
3%
3%
0%
5%
0%
0%
2%
PT
0%
1%
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2%
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
RO
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
SI
0%
1%
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
6%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2%
0%
0%
51%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3%
SK
0%
1%
42%
1%
3%
0%
5%
0%
0%
1%
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
36%
3%
3%
4%
1%
0%
0%
3%
0%
0%
1%
2%
2%
0%
2%
1%
0%
2%
FI
0%
0%
0%
3%
0%
12%
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
16%
0%
1%
0%
12%
0%
0%
0%
SE
0%
0%
0%
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1%
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
3%
0%
1%
2%
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
12%
0%
0%
1%
0%
12%
0%
0%
0%
UK
0%
2%
0%
1%
0%
0%
2%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
9%
11%
0%
2%
1%
0%
0%
4%
1%
2%
0%
0%
2%
0%
0%
1%
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
IS
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
LI
NO
0%
2%
0%
22%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1%
0%
0%
2%
18%
0%
1%
2%
1%
0%
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
12%
13%
0%
16%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1%
CH
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
19%
6%
Total
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Former Member State of insurance, employment or self-employment (i.e. Member State which issued the PD U1)
BE
BG
CZ
DK
DE
EE
IE
EL
ES
FR
HR
IT
CY
LV
LT
LU
HU
MT
NL
AT
PL
PT
RO
SI
SK
FI
SE
UK
IS
LI
NO
CH
0%
12%
0%
1%
2%
2%
0%
4%
11%
16%
2%
13%
0%
0%
3%
19%
1%
0%
28%
0%
9%
8%
20%
0%
0%
3%
1%
0%
1%
0%
0%
1%
Unknown
0%
3%
Total
* This is an incomplete picture due to missing data for IE, EL, CY, SI and LI as reporting Member State and given that some Member States did not
provide a (complete) breakdown by former Member State of insurance, employment or self-employment (CZ, EE, FR, IT, AT and CH).
Source
Questionnaire on aggregation of periods in case of unemployment benefits
23
S 340 - 2018-19 (1. samling) - Endeligt svar på S 340: Vil regeringen, i lyset af Parlamentets holdning om at EU-/EØS-borgere skal have ret til danske dagpenge fra dag et, aktivere artikel 48 TEUF i Lissabon-traktaten, som giver et medlemsland mulighed for at anmode om, at et forslag til en EU-retsakt forelægges det Europæiske Råd til drøftelse, hvis medlemslandet erklærer, at denne retsakt lovgivningsmæssig berører vigtige aspekter af den pågældende medlemsstats sociale sikringssystem?
1994677_0024.png
ANNEX II PD U1 QUESTIONNAIRE
Number of mobile EU workers (excluding former cross-
border workers) who became unemployed in the reference
year (2015) and received unemployment benefits in your
country on the basis of periods completed in another
Member State
Length of previous insurance, employment or self-
Total
employment completed by those workers in your
country before their application for unemployment
benefits
Less than one
More than one Three months
month (30 days)
month (30
or more (90
days), but less days or more)
than three
months (90
days)
Belgium
Bulgaria
Czech Republic
Denmark
Member States of origin (i.e. the member state which issued the PDU1)
Germany
Estonia
Ireland
Greece
Spain
France
Croatia
Italy
Cyprus
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Hungary
Malta
Netherlands
Austria
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Slovenia
Slovak Republic
Finland
Sweden
United Kingdom
Iceland
Liechtenstein
Norway
Switzerland
Total
S 340 - 2018-19 (1. samling) - Endeligt svar på S 340: Vil regeringen, i lyset af Parlamentets holdning om at EU-/EØS-borgere skal have ret til danske dagpenge fra dag et, aktivere artikel 48 TEUF i Lissabon-traktaten, som giver et medlemsland mulighed for at anmode om, at et forslag til en EU-retsakt forelægges det Europæiske Råd til drøftelse, hvis medlemslandet erklærer, at denne retsakt lovgivningsmæssig berører vigtige aspekter af den pågældende medlemsstats sociale sikringssystem?
1994677_0025.png
ANNEX III PORTABLE DOCUMENT U1
S 340 - 2018-19 (1. samling) - Endeligt svar på S 340: Vil regeringen, i lyset af Parlamentets holdning om at EU-/EØS-borgere skal have ret til danske dagpenge fra dag et, aktivere artikel 48 TEUF i Lissabon-traktaten, som giver et medlemsland mulighed for at anmode om, at et forslag til en EU-retsakt forelægges det Europæiske Råd til drøftelse, hvis medlemslandet erklærer, at denne retsakt lovgivningsmæssig berører vigtige aspekter af den pågældende medlemsstats sociale sikringssystem?
1994677_0026.png
S 340 - 2018-19 (1. samling) - Endeligt svar på S 340: Vil regeringen, i lyset af Parlamentets holdning om at EU-/EØS-borgere skal have ret til danske dagpenge fra dag et, aktivere artikel 48 TEUF i Lissabon-traktaten, som giver et medlemsland mulighed for at anmode om, at et forslag til en EU-retsakt forelægges det Europæiske Råd til drøftelse, hvis medlemslandet erklærer, at denne retsakt lovgivningsmæssig berører vigtige aspekter af den pågældende medlemsstats sociale sikringssystem?
1994677_0027.png
S 340 - 2018-19 (1. samling) - Endeligt svar på S 340: Vil regeringen, i lyset af Parlamentets holdning om at EU-/EØS-borgere skal have ret til danske dagpenge fra dag et, aktivere artikel 48 TEUF i Lissabon-traktaten, som giver et medlemsland mulighed for at anmode om, at et forslag til en EU-retsakt forelægges det Europæiske Råd til drøftelse, hvis medlemslandet erklærer, at denne retsakt lovgivningsmæssig berører vigtige aspekter af den pågældende medlemsstats sociale sikringssystem?
1994677_0028.png
S 340 - 2018-19 (1. samling) - Endeligt svar på S 340: Vil regeringen, i lyset af Parlamentets holdning om at EU-/EØS-borgere skal have ret til danske dagpenge fra dag et, aktivere artikel 48 TEUF i Lissabon-traktaten, som giver et medlemsland mulighed for at anmode om, at et forslag til en EU-retsakt forelægges det Europæiske Råd til drøftelse, hvis medlemslandet erklærer, at denne retsakt lovgivningsmæssig berører vigtige aspekter af den pågældende medlemsstats sociale sikringssystem?
1994677_0029.png
HOW TO OBTAIN EU PUBLICATIONS
Free publications:
one copy:
via EU Bookshop (http://bookshop.europa.eu);
more than one copy or posters/maps:
from the European Union’s representations (http://ec.europa.eu/represent_en.htm);
from the delegations in non-EU countries (http://eeas.europa.eu/delegations/index_en.htm);
by contacting the Europe Direct service (http://europa.eu/europedirect/index_en.htm)
or calling 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (freephone number from anywhere in the EU) (*).
(*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels
may charge you).
Priced publications:
via EU Bookshop (http://bookshop.europa.eu).
Priced subscriptions:
via one of the sales agents of the Publications Office of the European Union
(http://publications.europa.eu/others/agents/index_en.htm).
S 340 - 2018-19 (1. samling) - Endeligt svar på S 340: Vil regeringen, i lyset af Parlamentets holdning om at EU-/EØS-borgere skal have ret til danske dagpenge fra dag et, aktivere artikel 48 TEUF i Lissabon-traktaten, som giver et medlemsland mulighed for at anmode om, at et forslag til en EU-retsakt forelægges det Europæiske Råd til drøftelse, hvis medlemslandet erklærer, at denne retsakt lovgivningsmæssig berører vigtige aspekter af den pågældende medlemsstats sociale sikringssystem?
1994677_0030.png