Europaudvalget 2024-25
KOM (2025) 0503
Offentligt
3043042_0001.png
Danish technical paper on ensuring a well-functioning Single Market for digital ESG
solutions reducing administrative burdens for companies.
Having a well-functioning European market of digital ESG-solutions can significantly reduce administrative
burdens for companies by making it easier for them to comply with EU sustainability reporting requirements
and showcase their sustainability to business partners, investors, and customers. This requires that data,
system, and service providers, as well as calculation tools, sustainability certification schemes and data
platforms adhere to a
set of minimum requirements on methodologies and digital functionalities for ESG
solutions
making sharing of and access to ESG data easy among companies.
Analogue and fragmented data handling creates unnecessary administrative burdens.
For the past years, European companies have been faced with an increasing range of comprehensive new
EU-legislations requiring them to report on sustainability at both the product and company levels. To
efficiently comply with these new legislations, companies will need to digitize their product information and
adopt new digital systems. However, many companies currently handle data and information in an analogue
and fragmented manner, creating unnecessary administrative burdens for businesses, hampering European
competitiveness, and hindering the realization of a true digital single market.
As reporting requirements are still in development, companies and ESG solutions currently collect
sustainability data manually across value chains from a range of sources such as spreadsheets, PDFs, different
digital solutions, platforms, questionnaires, and online forms. This makes it complex and unnecessarily
burdensome for companies, especially SMEs, to supply their sustainability data multiple times in parallel to
their various larger customers. Different ESG solutions also use different methodologies and display varying
degrees of transparency in how they calculate and measure a
company’s
sustainability performance. This
makes calculations non-transparent and results incomparable. For example, available calculation tools for
GHG-emissions offered to European companies often differ in methodology, which hampers comparability.
Furthermore, ESG solutions are fragmented, using various digital and even proprietary standards, protocols,
and data formats, keeping data in closed platforms. This limits the possibilities for the free flow of data, cost-
effective data validation, and integration into companies’ existing IT-systems and interfaces, as well as
portability between different solutions. Consequently, the emerging market for ESG solutions is also
fragmented and non-transparent. The Commission has recognized the risks of a fragmented market of service
providers for digital product passports (DPP) and will adopt requirements for the emerging market of DPP
service providers in the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation by introducing provisions to establish
rules and requirements to be followed by product passport service providers, including a certification scheme
to ensure compliance with requirements, if appropriate.
1
Harmonising requirements for ESG data and solutions, creating a single market for ESG solutions.
To counter the tendencies towards fragmentation in the emerging market for ESG solutions, we need to set
minimum requirements on methodologies and digital functionalities of the ESG solutions. This is in order to
ensure transparency, robust methodologies, and a minimum level of interoperability of data and ESG
1
Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR), article 10 paragraph 2.
kom (2025) 0503 - Endeligt svar på spørgsmål 1: Spm. om non-papers eller positionspapirer vedr. sagerne om forenklingspakke IV
3043042_0002.png
solutions offered in the Single Market reducing administrative burdens for companies by harmonizing the
requirements for ESG data. This requires striking a delicate balance between setting sufficient requirements
guiding innovation and markets while not hindering innovation, distorting an emerging market, and limiting
European companies’
flexibility to choose solutions specific to their needs.
We recommend that the following actions are taken at the EU level to bolster market confidence in ESG
solutions, supporting companies' sustainability work and enhancing digital operations and reduced
administrative burdens amid regulatory complexities:
1.
Set minimum disclosure and transparency requirements for the underlying methodologies and
data sources for ESG solutions
including when substantial modifications to the methodologies are
put into effect. This may also include requirements for ESG solution providers to verify and document
their solutions’ comparability with requirements for reporting and methodologies for sustainability
reporting. This action could draw inspiration from new EU-regulation underway on CO2e emission
calculation tools for transport services
2
and existing tools such as the Danish Climate Compass
3
.
2.
Set minimum requirements for basic digital functionalities of ESG-solutions
such as data standards,
to promote a more effective flow of data between systems and companies, ensuring transparency
and security in digital ESG solutions. Minimum requirements should include:
a. Definition of required ESG-methodologies for digital solutions to streamline data collection,
aggregation, and reporting, ensuring accuracy and efficiency.
b. The ability to
send and receive data in standardized and structured digital data formats that
correlate with international standards for electronic exchange of reliable data, making it
easier to ensure compliance and transparency.
c. Mapping and promotion of uniform digital tagging of output formats, e.g., through
standardized digital taxonomy to ensure interoperability of data and data formats.
d. Adherence to recognized IT security standards, including automated backup of data.
3.
Ensure broad uptake by large companies of the voluntary SME-standard developed by EFRAG,
to
ensure a more standardized collection and sharing of ESG data between SMEs and large companies
subject to the CSRD by requiring ESG solutions to be able to send and receive data through a
standardized and structured digital format for the VSME-standard.
ESG solutions should be required to meet the requirements, and possibly be registered with relevant
authorities, which should make an updated list of systems available for companies to get an easy overview.
For inspiration on outlining digital requirements for methodology, similar requirements are made in the
Danish legislation on digital bookkeeping systems.
4
For more information, please feel free to contact:
Jacob Frellesvig ([email protected])
Frederik Weiergang Larsen ([email protected])
4
3
European Commission: Proposal for a regulation on the accounting of GHG of transport services. COM (2023) 441.
The Danish Climate Compass
www.klimakompasset.dk
4
Inspiration can be drawn from work done in Denmark on setting minimum requirements for digital bookkeeping
systems (https://danishbusinessauthority.dk/requirements-digital-standard-bookkeeping-systems)