Europaudvalget 2024
KOM (2024) 0800
Offentligt
2893718_0001.png
EUROPEAN
COMMISSION
Brussels, 24.7.2024
SWD(2024) 815 final
COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT
2024 Rule of Law Report
Country Chapter on the rule of law situation in Lithuania
Accompanying the document
COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN
PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL
COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS
2024 Rule of Law Report
The rule of law situation in the European Union
{COM(2024) 800 final} - {SWD(2024) 801 final} - {SWD(2024) 802 final} -
{SWD(2024) 803 final} - {SWD(2024) 804 final} - {SWD(2024) 805 final} -
{SWD(2024) 806 final} - {SWD(2024) 807 final} - {SWD(2024) 808 final} -
{SWD(2024) 809 final} - {SWD(2024) 810 final} - {SWD(2024) 811 final} -
{SWD(2024) 812 final} - {SWD(2024) 813 final} - {SWD(2024) 814 final} -
{SWD(2024) 816 final} - {SWD(2024) 817 final} - {SWD(2024) 818 final} -
{SWD(2024) 819 final} - {SWD(2024) 820 final} - {SWD(2024) 821 final} -
{SWD(2024) 822 final} - {SWD(2024) 823 final} - {SWD(2024) 824 final} -
{SWD(2024) 825 final} - {SWD(2024) 826 final} - {SWD(2024) 827 final} -
{SWD(2024) 828 final} - {SWD(2024) 829 final} - {SWD(2024) 830 final} -
{SWD(2024) 831 final}
EN
EN
kom (2024) 0800 - Ingen titel
2893718_0002.png
A
BSTRACT
The justice system continues to perform efficiently, and the use of digital tools continues to
be fostered. A reform of judicial salaries adopted in July 2023 is positively assessed by
judges, while concerns remain as to the remuneration of court staff and prosecutors. The new
selection procedures for judicial appointments in force since January 2023 have allowed for
multiple appointments to the Supreme Court without delays but there are calls to reinforce
some more safeguards on the transparency of judicial appointments in the law. There are
concerns that the discretion in announcing competitions and finalising judicial appointments
may lead to delays in appointments and to vacant posts in lower courts. The Government has
condemned acts of intimidation by Russian courts whereby they rendered sentences against
judges, exerting pressure on judges and prosecutors. The reform of the legal aid system
continues to advance but is not yet finalised, while legal aid providers underline that the
stipulated increase of hourly fees remains below inflation rates.
The first implementation plan 2023-2025 for the National Anti-Corruption Agenda 2022-
2033 is well on track. The implementation of the law on the adjustment of public and private
interests remains efficient, while further adjustments are under way to improve the
declaration process. The investigations and prosecutions in relation to corruption-related
offences are carried out efficiently. There continue to be concerns over shortcomings
regarding the handling of foreign bribery cases and the authorities are considering the
appropriate follow-up. High-risk areas for corruption, including public procurement, continue
to be addressed by the authorities. The number of submitted lobbying declarations increases
annually. The current rules on political party financing are being implemented. The
whistleblowing framework is functioning well, and the authorities aim at further
strengthening the current rules.
The legal framework for media freedom and pluralism in Lithuania continues to guarantee
the fundamental right of freedom of expression and the right to information. The broadened
composition of the media self-regulatory body has been predominantly met with positive
reactions. Transparency of media ownership is further promoted by linking it to access to the
new Media Support Fund which announced the first recipients in April 2024. The public
service broadcaster continues to operate independently. The situation regarding access to
documents is better with the guidelines for public authorities, although their implementation
by public authorities at all levels of government can still be improved. The Government has
adopted an action plan for the safety of journalists and continues to strengthen their
protection against abusive lawsuits.
Additional human and financial resources have been allocated to the Office of the
Parliamentary Ombudspersons. New rules to improve the quality of legislation are under
preparation. The civic space continues to be considered open, but concerns have been
expressed among civil society organisations regarding their effective participation in
decision-making processes and access to information. The Judicial Council is preparing a
proposal to be granted the right of constitutional appeal regarding legislation affecting the
judiciary.
1
kom (2024) 0800 - Ingen titel
2893718_0003.png
R
ECOMMENDATIONS
Overall, concerning the recommendations in the 2023 Rule of Law Report, Lithuania has
made:
Some further progress on continuing the reform of the legal aid system by ensuring
adequate conditions for the participation of legal aid providers, taking into account
European standards on legal aid.
Some further progress on continuing efforts to improve the transparency of the system of
appointments to judicial positions, notably to the Supreme Court, taking into account
European standards on judicial appointments.
Significant progress on continuing efforts to provide adequate resources for the justice
system, including on the level of remuneration for prosecutors and non-judicial staff,
taking into account European standards on resources and remuneration for the justice
system.
Significant progress on providing adequate human and financial resources for the
functioning of the Office of the Parliamentary Ombudspersons, taking into account
European standards on resources for Ombudsinstitutions and the UN Paris Principles.
On this basis, and considering other developments that took place in the period of reference,
it is recommended to Lithuania to:
Finalise the reform of the legal aid system, in particular by reducing the administrative
burden and ensuring adequate conditions for the participation of legal aid providers,
taking into account European standards on legal aid.
Continue efforts to improve the transparency of the system of appointments to judicial
positions, notably to the Supreme Court, taking into account European standards on
judicial appointments.
Continue efforts to provide adequate human and financial resources for the justice
system, taking into account European standards on resources for the justice system.
2
kom (2024) 0800 - Ingen titel
2893718_0004.png
I.
J
USTICE
S
YSTEM
The justice system is composed of the Constitutional Court
1
, courts of general jurisdiction
(the Supreme Court, the Court of Appeal, regional courts and district courts) and courts of
special jurisdiction (the Supreme Administrative Court and a Regional administrative court).
The judges of the Supreme Court, as well as its President chosen from among them, are
appointed and released by Parliament (Seimas) upon submission by the President of the
Republic. The judges of the Court of Appeal, as well as its President chosen from among
them, are appointed by the President of the Republic upon the assent of Parliament. The
judges and presidents of district, regional, and specialised courts are appointed, and their
places of work can be changed, by the President of the Republic. The Judicial Council,
entirely composed of judges appointed by their peers, is the executive body of judicial self-
governance, and ensures the independence of courts and judges
2
. The Judicial Council
advises the President of the Republic on the appointment, promotion, and transfer of judges,
or their release from duties. The National Courts Administration, which is independent from
the executive, is competent for providing material and technical support to the courts,
ensuring the efficient functioning of the court system and the training of judges. Prosecutors
are independent; the Prosecutor General is appointed and dismissed by the President of the
Republic upon the assent of Parliament
3
. Lower-ranked prosecutors are appointed by the
Prosecutor General, on the recommendation of a Selection Commission
4
. Lithuania
participates in the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO). The Bar Association is an
independent part of the legal system.
Independence
The level of perceived judicial independence in Lithuania continues to be average
among the general public and high among companies.
Overall, 56% of the general
population and 62% of companies perceive the level of independence of courts and judges to
be ‘fairly or very good’ in 2024
5
. Among the general public, this figure has slightly decreased
in comparison with 2023 (57%), but it is higher than in 2020 (52%). The perceived judicial
independence among companies has decreased in comparison with 2023 (64%), as well as in
comparison with 2020 (66%)
6
.
1
2
3
4
5
6
The Constitutional Court is composed of nine judges, appointed by Parliament, from among candidates
presented by the President of the Republic, the Speaker of Parliament, and the President of the Supreme
Court.
Art. 119, Law on Courts.
Deputy Prosecutors General are appointed and dismissed by the President of the Republic on the proposal of
the Prosecutor General.
Arts. 22 and 26, Law on the amendment of the law on the prosecutor’s office, No. I-599, of 13 October
1994.
Figures 51 and 53, 2024 EU Justice Scoreboard, and Figures 50 and 52, 2022 EU Justice Scoreboard. The
level of perceived judicial independence is categorised as follows: very low (below 30% of respondents
perceive judicial independence as fairly good and very good); low (between 30-39%), average (between 40-
59%), high (between 60-75%), very high (above 75%).
54% of the companies in Lithuania are either fairly or very confident that their investments are protected by
the law and courts in the Member State. 26% of the surveyed companies see the quality, efficiency or
independence of justice as one of the main reasons for concern about investment protection in the country.
Figures 55 and 56, 2024 EU Justice Scoreboard.
3
kom (2024) 0800 - Ingen titel
2893718_0005.png
The new selection procedures for judicial appointments in force since January 2023
have allowed for multiple appointments to the Supreme Court without delays resulting
in some further progress to improve the transparency of judicial appointments, but
there are calls to reinforce some more safeguards in the law.
The 2023 Rule of Law
Report recommended to Lithuania to ‘[c]ontinue efforts to improve the transparency of the
system of appointments to judicial positions, notably to the Supreme Court, taking into
account European standards on judicial appointments’
7
. As mentioned in the 2023 Rule of
Law Report, amendments to the Law on Courts, which introduced changes to the selection
procedures for candidates for judicial office, came into force in January 2023
8
. During the
reporting period, and under the new provisions, multiple appointments to the Supreme Court
took place, without the delays reported in previous years
9
. According to the new system,
candidates to judicial office are evaluated by a Selection Commission and entered in a
general ranking list of courts of the relevant jurisdiction
10
. The order of candidates on the list
is determined by the date at which they were added to the list of candidates
11
, and not by an
assessment ranking. No further changes were introduced during the reporting year, in
particular with regard to the discretionary power of the President of the Republic in selecting
candidates, without an obligation to motivate
.
The opinion of the Selection Commission
remains consultative and candidate judges who are not appointed cannot request judicial
review
12
. However, stakeholders report that there have been fewer instances in which the
decisions of the President of the Republic departed from the lists prepared by the Selection
Commission
13
. Stakeholders have welcomed the improvements in the practices regarding
appointments but continue to call for a legislative change which would provide for the
obligation to motivate the decisions concerning appointments, and for the possibility of
judicial review
14,15
. New discussions in this respect were triggered in March 2024, when the
integrity officer of Lithuanian courts
16
decided to investigate one case where the candidate
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
2023 Rule of Law Report, Country Chapter on the rule of law situation in Lithuania, p. 2. The 2022 Rule of
Law Report had also recommended to Lithuania to ‘‘[i]nitiate a process in view of adapting the system of
appointments to judicial positions, notably to the Supreme Court, including to improve transparency and
taking into account European standards on judicial appointments’ (2022 Rule of Law Report, Country
Chapter on the rule of law situation in Lithuania, p. 2). In the 2023 Rule of Law Report, the Commission
concluded that some progress was made on the recommendation.
2023 Rule of Law Report, Country Chapter on the rule of law situation in Lithuania, p. 4.
2022 Rule of Law Report, Country Chapter on the rule of law situation in Lithuania, p. 3; 2023 Rule of Law
Report, Country Chapter on the rule of law situation in Lithuania, pp. 3-4.
Input from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 3.
Input from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 6.
2023 Rule of Law Report, Country Chapter on the rule of law situation in Lithuania, p. 5.
Information received from the Judicial Council in the context of the country visit to Lithuania.
Information received from the Judicial Council and National Courts Administration in the context of the
country visit to Lithuania. See also Recommendation CM/Rec(2010)12 of the Committee of Ministers of the
Council of Europe, para. 47. The Court of Justice of the European Union has underlined that it is necessary
to ensure that the substantive conditions and procedural rules governing the adoption of judicial appointment
decisions are such that they cannot give rise to reasonable doubts, in the minds of individuals, as to the
imperviousness of the judges concerned to external factors and as to their neutrality with respect to the
interests before them, once they have been appointed as judges (see e.g. Court of Justice of the European
Union, judgment of 20 April 2021, Repubblika, C-896/19, para. 57, and the case law cited.
In view of the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court (ruling of 9 May 2006), the Lithuanian authorities
express doubt as to whether such legislative amendments, in particular, regarding judicial review, would be
compatible with that jurisprudence.
2023 Rule of Law Report, Country Chapter on the rule of law situation in Lithuania, p. 5.
4
kom (2024) 0800 - Ingen titel
2893718_0006.png
with the lowest assessment was selected for appointment
17
. Overall, there has been some
further progress on the recommendation made in the 2023 Rule of Law Report.
The discretion in announcing competitions and finalising judicial appointments leads to
delays in appointments and to vacant posts in lower courts.
The amendments to the Law
on Courts, were expected to speed up the process of appointments in all instances
18
.
However, it is reported that the reform has not led to the process being as fast and effective as
expected at the level of lower courts
19
. Stakeholders consider that the fact that the President
of the Republic retains discretion to announce the opening of the selection procedure, as well
as to decide on the selected candidates to be appointed, without there being any timeline
20
, is
leading to delays in the appointment procedures to lower courts
21
. Such delays have led to an
increase in vacancies in district and regional courts
22
, with considerable impact on the courts
capacity to operate
23
. Both the Judicial Council and the National Courts Administration have
called on the Office of the President of the Republic for more predictability
24
, and are seeking
to optimise the institutional cooperation in this regard
25
.
The Government has condemned acts of intimidation by Russian courts whereby they
render sentences against judges, exerting pressure on judges and prosecutors.
On 17
August 2023, the Basmannyj District Court in Moscow sentenced
in absentia
and authorised
the arrest of three Lithuanian judges, who had delivered the first instance judgment of 27
March 2019
26
in the case related to the events of 13 January of 1991
27
, when the armed forces
of the USSR committed an act of aggression against the independent state of Lithuania,
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Meeting of the Judicial Council of 1 March 2024, available at: https://www.teismai.lt/lt/teismu-
savivalda/teiseju-taryba/teiseju-tarybos-posedziu-transliacijos/9653; see also Lrytas, ‘Head of the Judicial
Council S. Rudėnaitė on the procedure for appointing judges: the president cannot put his hand in the bag
and pull out the 90th candidate’, 3 April 2024.
2023 Rule of Law Report, Country Chapter on the rule of law situation in Lithuania, p. 4.
Input from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 3. See also Contribution from European Network
of Councils for the Judiciary (ENCJ) for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 26.
Reply from the National Courts Administration of the Republic of Lithuania to the judicial independence
questionnaire distributed by the European Network of Councils for the Judiciary, February 2024.
Information received from the Judicial Council and National Courts Administration in the context of the
country visit to Lithuania.
In January 2024, there were 63 vacancies in district courts, 8 vacancies in regional courts and 2 vacancies in
regional administrative courts (Input from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 3).
Information received from the Judicial Council and National Courts Administration in the context of the
country visit to Lithuania.
Information received from the Judicial Council and National Courts Administration in the context of the
country visit to Lithuania.
Input from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 3. See also Contribution from European Network
of Councils for the Judiciary (ENCJ) for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, pp. 26-27.
Charges were brought in the Vilnius Regional Court against Dmitry Yazov, former Defence Minister of the
Soviet Union, Vladimir Uskhopchik, the Soviet army’s former Vilnius garrison commander, Mikhail
Golovatov, former commander of the KGB’s special forces and 64 other former officials of the Soviet Union
alleging their participation in crimes against humanity and war crimes during the events which took place in
Vilnius on 13 January 1991. On 27 March 2019 the Vilnius Regional Court gave its judgment finding all the
accused guilty of various crimes against humanity or war crimes. See also ‘European association of judges
statement on the purported prosecution of Lithuanian judges by Russian authorities’.
See also ‘European Parliament resolution of 28 November 2019 on recent actions by the Russian Federation
against Lithuanian judges, prosecutors and investigators involved in investigating the tragic events of 13
January 1991 in Vilnius’ (2019/2938(RSP)).
5
kom (2024) 0800 - Ingen titel
2893718_0007.png
which left 14 people dead and nearly 800 injured
28
. Stakeholders and the Lithuanian
Government have condemned these actions
29
, and raised concerns that these may not only
exert pressure on Lithuanian judges, but also on the judges of the international community
30
.
The concerns were also brought to the attention of the European Commission by the Judicial
Council
31
. According to European standards, judges should have unfettered freedom to
decide cases impartially, in accordance with the law and their interpretation of the facts
32
.
The interpretation of the law, assessment of facts or weighing of evidence carried out to
determine cases should not give rise to criminal liability, except in cases of malice
33
.
Initiatives to support integrity in the justice system continue to be prioritised.
In 2023,
the Judicial Council approved the Policy of the Transparency of Lithuanian Courts
34
, setting
up the essential values and general principles to be promoted in courts, that should be
complied with by all agents in the justice system
35
. Special training on ‘Creation of an anti-
corruption environment in the judiciary’ is also being conducted, and is now part of
compulsory introductory training for judges
36
. Following an OECD recommendation
37
, a
‘risk map of the justice sector’ is currently under preparation
38
.
Discussions continue regarding the need to regulate ‘revolving doors’ in appointments
to the Constitutional Court.
The 2023 Rule of Law Report took note of the discussions
concerning the need to regulate ‘revolving doors’ in the Constitutional Court as currently
there are no limitations for political officials to become a judge of the Constitutional Court if
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
Between July 2018 and April 2019, the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation initiated criminal
proceedings against the prosecutors, investigators and judges of the Republic of Lithuania who were
involved in investigating and judging the events of 13 January of 1991. On 14 December 2020, the same
Committee announced that charges had been brought against those judges. There is increasing concern about
the possibility that the Russian authorities would request Interpol to issue a notice targeting the judges
involved in the case at first and second instance; information received from the Judicial Council and
National Courts Administration in the context of the country visit to Lithuania. To minimise the possibility
of using Interpol’s search channels, Lithuanian authorities provide Interpol with updating reports concerning
individuals potentially facing political persecution due to their involvement in investigating cases linked to
the events of 13 January 1991 (information received from the Ministry of Interior in the context of the
country visit to Lithuania).
Ministry of Foreign Affairs, ‘Lithuania’s Permanent Representative asks UN Special Rapporteur to react to
Russia's illegal actions against Lithuanian judges in January 13 case’, 21 December 2020.
Information received from the Lithuanian Government, Judicial Council and National Courts Administration
in the context of the country visit to Lithuania. See also ‘European association of judges statement on the
purported prosecution of Lithuanian judges by Russian authorities’.
Letter from the Judicial Council to the European Commission, of 29 August 2023.
Recommendation CM/Rec(2010)12 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, para. 5.
Recommendation CM/Rec(2010)12 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, para. 68.
Available at: https://www.teismai.lt/data/public/uploads/2023/01/skaidrumo-politika.pdf.
In particular, it establishes a policy of non-tolerance to bribery, trade and abuse of office by employees,
abuse of authority, any means of protection of family members, close persons, relatives and other persons. It
also establishes that no gifts or other thanks, rewards for the work of judges or court employees are tolerated
in the courts, except for thanks or awards given within the court system (Input from Lithuania for the 2024
Rule of Law Report, p. 14).
Contribution from European Network of Councils for the Judiciary (ENCJ) for the 2024 Rule of Law
Report, p. 12.
Available at: https://www.oecd.org/publications/review-of-lithuania-s-national-agenda-on-the-prevention-of-
corruption-e6efed26-en.htm.
Input from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 14.
6
kom (2024) 0800 - Ingen titel
2893718_0008.png
the other requirements set out in the Constitution are met
39
, or regarding employment post
tenure at the Constitutional Court
40
. In this context, in July 2023 a group of members of
Parliament proposed draft amendments to extend the cases of disqualification of judges in
concrete constitutional cases in order to address cases of political officials who become
judges to the Constitutional Court
41
, but it was not taken forward in Parliament
42
. The
Government considers that, despite the absence of concrete regulation on ‘revolving doors’,
the legal provisions on self-disqualification or disqualification of Constitutional Court judges,
applicable in cases that can raise doubts as to the impartiality of the judge, provide the
necessary safeguards
43
. Following the appointments which took place in 2023 and which
gave rise to the discussions referred to in the 2023 Rule of Law Report
44
, there have been
three requests for disqualification of a judge, and three cases of self-disqualification, which
were accepted
45
. According to the Constitutional Court, these instances of disqualification
have not had an impact on the Constitutional Court’s activity
46
.
Lawyers continue to raise concerns regarding the respect for professional secrecy and
the right of the Minister of Justice to initiate disciplinary actions.
As noted in the 2022
and 2023 Rule of Law Reports
47
, concerns regarding alleged control of communications
between lawyers and their clients led the Bar Association to bring an application before the
European Court of Human Rights
48
, and the case remains pending
49
. Further concerns have
been expressed in the reporting period such as the existence of video surveillance in police
and detention facilities, and the lack of guarantee that exchanges between lawyers and clients
are not recorded
50
. Instances of lawyers being called to testify about facts covered by
professional secrecy, although prohibited in law, have also been reported
51
. According to
European standards, all necessary measures should be taken to ensure the respect of the
confidentiality of the lawyer-client relationship
52
. Lawyers continue to contest the fact that
the Minister of Justice can initiate disciplinary proceedings against them
53
. In this context,
parliamentarians have proposed draft amendments to limit the powers of the Minister of
Justice, and the Minister of Justice also submitted a draft proposal to decrease his/her role.
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
Being a citizen of the Republic of Lithuania with an impeccable reputation, higher education in law, and not
less than a 10-year length of service in the field of law or in a branch of science and education as a lawyer,
according to Art. 103 of the Constitution.
2023 Rule of Law Report, Country Chapter on the rule of law situation in Lithuania, p. 6.
The proposal would amend Art. 48 of the Law on the Constitutional Court, ‘The Self-Disqualification or
Disqualification of a Justice of the Constitutional Court’.
Information received from the Constitutional Court in the context of the country visit to Lithuania.
Input from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 7.
2023 Rule of Law Report, Country Chapter on the rule of law situation in Lithuania, p. 6.
Information received from the Constitutional Court in the context of the country visit to Lithuania.
Information received from the Constitutional Court in the context of the country visit to Lithuania.
2022 Rule of Law Report, Country Chapter on the rule of law situation in Lithuania, p. 6; 2023 Rule of Law
Report, Country Chapter on the rule of law situation in Lithuania, p. 6.
Application no. 64301/19.
Information received from the Bar Association in the context of the country visit to Lithuania.
Contribution from the Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (CCBE) for the 2024 Rule of Law
Report, p. 86. See also Figure 45, 2024 EU Justice Scoreboard.
Ibidem.
Recommendation No. R(2000)21 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on the freedom of
exercise of the profession of lawyer, para. 6.
Figure 67, 2024 EU Justice Scoreboard. See also 2023 Rule of Law Report, Country Chapter on the rule of
law situation in Lithuania, p. 7.
7
kom (2024) 0800 - Ingen titel
2893718_0009.png
The later proposal was however formally opposed by the Bar Association
54
, which
considered that it did not sufficiently address their concerns regarding the composition of the
Disciplinary Court, where two out of five members are appointed by the Minister of Justice
and can only be revoked by the Minister
55
.
Quality
There has been significant progress in providing adequate resources for the justice
system, including on the level of remuneration for prosecutors and non-judicial staff,
although the implementation of the reform is not finalised.
The 2023 Rule of Law Report
recommended to Lithuania to ‘[c]ontinue efforts to provide adequate resources for the justice
system, including on the level of remuneration for prosecutors and non-judicial staff, taking
into account European standards on resources and remuneration for the justice system’. As
mentioned in the 2023 Rule of Law Report
56
, the Law on Remuneration of Judges of the
Republic of Lithuania, which came into force on 1 July 2023, led to an increase in the salaries
of the judges (at all instances), presidents of the courts, vice-presidents, and presidents of the
court’s sections
57
. The changes are in line with European standards
58
, and were assessed
positively by the judiciary
59
, which expects the new system to be less politicised as no annual
negotiations on indexation in the context of the State budget will be necessary, and
responsive to economic changes
60
. Although the case concerning the adequacy of judicial
salaries under the previous system had been dismissed by the Constitutional Court
61
,
inter
alia,
due to the non-legal reasoning of the petitions, a question for a preliminary ruling was
referred to the Court of Justice of the European Union
62
. Concerns had also been raised on
the level of remuneration of prosecutors
63
. In December 2023, Parliament adopted
amendments to the Law on the Public Prosecution Service, which provides for a phased
increase in the salaries of prosecutors, as of 1 January 2024 and as of 1 January 2025
64
. While
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
Contribution from the Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (CCBE) for the 2024 Rule of Law
Report, p. 87.
Contribution from the Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (CCBE) for the 2024 Rule of Law
Report, p. 87.
2023 Rule of Law Report, Country Chapter on the rule of law situation in Lithuania, p. 8.
Contribution from European Network of Councils for the Judiciary (ENCJ) for the 2024 Rule of Law
Report, p. 32.
Recommendation CM/Rec(2010)12 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe to member
states on judges: independence, efficiency and responsibilities, para. 54 and para 33. The Court of Justice of
the European Union has declared that the receipt by the members of the judiciary of a level of remuneration
commensurate with the importance of the functions they carry out constitutes a guarantee essential to
judicial independence (Court of Justice of the European Union, judgment of 27 February 2018, C-64/16,
Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses, ECLI:EU:C:2018:117, para. 45).
Input from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 4.
Contribution from European Network of Councils for the Judiciary (ENCJ) for the 2024 Rule of Law
Report, p. 32.
Information received from the Constitutional Court in the context of the country visit to Lithuania.
Case C-374/23, Adoreikė.
2023 Rule of Law Report, Country Chapter on the rule of law situation in Lithuania, p. 8.
Input from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 19. The legislative proposal submitted by the
President of the Republic to Parliament on 15 June 2023, mentioned in the 2023 Rule of Law Report (p. 8)
which provided for an increase of the salaries of prosecutors as of 1 October 2023, was opposed by the
Government (Input from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 17).
8
kom (2024) 0800 - Ingen titel
2893718_0010.png
this increase has been welcomed
65
, prosecutors have raised concerns regarding the process of
the reform, as the prosecution was initially not involved
66
and underlined the current
disproportion of salaries between judges and prosecutors
67
. In addition, an increase of salaries
of prosecutors was phased in, while salaries of judges and all other institutions, that
participated in the reform, have been increased immediately. Concerning non-judicial staff,
the reform of civil service provides for an increase in salaries as of 1 January 2024. Although
the legal basis for an increase in the salaries of civil servants has been established, no funding
has yet been granted or planned for the increase of the salaries of civil servants in the Public
Prosecution Service. The reform does not address the situation of court or prosecutor’s office
staff contracted under general labour law. Some concerns have been expressed by the
judiciary that despite an increase in the budget allocated to courts in 2024
68
, the increase in
funding would be insufficient to ensure the foreseen level of salaries
69
. Consequently,
concerns remain among the judiciary and the National Court Administration as to the number
of vacancies and attractiveness of the profession
70
. Stakeholders have raised concerns that the
current situation may have an impact on the efficiency of the justice system
71
. According to
EU Justice Scoreboard data, Lithuania is among the Member States with the lowest
Government expenditure on law courts, both in absolute terms and as percentage of GDP
72
.
In line with European standards, each state should allocate adequate resources to the courts,
and a sufficient number of judges and appropriately qualified support staff should be
allocated to the courts
73
.
Therefore, there has been significant progress on the
recommendation made in the 2023 Rule of Law Report.
New amendments to the judicial map have been adopted, which provide for the
reorganisation of district courts.
On 29 June 2023, Parliament adopted the law
implementing the reform of district courts, which introduced changes to the judicial map.
One of the goals of this reform is to ensure more equal and effective use of the resources
allocated to the courts
74
. The changes aim to reduce the number of district courts and their
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
The Venice Commission has recalled the importance of ensuring a sufficient remuneration of prosecutors
(Venice Commission, Independence of the Judicial System, Part II: The Prosecution Service, CDL-
AD(2010)040, para. 69).
In particular, prosecutors raised concerns regarding the discussions during the legislative process, warning
that the manner in which it was conducted and statements from the executive and legislative powers
regarding the prosecution could be perceived as a form of pressure (Information received from the
Prosecution Service in the context of the country visit to Lithuania; Input from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule
of Law Report, pp. 17-19).
Input from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 17. The Consultative Council of European
Prosecutors (CCPE) has recommended that ‘the remuneration of prosecutors is established at a level
analogous to the remuneration of judges, or at least at a comparable level, and without any disproportionate
differences’ (Opinion of the CCPE Bureau following a letter of the Prosecutor General of Lithuania
concerning legislative developments resulting in a disproportionately large gap in the remuneration of
prosecutors and judges, para. 27).
Input from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 22.
Input from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, pp. 4, 22.
In March 2023, 90 posts of judicial assistants and 60 posts of court hearing clerks were vacant (information
received from the National Courts Administration in the context of the country to Lithuania).
Information received from the National Courts Administration in the context of the country to Lithuania.
Figures 33 and 34, 2024 EU Justice Scoreboard.
Recommendation CM/Rec(2010)12 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe to member
states on judges: independence, efficiency and responsibilities, paras. 33 and 35.
Input from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 7.
9
kom (2024) 0800 - Ingen titel
2893718_0011.png
chambers, taking into consideration their workload and efficiency
75
, as well as to change the
territories of some district courts
76
. The law provides that any changes to the structure of the
courts do not affect the exercise of the powers of the judges appointed to that court until 31
December 2023
77
, which is in line with European standards on irremovability of judges
78
.
According to the Lithuanian authorities, the changes to the judicial map are expected to
translate into savings in the expenditure on the justice system
79
.
There has been some further progress in continuing the reform of the legal aid system,
as the conditions for the participation of legal aid providers have been improved.
The
2023 Rule of Law Reports recommended to Lithuania to ‘[c]ontinue the reform of the legal
aid system by ensuring adequate conditions for the participation of legal aid providers, taking
into account European standards on legal aid’
80
. Parliament adopted amendments to the Law
on State-Guaranteed Legal Aid in June 2023, which came into force on 1 January 2024. The
amendments, prepared in consultation with the Bar Association
81
and the State Guaranteed
Legal Aid Service, envisage special training for advocates who provide legal aid in specific
areas
82
, to be organised by the Bar Association. Pursuant to the law as amended, lawyers who
complete special training and provide state-guaranteed legal aid in those specific areas will be
paid double for those services
83
, which corresponded to a demand of the Bar Association
84
.
Additionally, as had been announced
85
, the hourly fee for the remuneration of lawyers was
revised, and increased to EUR 25 as of 1 January 2024
86
. However, lawyers consider this
increase to be nominal, as it remains below the inflation rates registered in 2022 and 2023
87
.
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
There will be 11 district courts and 24 court chambers instead of the current 12 district courts and 48 courts
chambers.
Input from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 8; Contribution from European Network of
Councils for the Judiciary (ENCJ) for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 27.
Ibidem.
Recommendation CM/Rec(2010)12 of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, para. 52.
Information received from the Ministry of Justice in the follow-up to the country visit to Lithuania.
2023 Rule of Law Report, Country Chapter on the rule of law situation in Lithuania, p. 2. The 2022 Rule of
Law Report had also recommended to Lithuania to ‘[c]ontinue the reform of the legal aid system, including
by ensuring adequate conditions for the participation of legal aid providers, taking into account European
standards on legal aid’ (2022 Rule of Law Report, Country Chapter on the rule of law situation in Lithuania,
p. 2). In 2023, the Commission concluded that ‘some progress’ had been made on the recommendation
addressed in the 2022 Rule of Law Report.
Information received from the Bar Association in the context of the country visit to Lithuania.
Defense of suspected or accused minors, representation minors – victims of certain crimes, representation of
victims of crimes in specific cases (such as cases involving human trafficking, domestic violence, hate
crimes, crimes against sexual self-determination and integrity), and representation persons who are requested
to be declared as legally incapable or in cases regarding compulsory hospitalisation and treatment (Input
from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 5). The Bar Association reports a high degree of interest
in the trainings among lawyers (Information received from the Bar Association in the context of the country
visit to Lithuania).
Input from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 5.
Contribution from the Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (CCBE) for the 2024 Rule of Law
Report, p. 85.
2023 Rule of Law Report, Country Chapter on the rule of law situation in Lithuania, p. 9.
From EUR 20 per hour, rate established in 2022 (Input from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p.
5).
Contribution from the Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (CCBE) for the 2024 Rule of Law
Report, p. 85. Lawyers warn that even with the 25% increase in 2024, considering the inflation rates, the
current remuneration remains below the rate of 2021 (Information received from the Bar Association in the
context of the country visit to Lithuania).
10
kom (2024) 0800 - Ingen titel
2893718_0012.png
Lawyers also call for the reform to be taken further, in particular in order to make the
administrative aspect of the system less cumbersome, and suggest the system to be directly
administered by the Bar Association, rather than by a State service
88
. However, the possibility
to delegate the administration of the legal aid system to the Bar Association was discussed by
the State-guaranteed Legal Aid Coordination Council (an advisory body composed of
relevant stakeholders) and was rejected. The Government has announced new measures in
2024, aimed at reducing the administrative burden on lawyers and managing the caseload
89
.
Therefore, there has been some further progress on the recommendation made in the previous
years.
The use of digital tools in the justice system is widespread and continues to be fostered.
Electronic communication tools are widely available, both for courts
90
and the prosecution
service
91
. Digital solutions allow to initiate and follow proceedings in civil, commercial and
administrative
92
cases, but remains more limited in criminal cases, where, for instance, it is
still not possible for defendants to communicate confidentially with their lawyers during
remote hearings
93
. Online access to published judgments is ensured in all instances, for civil,
commercial and administrative cases
94
, and a new project aims to establish consistency in the
application of EU law by integrating the European Case Law Identifier (ECLI) into the
Lithuanian Courts information system
95
. The National Courts Administration is working on
introducing speech recognition software in courts, which will provide automated processing
and transcription of audio recordings of court proceedings
96
.
Efficiency
The justice system continues to perform efficiently, in particular in civil and
commercial cases.
According to data in the 2024 EU Justice Scoreboard, the disposition time
in first instance civil, commercial and administrative cases remains low, despite a slight
increase in 2022
97
. The disposition time in civil and commercial cases, as well as in
administrative cases in first instance was the lowest in the EU in 2022
98
, while in civil and
commercial cases at third instance an increase was registered
99
. The number of pending non-
criminal first instance cases remained stable and comparatively low at 1.2 per 100
inhabitants
100
. While the rate of resolving cases is stable, in 2022 courts received more cases
than those resolved
101
. To further improve the efficiency of the justice system, amendments
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
Contribution from the Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (CCBE) for the 2024 Rule of Law
Report, p. 85.
Input from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 5.
Figure 45, 2024 EU Justice Scoreboard.
Figure 46, 2024 EU Justice Scoreboard.
Figure 47, 2024 EU Justice Scoreboard.
Figure 48, 2024 EU Justice Scoreboard.
Figure 49, 2024 EU Justice Scoreboard.
Input from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 25.
Input from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 25.
Figure 5, 2024 EU Justice Scoreboard.
Figures 6 and 8, 2024 EU Justice Scoreboard.
From 403 days in 2021, to 451 days in 2022. Figure 7, 2024 EU Justice Scoreboard.
Figure 13, 2024 EU Justice Scoreboard.
Figures 10 and 11, 2024 EU Justice Scoreboard.
11
kom (2024) 0800 - Ingen titel
2893718_0013.png
to the Law on Mediation were adopted in June 2024. These changes are expected to
positively impact the overall length of court proceedings
102
.
II.
A
NTI
-C
ORRUPTION
F
RAMEWORK
The Ministry of Justice and the Special Investigation Service are the main bodies in charge of
the coordination of anti-corruption preventive measures at national level. The Chief Official
Ethics Commission supervises the ethics standards in public administration. Furthermore, the
Special Investigation Service is tasked with preparing and implementing certain anti-
corruption preventive measures. The task to fight against corruption is shared among several
authorities. The Special Investigation Service has competences to detect and investigate
corruption-related criminal offences and conduct pre-trial investigations and is in charge of
investigating the most serious corruption crimes
103
. The Prosecution Service organises and
coordinates pre-trial investigations and may also decide to conduct the entire or part of the
pre-trial investigation by itself.
The perception among experts and business executives is that the level of corruption in
the public sector is relatively low.
In the 2023 Corruption Perceptions Index by
Transparency International, Lithuania scores 61/100 and ranks 12
th
in the European Union
and 34
th
globally
104
. This perception has been relatively stable over the past five years
105
. The
2024 Special Eurobarometer on Corruption shows that 83% of respondents consider
corruption widespread in their country (EU average 68%) and 24% of respondents feel
personally affected by corruption in their daily lives (EU average 27%)
106
. As regards
businesses, 62% of companies consider that corruption is widespread (EU average 65%) and
28% consider that corruption is a problem when doing business (EU average 36%)
107
.
Furthermore, 38% of respondents find that there are enough successful prosecutions to deter
people from corrupt practices (EU average 32%)
108
, while 39% of companies believe that
people and businesses caught for bribing a senior official are appropriately punished (EU
average 31%)
109
.
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
Input from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, pp. 27-28.
Other investigation authorities are the police, the State Border Guard Service, the Financial Crime
Investigation Service and Custom but their competence is limited to offences committed by one of their
officials.
Transparency International, Corruption Perceptions Index 2023 (2024). The level of perceived corruption is
categorised as follows: low (the perception among experts and business executives of public sector
corruption scores above 79); relatively low (scores between 79-60), relatively high (scores between 59-50),
high (scores below 50).
In 2019 the score was 60, while in 2023, the score is 61. The score significantly increases/decreases when it
changes more than five points; improves/deteriorates (changes between 4-5 points); is relatively stable
(changes from 1-3 points) in the last five years.
Special Eurobarometer 548 on Citizens’ attitudes towards corruption in the EU (2024). The Eurobarometer
data on citizens’ corruption perception and experience is updated every year. The previous data set is the
Special Eurobarometer 534 (2023).
Flash Eurobarometer 543 on Businesses’ attitudes towards corruption in the EU (2024). The Eurobarometer
data on businesses’ attitudes towards corruption as is updated every year. The previous data set is the Flash
Eurobarometer 524 (2023).
Special Eurobarometer 548 on Citizens’ attitudes towards corruption in the EU (2024).
Flash Eurobarometer 543 on Businesses’ attitudes towards corruption in the EU (2024).
12
kom (2024) 0800 - Ingen titel
2893718_0014.png
The first implementation plan 2023-2025 for the National Anti-Corruption Agenda
2022-2033 is well on track.
As mentioned in the 2023 Rule of Law Report
110
, the 2023-
2025 Plan for the Implementation of the National Anti-Corruption Agenda for 2022-2033
111
was approved in May 2023 and it is now being implemented. The responsibility for
developing and supervising the implementation of the National Anti-Corruption Agenda lies
with the Government in cooperation with the Special Investigation Service. The
implementation is decentralised, namely the Plan is implemented by various public sector
institutions, depending on sectors and their competence. A working group composed of the
representatives of the institutions responsible for the implementation of the Plan as well as of
observers from civil society organisations
112
was set up to coordinate this process and to
promptly detect any potential implementation problems
113
.
The investigations and prosecutions in relation to corruption offences are carried out
efficiently.
The number of reports concerning possible acts of corruption reported by
individuals to the
Special Investigation Service
was over 30% higher in 2023 than in 2022
114
.
During the first six months of 2023, concerning corruption offences, 47 persons were
convicted and seven persons were acquitted by the final court decision, seven high level and
complex cases were investigated
115
.
The EPPO investigated six corruption cases in 2023,
which accounts for 6% of the total number of EPPO cases in Lithuania
116
.
In the end of 2023,
the
Special Investigation Service
investigated 693 offences (compared to 816 in 2022) and
120 cases were under the pre-trial investigation (compared to 126 in 2022) while 172 judicial
decisions were taken (compared to 103 in 2022) with 47 acquittals out of 172 (compared to
29 acquittals out of 103 cases in 2022)
117
. In 2023, investigations into 277 criminal offences
were initiated by Special Investigation Service (compared to 453 in 2022)
118
. Between
January and November 2023, 269 corruption-related criminal offences were registered by the
Prosecutor General’s Office (compared to 453 in 2022)
119
, which represents a significant
decrease. In parallel, the number of acquittals for corruption offences has been
increasing for
the last few years
120
(27.33%
in 2023)
121
. In terms of adjudication of corruption offences,
convictions were issued also in high-level corruption cases
122
.
In 2023, the
Special
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
2023 Rule of Law Report, Country Chapter on the rule of law situation in Lithuania, p. 12.
Resolution No. XIV-1178 of 28 June 2022.
Namely Transparency International, initiative ‘Clear Wave’, Lithuanian Artists' Association, charity and
support fund ‘Information and Support Center of Non- Governmental Organisations’. Information received
from the Special Investigation Service in the context of the country visit in Lithuania.
Order of the Minister of Justice No 1R-327 of 16 October 2023.
Special Investigation Service, ‘In 2023, the STT received a 30% increase in reports of possible corruption
from individuals’, 29 January 2024.
Input from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 44.
EPPO, Annual Report 2023, p. 41.
Special Investigation Service, 2023 Activity Report, pp. 12-13, 17.
Special Investigation Service, 2023 Activity Report, p. 12.
Those concerned passive bribery, trading in influence, active bribery, abuse of office. Input from Lithuania
for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 44.
3.83% in 2018; 4.78% in 2019; 5.88% in 2020; 11.38% in 2021; 19% in 2022; 18.5% between January and
September 2023.
Input from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 44.
Website of the President of the Republic of Lithuania, The President met with the Director of the Special
Investigation Service, 23 February 2024. In comparison to
3.83% in 2018; 4.78% in 2019; 5.88% in 2020;
11.38% in 2021; 19% in 2022; 18.5% in 2023 (January – September).
Input from Lithuania for the 2024
Rule of Law Report, p. 44.
In November 2023, the Court of Appeals reconsidered the ruling of political corruption case involving MG
Group and the former MPs for bribery and influence peddling. LRT, ‘Lithuania’s MG Grupė pays €1.1m
13
kom (2024) 0800 - Ingen titel
2893718_0015.png
Investigation Service
completed the project ‘Strengthening multidisciplinary and regional
approach in fighting corruption and fraud affecting EU financial interests in the Baltic
region’
123
and launched a new project on ‘Strengthening capacities of the
Special
Investigation Service
to investigate digital evidence’
124
.
There continue to be concerns over shortcomings regarding the handling of foreign
bribery cases and the authorities are considering the appropriate follow-up.
The OECD
report on Lithuania’s implementation and enforcement of the Convention on Combating
Bribery of Foreign Public Officials
125
reports on positive elements such as the legislative and
policy frameworks for fighting foreign bribery as well as the digitalisation of bank
information search for investigations
126
. However, it issued 49 recommendations regarding
the investigation and prosecution of the foreign bribery cases
127
. The recommendations
concern the need to promptly and proactively investigate foreign bribery allegations
128
,
amend the corporate liability law to eliminate the consideration of shareholder culpability
129
,
rationalise the process to remedy retaliation against whistleblowers
130
and routinely seek for
confiscation against bribers. The authorities are currently considering the appropriate follow
up to the recommendations
131
. While there has not yet been any conviction for foreign
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
fine in political corruption case’, 24 November 2023. LRT, ‘Former liberal leader and business tycoon given
prison sentences in Lithuania’s MG Baltic corruption case’, 22 November 2023.The Supreme Court
confirmed the conviction in the political party ‘Order and Justice’ Conviction in the Kaunas City
municipality case for bribery – November 2023. Information received from the Prosecution Service in the
context of the country visit in Lithuania.
The project aims to improve prevention, detection, investigation and cooperation abilities of law
enforcement and other related authorities involved in the protection of the Union’s financial interests in the
Baltic region. Special Investigation Service, ‘Cooperation of the Baltic countries in the fight against
corruption and fraud is being strengthened’, 5 February 2021. OLAF, ‘Lithuania: Multidisciplinary approach
and regional cooperation in tackling corruption and fraud risks affecting EU financial interests under the
Hercule III Programme (HERCULE-2020-TC-AG) 2023.
The project aims to keep up-to-date and improve detection and investigation abilities of the Special
Investigation Service involved in the protection of the Union’s financial interests in Lithuania by obtaining
the license of IT forensic tool ‘Graykey’ which is used as the one of the key components of Special
Investigation Service IT forensic toolset. Input from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 30.
OECD (2023), Phase 3 evaluation of Lithuania.
An electronic system of requesting and obtaining judicial authorisation to lift bank secrecy has accelerated
the execution of mutual legal assistance requests. The systems of the Prosecutor General’s Office and
Ministry of Justice for registering mutual legal assistance requests have been improved, though their
statistical capabilities need to be strengthened. The establishment of a central register of beneficial owners is
welcomed, as is a requirement that the certain corporate annual reports provide information on fighting
foreign bribery. OECD (2023), Phase 3 evaluation of Lithuania, pp. 7, 23.
OECD (2023), Phase 3 evaluation of Lithuania, pp. 58-62.
Authorities have also overlooked some allegations of this crime reported in the foreign media, and not
proactively investigated others. OECD (2023), Phase 3 evaluation of Lithuania, pp. 7, 18, 20.
Lithuanian courts consider whether a shareholder is culpable before holding a company liable for foreign
bribery. Such an approach is incompatible with the realities of the modern corporation where management
and ownership are often separated by design. Companies’ anti-corruption compliance programmes are not
explicitly recognised as a mitigating factor at sentencing. Nor can companies be required to implement such
programmes as a part of a sentence. OECD (2023), Phase 3 evaluation of Lithuania, pp. 11-12.
The OECD considers that, despite awareness raising efforts, individuals remain reluctant to report corruption
and rates of whistleblowing are poor, largely because of a lack of reporting culture. Multiple avenues of
redress are available to whistleblowers who suffer retribution, each offering remedies of varying
effectiveness. OECD (2023), Phase 3 evaluation of Lithuania, p. 51.
Information received from the Special Investigation Service in the context of the country visit to Lithuania.
14
kom (2024) 0800 - Ingen titel
2893718_0016.png
bribery in Lithuania, the Special Investigation Service reported to have conducted six pre-
trial investigations in 2023 of which five started in 2023
132
.
The revised law on prevention of corruption is being efficiently implemented.
As
mentioned in the 2023 Rule of Law Report
133
, following the entry into force of the new rules
included in the Law on prevention of corruption
134
of January 2022, the authorities focused
on their implementation. In 2023, the Special Investigation Service received 75 reports from
employees working in the public sector, who are obliged
135
to report suspicions of corruption
to law enforcement agencies
136
. In 2023, the Special Investigation Service e-learning
platform was further developed and became a regularly used anti-corruption awareness
raising tool for various public and private sector organisations
137
. In parallel, training
activities were organised
138
. The Special Investigation Service also updated the Guidelines
for Creating an Anti-Corruption Environment for Business
139
, whose main goals are to
improve awareness of the damage caused by corruption, to support corporations develop anti-
corruption tools, and to increase business transparency and accountability. Events for the
public sector regarding the measures provided for in the Law on prevention of corruption are
regularly carried out
140
. Based on the outcome of the evaluation of the Law on Prevention of
Corruption, which is currently being carried out by the Ministry of Justice, measures to
improve the corruption prevention system are expected to be considered
141
.
The implementation of the law on the adjustment of public and private interests
remains efficient, while further adjustments are under way to improve the declaration
process.
As regards the implementation of the current rules provided for in the Law on the
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
Special Investigation Service, 2023 Activity Report, p. 14.
2023 Rule of Law Report, Country Chapter on the rule of law situation in Lithuania, p. 12.
Law No. XIV-471, of 29 June 2021, Amending Law No. IX-904 on the Prevention of Corruption.
According to Art. 9 of the Law on the Prevention of Corruption.
Special Investigation Service, ‘In 2023, the STT received a 30% increase in reports of possible corruption
from individuals’, 29 January 2024.
Currently the Special Investigation Service e-learning platform offers 17 topics, 5 of which were introduced
in 2023, namely national anti-corruption system, corruption prevention for the public, supervision of
economic entities, educational institutions and probability of corruption. Currently, the training topics were
categorised into general topics, specific target areas and topics for corruption prevention and other
specialists. Input from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 34.
The Special Investigation Service provided 92 trainings to 7.835 public officials. Input from Lithuania for
the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 34. In 2023, more than 43.000 certificates of accomplishment were issued
to 28.000 users of the platform (out of 80.000 certificates in total since the platform was launched), and
Integrity Academy organised 13 events for exchanging best practices on anti-corruption, with over 5.000
participants. Furthermore, 24 entities and teachers received anticorruption expertise from the mentors of the
Integrity Academy. Integrity Academy, Special Investigation Service, official website,
https://skaidrumoakademija.lt/apie/.
These guidelines concern measures such as: company’s anti-corruption policy; identifying, assessing and
managing the corruption risks a company faces in its business environment; determining employees’
tolerance of corruption and unethical behaviour; codes of ethics and conduct; policy to avoid conflicts of
interest; raising employees’ anti-corruption awareness; assessing the integrity and loyalty of recruited
employees; gifts and representation policy; charitable donations and sponsorships policy; lobbying activities
policy; internal whistleblowing channels and protection of whistleblowers etc. Input from Lithuania for the
2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 35.
E.g., in 2023 there were events for internal auditors, events about measures such as anti-corruption
assessment of legal acts or drafts thereof, determination of the probability of manifestation of corruption,
corruption prevention planning documents; events regarding whistleblower protection institute and Law on
the Adjustment of Public and Private Interests. Input from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 43.
Written input from Lithuania to the 2024 Rule of Law Report.
15
kom (2024) 0800 - Ingen titel
2893718_0017.png
adjustment of public and private interests (LAPPI)
142
, investigations of possible misconduct
are opened upon request, or
ex officio
following media reports
143
. Although the electronic
tool PINREG
144
facilitates the declaration process
145
, it does not replace the manual check of
the submitted declarations
146
. COEC
147
is planning to propose further amendments to the
functioning of PINREG to clarify the mandatory data that needs to be provided
148
. In July
2023, the President of the Republic vetoed proposed amendments
149
to LAPPI that sought to
remove the Chief Official Ethics Commission from analysing potential conflicts of interest of
mayors and members of municipal councils
150
. In 2023, the COEC received the usual number of
reports (around 250) while it investigated and passed 24 decisions (compared to 55 in 2022) on the
violations of the provisions of LAPPI
151
. In 2023, the COEC developed a distance learning course on
the declaration of private interests intended for all declarants in order to provide advice on the
application of the provisions of LAPPI to institutions and bodies conducting investigations
152
.
The number of submitted lobbying declarations increases annually.
Since 2021, when the
Law on Lobbying Activities was amended, the number of registered lobbyists has nearly
tripled — from 122 lobbyists in December 2020 to 330 lobbyists in August 2023
153
. In 2023,
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
The Law on the Adjustment of Public and Private Interests, No. VIII-371 of 7 July 1997.
In 2023 COEC received over 300 notifications of possible breaches of LAPPI. As a result, 50 investigations
were carried out. Information received from COEC in the context of the country visit in Lithuania.
The PINREG is intended not only for declaring persons, but also for the public, whose members can easily
search for relevant declarations of private interests, as well as for the management of the institution or its
authorised representatives, who can create in the PINREG the structure of the institution, the list of declaring
employees, easily analyse the data of their declarations of private interests, and ensure control (COEC
Annual Activity Report 2021, p. 16).
Information received from COEC, Special Investigation Service and Transparency International in the
context of the country visit in Lithuania.
In April 2023, Deputy Finance Minister Gediminas Norkūnas was found to have been wrongly filling his
private interest declaration. The Chief Official Ethics Commission ruled that G. Norkūnas had a conflict of
interest over owning a stake in a state-controlled energy company Ignitis Grupė. The ruling stated that the
deputy minister placed himself in a conflict when making decisions on the state-controlled energy group’s
activities and that he failed to declare his interests properly. As a result, he stepped down. Given the duty to
firstly self-assess before declaring one's interest, the Vilnius Regional Court has identified a risk of improper
declaration and stressed that judges have to better understand how to declare their private interest and when.
Baltics News, ‘Norkūnas did not avoid a conflict of interest regarding decisions in “Ignitis Group”’, 12 April
2023.
Chief Official Ethics Commission (COEC) is a body tasked with assisting persons in declaring their
interests, monitoring the process of declaring one's interests and carrying investigations about possible
misdoings.
Information received from COEC in the context of the country visit in Lithuania.
The vetoed amendments to the Law of the Adjustment of Public and Private Interests, Law Nr. XIV-2089 of
22 June 2023.
The draft Law, dropped as a result of the veto, suggested that such conflicts should first be examined by the
ethics commission of the local government rather than the central one. According to the President, the
proposal contradicts the currently established control mechanism of politicians’ behaviour and does not
create trustworthy democratic governance, as foreseen by the Code of Conduct of Politicians. The website of
the President of Lithuania, ‘Presidential veto: The High Commission on Official Ethics must defend the
constitutional principle of the service of government bodies to the people’, 5 July 2023.
In 2023, the majority of violations due to a conflict of private and public interests was found in the case of
participation in or attempts to influence the deliberations and adoption of decisions concerning private
interests of the declarant or a person close to the declarant (12). Seven of the cases involved state politicians
(two mayors of municipalities and five members of municipal councils). The violations of this nature are
among the most frequent in the practice of the COEC. COEC Annual Activity Report 2023, p. 7.
COEC Annual Activity Report 2023, p. 7.
SKAIDRIS – the platform for lobbying transparency, Chief Official Ethics Commission.
16
kom (2024) 0800 - Ingen titel
2893718_0018.png
the COEC received 21 reports and investigated 6 cases on the violation of the lobbying
rules
154
. Over the past two and a half years, lobbyists have declared 2.5 times more
declarations (1963) than politicians and civil servants (792)
155
. The majority of declared
lobbying activities are related to the Law on Pharmacy and legislation related to trade in
marketplaces, lotteries, electronic communications, and the regulation on tobacco products
156
.
The current rules on political party financing are being implemented.
The rules in place
regarding political party financing are generally considered to be sufficient and well
implemented
157
. In 2023, the Special Investigation Service launched eleven pre-trial
investigations in connection with the expenses scandal involving local politicians and
municipalities
158
. A series of events took place aimed at newly elected members of the
Municipal Councils, Ethics Commissions, and newly elected mayors to create an anti-
corruption environment in the municipality
159
.
The whistleblowing framework is functioning well and the authorities aim at further
strengthening the current rules.
The protection of whistleblowers, their rights and possible
legal remedies are laid down in the Law on the Protection of Whistleblowers
160
. Transparency
International called on public and private sector institutions to effectively safeguard the
confidentiality of whistleblowers and encourage them to report wrongdoing
161
. Based on the
evaluation of the implementation of the Whistleblowers Protection Law for the period 2019
to 2023, the Prosecutor General’s Office recommended amendments to consider increasing
the level of fines for breaches of confidentiality and other violations of the whistleblowers
protection legislation. Also, it was recommended to consider the possibility of amending laws
regulating court proceedings and ensuring that cases of retaliation against the reporting
person be resolved urgently. The healthcare sector remains a priority in terms of
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
In 2023, 60 persons, including 41 legal persons, were included in the list of lobbyists, bringing the total
number of lobbyists to 348. Overall, 635 declarations were submitted on SKAIDRIS. COEC Annual Activity
Report 2023, p. 9.
Analysis of lobbying activity data conducted by Transparency International Lithuania. This review provides
data on lobbying activities, based on Transparency International Lithuania inquiries to the Chief Official
Ethics Commission. Transparency International, ‘Shining a light on lobbying in Lithuania data, risks and
regulations, 2023. Transparency International, ‘Lobbyists report lobbying activities more frequently than
politicians and civil servants’, 21 November 2023.
Transparency International, ‘Lobbyists report lobbying activities more frequently than politicians and civil
servants’, 21 November 2023.
Information received from Transparency International in the context of the country visit to Lithuania.
LRT, ‘Officers to start questioning suspects following politicians' expenses scandal’, 1 August 2023.
In order to ensure greater transparency of procedures and to foster the anti-corruption environment the series
of events ‘The importance of creating a corruption-resistant environment in self-government’ was organised.
Special Investigation Service, ‘A series of STT events: creating a corruption-resistant environment in self-
government’, 16 June 2023. Special Investigation Service, ‘The cycle of STT events continues: creating a
corruption-resistant environment in self-government’, 25 September 2023.
Law on the protection of whistleblowers No XIII-804 of 28 November 2017.
Transparency International, ‘The protection of whistleblowers receives insufficient attention’, 28 September
2023. The Prosecutor General's Office and the Ministry of Justice aim at further strengthening the protection
of whistleblowers and encouraging the reporting of corruption in Lithuania, which is expected to be carried
out through an assessment of the practical application of the legislative framework, providing
methodological assistance to public and private sector entities and encouraging individuals to report
corruption cases with the use of social media presentations and events. The measure is to be implemented by
2025. Input from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 36.
17
kom (2024) 0800 - Ingen titel
2893718_0019.png
whistleblowing, despite a decrease in numbers of reports
162
. According to the data of the
Special Investigation Service
for 2023, the Prosecutor General Office granted a status of
whistleblowers to five persons, who provided information to the
Special Investigation Service
about alleged acts of corruption (in comparison to nine persons in 2022), while information
and advice about the application of the rules in place was provided through the hotline by the
Prosecutor General’s Office to 259 persons (in comparison to 286 persons in 2022)
163
. Out of
the 76 reports received (in comparison with 53 reports in 2022), seven reports were not
forwarded for investigation as the provided information had already been examined
164
. In
2023, the Prosecutor General's Office recognised 41 persons as whistleblowers (in
comparison to 31 persons in 2022). In parallel, training
165
and awareness raising
166
activities
were carried out.
Efforts continue to address the high-risk areas for corruption, including public
procurement.
The Flash Eurobarometer on Businesses’ attitudes towards corruption in the
EU shows that 34% of companies in MS (EU average 27%) think that corruption has
prevented them from winning a public tender or a public procurement contract in practice in
the last three years
167
. Public procurement, healthcare, local government, environmental
protection, territorial planning and construction supervision remain high-risk areas for
corruption in Lithuania
168
. Specific measures in this regard are being carried out, according to
objectives under both the implementation plan 2023-2025 of the National Anti-Corruption
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
Information received from the Prosecutor General’s Office in the context of the country visit in Lithuania.
Two training sessions were conducted in 2023, catering to personnel from hospital and consultation settings,
with a total attendance exceeding 350 individuals. In July 2023, the Minister of Health issued an order
approving the action plan for preventing corruption within the healthcare system for the years 2023-2025.
The core component of this plan involves fostering an understanding of whistleblower protection
mechanisms among employees, with the objective of reshaping institutional attitudes towards
whistleblowers. This entails organising various educational events, including trainings, seminars,
discussions, and other initiatives to disseminate best practices and cultivate a supportive environment for
whistleblowers. Furthermore, the General Prosecutor's Office plans to conduct an analysis in 2024 of how
internal channels are implemented in healthcare institutions and compile a list of employees responsible for
the operation of internal channels. Information received from the Prosecutor General’s Office in the context
of the country visit to Lithuania.
Input from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 36.
Input from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 37. In 2023, 5 per cent of all received reports (4
out of 76), were related to public procurement. Information received from the Prosecutor General’s Office in
the context of the country visit to Lithuania.
Specialised training sessions were organised for institutions, professionals and internal channels involved in
the whistleblowing process. These sessions aimed to enhance their understanding of the procedures and
responsibilities associated with reporting and addressing corruption and other issues. Input from Lithuania
for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 37.
As part of the awareness program at the end of September 2023, a website for whistleblowers
www.pranesktiesa.lt has been launched. The page provides explanations about the protection granted to
whistleblowers and reporting channels, includes all relevant legal acts, forms for reporting violations, and
contact information for whistleblower consultation lines. Additionally, real-life examples, cases of
whistleblower protection, encouragement, and assistance measures are available. The website also features
current news related to the whistleblower institute and an events calendar. Input from Lithuania for the 2024
Rule of Law Report, p. 33.
Flash Eurobarometer 543 on Businesses’ attitudes towards corruption in the EU (2024). This is 7 percentage
points above the EU average.
Lithuanian Corruption Map 2022/2023; Information received from the Special Investigation Service and
Prosecutor General’s Office in the context of the country visit in Lithuania.
18
kom (2024) 0800 - Ingen titel
2893718_0020.png
Agenda
169
, and the Recovery and Resilience Plan
170
. While numerous activities are well on
track, the launch of the new e-procurement
system ‘SAULE’
171
, which was anticipated to
start operating in 2023, is expected to be delayed for a few years
172
. In 2023, the Public
Procurement Office implemented the project ‘Increasing the number of suppliers into
public
procurements’ focusing on training for suppliers strengthening their competences
173
. In 2023,
anti-corruption intelligence inspections on public procurement procedures were carried out by
individual municipalities
174
. In parallel, the Special Investigation Service carried out similar
inspections in the areas of state supervision of construction and territorial planning,
distribution of support from European Structural Funds, National Defence, Social Security
and Labour, Communications, Energy in order to identify and assess possible conflicts of
interests and corruption risks
175
. The healthcare system is the only sector showing high levels
of both corruption perception and experience
176
.
III.
M
EDIA
P
LURALISM AND
M
EDIA
F
REEDOM
In Lithuania, the legal framework concerning media pluralism and media freedom is based on
constitutional safeguards and sectorial legislation. The Constitution prohibits censorship and
monopolisation of the media and guarantees the right to freedom of expression and
information. The Law on the Provision of Information to the Public is the main media law.
Access to information held by public authorities is regulated by the Law on the Right to
Obtain Information and Data Reuse. The institutional framework consists of the Lithuanian
Radio and Television Commission (LRTK), the Office of the Inspector of Journalist Ethics
and the Public Information Ethics Association
177
.
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
The Plan for implementation of National Anti-Corruption Agenda in the period of 2023-2025 (Order No 324
of 3 May 2023) foresees an analysis of the practice of application of the institute of unreliable suppliers and
factors potentially reducing the effectiveness of the application of this institute. The Plan also foresees nine
measures in the field of health protection, seven measures to reduce risk of corruption in environmental
protection, four measures to reduce risk of corruption in territorial planning and construction supervision.
Input from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, pp. 39-41.
The objective of measure F.3.1 (Improving centralised public procurement) is to make the public
procurement system in Lithuania more efficient and increase participation in public procurement tenders by
centralising public procurement via the Central Purchasing Organisation. This measure foresees two actions:
i) to expand the catalogues of items that can be purchased via the Central Purchasing Organisation and ii) to
adopt a plan for centralisation of public procurement of health institutions and agencies. The measure has a
final expected date of implementation in Q4 2025. Annex to the Council Implementing Decision of 27
October 2023 amending Implementing Decision of 20 July 2021 on the approval of the assessment of the
recovery and resilience plan for Lithuania, p. 138.
Objectives for the new e-procurement system remain the same: it should have technical features allowing for
easier accumulation, handling and analysis of public procurement data throughout the procurement process
(‘once-only’ principle, automated solutions for data gathering, publication of the data according to the
obligations set in Public Procurement Law, integrations with state registers (including integration with
PINREG), open data format for user friendliness and easier data analysis, etc.). Input from Lithuania for the
2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 42.
Information received from the Public Procurement Office in the context of the country visit in Lithuania.
Input from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 42.
Input from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 39.
Input from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 40.
Lithuanian Map of Corruption 2022/2023, Special Investigation Service.
Lithuania ranks 13
th
in the 2024 Reporters without Borders World Press Freedom Index compared to 7th in
the previous year.
19
kom (2024) 0800 - Ingen titel
2893718_0021.png
The regulator for audiovisual media services continues to be sufficiently funded, also in
the light of its new competences.
As of 1 July 2023, the LRTK is responsible for the
enforcement of copyright law
178
and the calculation of the annual fee due by media service
providers (which forms the second pillar of the LRTK’s funding)
179
. In light of these new
competences, the funding and the staff resources of the LRTK are assessed as sufficient
180
.
The LRTK continued to implement the prohibition of the retransmission or internet
distribution of TV and radio channels and programmes that can be linked to Russia or
Belarus, except when authorised by the LRTK
181
. In 2022, it had already issued fines for two
media service providers for the retransmission of prohibited programmes and blocked 130
websites that provided services without having them notified to the LRTK
182
. In addition, in
2023, the LRTK started to issue orders against internet access providers to block IP addresses
of websites that distributed prohibited programmes, with the result of almost 300 being
blocked
183
. The Media Pluralism Monitor (MPM 2024) reports a continuously low risk for
the independence and effectiveness of the media authority
184
.
The broadened composition of the media self-regulatory body has been predominantly
met with positive reactions.
The 2023 amendment
185
to include representatives of the public
service media provider (LRT) in the media self-regulatory body, namely the Public
Information Ethics Commission, has been widely welcomed
186
. As regards the inclusion of
members of the Media Council that have been nominated by universities offering a
programme of journalism studies
187
, the Ethics Commission and the LRT have welcomed it,
while the Lithuanian Journalists’ Union expressed some reservations
188
.
Transparency of media ownership is further promoted by linking it to access to the new
Media Support Fund which announced the first recipients in April 2024.
As reported in
2023, a public information system, called ‘VIRSIS’, provides data on media owners and
amounts of funds obtained from public bodies
189
. Public authorities are under an obligation to
178
179
This activity is financed by the blank tape levy.
Input from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 43; Information received from the LRTK in the
context of the country visit to Lithuania.
180
Information received from the LRTK in the context of the country visit to Lithuania.
181
See for the adoption of this prohibition 2023 Rule of Law Report, Country Chapter on the rule of law
situation in Lithuania, p. 17. The authorisation is subject to the discretion of the LRTK.
182
Information received from the LRTK in the context of the country visit to Lithuania. See also LRTK, 2022
Annual Report, pp. 3-4, and 2023 Rule of Law Report, Country Chapter on the rule of law situation in
Lithuania, p. 17.
183
Information received from the LRTK in the context of the country visit to Lithuania.
184
2024 Media Pluralism Monitor, country report for Lithuania, p. 12.
185
2023 Rule of Law Report, Country Chapter on the rule of law situation in Lithuania, p. 18.
186
Information received from the Public Information Ethics Commission, the Lithuanian Journalists’ Union and
the public service media provider LRT in the context of the country visit to Lithuania; Contribution from
Liberties Europe for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 15.
187
The Media Council is an advisory body of the Lithuanian Ministry of Culture. As regards the potential
nominees, information received from LRT in the context of the country visit to Lithuania.
188
Information received from the Public Information Ethics Commission and the LRT (see also contribution
from Liberties Europe for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 15) and from the Lithuanian Journalists’ Union in
the context of the country visit to Lithuania. The latter based its reservations on the consideration that the
new members of the Media Council would not be as familiar with the relevant topics as the other members.
189
2023 Rule of Law Report, Country Chapter on the rule of law situation in Lithuania, p. 18.
20
kom (2024) 0800 - Ingen titel
2893718_0022.png
submit data twice a year in VIRSIS on the public funds to media service providers
190
. They
are also obliged to publish information about state advertising on their websites
191
. Some
limitations exist however, as the current legal regime does not address the ownership via
proxies, which has become an issue at least in one Lithuanian region
192
. According to the
MPM 2024, media ownership transparency is at low risk
193
. While news media concentration
is very high, Lithuanian law does not provide for specific rules on market concentration in the
media sector
194
. The new Media Support Fund
195
which was established in September 2023
and announced the first recipients of funding in April 2024
196
got a budget of EUR 6.5
million, amounting to almost double than originally planned, following interventions from
the sector
197
, but there was concern that the fund would come too late for some outlets
198
.
Access to funding is conditional on meeting the obligation to provide ownership data to
VIRSIS
199
.
The public service broadcaster continues to operate independently.
The election of the
new Director-General of the public service media provider LRT underwent delays and took
place half a year later than expected, in October 2023, after the first two attempts resulted in a
split vote
200
. The procedures which led to those delays have been amended by a law adopted
in June 2024 and will enter into force in September 2024, aiming at the prevention of such a
situation
201
. While Lithuanian law already prohibits members of Parliament or the
Government to serve on the supervising council of LRT, the new law extends this
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
Input from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 43; information received from the Ministry of
Culture in the context of the country visit to Lithuania.
Written contribution from the Lithuanian Government in the context of the country visit to Lithuania.
In this region there are two local newspapers which are
de facto
controlled by the same person without this
having to be reported to VIRSIS; input from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, pp. 44-45.
Stakeholders raised concerns regarding the issue of local newspapers being controlled by local politicians
(even if this might be transparent to the public), including the case of two regions in Lithuania where
politicians controlled the media (information received from the Lithuanian Journalists’ Union and the
Freedom House in the context of the country visit to Lithuania).
2024 Media Pluralism Monitor, country report for Lithuania, p. 14.
2024 Media Pluralism Monitor, country report for Lithuania, p. 14.
See already 2023 Rule of Law Report, Country Chapter on the rule of law situation in Lithuania, p. 18.
Media Support Fund (2024), Funding for cultural periodical press and regional media activities is
announced.
Input from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 44.
Information received from the Lithuanian Journalists’ Union in the context of the country visit to Lithuania,
that referred to a high-quality magazine that declared bankruptcy in the beginning of February. See also
Delfi, ‘Cultural media left without funding’, 24 January 2024.
Information received from the Ministry of Culture in the context of the country visit to Lithuania.
Input from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 43. 2023 Rule of Law Report, Country Chapter on
the rule of law situation in Lithuania, p. 19.
Law no. XIV-2695 of 6 June 2024. The law provides for the Chair of the LRT Council having a casting vote
in case of a vote that is split among the Council’s 12 members; currently, however, the Council’s rules of
procedure provide for elections by secret ballot, meaning that the vote of the Chair cannot be identified and
rendering impossible the law’s solution. The new law provides for an election by open ballot.
21
kom (2024) 0800 - Ingen titel
2893718_0023.png
prohibition, among others, to members of local councils
202
. According to the MPM 2024,
‘independence of public service media’ is at very low risk
203
.
The situation regarding access to documents is better with the guidelines for public
authorities although their implementation by public authorities at all levels of
government can still be improved.
The guidelines for the reconciliation of personal data
protection requirements and freedom of expression and information published by the Office
of the Inspector of Journalist Ethics in February 2023
204
have been welcomed by
journalists
205
. Stakeholders report that the guidelines are not yet implemented in practice by
authorities at all levels of government, and not all journalists are aware of them
206
; the Office
of the Inspector of Journalist Ethics plans to further promote them
207
. According to
stakeholders, public authorities at lower levels of government tend to show reluctance to
provide information, citing data protection reasons
208
. The appeals procedure has been
criticised as being rather complex and lengthy
209
. In June 2024 the Government proposed to
permit journalists access to a register of members of political organisations (that is scheduled
to be operational as of July 2025) which would allow them to gain knowledge about current
and historical data concerning these members and to thus contribute to the fight on
corruption; the proposal will be submitted to Parliament
210
.
The Government has adopted an action plan for the safety of journalists and continues
to strengthen their protection against abusive lawsuits.
Since the publication of the 2023
Rule of Law Report, two new alerts have been published regarding Lithuania on the Council
of Europe’s Platform to promote the protection of journalism and safety of journalists and on
the Mapping Media Freedom platform; one is about the use of spyware against exiled
Russian and Belarusian journalists living in Lithuania, committed by unknown
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
The new law further excludes Members of the European Parliament, of the Public Information Ethics
Commission and the Inspector of Journalist Ethics from serving on the Supervisory Council of the LRT;
written contribution from the Lithuanian Government in the context of the country visit to Lithuania.
2024 Media Pluralism Monitor, country report for Lithuania, p. 17. According to the European Parliament’s
Flash Eurobarometer: News & Media Survey 2023, p. 44, 54% of the population of Lithuania trust public
TV and radio stations (incl. online), which is above the EU average of 48%.
2023 Rule of Law Report, Country Chapter on the rule of law situation in Lithuania, p. 19.
Information received from the Lithuanian Journalists’ Union, the LRT and the Office of the Inspector of
Journalist Ethics in the context of the country visit to Lithuania.
Information received from the Office of the Inspector of Journalist Ethics and from LRT in the context of the
country visit to Lithuania. LRT attributes the lack of knowledge of journalists to allegedly missing efforts of
the Office of Inspector of Journalist Ethics to distribute the guidelines among journalists.
Information received from the Office of the Inspector of Journalist Ethics in the context of the country visit
to Lithuania.
Information received in the context of the country visit to Lithuania: according to the Office of the Inspector
of Journalist Ethics public authorities would not be ‘keen’ to provide information and would use the GDPR
as a ‘tool’ in that context. Freedom House also said the culture to talk to journalists could be better. The
Ministry of Culture has acknowledged this situation. According to the Lithuanian Journalists’ Union the
issue is limited to public authorities at lower levels of government.
The study ‘Disputes over Access’ (2023) by Balticada Investigations Studies, which looks at the situation
regarding access to documents in the three Baltic states, concludes that in Lithuania, ‘the combination of
multiple normative privileges and a multifaceted [freedom of information] appeal mechanism results in a
complex web of norms that journalists find hard to understand’, p. 9. The Office of the Inspector of
Journalist Ethics does not consider the mechanism to be complex, but to consume time and resources,
information received in the context of the country visit to Lithuania.
LRT (2024), Government for the right of journalists to receive free of charge the data of members of
political organisations.
22
kom (2024) 0800 - Ingen titel
2893718_0024.png
perpetrators
211
. In September 2023 the Ministry of Culture adopted an action plan for the
protection, safety and empowerment of journalists that envisages various actions to be
implemented by different public authorities until 2025, such as training for law enforcement
authorities and journalists, informing journalists on draft legislation and providing
unemployment insurance coverage to self-employed journalists
212
. So far, the actions have
been implemented as planned, with stakeholders describing the situation regarding the safety
of journalists (and notably the cooperation between journalists and the law enforcement
authorities) to be good
213
. LRT would like the Government to provide guidance on how to
ensure the operation of LRT and the safety of its staff in the event of a war or other major
crisis
214
. Strategic Lawsuits against Public Participation (SLAPPs) have been described as a
minor occurrence in the country, although the identification of a lawsuit to be a SLAPP has
been reported to be a relevant issue due to lack of knowledge about these types of lawsuits
215
.
Following the legislative amendments introduced in 2022
216
, a further legislative amendment
entered into force on 1 January 2024 which makes it possible for SLAPP targets to receive
state-guaranteed legal aid in SLAPP cases without the assessment of the defendant’s assets
and income
217
.
IV.
O
THER
I
NSTITUTIONAL
I
SSUES RELATED TO
C
HECKS AND
B
ALANCES
Lithuania is a representative democratic republic with a directly elected President and a
unicameral Parliament (Seimas). The Constitutional Court is in charge of constitutional
review of laws and other legislation enacted by Parliament and of acts of the President and
the Government (ex post control). The Parliament, the President, the Government, and a
group of at least 50 000 citizens of the Republic of Lithuania with the right to vote have the
right of legislative initiative, and a group of at least 300 000 citizens of the Republic of
Lithuania with the right to vote have the right of initiative to change the Constitution and call
a referendum
218
. Citizens and foreigners permanently residing in Lithuania, aged 16 and over,
also have the right to petition the state or municipal authorities for the adoption of a
normative legal act of public interest
219
. The Parliamentary Ombudspersons are the National
Human Rights Institution and are tasked with protecting and promoting human rights and
fundamental freedoms. The Office of the Equal Opportunities Ombudsperson is the equality
body.
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
Council of Europe, Platform to promote the protection of journalism and safety of journalists, Latvia (the
alert has been published in the country profile of Latvia only due to other affected journalists that live in
Latvia; the country profile of Lithuania does not include any new alert); European Centre for Press and
Media Freedom, Mapping Media Freedom, Lithuania country profile. The other alert (on both platforms) is
about an amendment introduced in Parliament which, according to LRT, would threaten the funding model
of the public broadcaster if adopted.
Input from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 45.
Information received from the Ministry of Culture and the Lithuanian Journalists’ Union in the context of the
country visit to Lithuania.
Information received from the LRT in the context of the country visit to Lithuania.
Information received from the Office of the Inspector of Journalist Ethics in the context of the country visit
to Lithuania.
See 2023 Rule of Law Report, Country Chapter on the rule of law situation in Lithuania, p. 20.
Input from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, pp. 45-46.
The Constitutional Law on Citizens' Legislative Initiative of the Republic of Lithuania, drafted by the
Ministry of Justice, should enter into force on 1 September 2024.
The Constitutional Law on Petitions of the Republic of Lithuania, drafted by the Ministry of Justice, entered
into force on 1 July 2023.
23
kom (2024) 0800 - Ingen titel
2893718_0025.png
The Ministry of Justice has developed new rules to improve the quality of legislation.
The Legislative Methodological Recommendations
220
and Recommendations for
Codification
221
mentioned in the 2023 Rule of Law Report
222
, were published on 16
November 2023, after consultation with other ministries and with the Government
chancellery. The Recommendations aim to ensure the quality and sustainability of
legislation
223
, as well as to determine the general systematic codification of legal acts, while
increasing their comprehensibility and accessibility
224
. In addition, the rules for coordination
in the development of normative legal acts by ministers, Government institutions, and other
subjects of public administration subordinate and accountable to the Government the aim of
which is to ensure uniform legislative and public consultation rules were developed by the
Ministry of Justice and adopted by the Government on 3 May 2024
225
.
The Judicial Council is preparing a proposal to amend the Constitution in order to be
granted the right of constitutional appeal regarding legislation affecting the judiciary.
The document ‘Vision of the development of Lithuanian courts for the years 2023-2033’,
adopted by the Judicial Council in 2022
226
, includes the proposal for the establishment of the
right of the Judicial Council to appeal to the Constitutional Court of the Republic of
Lithuania by amending Article 106 of the Constitution
227
. Such an amendment would provide
the Judicial Council with the right to apply to the Constitutional Court in cases where it is
considered that the independence of the judiciary is threatened
228
. A draft concept note of the
Judicial Council’s right to constitutional appeal has been prepared
229
, and will be submitted to
the Judicial Council’s Plenum for approval, after which the National Courts Administration
will draft the proposed constitutional amendment
230
. The Judicial Council plans to obtain the
amendment adopted by 2028
231
.
The Constitutional Court was called to clarify the principle of separation of powers.
In a
ruling of 26 April 2023
232
, the Constitutional Court clarified the separation between the
legislative and executive powers. This concerned the possibility to regulate through
implementing regulation cases which, according to the Constitution, must be regulated
through laws
233
. In this case, it was considered that Parliament disregarded the prohibition,
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
Ministry of Justice, ‘Legislative methodological recommendations’.
Ministry of Justice, ‘Recommendations for Codification’.
2023 Rule of Law Report, Country Chapter on the rule of law situation in Lithuania, p. 20.
In Lithuania, 27% of the surveyed companies perceive the frequent changes in legislation or concerns about
quality of law-making process as a reason for the lack of confidence in investment protection. Figure 56,
2024 EU Justice Scoreboard.
Input from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, pp. 50-51.
Input from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, pp. 50-51.
Available at: https://www.teismai.lt/data/public/uploads/2023/02/eng-taisytas-1.pdf.
Which enshrines the right to constitutional appeal of the President of the Republic, Parliament, Government
and individuals.
Input from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 13; Contribution from European Network of
Councils for the Judiciary (ENCJ) for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, pp. 11-12.
Contribution from European Network of Councils for the Judiciary (ENCJ) for the 2024 Rule of Law
Report, pp. 11-12.
Information received from the Judicial Council and National Courts Administration in the context of the
country visit to Lithuania.
Input from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 13; Contribution from European Network of
Councils for the Judiciary (ENCJ) for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, pp. 11-12.
Constitutional Court, judgment of 26 April 2023, No. KT40-N4/2023, case No. 7/2022.
Input from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 50.
24
kom (2024) 0800 - Ingen titel
2893718_0026.png
arising from the constitutional principle of the rule of law, of entrusting the Government with
the implementation of a competence entrusted to Parliament by the Constitution. The ruling
was swiftly implemented by Parliament, which revised and amended the contested legal
regulation
234
.
On 1 January 2024, Lithuania had 22 leading judgments of the European Court of
Human Rights pending implementation, an increase of three compared to the previous
year
235
.
At that time, Lithuania’s rate of leading judgments from the past 10 years that remain
pending was at 34% (compared to 31% in 2023), the average time that the judgments have
been pending implementation was almost 3 year and 8 months (compared to 3 years and 4
months in 2023)
236
. The oldest leading judgment, pending implementation for 16 years,
concerns the lack of legislation governing the conditions and procedures relating to gender
reassignment
237
. As regards the respect of payment deadlines, on 31 December 2023 there
were no cases in total awaiting confirmation of payments (in 2022 compensations were also
paid within the deadline)
238
. On 1 July 2024, the number of leading judgments pending
implementation had remained 22
239
. Following the European Court of Human Rights decision
in
Macatė v Lithuania
240
, the Ministry of Justice prepared a draft law aiming at executing the
judgment
241
, which was however rejected by Parliament in November 2023. Following that,
the Government submitted an application to the Constitutional Court
242
, which was admitted
on 22 February 2024
243
.
Education Law No. I-1489 – Amendment of articles 28, 37, 42, 43, 44, 66 and 67, of 26 September 2023.
The adoption of necessary execution measures for a judgment by the European Court of Human Rights is
supervised by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe. It is the Committee’s practice to group
cases against a State requiring similar execution measures, particularly general measures, and examine them
jointly. The first case in the group is designated as the leading case as regards the supervision of the general
measures and repetitive cases within the group can be closed when it is assessed that all possible individual
measures needed to provide redress to the applicant have been taken.
All figures are calculated by the European Implementation Network and are based on the number of cases
that are considered pending at the annual cut-off date of 1 January 2024. See the Contribution from the
European Implementation Network for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, pp. 5-6.
Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 11 September 2007,
L. v. Lithuania,
27527/03, pending
implementation since 2008.
In 2022, in one specific case, additional corrections to the payment of compensation were made after the
deadline. Council of Europe (2024), Supervision of the execution of judgments decisions of the European
Court of Human Rights – 17
th
Annual Report of the Committee of Ministers – 2023, p. 137.
Data according to the online database of the Council of Europe (HUDOC).
European Court of Human Rights, judgment of 23 January 2023,
Macatė v Lithuania,
case no. 61435/19.
The Court found the State measures imposed on the applicant’s children’s book containing storylines about
same-sex marriage (temporary suspension of the distribution of the book and further marking with a warning
label stating that its contents could be harmful to children under the age of 14) in application of Art. 4 of the
Law on the Protection of Minors against Negative Effects of Public Information to be in violation of Article
10 ECHR.
Updated Action Plan (09/11/2023) – Communication from Lithuania concerning the case of
Macatė v.
Lithuania
(Application No. 61435/19).
The Government asks whether Paragraph 16 of Part 2 of Art. 4 of the Law on the Protection of Minors
against Negative Effects of Public Information is in line with Parts 1 and 2 of Art. 25 (freedom of
expression), Art. 29 (principle of equality), Parts 1 and 2 of Art. 38 (protection of the family), and part 3 of
Art. 138 (International treaties ratified by the Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania shall be a constituent part
of the legal system of the Republic of Lithuania) of the Constitution, as well as with the constitutional
principle of the rule of law.
Information received from the Constitutional Court in the context of the country visit to Lithuania. The
Government considers nevertheless, even if the amendments to the Minors Protection Act were not adopted,
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
25
kom (2024) 0800 - Ingen titel
2893718_0027.png
There has been significant progress in providing adequate human and financial
resources for the Parliamentary Ombudspersons.
The 2023 Rule of Law Report
recommended to Lithuania to ‘[p]rovide adequate human and financial resources for the
functioning of the Office of the Parliamentary Ombudspersons, taking into account European
standards on resources for Ombudsinstitutions and the UN Paris Principles’
244
. In 2023, in the
context of the discussions of the 2024 state budget, additional EUR 64 000 were allocated to
finance two vacant posts in the Human Rights Division
245
for the year 2024. In addition, in
the context of the reform of the civil service
246
, the remuneration of the Parliamentary
Ombudspersons was increased
247
. The Office of the Parliamentary Ombudspersons is
accredited with ‘A’ status by the UN Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions
(GANHRI)
248
, and the Office reports that the increase in the allocated resources will be
instrumental to ensure the reaccreditation
249
. While this has been considered a positive
development, the Office continues to raise concerns regarding its adequacy to fulfil its
extensive mandate
250
, in particular in the light of the possible attribution of new tasks
currently under discussion. Moreover, the Office reported that the reform which abrogated
some of its prerogatives in the recruitment process, could impact the capacity of newly
recruited staff to exercise functions requiring legal analysis
251
. Overall, there has been
significant progress on the recommendation made in the previous years.
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
that, based on the current practice, there is no possibility for the contested provision which is still in place to
be applied in violation of Article 10 ECHR (Information received from the Lithuanian Government in the
context of the country visit to Lithuania. See also Updated Action Plan (09/11/2023) – Communication from
Lithuania concerning the case of
Macate v. Lithuania
(Application No. 61435/19).
2023 Rule of Law Report, Country Chapter on the rule of law situation in Lithuania, p. 2. The 2022 Rule of
Law Report had also recommended to Lithuania to ‘[p]rovide adequate human and financial resources for
the functioning of the Office of the Parliamentary Ombudspersons, taking into account European standards
on resources for Ombudsinstitutions and the UN Paris Principles’ (2022 Rule of Law Report, Country
Chapter on the rule of law situation in Lithuania, p. 2. In 2023 the Commission concluded that ‘no progress’
had been made on the recommendation addressed in the 2022 Rule of Law Report.
Law on the Approval of Financial Indicators of the State Budget and Municipal Budgets of the Republic of
Lithuania for 2024. See also contribution from the European Network of National Human Rights Institutions
(ENNHRI) for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, pp. 346-347.
Law amending the Law on Remuneration of State Politicians and State Officials No VIII-1904 (TAR, 25
May 2023, No. 11591), adopted on 25 May 2023.
Information received from the Office of the Parliamentary Ombudpersons in the context of the country visit
to Lithuania; Input from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 61. See also contribution from the
European Network of National Human Rights Institutions (ENNHRI) for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p.
346.
Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions (GANHRI), Sub-Committee on Accreditation (SCA)
(2017), Accreditation Report – March 2017.
Information received from the Office of the Parliamentary Ombudpersons in the context of the country visit
to Lithuania. The periodic accreditation of the Lithuanian NHRI was considered by the SCA between March
and May 2024 (see also contribution from the European Network of National Human Rights Institutions
(ENNHRI) for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 50).
Which includes the investigation of complaints from individuals against the activities (inaction) of officials
of state and municipal authorities, national prevention of torture and national human rights institution. The
Human Rights Division of the Office counts with five staff members who, however, do not practice
exclusively in specific areas of expertise (Input from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 62).
In line with the new rules applicable, the Office of the Ombudsperson no longer has the prerogative to
determine the academic requirements for the fulfilment of vacancies. Information received from the Office
of the Parliamentary Ombudpersons in the context of the country visit to Lithuania.
26
kom (2024) 0800 - Ingen titel
2893718_0028.png
Stakeholders have reported concerns regarding the effective participation of civil
society in decision-making processes.
The civic space continues to be considered open
252
.
Civil society organisations (CSOs) continue to be actively involved in decision-making and
implementation regarding the support to refugees from Ukraine and in crisis management, as
also reported in the 2023 Rule of Law Report
253
, and working groups are being created in this
context
254
. While the National NGO council continues to operate under the Prime Minister’s
office, in addition to municipal NGO councils
255
, stakeholders reported some challenges
regarding their participation in decision making
256
, and raised concerns that public
participation is broadly seen as
pro-forma
257
. According to CSOs
258
, ‘SKAIDRIS’, the lobby
register, remains key to participate fully in the decision-making process
259
. Concerns have
also been raised regarding the fact that NGOs’ right to access to information is narrowly
defined, requiring direct interest, which limits their capacity to meaningfully participate in the
decision-making process and exercise their role as watchdogs
260
, thus impacting their work in
concrete areas
261
. The National NGO fund continues to finance programmes to support
capacity building
262
, although stakeholders continue to raise concerns about the limited
availability of funds, which have remained unchanged for several years
263
.
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
Rating by CIVICUS; ratings are on a five-category scale defined as: open, narrowed, obstructed, repressed
and closed.
2023 Rule of Law Report, Country Chapter on the rule of law situation in Lithuania, p. 23.
Information received from the NGO Coalition in the context of the country visit to Lithuania.
Input from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 60.
Information received from the NGO Coalition in the context of the country visit to Lithuania.
Information received from the Human Rights Monitoring Institute in the context of the country visit to
Lithuania.
Parliament of Lithuania, Public discussion at the Parliament of Lithuania, official recording, Atviras Seimas
- ‘Discussion “Transparency of politics: how to ensure open decision-making”?’, 21 November 2023.
Only 11% of the population, 10% of company managers and 20% of civil servants think that the decision-
making in Lithuania is an open process. Civil servants and company managers consider that the
pharmaceutical, healthcare and energy sectors are the most influential. The most frequently mentioned forms
of influence remain the same as in 2021: informal meetings and proposals, use of acquaintances, support for
political campaigns or parties, and the promise of financial rewards for a favourable decision. Special
Investigation Service, ‘Lithuanian Map of Corruption, 2022/2023’.
Information received from the NGO Coalition and Human Rights Monitoring Institute in the context of the
country visit to Lithuania. See also contribution from Liberties Europe for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, pp.
15-16.
Contribution from Human Rights Monitoring Institute for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 22.
Input from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule of Law Report, p. 66.
Information received from the NGO Coalition in the context of the country visit to Lithuania.
27
kom (2024) 0800 - Ingen titel
2893718_0029.png
Annex I: List of sources in alphabetical order*
* The list of contributions received in the context of the consultation for the 2024 Rule of Law report
can be found at
https://commission.europa.eu/publications/2024-rule-law-report-targeted-
stakeholder-consultation_en.
Balticada Investigations Studies (2023), Disputes over Access – A Study on Journalists’ Practices and
Freedom of Information Policies in the Baltics,
https://disputesoveraccess.eu/wp-
content/uploads/2024/02/Disputes_over_Access_2023.pdf
.
Baltics News (2023), ‘VTEK: Norkūnas did not avoid a conflict of interest regarding decisions in
“Ignitis Group”’,
VTEK: Norkūnas did not avoid a conflict of interest regarding decisions in "Ignitis
Group" – Baltics News.
Centre for Media Pluralism and Media Freedom (2024), European University Institute, Media
Pluralism Monitor 2024, Country report for Lithuania.
Chief Official Ethics Commission (COEC) website:
Who We Are - Chief Official Ethics Commission
(vtek.lt).
Civicus, Monitor tracking civic space – Lithuania,
https://monitor.civicus.org/country/lithuania/.
COEC (2021), Annual Activity Report 2021.
COEC (2023), Annual Activity Report 2023.
Constitutional Court, judgment of 26 April 2023, No. KT40-N4/2023, case No. 7/2022.
Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (2024), Contribution from the Council of Bars and Law
Societies of Europe (CCBE) for the 2024 Rule of Law Report.
Council of Europe: Committee of Ministers (2000), Recommendation No. R(2000)21 of the
Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on the freedom of exercise of the profession of
lawyer.
Council of Europe: Committee of Ministers (2010), Recommendation CM/Rec(2010)12 of the
Committee of Ministers to member states on judges: independence, efficiency and responsibilities.
Council of Europe: Committee of Ministers (2023), Supervision of the execution of judgments
decisions of the European Court of Human Rights – 17
th
Annual Report of the Committee of
Ministers – 2023, p. 137.
Council of Europe: Consultative Council of European Prosecutors (2023), Opinion of the CCPE
Bureau following a letter of the Prosecutor General of Lithuania concerning legislative developments
resulting in a disproportionately large gap in the remuneration of prosecutors and judges.
Council of Europe: Venice Commission (2010), Report on European standards as regards the
Independence of the Judicial System, Part II: The Prosecution Service (CDL-AD(2010)040).
Council of Europe, Platform to promote the protection of journalism and safety of journalists –
Lithuania,
https://fom.coe.int/en/pays/detail/11709544.
Council of the European Union (2023), Annex to the Council Implementing Decision of 27 October
2023 amending Implementing Decision of 20 July 2021 on the approval of the assessment of the
recovery and resilience plan for Lithuania.
Court of Justice of the European Union, judgment of 27 February 2018, Case C-64/16, Associação
Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses, ECLI:EU:C:2018:117.
Court of Justice of the European Union, judgment of 20 April 2021, Repubblika v Il-Prim Ministru,
C-896/19, ECLI:EU:C:2021:311, para. 57.
Delfi (2024), ‘The Media Support Fund reacted to the passions for cultural media left without
funding: it would be counterproductive and foolish to look for the guilty’,
28
kom (2024) 0800 - Ingen titel
2893718_0030.png
https://www.delfi.lt/m360/naujausi-straipsniai/i-aistras-del-be-finansavimo-likusios-kulturines-
ziniasklaidos-sureagavo-mediju-remimo-fondas-ieskoti-kaltu-butu-neproduktyvu-ir-kvaila-95698073.
Diena (2024), ‘Presidency: the number of acquittals in cases investigated by the STT is difficult to
explain’,
The Presidency: The number of acquittals in the cases investigated by the STT is difficult to
explain | Diena.lt.
EPPO (2024), Annual Report 2023.
European Association of judges (2024), ‘European association of judges statement on the purported
prosecution of Lithuanian judges by Russian authorities’.
European Centre for Press and Media Freedom, Mapping Media Freedom, Lithuania country profile,
https://www.mappingmediafreedom.org/.
European Commission (2019), Flash Eurobarometer 482.
European Commission (2022), 2022 EU Justice Scoreboard.
European Commission (2022), 2022 Rule of Law Report, Country Chapter on the rule of law situation
in Lithuania.
European Commission (2023), 2022 Rule of Law Report, Country Chapter on the rule of law situation
in Lithuania.
European Commission (2023), Special Eurobarometer on Corruption.
European Commission (2023), Flash Eurobarometer 507 on Businesses’ attitudes towards corruption
in the EU.
European Commission (2024), EU Justice Scoreboard.
European Commission (2024), Letter from the Vice-President Jourová to the Judicial Council, of 25
January 2024.
European Court of Human Rights, judgment of 11 September 2007,
L. v. Lithuania,
27527/03.
European Court of Human Rights, judgment of 23 January 2023,
Macatė v Lithuania,
case no.
61435/19.
European Implementation Network (2024), Contribution from the European Implementation Network
for the 2024 Rule of Law Report.
European Network of Councils for the Judiciary (2024), Contribution from the European Network of
Councils for the Judiciary (ENCJ) for the 2024 Rule of Law Report.
European Parliament (2019), Resolution of 28 November 2019 on recent actions by the Russian
Federation against Lithuanian judges, prosecutors and investigators involved in investigating the
tragic events of 13 January 1991 in Vilnius’ (2019/2938(RSP)).
European Parliament (2023), Flash Eurobarometer, News & Media Survey 2023.
Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions (GANHRI), Sub-Committee on Accreditation
(SCA) (2017), Accreditation Report – March 2017.
Human Rights Monitoring Institute (2024), Contribution from Human Rights Monitoring Institute for
the 2024 Rule of Law Report.
Integrity
Academy,
Special
https://skaidrumoakademija.lt/apie/.
Investigation
Service,
official
website,
Judicial Council (2023), Letter from the Judicial Council to the European Commission, of 29 August
2023.
Law on Political campaign finance and finance control, No. IX-2428, 2004,
https://www.e-
tar.lt/portal/lt/legalAct/TAR.CF812DA6E814/asr.
29
kom (2024) 0800 - Ingen titel
2893718_0031.png
Law on the protection of whistleblowers XIII-804 of 28 November 2017,
https://e-
seimas.lrs.lt/portal/legalAct/lt/TAD/267de1c2a9b911eb98ccba226c8a14d7?jfwid=-mmidcquki.
Law on the Adjustment of Public and Private
seimas.lrs.lt/portal/legalAct/lt/TAD/TAIS.41669/asr.
Interests,
No.
VIII-371,
https://e-
Law No. XIV-471, of 29 June 2021, Amending Law No. IX-904 on the Prevention of Corruption.
Liberties Europe (2024), Contribution from Liberties Europe for the 2024 Rule of Law Report.
Lithuanian Government (2022), Resolution No. XIV-1178, of 28 June 2022.
Lithuanian Government (2023), Updated Action Plan (09/11/2023) – Communication from Lithuania
concerning the case of
Macatė v. Lithuania
(Application No. 61435/19).
Lithuanian Government (2024), Input from Lithuania for the 2024 Rule of Law Report.
Lithuanian
Map
of
Corruption
2022/2023,
Special
Investigation
Service,
https://www.stt.lt/data/public/uploads/2023/06/d2_tyrimo_pristatymas_lietuvos_korupcijos_zemelapi
s_2022_2023.pdf.
Lrytas (2024), ‘Head of the Judicial Council S. Rudėnaitė on the procedure for appointing judges: the
president cannot put his hand in the bag and pull out the 90th candidate’,
Teisėjų tarybos vadovė S.
Rudėnaitė apie teisėjų skyrimo tvarką: prezidentas negali įkišti ranką į maišą ir ištraukti 90-ą
kandidatą (lrytas.lt).
LRT (2018), The CEC will decide whether there were political advertisements in the Summer of
Naisiai,
https://www.lrt.lt/naujienos/lietuvoje/2/219586/vrk-spres-ar-naisiu-vasaroje-buvo-politines-
reklamos.
LRT (2023), Lithuania’s MG Grupė pays €1.1m fine in political corruption case,
Lithuania’s MG
Grupė pays €1.1m fine in political corruption case - LRT.
LRT (2023), Former liberal leader and business tycoon given prison sentences in Lithuania’s MG
Baltic corruption case, ‘Former
liberal leader and business tycoon given prison sentences in
Lithuania’s MG Baltic corruption case – LRT’.
LRT (2023), Officers to start questioning suspects following politicians’ expenses scandal,
Officers to
start questioning suspects following politicians' expenses scandal - LRT.
LRT (2024), Government for the right of journalists to receive free of charge the data of members of
political
organisations,
https://www.lrt.lt/naujienos/lietuvoje/2/2295386/vyriausybe-uz-teise-
zurnalistams-nemokamai-gauti-politiniu-organizaciju-nariu-duomenis.
LRTK
(2023),
2022
Annual
Report,
https://www.rtk.lt/uploads/documents/files/Annual%20reports/Annual%20Report%202022.pdf.
Media Support Fund (2024), Funding for cultural periodical press and regional media activities is
announced,
https://medijufondas.lrv.lt/lt/naujienos/skelbiamas-kulturos-periodines-spaudos-ir-
regionines-ziniasklaidos-veiklos-finansavimas/.
OECD (2023), Phase 3 evaluation of Lithuania.
Minister of Justice (2023), Order of the Minister of Justice No 1R-327 of 16 October 2023.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2020), ‘Lithuania‘s Permanent Representative asks UN Special
Rapporteur to react to Russia's illegal actions against Lithuanian judges in January 13 case’, 21
December 2020.
Ministry
of
Justice,
‘Legislative
methodological
recommendations’,
https://tm.lrv.lt/uploads/tm/documents/files/dokumentai/Teis%C4%97k%C5%ABra/Teis%C4%97k%
C5%ABros%20metodin%C4%97s%20rekomendacijos%202023%2009.pdf.
30
kom (2024) 0800 - Ingen titel
2893718_0032.png
Ministry
of
Justice,
‘Recommendations
for
Codification’,
https://tm.lrv.lt/uploads/tm/documents/files/dokumentai/Teis%C4%97k%C5%ABra/Rekomendacijos
%20d%C4%97l%20galiojan%C4%8Di%C5%B3%20normini%C5%B3%20teis%C4%97s%20akt%C
5%B3%20kodifikavimo%20ir%20po%C4%AFstatymini%C5%B3%20teis%C4%97s%20akt%C5%B
3%20konsolidavimo%202023%2009.pdf.
Parliament of Lithuania (2023), Public discussion at the Parliament of Lithuania, official recording,
Atviras Seimas, 21 November 2023,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_zMY8hVF81Y.
President of the Republic of Lithuania (2023), Presidential veto: The High Commission on Official
Ethics must defend the constitutional principle of the service of government bodies to the people,
https://www.lrp.lt/lt/prezidento-veto-vyriausioji-tarnybines-etikos-komisija-turi-ginti-konstitucini-
valdzios-istaigu-tarnavimo-zmonems-principa/40764.
President of the Republic of Lithuania (2024), The President met with the Director of the Special
Investigation
Service,
https://lrp.lt/lt/prezidentas-susitiko-su-specialiuju-tyrimu-tarnybos-
direktoriumi/42342.
Reporters Without Borders (2023),
2023 World Press Freedom Index.
SKAIDRIS – the platform for lobbying transparency, Chief Official Ethics Commission, official
website,
https://skaidris.vtek.lt/public/.
Special Investigation Service (2021), Cooperation of the Baltic countries in the fight against
corruption and fraud is being strengthened,
https://www.stt.lt/en/news/7481/_2021-2/cooperation-of-
the-baltic-countries-in-the-fight-against-corruption-and-fraud-is-being-strengthened:3055.
Special Investigation Service (2021), Multidisciplinary approach and regional cooperation in tackling
corruption and fraud risk affecting EU affecting EU financial interests under the Hercule III
Programme,
https://stt.lt/data/public/uploads/2023/05/olaf_workshop-8.pdf.
Special Investigation Service (2023), Guidelines for creating an anti-corruption environment for
business,
https://stt.lt/data/public/uploads/2023/04/guidelines-for-business.pdf.
Special Investigation Service (2023), 2023 Activity Report.
Special Investigation Service (2023), The cycle of STT events continues: corruption-resistant
environment in self-government,
https://www.stt.lt/naujienos/7464/tesiamas-stt-renginiu-ciklas-
korupcijai-atsparios-aplinkos-kurimas-savivaldoje:3656.
Special Investigation Service (2024), 2023 Activity Report.
Special Investigation Service (2024), ‘In 2023, the STT received a 30% increase in reports of possible
corruption from individuals’,
In 2023, the STT received a 30% increase in reports of possible
corruption from individuals | STT.
Special Investigation Service (2024), ‘New allegations against four more municipal councillors of
misappropriation of municipal funds’,
New allegations against four more municipal councillors of
misappropriation of municipal funds | STT.
Transparency International Lithuania (2020), ‘Let's agree on what we consider political advertising on
social media’,
https://www.transparency.lt/sutarkime-ka-socialiniuose-tinkluose-laikome-politine-
reklama/.
Transparency International (2023), ‘Shining a light on lobbying in Lithuania data, risks, and
regulations’,
IW3_Country-Report_TI-Lithuania_final.pdf (transparency.lt).
Transparency International (2023), The protection of whistleblowers receives insufficient attention,
The protection of whistleblowers receives insufficient attention - Transparency International Lietuvos
skyrius.
31
kom (2024) 0800 - Ingen titel
2893718_0033.png
Transparency International (2023), Lobbyists report lobbying activities more frequently than
politicians and civil servants,
Lobbyists report lobbying activities more frequently than politicians and
civil servants - Transparency International Lietuvos skyrius.
Transparency International (2024), 2023 Corruption Perception Index.
32
kom (2024) 0800 - Ingen titel
Annex II: Country visit to Lithuania
The Commission services held virtual meetings in January and February 2024 with:
Bar Association
COEC
Confederation of Lithuanian Industrialists
Constitutional Court
Freedom House
Human Rights Monitoring Institute
Judicial Council
Lithuanian Journalists Union
Lithuanian Radio and Television
Media Authority – Radio and Television Commission of Lithuania
Ministry of Culture
Ministry of Foreign Affairs
Ministry of Justice
National Courts Administration
National NGO Coalition
Office of the Inspector of Journalist Ethics
Office of the Prosecutor General
Office of the Seimas Ombudspersons
Public Information Ethics Association
Public Procurement Service
Special Investigation Service
Supreme Court
Transparency International Lithuania
* The Commission also met the following organisations in a number of horizontal meetings:
Amnesty International EU
Centre for Democracy and Technology Europe
Centre for European Volunteering
Civil Liberties Union for Europe
Civil Rights Defenders
Civil Society Europe
Culture Action Europe
Democracy Reporting International
European Centre for Non-Profit Law
European Civic Forum
European Federation of Journalists
European Partnership for Democracy
European Youth Forum
Free Press Unlimited
International Federation for Human Rights
International Planned Parenthood Federation
33
kom (2024) 0800 - Ingen titel
International Press Institute
Irish Council for Civil Liberties
JEF Europe
Open Society Foundations
Philanthropy Europe Association
PICUM
Reporters Without Borders
SOLIDAR
Transparency International EU
34