Europaudvalget 2021
KOM (2021) 1000
Offentligt
2462606_0001.png
EUROPEAN
COMMISSION
Brussels, 11.10.2021
SWD(2021) 1001 final
PART 30/38
COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT
Accompanying the document
REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN
PARLIAMENT
on the implementation of Council Directive 91/676/EEC concerning the protection of
waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources based on Member
State reports for the period 2016–2019
{COM(2021) 1000 final}
EN
EN
kom (2021) 1000 - Ingen titel
2462606_0002.png
PORTUGAL FICHE
Pressure from Agriculture
Portugal
’s
utilized agricultural area
amounts to 3.6 Mha, representing 40% of
the total land area. The major outputs of the
agricultural industry excluding services
include in a decreasing order fruit (19.3%),
vegetables and horticultural plants (16.6%)
and other crops (14.9%).
Major land use statistics for Portugal
Table 1.Utilized agricultural area (abbreviated as UAA)
Portugal’s arable land
has decreased from the
last reporting period by
14%.
Permanent
grassland, crops and
kitchen
gardens
remained stable.
Animal distribution in Portugal
Portugal
has
seen
an
increase in all livestock
numbers. Consequently, the
livestock density index has
increased by 8.9% since
2013. The livestock intensity
index is lower than the EU
average of 0.8.
Table 2. Livestock statistics
564
kom (2021) 1000 - Ingen titel
2462606_0003.png
PORTUGAL FICHE
Nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers and surplus (kg/ha UAA)
Figure 1. N and P fertilizers and gross surplus (kg/ha)
The N and P mineral fertilizer, manure and gross nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P)
surpluses originate from EUROSTAT data for the years 2000-2017, while for years
2018-2019 from the National Institute of Statistics (INE). The consumption of inorganic
N during the last reporting period is lower than that of the previous. The consumption of
inorganic P fertilizer has increased by 13%. Both N and P from manure have increased
since the last reporting period. The N surplus continues to increase since 2010. The
phosphorus surplus is higher than that of the previous reporting period. In the plots: N/P
min and N/P man are respectively the N/P mineral fertilizers and N/P manure.
565
kom (2021) 1000 - Ingen titel
2462606_0004.png
PORTUGAL FICHE
Livestock unit - LSU /ha
Figure 2. Map of livestock unit distribution in the Continent part, year 2016 (Source: Eurostat, February
2021)
Animal production is concentrated in the south-western part of the Portugal (total LSU
and LSU by animal type were retrieved individually from EUROSTAT).
In this document, the NUTS-2013 version is used.
(https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/gisco/geodata/reference-data/administrative-units-
statistical-units/nuts)
566
kom (2021) 1000 - Ingen titel
2462606_0005.png
PORTUGAL FICHE
Livestock unit - LSU /ha
Acores and Madeira
Figure 3. Map of livestock unit distribution in Acores and Madeira, year 2016 (Source: Eurostat, February
2021)
Bovine production is dominating in Acores while poultry is dominating in Madeira (total
LSU and LSU by animal type were retrieved individually from EUROSTAT).
In this document, the NUTS-2013 version is used.
(https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/gisco/geodata/reference-data/administrative-units-
statistical-units/nuts)
567
kom (2021) 1000 - Ingen titel
2462606_0006.png
PORTUGAL FICHE
Water Quality Monitoring
The Regional Directorates of Water Resources and Spatial Planning including the
Azores Regional Directorate are in charge of maintaining an up to date record of the
results obtained from the region’s monitoring programmes and provide it to the
competent national authority, the Portuguese Environment Agency.
It is noteworthy that in some cases in the bar charts the total value can differ from 100%
due to rounding errors.
Groundwater quality monitoring network
Table 3. Number of GW stations with measurements and trends per type
Surface water quality monitoring network
Table 4. Number of SW stations with measurements, trends and trophic status per type
568
kom (2021) 1000 - Ingen titel
2462606_0007.png
PORTUGAL FICHE
Groundwater Quality
Groundwater average annual nitrate concentration
Figure 4. Spatial distribution of average NO3 annual concentration (map) and corresponding percentage
of monitoring points per classes of concentration by reporting period (x axis). The percentages below 5%
are not labelled, see the next plot for more information. In the map in blue the NVZ.
Figure 5. Comparison of percentage of monitoring points in the three reporting periods by classes of
average NO3 annual concentration (x axis)
569
kom (2021) 1000 - Ingen titel
2462606_0008.png
PORTUGAL FICHE
Groundwater average annual nitrate concentration trend
Figure 6. Spatial distribution of average NO3 annual trends (map) and corresponding percentage of
monitoring points per classes of trends by reporting period (x axis). In the map in blue the NVZ.
Figure 7. Comparison of percentage of monitoring points in the three reporting periods by classes of
average NO3 annual trends (x axis)
570
kom (2021) 1000 - Ingen titel
2462606_0009.png
PORTUGAL FICHE
Groundwater hotspot
Figure 8. GW hotspot analysis map (top graph) and distribution by NUTS2 (lower graph) of average NO3
annual concentration greater than 40 mg/l. In the map in blue the NVZ.
The hotspot analysis identifies all the GW monitoring stations that have NO3
concentration in the range of 40-50 mg/l with increasing trends or are above 50 mg/l.
The map shows the spatial distribution of these points, and the table reports the number
of stations by NUTS inside and outside NVZ. Only the NUTS of interest are reported.
571
kom (2021) 1000 - Ingen titel
2462606_0010.png
PORTUGAL FICHE
Groundwater stations removed
Figure 9. GW removed stations map (top graph) and distribution by groundwater type (lower graph). In
the map in blue the NVZ.
The removed stations analysis identifies all the GW monitoring stations that were
removed in the current reporting period. The map shows the spatial distribution of these
points with the concentrations of the previous reporting period, and the table reports the
number
of
stations
with
measurements
and
trends
per
type.
572
kom (2021) 1000 - Ingen titel
2462606_0011.png
PORTUGAL FICHE
Surface Water Quality
Surface water average annual nitrate concentration
Figure 10. Spatial distribution of average NO3 annual concentration (map) and corresponding percentage
of monitoring points per classes of concentration by reporting period (x axis). The percentages below 5%
are not labelled, see the next plot for more information. In the map in blue the NVZ.
Figure 11. Comparison of percentage of monitoring points between the three reporting periods by classes
of NO3 concentration (x axis)
573
kom (2021) 1000 - Ingen titel
2462606_0012.png
PORTUGAL FICHE
Surface water average annual nitrate concentration trend
Figure 12. Spatial distribution of average NO3 annual trends (map) and corresponding percentage of
monitoring points per classes of trends by reporting period (x axis). The percentages below 5% are not
labelled, see the next plot for more information. In the map in blue the NVZ.
Figure 13. Comparison of percentage of monitoring points in the three reporting periods by classes of
average NO3 annual trends (x axis)
574
kom (2021) 1000 - Ingen titel
2462606_0013.png
PORTUGAL FICHE
Surface Water Eutrophication
Figure 14. Spatial distribution of eutrophic status (map) and corresponding percentage of monitoring
points per classes of status by reporting period (x axis). In the map in blue the NVZ.
Figure 15. Comparison of percentage of monitoring points in the three reporting periods by classes of
status (x axis)
575
kom (2021) 1000 - Ingen titel
2462606_0014.png
PORTUGAL FICHE
The Eutrophic status vs average NO3 annual concentration
Figure 16. The SW monitoring stations with eutrophic status versus the average NO3 annual
concentration. In the map in blue the NVZ.
The analysis shows all the SW monitoring stations with the higher trophic status and the
corresponding value of NO3 concentration. The map shows the spatial distribution of
these points, and the table reports the number of stations with measurements with
highest trophic status and the corresponding stations by classes of NO3 concentration.
Only the NUTS of interest are reported.
576
kom (2021) 1000 - Ingen titel
2462606_0015.png
PORTUGAL FICHE
The classification criteria implemented under the WFD were considered as the basis to
assess the trophic status of both rivers and reservoirs. Two geographical zones were
considered for the classification in which both nitrate and total phosphorus
concentrations were used. For the northern rivers the lowest limits for eutrophication
were 25 mg NO3/l and 0.2 mg P/L for nitrate and total phosphorus, respectively. For
southern rivers the lowest criteria for total phosphorus is 0.23 mgP/L while the criteria of
nitrate is identical to that of northern rivers. For reservoirs, chlorophyll-a is considered in
addition to the nitrate and total phosphorus criteria. Again, two zones are used to
determine the trophic classes boundaries. For reservoirs, the nitrate limit for
eutrophication is the same as for rivers. For total phosphorus the concentrations limits
are 0.05 and 0.08 mgP/L for northern and southern reservoirs, respectively. The
chlorophyll-a limits for eutrophication are 7.9 and 9.66 mg/L for northern and southern
reservoirs, respectively. Nitrate, phosphate and chlorophyll-a parameters were
considered pertinent in the trophic status classification system of coastal and
transitional water, using as a basis the reference values defined in the implementation
of the WFD for the different types of water bodies and classes of salinity. While most
rivers are classified as non-eutrophic the large majority of lakes are eutrophic. There
are no eutrophic coastal waters while transitional waters had almost the same
distribution for the eutrophic, non-eutrophic and could become eutrophic classes.
Table 5. Summary of SW stations by classes of trophic status and type.
577
kom (2021) 1000 - Ingen titel
2462606_0016.png
PORTUGAL FICHE
Surface Water quality hotspot
Figure 17. SW hotspot analysis map (top graph) and distribution by NUTS2 (lower graph) of average
NO3 annual concentration greater than 40 mg/l and trophic status. In the map in blue the NVZ.
The hotspot analysis identifies all the SW monitoring stations that have high trophic
status, NO3 concentration in the range of 40-50 mg/l with increasing trends or are
above 50 mg/l. The map shows the spatial distribution of these points, and the table
reports the number of stations by NUTS inside and outside NVZ.
Only
the
NUTS
of
interest
are
reported.
578
kom (2021) 1000 - Ingen titel
2462606_0017.png
PORTUGAL FICHE
Surface Water Stations Removed
Figure 18. SW removed stations map (top graph) and distribution by surface water type (lower graph). In
the map in blue the NVZ.
The removed stations analysis identifies all the SW monitoring stations that were
removed in the current reporting period. The map shows the spatial distribution of these
points with the concentrations of the previous reporting period, and the table reports the
number
of
stations
with
measurements
and
trends
per
type.
579
kom (2021) 1000 - Ingen titel
2462606_0018.png
PORTUGAL FICHE
Measures in the Action Programme
The first Code of Good Agricultural Practice was drawn up on 23/11/1997, revised in
2016 and approved in 2018. The new version of CGAP contains updates with regard
to:
Periods in which the application of fertiliser is inappropriate
Application of fertiliser on steep slopes
Fertiliser application on water-saturated, flooded, frozen or snow-covered soil
Conditions for fertiliser application on land adjacent to watercourses
The capacity and the construction of manure storage tanks, including
measures to prevent water pollution by run-off and seepage into the
groundwater and surface water of liquids containing livestock manures and
effluents from stored plant materials such as silage
Fertiliser application methods, including dosage and uniformity of spreading, of
both chemical fertiliser and livestock manure in order to maintain nutrient
losses to water at an acceptable level
Land use management, including crop rotation systems and the relative
proportion between the area devoted to permanent crops and annual crops
Maintaining a minimum level of vegetation cover during (rainy) periods that will
absorb soil nitrogen that otherwise could cause water pollution by nitrates
Establishment of fertiliser plans at farm level and maintaining a record of the
application of fertilisers
Prevention of water pollution caused by drainage or by infiltration beyond the
roots of the plants in irrigation systems
Portuguese authorities have pointed out that they assume that the voluntary
implementation of CGAP by farmers and livestock producers located outside NVZs
has grown since it was first published in 1997, due to the evolution seen in the
agricultural and livestock sector.
The Action Programme (AP) was published for the first time in 1998 and was revised
in 2001 for NVZ: Esposende Villa do Conde, Aveiro, Faro. In 2003 Mira was included.
During the four-year period of 2008-2011 the following NVZ were included: Tagus,
Beja, Elvas-Villa Boim, Luz-Tavira. Revisions of NVZ areas were also made in this
period. Recently, a single Action Programme was drawn up for all NVZs on mainland
Portugal, while in Azores three different Action Programmes are available for different
NVZ.
The Action Programme was drawn up taking into account crop requirements during
their growth cycle and the maximum quantities of nitrogen to be applied. It also limits
the amount of organic fertilisers which can be used and considers the need to draw
580
kom (2021) 1000 - Ingen titel
2462606_0019.png
PORTUGAL FICHE
up fertilisation plans and balances. It further prohibits the application of fertilisers in
specific seasons, in soils which are flooded or susceptible to flooding, in snow-
covered or frozen soils and on land adjacent to watercourses, groundwater wells,
reservoirs, lakes (buffer strips). The AP also sets out the requirement for the
sustainable management of livestock manure and slurry and the correct management
of irrigation while also making compulsory certain agricultural practices on sloping
land. It also sets out procedures for monitoring and controlling nitrates in waters and
on agricultural land parcels.
For each NVZ, measurable criteria for assessing impact of the programmes on
practices in the field have been reported, as well as the percentage of farmers
respecting the rules.
No cost effectiveness was reported.
Controls
Portugal reported by NVZ regions the controls performed to assess the
implementation of the Action Programme. The percentage of farms visited in each
zone varied from 0 to 25% of the farmers concerned. The percentage of non-
compliance varies widely between the regions and ranges from 0% to 20% of non-
compliance. The most frequent reason of non-compliance deals with the need of a
balanced fertilization.
Designation of NVZ
Portugal has made no adjustment to the nitrate vulnerable zones designated in the
previous report. So, Portugal designated 4,047 km
2
as NVZ, which represents 4.4%
of the national territory.
581
kom (2021) 1000 - Ingen titel
2462606_0020.png
PORTUGAL FICHE
Forecast of Water Quality
A groundwater model was used to simulate the nine vulnerable zones designated in
mainland Portugal. The groundwater model was calibrated against actual
measurements of piezometric levels and nitrate concentration. Then it was assumed
that no additional nitrate input occurred in the groundwater and the model was used
to estimate nitrate concentrations in 2040. Six aquifers out of 9 have nitrate
concentrations above 50mg/l. Calculated concentrations of nitrate above 50mg/L
covered from 1.5 to 6.7% of the area of the remaining aquifers.
582
kom (2021) 1000 - Ingen titel
2462606_0021.png
PORTUGAL FICHE
Summary
Figure 19. The summary plot for the period 2016-2019
This plot provides in the first row the percentage of stations exceeding 50 mg/l with
respect to the total stations with measures and the percentage of eutrophic SW
stations with respect to the total for which the trophic status is reported. In the second
row, the percentage of stations exceeding 50 mg/l that are outside NVZ with respect
to the total of stations exceeding 50 mg/, and the percentage of SW eutrophic
stations that are outside NVZ with respect to the total that are eutrophic.
583
kom (2021) 1000 - Ingen titel
2462606_0022.png
PORTUGAL FICHE
Long term analysis
Figure 20. Time series of box whisker plots along with the distribution of the average NO3 annual
concentrations for each reporting period, for groundwater stations. The blue, red, green and black dots
represent the mean of the fourth third, second and first quartiles, respectively.
Figure 21. Time series of box whisker plots along with the distribution of the average NO3 annual
concentrations for each reporting period, for surface water stations. The blue, red, green and black
dots represent the mean of the fourth third, second and first quartiles, respectively.
584
kom (2021) 1000 - Ingen titel
2462606_0023.png
PORTUGAL FICHE
Conclusions and recommendations
The livestock density close to the EU average and a nitrogen and phosphorus
surplus which is slightly lower than the EU average.
The network of monitoring stations is concentrated in NVZ but there are also station
outside NVZ to follow the development of the possible nitrates pollution. There is a
high number of groundwater hotspots showing nitrates concentration above 50 mg/l
in NVZ, also a high number of stations show an increasing trend. A high number of
surface waters are affected by eutrophication of which very high number is outside
NVZ.
The action programmes was revised in 2012.
The Commission recommends that Portugal revises and reinforces its action
programme to tackle the groundwater pollution in hot spots and revises NVZ
designation to address eutrophication of surface waters where agriculture pressure is
significant.
585